Search

Background: Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology‐based topics spanning the field. Methods: In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence‐Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence‐Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus‐building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. Results: The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology‐based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. Conclusion: As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Sinonasal malignancy surveillance paradigms are often based on Head and Neck National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, which do not recommend standard surveillance imaging beyond 6 months without concerning symptomatology or physical examination findings.This was a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent resection of sinonasal malignancy at a tertiary care center over a 20‐year period from 2000 to 2020, with an ensuing surveillance period demonstrating recurrence.Fifty‐two patients with sinonasal malignancy recurrence were included, with an average time to recurrence of 30.9 months and a follow‐up period of over 60 months. Recurrence was diagnosed by routine imaging or endoscopy in asymptomatic patients in a majority (60%) of cases, while the remaining minority of diagnoses followed new symptomatology. Asymptomatic recurrence was associated with perineural spread of tumor at initial resection (p = 0.025), but not with age (p = 0.85) or stage at diagnosis (p = 0.68). Expectedly, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) more often detected regional or distant recurrence, while structural imaging (CT/magnetic resonance imaging) demonstrated more frequent detection of recurrence in those with perineural spread of tumor (p = 0.01).Our findings support high rates of asymptomatic recurrence in sinonasal malignancy, with the majority of recurrences diagnosed by routine endoscopy or imaging. Tailored and extended surveillance guidelines are necessary relative to those utilized for other head and neck mucosal cancers, and are especially appropriate when features such as perineural spread are present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The impact of sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) on quality of life (QOL) at presentation is poorly understood. The Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) and University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL) are validated QOL instruments with distinctive subdomains. This study aims to identify factors impacting pretreatment QOL in SNM patients to personalize multidisciplinary management and counseling. Methods: Patients with previously untreated SNMs were prospectively enrolled (2015–2022) in a multicenter observational study. Baseline pretreatment QOL instruments (SNOT‐22, UWQOL) were obtained along with demographics, comorbidities, histopathology/staging, tumor involvement, and symptoms. Multivariable regression models identified factors associated with reduced baseline QOL. Results: Among 204 patients, presenting baseline QOL was significantly reduced. Multivariable regression showed worse total SNOT‐22 QOL in patients with skull base erosion (p = 0.02). SNOT‐rhinologic QOL was worse in women (p = 0.009), patients with epistaxis (p = 0.036), and industrial exposure (p = 0.005). SNOT extranasal QOL was worse in patients with industrial exposure (p = 0.016); worse SNOT ear/facial QOL if perineural invasion (PNI) (p = 0.027). Squamous cell carcinoma pathology (p = 0.037), palate involvement (p = 0.012), and pain (p = 0.017) were associated with worse SNOT sleep QOL scores. SNOT psychological subdomain scores were significantly worse in patients with palate lesions (p = 0.022), skull base erosion (p = 0.025), and T1 staging (p = 0.023). Low QOL was more likely in the presence of PNI on UW health (p = 0.019) and orbital erosion on UW overall (p = 0.03). UW social QOL was worse if palatal involvement (p = 0.023) or PNI (p = 0.005). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate a negative impact on baseline QOL in patients with SNMs and suggest sex‐specific and symptom‐related lower QOL scores, with minimal histopathology association. Anatomical tumor involvement may be more reflective of QOL than T‐staging, as orbital and skull base erosion, PNI, and palate lesions are significantly associated with reduced baseline QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sinonasal lymphoma (SL) is a heterogeneous, underrecognized neoplastic disorder with limited outcomes data. We sought to better define outcomes by subtype and treatment at 2 referral centers over the past 2 decades. Methods: Demographics, clinicopathologic data, and treatment outcomes for patients treated for SL were queried from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2021 at 2 tertiary academic medical centers. Results: Eighty‐four patients were included, with an average age at diagnosis of 63.4 ± 15 years. There were 34 females (40.5%). The majority of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of <2 (76.2%) and the most common presenting symptom was facial swelling/pain (26.2%). The most common primary site was the nasal cavity (36.9%). Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma was the most common subtype (46.4%), followed by extranodal NK/T‐cell lymphoma (17.9%). Chemotherapy was the most common treatment strategy (n = 59, 70.2%), followed by radiation therapy (n = 35, 41.7%) and immunotherapy (n = 24, 28.6%). Disease‐specific survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85.7%, 73.6%, and 58.6%, respectively. Eighteen patients (21.4%) developed recurrence. On multivariate analysis, higher ECOG score (p < 0.0001) and history of head and neck radiation (p = 0.048) were associated with worse survival. Younger age was associated with greater risk of recurrence (p = 0.022) and male sex was associated with more treatment side effects (p = 0.012). Conclusion: This is the largest multi‐institutional analysis of SL characteristics and outcomes. Our work suggests that, although disease control in the first 5 years is reasonable, 10‐year outcomes remain challenging. Further studies are needed to investigate new treatment paradigms and risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Esthesioneuroblastomas (ENB) are uncommon and data regarding outcomes are often limited to single-institution series. The National Cancer Database (NCDB), which contains outcomes information from treatment centers across the United States, represents an opportunity to evaluate outcomes for rare diseases such as ENB across multiple institutions. Methods The NCDB was queried for location codes corresponding to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and the histology code for ENB. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate for contributing factors to overall survival. Results A total of 1225 patients with ENB met the inclusion criteria. The 5-year overall survival was 76.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.4-79.0%). Overall survival was associated with Kadish stage, grade, treatment sequence, margin status, Charlson/Deyo score, age, and gender ( p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, compared with surgery alone, surgery followed by radiation without chemotherapy had improved all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95). Surgery with chemotherapy alone was associated with increased odds of all-cause mortality (OR, 4.86; 95% CI, 2.31-10.25). Multivariate subanalysis for Kadish stages A and B demonstrated no difference in survival between surgery and surgery followed by radiation, but surgery followed by chemoradiation had worse overall survival (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.07-8.56). For Kadish stage C, surgery followed by radiation had improved overall survival compared with surgery alone (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81). Conclusion The most common treatment for ENB is surgery followed by radiation, which is associated with the highest overall survival. The role of adjunctive chemotherapy needs to be re-evaluated in further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]