Search

This paper proposes an education 3.0 system called Mutual Learning Community (MLCOM) by combining the subsystems of the Virtual based Learning Classroom (VLC), Mobile based Learning Classroom (MLC), and Flipped Learning Classroom (FLC). In terms of originality, the findings lead to the key elements of the system architecture to develop MLCOM, which enhance twenty-first century skills for higher education learners in Thailand. The list of discovered elements for each subsystem indicates that a virtual smart classroom consists of (1) learning and innovation via a smart agent, Inno Ed Tools, (2) experience exchange via technological educational media, (3) access to learning resources various media in the virtual smart classroom, and (4) testing and evaluation of work submitted via the virtual smart classroom system. Smart classroom application consists of (1) presenting questions or problems, (2) identifying information for answering questions or problems, and (3) choosing media and information technology to research, as well as (4) evaluating information and sources critically, (5) connecting information and formulating a summary, and (6) presenting the project. A flipped classroom consists of (1) self-learning preparation, (2) various online media for diverse learners, (3) learning reflection and questioning, (4) in-class collaboration, (5) learning transition facility, and (6) learning evaluation. However, the construction of such a community was no implemented in this paper due to limited resources and the sheer enormity of scale required for the task. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the usage of institutional and non-institutional technologies to support learning and teaching in UK higher education. Previous work on disruptive technology and disruptive innovation has argued that users prefer simple and convenient technologies, and often repurpose technologies from designers' intentions; this paper evaluates its data in relation to this argument. The paper uses a structured observation as its research instrument; seven participants (three lecturers and four students) were given one of two tasks. Results showed the participants using a narrow range of technologies, and showed a preference for non-institutional over institutional technologies. The paper argues that there is a misalignment between the technologies provided by higher education institutions (HEIs) and the technologies used in practice by students and lecturers, and further argues that disruptive technology and disruptive innovation comprise a useful means of assessing the likely success, in terms of usage, of a technology. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In view of the discrepancies in teacher training and teaching practice, this paper put forward a context-adaptive teacher training model in a ubiquitous learning (u-learning) environment. The innovative model provides teachers of different subjects with adaptive and personalized learning content in a u-learning environment, implements intra- and inter-group collaboration to facilitate knowledge construction and in-depth study, and promotes reflection with the help of the supervising teacher's review and summarization. To test the effect, the model was applied to a general teacher training. Participants were then given questionnaires and interviews were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the model and attitude. Results showed that the model promoted teachers’ learning effectively, achieved the combination of teacher training and teaching practice. Moreover, teachers held positive attitude toward the model. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]