1. An in vitro evaluation of a supplementary step in cleaning apical third area of oval canals using micro-computed tomography.
- Author
-
Srivastava, Swati
- Subjects
- *
GUTTA-percha , *COMPUTED tomography , *TOMOGRAPHY , *FILLER materials , *SURFACE area , *DENTAL pulp cavities - Abstract
Background: High resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is pioneering, nondestructive, and reproducible equipment that produces very thin sections and an accurate three dimensional reconstruction of the object with cubic voxels and isotropic resolution. To the best of our understanding, no research has so far tested the removal efficacy of XP-F and XP-FR in obturated oval canals using micro-computed tomography. Aim: This study aimed to assess and relate the efficacy of XP-F and XP-FR as a supplementary step during re-treatment in apical third area of oval canals through micro-CT analysis. Materials and methods: Root canals of forty human extracted maxillary premolars were prepared with ProTaper Universal (PTU) and obturated using F3 ProTaper single cone and AH Plus Sealer. The surface area and volume was analyzed using micro CT imaging. The canals were re-treated with ProTaper Universal retreatment files (PTUR). Post re-treatment surface area and volume were evaluated with micro CT imaging. Supplementary re-treatment was done with XP-endo Finisher (XPF) and XP-endo Finisher R (XP-FR). The roots were scanned again in the micro CT device and the remaining volumes of the filling material were quantified. Data was analyzed by means of Mann-Whitney test with a significance threshold of 5%. Results: The remaining filling material after re-treatment with PTR files in both the groups was not statistically significant for both volume and surface area (p > 0.05). For XP-F group, the elimination of filling material was 83.2% in volume and 89.4% in surface area in apical 5 mm. For XP-FR group, the elimination of filling material was 72.3% in volume and 78.7% in surface area in apical 5 mm. The percentage of filling material removed by XP-F was statistically significant as compared to the XP-FR group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the apical 5 mm of oval shaped canals XP-F showed better re-treatment efficiency than XP-FR. However, neither of both instruments could eliminate all remaining filling material. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021