Search

Workplace limits for dust and nitrogen oxides are under review in Germany and the EU. We conducted a study on German coal miners to determine the effects of exposure on lung function. Longitudinal inception cohort study (1974–1998) on miners who began working underground at two coal mines between 1974 and 1979. We determined the number of shifts worked underground, the exposure to coal mine dust, quartz dust, nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2), smoking behavior, and three lung function parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC). General estimation equation (GEE) models were fitted. 1,369 miners worked an average 3,017 shifts ( S) underground. The mean respirable coal mine dust concentration was 1.89 mg/m³ (quartz: 0.067 mg/m³), and the nitrogen oxide concentrations were 0.58 ppm (NO) and 0.007 ppm (NO2). On average, 9 measurements of lung function were available per miner. Compared to reference values, the findings were unexceptionable (103, 101, and 99%) on average. GEE-regression models did not reveal detrimental dust exposure effects. Nitrogen oxides (NO x = NO + NO2) showed small but clearly insignificant effects on lung function: ∆ FVC = −0.0008 ml/(220 ppmS), P = 0.86, ∆ FEV1 = −0.003 ml/(220 ppmS), P = 0.50 and ∆ FEV1%FVC = −0.07%/(220 ppmS), P = 0.22. The effect of dust exposure on lung function described in older British and American coal miner studies was not confirmed. This can be explained partly by differences in methods (here: longitudinal studies, no prior exposure), but also by lower dust levels. NO x exposures showed no relevant influence on lung function—a result confirming findings from British coal mining. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Starting shortly after the reunification of Germany and lasting up to the end of the 1990s, an extensive series of retrospective exposure investigations for the East German uranium mining industry was performed in order to provide information about the exposure situation of the miners towards respirable dust, inhalable dust, crystalline silica and heavy metals. It should provide the necessary information for legal compensation of miners with potential industrial diseases as well as for epidemiological research. Extensive side-by-side measurements using original historic equipments as well as comprehensive evaluation of the time increments of specific jobs with respect to exposure relevant tasks were performed. After attributing average exposures to the tasks, shift exposures for the jobs could be calculated. By the end a comprehensive job exposure matrix for all underground jobs of the German uranium mining industry was developed for the components mentioned, including arsenic where relevant. In the early days of SAG/SDAG Wismut dust and silica exposures were extremely high with respirable dust up to 20 mg/m3 and respirable crystalline silica well above 2 mg/m3 as shift averages. Beginning from about the early 1960s dust control measures started to improve conditions dramatically. It is absolutely necessary to invest sufficient effort for the estimation of exposure situations of past technological environments. Especially, the situation of early mechanised mining, characterised by low ventilation, dry drilling techniques and generally lacking dust control measures was characterized by extreme shift exposures. It is important to keep these in mind when metal mining exposure in different environments is considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. The European Co-ordination on Diesel Soot Exposure (ECDSE) working group organised a laboratory inter-comparison which integrated both the sampling and the analytical determination. The aim was to gain more information on the performance of the methods for the determination of diesel particulate matter at workplaces and on their comparability, and to also confirm that the requirements of the European standard EN 482 are fulfilled for this analytical procedure. Methods. Sampling was carried out in a diesel aerosol test chamber where participants used their own sampling devices. Overall, ten sampling exercises at two different concentration levels were performed and both personal air sampling systems and stationary samplers were used. The analytical determination was performed according to the laboratory's own standard procedure. Results. There was good agreement between the laboratories for the determination of organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC) and total carbon (TC). Almost all the results when expressed as a coefficient of variation were in the range ±30% of the overall means. The results also showed that the coefficient of variation for OC was approximately twice the coefficient of variation for EC. This is not too critical, because existing occupational exposure levels (OELs) are based on the measurement of EC. Conclusions. The inter-comparison showed that existing analytical procedures for the determination of diesel particulate matter at workplaces fulfil the requirements of European standard EN 482. Both personal air samplers and stationary samplers give comparable results. The parameters for the analytical determination are not critical within the range of parameter values presented in this