Search

Physical activity is an important determinant of population health. In this paper, we examine levels of physical activity among Canadian adolescents in relation to socioeconomic status.Data from the Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 2.1, conducted in 2003, were used to evaluate the association between socioeconomic status and physical activity. This survey included 9,294 males between 12 and 20 years of age, and 9,147 females in the same age range.Among adolescents aged 12 to 20 years, 55.9% of males and 39.2% of females were physically active. The proportion of subjects in the active category tended to decrease with age in both males and females. Adolescents from low income families were more physically inactive (odds ratio=1.30, 95% confidence interval=1.29-1.32) than those from high income families.Physical inactivity in adolescence represents an important population health issue in Canada. Physical activity levels tended to be higher among males, younger people, and those with higher socioeconomic status. Multi-sectoral policies and initiatives are needed to create environments that promote physical activity among Canadian youth.

UNLABELLED Physical activity is an important determinant of population health. In this paper, we examine levels of physical activity among Canadian adolescents in relation to socioeconomic status. METHODS Data from the Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 2.1, conducted in 2003, were used to evaluate the association between socioeconomic status and physical activity. This survey included 9,294 males between 12 and 20 years of age, and 9,147 females in the same age range. RESULTS Among adolescents aged 12 to 20 years, 55.9% of males and 39.2% of females were physically active. The proportion of subjects in the active category tended to decrease with age in both males and females. Adolescents from low income families were more physically inactive (odds ratio=1.30, 95% confidence interval=1.29-1.32) than those from high income families. CONCLUSION Physical inactivity in adolescence represents an important population health issue in Canada. Physical activity levels tended to be higher among males, younger people, and those with higher socioeconomic status. Multi-sectoral policies and initiatives are needed to create environments that promote physical activity among Canadian youth.

The purpose of this study was to provide information to improve the management of childhood asthma in Canada. The Student Lung Health Survey (SLHS) was conducted as a stratified and multi-staged cluster survey across Canada in 1996. It included a total of 136 public, private and separate schools in nine health units. The target study population was schoolchildren aged 5 to 19 years. Among all 5-19 years old students, the prevalence of asthma was 13.0%, with the prevalence for males being higher than for females, the adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) was 1.17, (95% CI 1.14-1.19) for males, in comparison with females. The prevalence in the 15-19 age group was higher than that in the 5-9 and 10-14 age group in females, but it was higher in the 5-9 and 10-14 age group than in the 15-19 age group in males. The mean delay from the onset of symptoms to time of first diagnosis was 1, 0.4 and 0.3 years for the 1-4, 5-9 and 10-14 age group respectively. However, there was no delay in the 15-19 group. The prevalence of asthma in Prince Edward Island (17.9%), Halifax (17.1%), and Kingston (16.1%) was higher than that in Saskatoon (10.0%). Sherbrooke (9.7%) and Kelowna (11.9%). The proportion of asthma for students who smoked more than 11 cigarettes per day (OR = 1.41), were exposed to passive smoke in home (OR = 7.29), in car (OR = 4.71), and in school (OR = 4.24) or had a family income less than CAN$40,000 (OR = 1.19), was significantly higher than groups without those factors. Risk factors and socio-economic status such as living conditions and environment, pets or plants in the home, parental education levels also affected the morbidity of asthma. The results of the SLHS study demonstrated the serious burden of childhood asthma, and asthma triggers, living and environmental conditions and lifestyle influence the prevalence and the effects of childhood asthma diagnosis, treatment, and education in Canada. Asthma is still a serious chronic condition for students and it influences their academic performance and their quality of life. The diagnostic methods and the practice guidelines for asthma control are useful for preventing and controlling asthma. These findings provide indications of interventions are being used for the control of asthma in Canada.

UNLABELLED The objective of this study was to estimate the severity of childhood asthma in Canada, identify the effects of asthma interventions in different target groups, and to profile asthma management and control practices by geographic area, sex, age, and severity groups. METHODS The SLHS was conducted as a stratified and multi-staged cluster survey across Canada in 1996. It included a total of 136 public, private and separate schools in nine health units (Prince Edward Island, Halifax, Sherbrooke, Kingston, Guelph, Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Edmonton, and Kelowna). The target study population was schoolchildren aged 5 to 19 years. Descriptive analyses were used to calculate the severity of childhood asthma for the different groups. Logistic regression was then employed to measure the quality of asthma intervention and control. Multivariate logistic regression was also used to compare the severity and treatment of asthma with age, sex and lifestyle, living and housing conditions. Using existing Clinical Practice Guidelines as a reference, the study also evaluated the effectiveness of interventions such as treatment, and asthmatic education. RESULTS Based on the Canadian Consensus Recommendations of definition of asthma control, among all 5-19 years old students, 39.9% were well controlled, 33.8% were acceptably controlled and 26.3% were poor controlled. The rates of intermittent and mild asthma were 44.8% and 11.6% compared with moderate (15.3%) and severe (0.9%). Students with asthma reported receiving more advantaged information from a demonstration of inhaler users (OR = 7.51, 95% CI = 5.65-8.94), during a medical visits (OR = 6.33, 95% CI = 5.11-7.83), from the pamphlet/brochures (OR = 6.22, 95% CI = 5.05-7.76) or from a demonstration of the correct use of medicine (OR = 5.62, 95% CI = 4.62-6.82). More students visited a family doctor (40.3%, OR = 5.52, 95% CI = 4.95-6.64) and medical specialists (31.0%, OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 2.58-4.78) than other specialist when they had respiratory problems. CONCLUSIONS The results of the SLHS study demonstrated variations in the management and control of childhood asthma across Canada. The interventions and the practice guidelines for asthma control are useful for preventing and controlling asthma. These findings provide indications of interventions that are being used for the control of asthma in Canada.