Search

Dynamic multiobjective optimization problems (DMOPs) vary over time, requiring an optimization algorithm to track the position of Pareto-optimal front (PF) in a dynamic environment. To achieve that, a novel co-evolutionary algorithm based on problem analysis (CAPA) is proposed in this paper. CAPA is designed to solve DMOPs from decision space and objective space simultaneously, which is achieved by the combination of adjustable prediction (AP) and precise mapping strategy (PM). In decision space, the proposed multi-model prediction can estimate the location of new population based on the historical median points. In objective space, a novel sampling method is developed to search for sample points with better convergence or diversity. Then, mapping these sample points back to decision space based on inverse model. Through the problem analysis mechanism, the proportion of the new solutions produced by each strategy changes adaptively. CAPA is incorporated into the dynamic multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (DMOEA) based on decomposition (MOEA/D) to construct a novel algorithm. The efficacy of CAPA is validated by comparison with five state-of-the-art algorithms on 28 benchmarks. Experimental results show that CAPA has the ability to generate high quality population uniformly along PF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Analyze DE algorithm two key issues: parameter sensitivity and search imbalance. • A complementary mutation strategy based on complementary symmetric selection and a Gaussian distribution mutation is proposed. • Data fusion-based parameter adaptation method proposed for parameter rationalization. • A novel variant of DE called DACDE is designed and results shown competitive edge. As an excellent optimization algorithm widely used to solve various practical problems, differential evolution (DE) algorithm has few parameters, yet its performance is significantly affected by these parameters. To address this issue, this paper presents a novel variant of DE called DACDE, which utilizes data fusion-based parameter adaptation and a complementary mutation strategy. Most parameter adaptation methods based on successful history only analyze the mean of parameters and ignore their degree of dispersion. In DACDE, the successful parameter distribution is recorded and described by both the mean and variance. Data fusion is then used to combine records and generate an estimated distribution, which is applied to a Gaussian distribution to generate new parameters. Inspired by opposition-based learning, we introduce a complementary mutation strategy. This strategy employs a symmetric selection mechanism to adapt to the varying search abilities required by the algorithm at different stages. The new variant is verified on 32 single-objective functions from CEC 2011 and 2014 benchmark suites, and the results show that DACDE is competitive compared to other 29 evolutionary algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the realm of practical problem-solving, multi-objective optimisation problems with redundant variables and indefinite objective functions (MOPRVIF) are becoming increasingly prevalent. MOPRVIF involve determining the optimal decision variables that optimise multiple objectives, leveraging the relational data of a set of variables and multiple objectives. For these problems, this paper focuses on the following two issues: one is the demand for a unified computational model to solve this problem; the other is how to improve the algorithm's deep intelligent search capability. In this regard, this paper designs a dual data-driven multi-objective optimisation method. The method used consisted of four parts: elimination of redundant variables (ERV), objective function construction (OFC), selection evolution operator (SEO), and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA). MOEA was the main focus of the method. ERV is data preparation and variable selection according to multiple objectives. OFC involves constructing the relationship model between variables and objectives, and a high-accuracy model is important for guaranteeing reliable results. Furthermore, SEO can adjust the evolution operator during a deep search. This is an important guarantee for deep, intelligent search. MOEA combined OFC and SEO to form the final solution algorithm—Dual Data Driven Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (DDMOEA). DDMOEA was explored using two different disciplinary problems of drug compound optimisation and wild blueberry cultivation and benchmarks were selected. The first two problem domains are distinct. The first problem is more complex than the second; however, both encompass redundant variables and indefinite objective functions. Benchmarks are utilised independently to gauge the profound intelligent search capability. The experiments affirm that the dual data-driven optimization approach proposed in this paper is effective, practical, and scalable. • Provide a unified solution for optimisation problems with redundant variables and indefinite objective functions. • Propose a data-driven multi-objective optimisation algorithm. • Designing an adaptive optimiser to enhance the algorithm's depth search capability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The application of semantic technologies, particularly ontologies, in the realm of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms is overlook despite their effectiveness in knowledge representation. In this paper, we introduce MOODY, an ontology specifically tailored to formalize these kinds of algorithms, encompassing their respective parameters, and multi-objective optimization problems based on a characterization of their search space landscapes. MOODY is designed to be particularly applicable in automatic algorithm configuration, which involves the search of the parameters of an optimization algorithm to optimize its performance. In this context, we observe a notable absence of standardized components, parameters, and related considerations, such as problem characteristics and algorithm configurations. This lack of standardization introduces difficulties in the selection of valid component combinations and in the re-use of algorithmic configurations between different algorithm implementations. MOODY offers a means to infuse semantic annotations into the configurations found by automatic tools, enabling efficient querying of the results and seamless integration across diverse sources through their incorporation into a knowledge graph. We validate our proposal by presenting four case studies. • A semantic model is proposed for consolidating multi-objective optimization knowledge. • A knowledge graph is presented, as well as the tools to include new RDF data. • The model allows for semantic reasoning on evolutionary algorithm configurations. • The proposal is validated on three use cases with data from experiments. • Moody enables knowledge-based recommendations of configurations for algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Balancing multiple objectives and various constraints is crucial for effectively solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). Excessive focus on either convergence or feasibility may not result in favorable outcomes of the algorithm. To confront this challenge, this paper proposes a cooperative evolutionary algorithm named SaE-CMO, which aims to achieve a harmonious balance between convergence and feasibility by extracting valuable information from both feasible and infeasible regions. To achieve this, SaE-CMO employs a dual-population approach to enhance search progress, consisting of a main population, Population1, and an auxiliary population, Population2. These two populations complement each other to achieve optimal results. A newly proposed self-adaptive epsilon method is employed in both Population1 and Population2, using different comparison criteria to select next population from mating pools, respectively. Population2 can retain some solutions that are well-constrained but poorly converged, thereby preserving information about both the constrained and the unconstrained Pareto front. This property enables Population2 to assist Population1 in maintaining diversity in certain complex CMOPs. To verify the effectiveness of SaE-CMO, we conduct experiments on three benchmark test instances and four real-world CMOPs with some related state-of-the-art constrained multi-objective optimization algorithms, experimental results prove that the proposed algorithm outperforms the compared algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-objective optimization problems with interval parameter (IMOPs) are among the most critical optimization problems in practical applications. However, in contrast to deterministic multi-objective optimization, few studies have addressed IMOPs. Moreover, the uncertainty in such problems makes the convergence and diversity of the algorithm more challenging. Therefore, this paper proposes an interval multi-objective optimization algorithm based on elite genetic strategy (EG-IMOEA). First, existing interval dominance relations cannot comprehensively determine which of the two intervals is better when their midpoints are equal but their upper and lower limits are unequal. Therefore, a conditional-based interval confidence dominance relation is proposed that considers both the average level of convergence and value of the minimum lower limit of intervals. The interval crowding distance (ICD) applied to multiple objectives is then defined to evaluate the solutions more completely. Furthermore, an elite genetic strategy for crossover and mutation is proposed to generate better offspring. The proposed algorithm was evaluated on nine benchmark test problems and compared with the typical algorithm as well as state-of-the-art algorithms. The results showed that this algorithm outperformed the comparison algorithms in terms of convergence, diversity, imprecision, and uniform distribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]