article. Additionally, it may be concluded that the diesel aerosol test chamber used in this exercise is well suited for producing an atmosphere containing a constant and reproducible level of diesel particulate matter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: An informal European coordination group organized two round-robin tests on filters collected from environmental, workplace and diluted diesel emissions. Previous inter-laboratory comparisons have shown that experimental samples give reasonably good results in terms of the dispersion around the mean, from all the participating laboratories. However, there were significant differences between the laboratories owing to a narrow distribution of the results within a single laboratory. In order to gain a better understanding of the differences obtained between the laboratories, it was decided to carry out more round-robin tests and to investigate further the possible factors which may influence the results. Methods: The first round-robin (RRT3) was performed on six different samples (eight replicates) analyzed by ten laboratories. The range of loading was 40 to 138 μg cm-2 of total carbon (TC). Laboratories used their own thermal procedure parameters. The second round-robin test (RRT4) was performed on three different diluted diesel emissions (two replicates) samples analyzed by 13 laboratories. The range of loading was 21 to 37 μg cm-2 TC. Laboratories analyzed samples using imposed temperatures (500, 650 and 800 °C) and imposed duration (12 min). Results: Inter-laboratory coefficients of variation for diluted diesel emission samples were 10% for RRT3 and ranged from 6 to 19% for RRT4. The influence of the desorption temperature was clearly demonstrated and the results tended to show that a desorption temperature of 650 °C could be an acceptable compromise. The influence of the organic carbon/elemental carbon (OC/EC) ratio was shown to be insignificant with pure diesel soot samples. Conclusions: It was expected that a significant improvement would be seen in the inter-laboratory dispersion by the use of a common standardized thermal desorption program, but the objectives of these RRTs were only partly reached. This paper provides new information that will be useful in the elaboration of a standardized procedure for the European Normalisation Centre (CEN TC 137 WG2 – General requirements for measuring procedures). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Object: Diesel soot has been recognized as probably carcinogenic to humans. Elemental carbon (also called black carbon) in soot is considered at the moment as the most significant surrogate to be measured for assessing the exposure to this pollutant. Its analysis is done by combustion in an oven and determination of the CO2 formed, after elimination of the organic fraction of the soot by heating and/or by solvent extraction. The analysis allows determination of both fractions of the soot: “elemental carbon” (EC) and organic carbon␣(OC). The sum of EC and OC is called TC (total carbon). Method: An informal European coordination group organized two round robin tests on filter samples collected from diluted diesel emissions. The first round (RRT1) was performed on 13 different samples analyzed by ten laboratories. The range of loading was 2.5 to 150 μg/cm2 of EC. No evaluation of the precision within laboratories could be made since each laboratory gave only one result per sample. Therefore a second round (RRT2) was organized with two samples and a blank filter sent in several portions to 11 laboratories. It should be stressed that each laboratory used its own method and that no standardization was planned at this stage. Results: Results of RRT1 showed that the coefficient of variation between laboratories decreased with higher loading and was around 10% to 15% for EC above about 20 μg/cm2. Dispersion of the results varied and it appeared that the way OC is removed from the soot is probably the most important factor of influence. The correlation between the laboratories was good as a whole but some systematic differences could be detected. Besides the different techniques to remove the organic carbon, the pretreatment of the filter by HCl (either as a vapor or as a solution) to remove the inorganic carbonates (potential interference sources), is probably also a significant factor of influence in the dispersion of the results between laboratories. It is not yet clear from these results whether the “environmental” laboratories give different results from the “occupational” laboratories, but it is clear that their objectives differ since for the “environmentalists”, EC is not a specific marker of diesel immissions, in contrast to the “occupationalists”. Conclusion: It can be concluded that, although significant differences exist between laboratories they can be attributed mainly to the narrow distribution of the results within a single laboratory, and that the overall agreement of the results for EC and TC is fairly good. These results obtained with pure diesel engine emissions, should be complemented by field samples, but they have already achieved relevant findings in the performance of the procedures used to assess exposure to diesel soot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]