Search

Introduction: Patients with above-knee amputations (AKA) are normally treated with the traditional socket-mounted prosthesis (SMP), which is associated with a high incidence of problems. Osseointegration has been proposed as a promising option for avoiding many common SMP drawbacks. Several concerns have arisen regarding amputee osseointegration, however, mainly with respect to infection. We report on the safety of a single-stage osseointegration protocol using an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel to coat the intramedullary implant., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all AKA cases treated at our center between January 2019 and April 2022, in which a transcutaneous osseointegrated implant was used in a single-stage strategy, together with a rapid-resorbable hydrogel loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin. The specific protocol used, infection rate, implant osseointegration rate and implant survivorship were determined after a minimum follow-up of 12 months., Results: Eleven osseointegration cases were included in the study, with an average of 16 years post-amputation (range: 3-35 years). After a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12-49 months) no patient had suffered any implant-related infection. Osseointegration of the implant had been achieved in all cases. The mid-term survivorship of the implant in our series was 100 % at the end of follow-up. Radiographs of all cases showed no loosening of the implant. Further, 91 % of the series patients were able to walk without restrictions after the rehabilitation process., Conclusions: The single-stage osseointegration protocol for AKA, using a rapid-resorbable hydrogel loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin, yields low rates of implant-related deep infection. This protocol consistently delivers high rates of radiological osseointegration, with no hydrogel-associated complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest M. Al Muderis receives royalties for design contributions for the Osseointegrated Prosthetic Limb. (OPL; Permedica s.p.a; Milan, Italy) implant system., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Acute tibial fracture-related infection (FRI) is one of the most feared and challenging complications after a tibial fracture. The most appropriate treatment in this scenario is far from a resolved topic. Circular external fixators (CEFs) offer multiplanar control and minimize soft tissue injury using temporary implants far from the infected area. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of two different types of CEFs (Ilizarov and hexapod) in the treatment of a series of acute tibial FRIs., Material and Methods: A retrospective study at two specialized limb reconstruction centres identified all patients with an acute tibial FRI (≤4 weeks after index procedure) definitively treated with a CEF from January 2015 to December 2020., Primary Outcomes: fracture healing and infection eradication rate with a minimum FU of 12 months after frame removal., Secondary Outcomes: to investigate the differences between the two types of circular frames regarding final post-treatment deformity magnitude., Results: We included 31 patients with acute tibial FRIs: 18 treated with hexapod-type and 13 with Ilizarov-type CEFs. Average age was 45.5±16.56 years. Fracture healing and infection eradication were achieved in all patients (31/31) after a mean follow-up of 24.7 months (range 12.1-55.3). Patients treated with an Ilizarov-type fixator presented shorter time to fracture union (5.5±2.2 months vs. 9.2±6.0 months; p-value 0.021) and shorter duration of external fixation (p-value 0.001). Regarding residual post-treatment deformity, the hexapod system presented significantly less residual coronal translation deformity (p-value 0.034) and better callus quality. Fixator-related complications were similar when comparing the two groups. No significant differences were seen in pain (p-value 0.25), RTW rate (35% vs. 45%; p-value 0.7) or functionality (p-value 0.4)., Conclusions: Definitive circular external fixation is an excellent treatment for acute tibial FRI. Both Ilizarov and hexapod systems offer a very high rate of fracture healing and infection eradication. Although both presented very low radiological post-operative residual deformity, the hexapod system showed less residual coronal translation deformity and better callus quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Infected post-traumatic distal femur defects remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-biological reconstruction offers an option for avoiding complex biological knee arthrodesis procedures. The Compress Ⓡ implant is an alternative to the traditional distal femur stemmed megaprosthesis. The aim of this study is to analyse the first patients treated with a distal femur Compress Ⓡ prosthesis to manage massive infected post-traumatic defects of the distal femur with joint involvement., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with massive