Search

Background: Consent to therapy is increasingly requested in the form of ''informed consent''., Objective: To validate an evidence-based informed consent form for erythropoietin (EPO) therapy and to evaluate patient opinions about the informed consent approach., Methods: An evidence-based informed consent form was developed as part of the Evidence-Based-Medicine course at the Medical School of Turin, Italy. It was validated by anonymous questionnaires (0-10 analogical scales and open answers) administered to patients at different stages of CKD (19 pre-ESRD, 26 hemodialysis, 12 transplant patients) attending an outpatient unit of the University of Turin, to 8 nurses, and to 26 medical students., Results: All individuals filled in the questionnaire. Interest in a detailed explanation of the therapy was high (median 9), as was comprehension (median 9), with no differences between patients with regard to disease stage (pre-ESRD vs. RRT) or educational level. Prior knowledge of the therapy was affected by the educational level (p=0.013 for the advantages and p=0.004 for the side effects) and the professional role (patients vs caregivers: p=0.009 for the advantages and p<0.001 for side affects); patient knowledge of the advantages (median 6) tended to increase as the disease progressed (p=0.015). The most common response by patients was that informed consent was necessary for all drugs (35.1%); 73.1% of the caregivers considered it necessary only for severe side effects. The preferred modality of consent was discussion with the caregiver during the clinical controls (42% of all cases)., Conclusions: Patient interest in and comprehension of an informed consent form with a detailed explanation of the therapy was high; the caregiver's opinion was still the most valued teaching tool.

Background: Informed consent is crucial in therapeutic choices; however, the forms presented to patients are often locally developed and information may not be homogeneous., Objective: To prepare an evidence-based model for informed consent, applied in the case of erythropoietin therapy (EPO) as a teaching tool for medical students., Methods: Methodological tools of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) were developed within the EBM Course in the Medical School of Torino, Italy, as problem solving and patient information tools (5th year students work in small groups under the supervision of statisticians, epidemiologists and experts of internal medicine--nephrology in this case)., Results: Methodological and ethical problems were identified: in the pre-dialysis field, evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCT) is scant; how to use evidence gathered in dialysis? How to deal with implementation? How with the mass media? Do we need to discuss the drug choice with the patients? How to deal with rare and severe side effects?). The "evidence" was searched for on Medline/Embase, by using key-words and free terms. About 680 papers were retrieved and screened. Forms available on the Internet were retrieved and a general scheme was drawn: it included 5 areas: title, aim and targets (patients and family physicians); search strategies and updating; pros and cons of therapy; alternative options; open questions., Conclusions: EBM may offer valuable tools for systematically approaching patient information; the inclusion of this kind of exercise in the Medical School EBM courses may help enhance the awareness of future physicians of the correct communication with patients.

Maintenance of residual renal clearance is a clinical advantage, protecting against the long-term effects of uremia: although demonstrated in peritoneal dialysis, the strategies in hemodialysis are less clear. This case suggests that dialysis schedules individualized on the basis of renal clearances may help preserve residual function. SB is a 58 year-old male who started dialysis in emergency (creatinine 30.7 mg/dL) in 1993. He had a history of gout, small shrunken kidneys and moderate hypertension. The clinical diagnosis was vasculointerstitial nephropathy. Eighteen months after starting hemodialysis on a conventional thrice weekly schedule, the patient was switched to 2 sessions/week (creatinine clearance increased to 6 ml/min). Thereafter, clearances were checked in alternate months and treatment was tailored to an equivalent renal clearance > or =12 ml/min (1-2 sessions, 2-3.30 hours/week). Ten years after beginning dialysis, he is on a twice weekly schedule (3.30 hours), is normotensive, works full-time and does not want to go on a transplant waiting list.

The prognosis of diabetic patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) is usually poor. We report on the type 1 diabetic woman with the longest RRT follow-up in our area: over 20 years, half on dialysis, half with a renal graft. CS started RRT at age 27 on peritoneal dialysis (3 years), continued until an underdialysis syndrome developed, was switched to acetate dialysis and, because of poor tolerance, to hemofiltration which with good clinical results, allowing her to become the first Italian patient on home hemofiltration, which continued for 5 years. A cadaver graft lasted for the subsequent decade, despite several complications; afterwards she resumed bicarbonate dialysis, choosing a frequent home hemodialysis schedule. Despite several vascular access problems, her clinical conditions were good enough to candidate her for a second renal transplant, performed 3 years ago. This history of active self-care may draw attention to the advantages of a multiple choice dialysis network.

Background: Therapeutic compliance is fundamental on dialysis; however following a therapy requires a prior understanding of it. Aim of the study was to assess the need and interest for information on dialysis efficiency and to prepare a dedicated teaching tool., Methods: 72 patients, on hemodialysis in two limited-care satellite units, were given a questionnaire testing knowledge and interest on dialysis efficiency. In a subsequent second phase, following patients' suggestions, a cartoon book was prepared and opinions recorded., Results: 63 patients' returned the questionnaire. 79.4% had basic knowledge on routine blood tests, 30.1% were aware of their specific meaning. All patients asked for further information, preferring books to other media. The book "Kt/V as cartoon" was distributed; 71.2% read it, 93% scored it as good-very good. In the Unit employing flexible dialysis schedules, 22/42 patients increased dialysis time., Conclusions: Despite insufficient knowledge on dialysis efficiency, patient interest is high. An educational program is feasible and may also give practical results, such as self-increase in dialysis time.

The increasing number of Diabetic Uremic Patients (DUP) starting the substitutive treatment (ST) constitutes a difficult and often disappointing problem in terms of efforts, clinical results and side-effects. While treatment of these patients by C.A.P.D. is well documented, the adoption of Hemofiltration (HF), has been, up to now scarcely considered. In order to define the potentialities of a HF policy in the treatment of these patients, data from 6 DUP treated with postdilutional HF for a 10.6 months/patient period were collected on a multi-center basis and retrospectively examined. Good results were achieved in terms of vascular stability, control of arterial hypertension and of retinopathy, clinical complications and hospitalization rate. Although C.A.P.D. may represent a first choice treatment for DUP with residual function, satisfactory glicemic control, difficult blood access and a motivation to full autonomization, HF may constitute a logical alternative when C.A.P.D. should be unmanageable (visus impairment, history of repeated peritonitis and dismetabolism, considerable weight gain): an integration of HF and C.A.P.D. can assure PDU with a continuative treatment.