1. Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Short-term outcomes at a single center.
- Author
-
Dong-ping Hu, Xiao-long Zhu, He Wang, Wen-han Liu, Yao-chun Lv, Xin-long Shi, Li-li Feng, Wei-sheng Zhang, Xiong-Fei Yang, Hu, Dong-Ping, Zhu, Xiao-Long, Wang, He, Liu, Wen-Han, Lv, Yao-Chun, Shi, Xin-Long, Feng, Li-Li, Zhang, Wei-Sheng, and Yang, Xiong-Fei
- Subjects
- *
COLORECTAL cancer , *ONCOLOGIC surgery , *LAPAROSCOPIC surgery , *PROCTOLOGY , *SURGICAL robots , *LENGTH of stay in hospitals , *RESEARCH , *CLINICAL trials , *RESEARCH methodology , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *MEDICAL cooperation , *EVALUATION research , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *COMPARATIVE studies , *LAPAROSCOPY , *MEDICAL specialties & specialists , *LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Background: The robotic technique has been established as an alternative approach to laparoscopy for colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer.Methods: The cases of robot-assisted or laparoscopic colorectal resection were collected retrospectively between July 2015 and September 2018. We evaluated patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and pathologic examinations. Short-term outcomes included time to passage of flatus and length of postoperative hospital stay.Results: A total of 580 patients were included in the study. There were 271 patients in the robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) group and 309 in the laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) group. The time to passage of flatus in the RCS group was 3.62 days shorter than the LCS group. The total costs were increased by 2,258.8 USD in the RCS group compared to the LCS group (P < 0.001).Conclusion: The present study suggests that colorectal cancer robotic surgery was more beneficial to patients because of a shorter postoperative recovery time of bowel function and shorter hospital stays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF