Search

The first paper in this series reported that it was possible to reconstitute the response of low concentrations of mouse spleen lymphocytes to concanavalin A (Con A) by adding small numbers of peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) to the cultures. In this paper it is shown that the role of the PEC in this system can be partially replaced by conditioned medium (CM) prepared from PEC cultures or completely replaced by CM taken from lymphocytes cultured at optimal concentration. These CM were inactive unless fresh Con A was added to the assay cultures. Activity was present in CM which was incubated with lymphocytes or PEC for the shortest possible time but maximal activity was found after 24 hr of incubation. Activity was also found in CM prepared in the absence of Con A. Only in the case of lymphocytes cultured at optimal concentration for 24 hr was there substantially more activity in the CM thus prepared if Con A was present. PEC preparations depleted of T lymphocytes produced as much activity in CM as the untreated control. CM produced by PEC was less sensitive to heat treatment or to freezing and thawing than that produced by lymphocyte cultures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines helper T-cell responses and antibody titres and isotypes following immunization with a peptide antigen in association with three different adjuvants. B10.A mice were primed with pigeon cytochrome c fragment 81-104 in association with the adjuvants complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) and alum. Strong antibody responses, dominated by IgG1, were observed upon priming with CFA and IFA. In contrast, priming with alum induced a weak antibody response with little or no detectable antigen-specific IgG1. These differences did not correlate with differences in T-cell priming, as immunization with peptide in association with all three adjuvants induced comparable T-cell proliferative responses and frequencies of antigen-specific cells. In addition, no significant differences in iiiterleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and IL-4 production could be found, suggesting that the adjuvants did not differentially affect Th1 and Th2 cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the T suppressor circuits induced by picrylsulphonic acid includes the T suppressor cell (Ts-eff) which acts at the efferent stage of the contact sensitivity reaction and produces antigen-specific T suppressor factor (TsF). This factor does not act directly but arms a T acceptor cell (Tacc). This Tacc liberates a non-specific inhibitor when it is armed with TsF and then exposed to picrylated cells sharing the I-J genotype of the source of the TsF. This paper investigates the role of I-J region gene products in this T suppressor circuit. Two approaches were used. Syngeneic CBA (H-2k) lymphocytes were separated into I-J+ and I-J- cells by treatment with anti-I-Jk serum followed by panning on anti-immunoglobulin plates. The cells were then picrylated and used as a source of antigen. Alternatively, B10.A congeneic mice syngeneic (SR) or allogeneic (3R) with CBA at the I-J locus were picrylated and used similarly. The main findings were as follows. (i) The intravenous injection of picrylated I-J+ spleen cells but not a similar number of I-J- cells induced Ts-eff which blocked the transfer of contact sensitivity. Picrylated unseparated cells syngeneic, but not allogeneic, at the I-J locus were also effective. (ii) It is known that the lymphocytes of mice injected with picrylsulphonic acid and then re-exposed to antigen by painting with picryl chloride liberate TsF in vitro. The re-exposure to antigen can be replaced by the intravenous injection of picrylated I-J+ cells or by cells syngeneic at the I-J locus the day before harvesting the spleen cells. (iii) The release of non-specific inhibitor by Tacc armed with TsF requires exposure to picrylated I-J+ cells or cells syngeneic at the I-J locus. The requirement for antigen on a cell bearing syngeneic I-J suggests that antigen together with I-J is an activation signal in this T-cell circuit. The simplest explanation is that the receptor of the pristine Ts and of the mature Ts-eff is similar to T suppressor factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]