Search

High-resolution mapping is useful to identify reconnection gaps in the pulmonary vein after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. However, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate pulmonary vein potentials from far-field potentials because of very low amplitudes. Our purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel differential atrial pacing method to differentiate reconnected pulmonary vein potentials from isolated pulmonary vein potentials. This retrospective observational study included 34 patients with atrial fibrillation (22 men; mean age, 64 ± 14 years; 28 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) who underwent radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. Following pulmonary vein isolation, we created a high-resolution activation map during pacing from both the coronary sinus and left atrial appendage. We compared the characteristics of the pulmonary vein potentials and the pattern of activation between the reconnected and isolated pulmonary veins. We analyzed 131 pulmonary veins and found reconnections in 41 pulmonary veins (R group); 90 pulmonary veins had no reconnection (NR group). The R group had a significantly shorter distance between the earliest pulmonary vein activation sites in both activation maps, compared with the NR group (5.22 ± 0.53 mm versus 17.08 ± 0.36 mm, respectively; P < 0.0001). The amplitude of the pulmonary vein potentials was higher in the R group versus the NR group (0.61 ± 0.05 mV versus 0.04 ± 0.03 mV, respectively; P < 0.0001). Six gaps (14%) in the R group that were unrecognized using a conventional method were identified using our novel method. In conclusion, differential atrial pacing was useful to identify pulmonary vein reconnection gaps during ablation using a novel high-resolution mapping system.

The errors in the following list appeared in the article entitled "Differential Atrial Pacing to Detect Reconnection Gaps After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation" by Mai Tahara, Ritsushi Kato, Yoshifumi Ikeda, Koji Goto, So Asano, Hitoshi Mori, Shiro Iwanaga, Toshihiro Muramatsu, and Kazuo Matsumoto (Vol. 61, No. 3, 503-509, 2020).

High-resolution mapping is useful to identify reconnection gaps in the pulmonary vein after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. However, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate pulmonary vein potentials from far-field potentials because of very low amplitudes. Our purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel differential atrial pacing method to differentiate reconnected pulmonary vein potentials from isolated pulmonary vein potentials. This retrospective observational study included 34 patients with atrial fibrillation (22 men; mean age, 64 ± 14 years; 28 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) who underwent radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. Following pulmonary vein isolation, we created a high-resolution activation map during pacing from both the coronary sinus and left atrial appendage. We compared the characteristics of the pulmonary vein potentials and the pattern of activation between the reconnected and isolated pulmonary veins. We analyzed 131 pulmonary veins and found reconnections in 41 pulmonary veins (R group); 90 pulmonary veins had no reconnection (NR group). The R group had a significantly shorter distance between the earliest pulmonary vein activation sites in both activation maps, compared with the NR group (5.22 ± 0.53 mm versus 17.08 ± 0.36 mm, respectively; P0.0001). The amplitude of the pulmonary vein potentials was higher in the R group versus the NR group (0.61 ± 0.05 mV versus 0.04 ± 0.03 mV, respectively; P0.0001). Six gaps (14%) in the R group that were unrecognized using a conventional method were identified using our novel method. In conclusion, differential atrial pacing was useful to identify pulmonary vein reconnection gaps during ablation using a novel high-resolution mapping system.

Right ventricular (RV) lead perforations are relatively rare but a potentially life-threatening complication of surgical implantations of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The result of percutaneous simple lead traction after lead perforations in the Japanese population has not been well clarified.We retrospectively studied 1359 patients (pacemakers [PMs], 973 patients; implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICD], 386 patients) from April 2007 to December 2018 who underwent initial CIED implantation. Fifteen patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with RV lead perforations. The clinical data were evaluated in those patients, and the baseline characteristics and echocardiographic data were compared between the lead perforation group and the non-perforation group. The success and complication rates of the simple traction and repositioning of the RV lead were also assessed.The number of perforated RV leads was seven ICD leads (1.8%) and eight PM leads (0.82%). They were diagnosed on a median seven days (5.5-36.0) after the CIED implantation. Twelve patients were asymptomatic but were detected by an increased capture threshold. Three patients had pericarditis and stimulation of the diaphragm. Only one patient in the ICD lead group who took anticoagulants had a cardiac tamponade and needed an urgent pericardiocentesis (0.07%). No one required a thoracotomy or other devices related to complications after repositioning the RV lead. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics and echocardiographic parameters between the groups.RV lead perforations were relatively rare complications of CIED implantations. Percutaneous simple lead traction and repositioning the perforated lead was feasible and effective if the patients did not receive anticoagulants.