infected defects of the distal femur where this implant was used in a two-stage strategy, together with an antibacterial coating hydrogel (DAC Ⓡ ). The specific protocol, microbiological data, clinical and radiological results, complications, functional results and prosthesis survivorship were determined. Follow-up was for a minimum of 12 months, or until implant removal., Results: Ten patients (11 Compress Ⓡ implants) with a mean age of 52 years (range 35-73) were included. On average, patients had undergone 4.4 previous surgical procedures before index surgery. The mean bone defect was 14 cm (range 8-21). After a median follow-up of 27 months (range 12-50 months) no patient had presented with recurrence of the infection, and limb salvage was achieved in all cases. Two patients suffered aseptic loosening which required revision of the femoral component. The short-term survivorship of the implant in our series was 81.8% at 4 years, with all failures occurring in the first 7 months. After this 7-month time threshold, we encountered no further loosening. Regarding functional outcomes, patients had a mean knee ROM of -4/86, expressed high overall satisfaction with the procedure according to the SAPS scale, and had an average LEFS of 52.5% (40-72.5%)., Conclusion: Non-biological reconstruction of the distal femur with the Compress Ⓡ implant is a valid option in selected patients with massive infected defects with joint involvement. Survivorship was high, with all loosening occurring in the first months after surgery-representing a failure in the osseointegration of the implant., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preoperative planning for circular external fixators is considered vital towards achieving the best results for complex post-traumatic tibial deformities, and patient-specific 3D printed (3DP) models were used here as a planning aid. The main goal was to investigate the fidelity of the preoperative planning process, by assessing the potential to reduce operative time and determining the need to adjust pre-constructed frames intra-operatively., Patients and Methods: Nine patients (10 limbs) underwent treatment for post-traumatic tibial complications using circular external fixation. These were compared to 10 similar cases where a 3DPM was not used as a pre-operative planning aide (Control group). Patient-specific models of affected bones were printed, and preoperative planning was performed using conventional techniques and Hexapod-assisted software. Detailed planning in a virtual procedure determined osteotomy levels and identified sites for wires and half-pins. The prototype of the external fixator was locked in this optimized configuration, removed from the model, and sterilized prior to the actual procedure., Results: Nine patients with 10 limbs were treated for complications following tibial fractures. Seven were infected non-unions, and three cases were malunions. For all cases a CT based 3DP model of the full tibia was used in the preoperative planning stage. Image analysis required a mean of 1.7 h, with an average of 14.9 h to 3D print each model. In the control group (without a 3D model), the mean surgical time was 329 min (180-680). The mean surgical time in the 3DPM group was only 172.4 min (72-240), (p = 0.024), reducing the surgery time by 48%. For the 3DPM group it was not necessary to modify the preassembled frame in any case, while in the Control group, the pre-constructed frame required intra-operative modifications in 8 of the 10 cases (p = 0.0007)., Conclusion: Using patient-specific 3D models has allowed us to carry out meticulous preoperative planning sessions, eliminating the need to modify or alter the frame assembly in the operating room, saving substantial surgical time and enabling a more precise design of the apparatus. This was especially useful in multiplanar deformities and for the spatial configuration of the foot support, talus ring, and ankle ring., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Bone transport techniques have been widely used to solve massive bone defects due to trauma, osteomyelitis or bone tumors. The technique of bone interruption to achieve better new bone formation is a subject of debate. Low-energy osteotomy (LEO) techniques have been proposed as the gold standard. Some authors reject open osteotomy with an oscillating saw (OOS osteotomy), based on the danger of bone tissue thermal necrosis and periosteal damage. To date, however, there is no strong clinical evidence to discourage this high-energy (HEO) bone interruption technique., Methods: The aim of this study was to determine outcomes in using OOS osteotomy in a series of patients, where monolateral-frame bone transport has been used to resolve segmental bone defects of the lower extremity. The minimum accepted follow-up was 1 year. The primary endpoints were radiographic evidence of regenerated bone quality (Li classification) and final outcome (Cattaneo clinical system assessment). Further, we analyzed associated complications, and compared results with