Search

Objectives: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) with sutureless bioprostheses has become an alternative to conventional AVR for patients with intermediate to high operative risk. However, this technique is associated with an increased risk of postoperative conduction disorders., Methods: We analysed 258 patients who underwent AVR with the Perceval prosthesis from July 2010 to September 2014 at our centre. Electrocardiography were obtained at baseline to record preoperatively the presence of conduction disorders. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative procedures and complications (61 variables) were compared between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM group) and without (no-PPM group) need for postoperative PPM implantation., Results: One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent isolated AVR with the Perceval bioprosthesis, 89 patients had associated surgery and 23 patients underwent redo operations. The mean age was 77.7 ± 5 years, 139 patients were female (46%) and the mean logistic EuroSCORE was 13.2 ± 11%. At baseline, 8 patients had already an implanted pacemaker. Postoperatively, 27 patients (10.5%) required new PPM implantation due to complete atrioventricular block. On univariate analysis, age (PPM vs no-PPM group: 80 ± 5 vs 77 ± 5 years, P = 0.009) and preoperative presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) [overall n = 20 (7.8%); PPM vs no-PPM group: 9 vs 11 (33 vs 4.8%); P < 0.001] were identified as independent predictors of postoperative conduction disorders, but only pre-existing RBBB persisted on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 11.3-C-statistic 0.74, error estimate 0.064, confidence interval 0.672-0.801; P = 0.0002). Among patients undergoing sutureless AVR, the rate of PPM implantation was high., Conclusions: The analysis of the data collected made it possible to identify preoperatively a subset of patients undergoing sutureless AVR at higher risk of postoperative atrioventricular block. Additional surgical precautions should be implemented to prevent the occurrence of conduction disorders after sutureless AVR., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in aortic stenosis (AS) is considered a compensatory response helping maintain systolic function, but constitutes a risk factor for cardiac morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the degree of LV mass regression after sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy)., Methods: Between March 2010 and July 2012, 78 patients with symptomatic AS underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Perceval bioprosthesis. Mean age was 77.1 ± 5.3 years, 46 patients were female (59%) and mean logistic EuroSCORE was 11 ± 7.5%. Echocardiography was performed preoperatively, at discharge, and at follow-up (mean 13.5 ± 7.3 months). LV mass was calculated using the Devereux formula and indexed to body surface area., Results: There was 1 in-hospital non-cardiac death and 3 late deaths. LV mass index decreased from 148.4 ± 46 g/m(2) at baseline to 119.7 ± 38.5 g/m(2) at follow-up (P = 0.002). No significant changes were observed in LV hypertrophy and/or relative wall thickness >0.42 as well as in LV ejection fraction. Mean aortic gradient decreased from 49.5 ± 15.8 mmHg at baseline to 11.6 ± 5.1 mmHg at discharge and 8.3 ± 4.4 mmHg at follow-up (P < 0.001), resulting in significant clinical improvement. No moderate or severe paravalvular leakage was observed at discharge and at follow-up., Conclusions: In AS patients, isolated AVR with the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis is associated with significant LV mass regression at 1-year follow-up. However, longer-term follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings.

Recently, small case series have described the successful off-label use of transcatheter valve implantation in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position. We report here the case of a 78-year old female patient who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis and transapical valve-in-valve implantation for a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis. There was no evidence of intraprosthetic regurgitation and/or paraprosthetic leakages on control angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography. The postoperative course was uneventful. Following accurate patient selection and evaluation by an experienced multidisciplinary team, the transcatheter approach to double-valve implantation in the aortic and mitral positions may represent a viable treatment option for those high-risk patients who would otherwise be inoperable. We preferred a two-step approach, considering a single procedure to be high-risk.

The Perceval S bioprosthesis (21 and 23 mm) was approved for clinical use in December 2010 and it is now routinely used. This bioprosthesis is suggested for the treatment of patients undergoing minimally-invasive surgery for reasons of safety and reduction in implantation time. Here we describe the use of the Perceval bioprosthesis in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery.