Search

• Despite successful antiretroviral therapy, patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) could develop multi-class drug resistance (MDR) • Data about the prevalence of HIV-MDR are scanty and results are unclear • A significant decline in the prevalence of HIV-MDR over between 1998 and 2018 was observed • Nowadays, HIV-MDR still occurs, although at a lower rate • Management of patients infected by MDR viruses is a critical issue in HIV therapy Despite successful antiretroviral therapy (ART), patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can develop multi-class drug resistance (MDR). This retrospective study aimed to explore the prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance over the past two decades by focusing on HIV-MDR and its predictors. ART-experienced patients with HIV with results from at least one plasma genotypic resistance test (GRT) from 1998 to 2018, from the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis database, were included in this study. The temporal trend of resistance to any drug class was evaluated by considering all GRTs. Prevalence and predictors of HIV-MDR were analysed by consideration of cumulative GRTs. Among 15 628 isolates from 6802 patients, resistance to at least one drug class decreased sharply from 1998 to 2010 (1998–2001: 78%; 2008–2010: 59%; P <0.001) and then remained relatively constant at approximately 50% from 2011 to 2018, with the proportion of isolates with HIV-MDR also stable (approximately 9%). By evaluating factors associated with cumulative HIV-MDR, the following factors were found to be associated with increased risk of HIV-MDR on multi-variate analysis: male gender; sexual and vertical transmission; number of previous protease inhibitors, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-NRTIs; previous exposure to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, enfuvirtide and maraviroc; and co-infection with hepatitis B virus. In contrast, a nadir CD4 cell count ≥200 cells/mm3, starting first-line ART in 2008 or later and co-infection with hepatitis C virus were associated with lower risk of HIV-MDR. In conclusion, this study revealed that HIV-1 drug resistance has been stable since 2011 despite its dramatic decrease over the past two decades. HIV-MDR is still present, although at a lower rate, suggesting the need for continuous surveillance and accurate management of ART-experienced patients with HIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Both bictegravir (BIC) and dolutegravir (DTG), in association with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF), show high efficacy in treatment-naïve people living with human immunodeficiency virus. • DTG+FTC/TAF discontinuations are mainly due to switching to a single tablet regimen or a two-drug regimen. • Favourable immunological recovery was observed, even in the short term. First-line integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens have become commonly used in clinical practice over the last decade. This study aimed to analyse and compare the efficacy and safety of bictegravir (BIC) and dolutegravir (DTG) when prescribed in association with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF) as part of a first-line regimen for the treatment of human immunodeficiency-1 (HIV-1) infection. Treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLWHIV) starting a first-line regimen with either BIC/FTC/TAF (BIC group) or FTC/TAF+DTG (DTG group) were analysed. Snapshot analyses were performed after 24 and 48 weeks to evaluate virological efficacy. In addition, differences in the rate of treatment discontinuation (TD) between the two groups were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log rank test. Data from 327 PLWHIV were analysed: 140 in the DTG group and 187 in the BIC group. At 48 weeks, 90.0% of individuals in the DTG group and 86.7% of those in the BIC group achieved HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL. In total, 88 and 38 cases of TD were observed in the DTG group and BIC group, respectively. The estimated probability of maintaining the study regimen at week 48 was 59.5% in the DTG group and 84.2% in the BIC group. Analysing changes in immunological parameters after 48 weeks, median improvements of +169 cell/mm3 (P <0.001) and +233 cell/mm3 (P <0.001) were observed in the DTG group and the BIC group, respectively. Both BIC and DTG, in combination with FTC/TAF, show promising efficacy and safety as first-line strategies in clinical practice, with favourable immunological recovery even in the short term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]