other published series. We hypothesized that OOS osteotomy produces results no less favorable than those achieved with other, low-energy techniques., Results: A total of 54 patients, with an average bone defect of 8.58cm (CI95% 7.01-10.16), were enrolled in the study. In terms of regeneration quality, 84% of the regenerated segment shapes were associated with good outcomes; only 16% exhibited a shape (hypotrophic) predictive of a poor outcome. Regarding functional assessment, following the Cattaneo system, we found a total of 90% good or excellent results. Finally, the Bone Healing Index (BHI) in our series averaged 21.09 days per cm. The main complication observed was pin-track infection, occurring in 45% of the cases., Conclusion: According our data, the superiority of an LEO technique over HEO techniques is yet to be confirmed; it appears that any open osteotomy is effective, performed well and in a proper clinical setting, and that many factors other than choice of osteotomy technique must play important roles., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Necrotising fasciitis (NF) is potentially life-threatening soft-tissue infection. Early diagnosis and aggressive surgical debridement are critical to decrease mortality and morbidity. The impacts of new management technologies such as hydro-bisturi-assisted debridement (HAD) and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) are not yet clear with respect to treatment of NF. The objective of this study was to describe laboratory (including LRINEC score), clinical and microbiological factors, treatment methods and outcomes related to managing necrotising fasciitis, focusing on the implementation of new treatment methods in our centre., Methods: From June 2010 to June 2014, adult patients diagnosed with necrotising fasciitis affecting an upper or lower limb that were admitted to our hospital, a referral tertiary care centre, were eligible to participate in this study. Demographic data, clinical features, location of infection, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) score on the day of admission, microbiology and laboratory results, use of HAD, wound management using NPWT, and patient outcomes were retrospectively analysed. A univariate risk factor analysis was performed, in an attempt to define prognostic factors for mortality., Results: A total of 20 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Type II NF (Group A ß-haemolytic streptococci) was found in 8 cases (40%). The average LRINEC score on the day of admission was 6. The lower extremity was affected in 60% of the cases. All patients were treated operatively, with 2.5 interventions on average. Hydro-bisturi was used in the first debridement in 40% of the cases (8 out 20). In 75% of the studied cases, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) was the technique selected for surgical wound management. The global mortality rate was 30%. On univariate analysis, the only factors significantly associated with mortality were high levels of creatinin (p=0.033) and low blood glucose levels (p=0.012). Finally, four amputations were observed in this series., Conclusion: We confirm that necrotising fasciitis (NF) of the extremities, despite new advancements in treatment and critical care management, is still a potentially life-threatening soft-tissue infection (30% mortality). New, advanced wound management modalities have been heavily used in management of necrotising fasciitis, but these have not had significant impacts on morbidity and mortality rates., (© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) secondary to proximal femur fracture, acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most important complications. We have detected an increased risk of PJI in chronic institutionalized patients (CIPs), and a higher number of early postoperative infections are caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), not covered by the current prophylaxis (cefazolin in noninstitutionalized patients (NIPs) and cotrimoxazole in CIPs). We sought to compare infection characteristics between NIPs and CIPs, analyzing predisposing factors, causative pathogens, and antibiotic prophylaxis-related microbiological characteristics. We performed a retrospective review of our prospective institutional database to identify all patients consecutively admitted for HHA to treat proximal femur fracture at our centre between 2011 and 2013. PJI was diagnosed in 21 of 381 (5.51%) patients, with 10 of 105 (9.52%) in the CIP group and 11 of 276 (3.99%) in the NIP group, and statistical significance was achieved. GNB accounted for PJI in 14 (66.67%) patients. We detected a single case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in the NIP group. We confirm a higher risk of acute PJI among institutionalized patients, commonly caused by Gram-negative microorganisms, which are not covered by the current prophylaxis. New prophylactic strategies should be investigated in order to reduce this problem., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)