Search

As described in an accompanying paper, trinitrophenyl (TNP) modification of pork insulin (PI) at the A1 glycine position allows this molecule to stimulate a proliferative response in H-2b (B10) mice. We now show that this antigen stimulates low IgG responses in the same strain of mice. Our results show that T-cell help and proliferation may therefore be regulated independently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MRL-+, MRL-lpr and B6-lpr have been shown to be useful models in studying systemic lupus erythematosus. MRL-lpr and B6-lpr differ from their congenic counterparts by the presence and expression of the homozygous recessive lymphoproliferation (Ipr) gene. One manifestation of this gene is a massive Tall proliferation that results in a generalized lymphadenopathy in older animals. A paradox that has developed out of the work utilizing the congenic mice is that the gene responsible for lymphoproliferation also appears to be responsible for the inability of T cells to respond to proliferative signals in vitro. In this paper we investigate the basis for this hypo responsiveness in antigen-induced activation of proliferation and antibody synthesis. We have demonstrated that spleen cells from both MRL-+ and MRL-lpr mice gave minimal stimulation in a one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction against allogeneic T cells. These findings were extended to include antigen-specific proliferation involving antigen that must be processed and presented to responder lymphocytes in a H-2 restricted manner. Thus, MRL- + and MRL-lpr spleen cells pulsed with ferredoxin also failed to stimulate ferredoxin-primed T cells from B10.Br animals in vitro. We then investigated whether any T-cell defect(s) was also contributing to this proliferative hyporesponsiveness. T lymphocytes from the spleen of MRL- +, 2-month-old MRL-lpr, and 6-month-old MRL-lpr were tested in a one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction. It was found that only the MRL- + T cells gave responses approaching normal, suggesting lpr gene involvement in T-cell non-responsiveness. This was confirmed by the demonstration of an age-onset T-cell proliferative hyporesponsiveness in B6. lpr mice. This lpr gene-linked non-responsiveness was also shown to extend to T-cell helper function in a positive allogeneic effect assay. We can conclude from these studies that antigenic non-responsiveness in MRL congenic mice can be explained by two defects: (i) the failure of antigen-presenting cells in MRL- + and MRL-lpr mice to provide the necessary signal(s) to immunocompetent T cells, this defect not being associated with the lpr gene, and (ii) the Ip gene controlled outgrowth of a unique T-cell population that cannot respond in our assay systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the autologous Theileria mixed leucocyte reaction (MLR), irradiated Theileriaparva-infected cells induce proliferative responses in autologous peripheral blood mononuclear leucocytes (PBM)II irrespective of the immune status of the donor animal. In this paper we have analysed the cellular basis of this response in naive and immune cattle to determine the Thelleria specificity of the response. The magnitude of proliferation is dependent on two parameters, namely the presence or absence of monocytes in the responder population, and the phenotype of the parasitized stimulator cells, both of which appeared to be independent of the immune status of the donor animal. Monocyte-depleted responders invariably gave stronger proliferative responses but generated cytotoxicity from immune cattle that tended to be less genetically restricted. Marked differences were observed in the stimulatory capacity of cloned parasitized T-cell and non-T cell lines. At least part of this variation was associated with differences in the capacity of the parasitized cells to secrete soluble suppressive factors and possibly also stimulatory factors. Two observations indicated that, in immune cattle, part of the proliferative response in the autologous Theileria MLR is parasite-specific. First, stimulator cells fixed with glutaraldehyde stimulated proliferative responses in monocyte-depleted PBM from immune animals but not naive animals. Second, in autologous Theileria MLRs with intact PBM, genetically restricted cytotoxic cells were generated from immune but not naive animals. While inonocytes seem not to be required for induction of the parasite-specific component of the response, their absence from the assay when viable stimulator cells are utilized appears to enhance the non- specific component of the proliferative and cytotoxic responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MRL-lpr mice and their congenic counterparts MRL- + spontaneously develop an autoimmune disease that resembles systemic lupus erythematosus in humans. The two strains, although congenic, differ by a considerable number of disease parameters, reflecting the expression of the lpr autosomal recessive gene. One paradox that has developed out of the work utilizing the congenic mice is that the gene responsible for lymphoproliferation also appears to be responsible for the inability of T cells to respond to proliferative signals in vitro. In this paper we investigated a possible lpr gene-encoded macrophage defect in these mice. It was found, however, that both the MRL- + and MRL-lpr mice failed to divide in response to Con A, the lack of division correlating with an inability to secrete the growth promoter interleukin-2. In MRL- + mice and young MRL-lpr mice this non-responsiveness was corrected by the addition of normal CRA PEC. The defect could not be explained by a failure of M RL- + or M RL-lpr peritoneal exudate cells to quantitatively or qualitatively provide a source of interleukin-1 to Con A-activated T cells or by the possibility that the peritoneal exudate cells were blocked in their function by the presence of sera-derived autoantibodies and/or immune complexes on their membranes. We postulate that the inability of T cells to proliferate in MRL congenic mice can be explained by two defects: (i) the failure of antigen-presenting cells in MRL- + and MRL-lpr to provide the necessary signals to immunocompetent T cells, this defect not being associated with the lpr gene, and (ii) the lpr gene controlled outgrowth of a unique T-cell population that cannot respond in our assay system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we describe the first in vitro response to the liver alloantigen F. The anti-F response serves as a valuable model for autoimmune phenomena since priming appropriate strains of mice (responders) with allogeneic but not syngeneic type F leads to autoantibody production. The in vitro system is based on the proliferation of T cells, from mice primed in vivo with F, when coincubated with splenic adherent cells (SAC) prepulsed with F in vivo. The system displays two important correlates of the in vivo antibody response to F:1.T cells from mice primed with syngeneic F do not proliferate when incubated with SAC prepulsed with syngeneic F and 2. Mice that do not make antibody responses to allo F in vivo (DBA/2) do not show in vitro proliferative responses. These findings indicate that the proliferative assay is a good in vitro model for the F response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]