Search

Introduction Refractory angina (RA) is considered the end-stage of coronary artery disease, and often has no interventional treatment options. Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) is a recent addition to the therapeutic arsenal, but its efficacy has only been evaluated on small populations. The RESOURCE registry provides further insights into this therapy. Methods The RESOURCE is an observational, retrospective registry that includes 658 patients with RA from 20 centers in Europe, United Kingdom and Israel. Prespecified endpoints were the amelioration of anginal symptoms evaluated with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score, the rates of procedural success and complications, and MACEs as composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndromes, and stroke. Results At a median follow-up of 502 days (IQR 225–1091) after CSR implantation, 39.7% of patients improved by ≥2 CCS classes (primary endpoint), and 76% by ≥1 class. Procedural success was achieved in 96.7% of attempts, with 3% of procedures aborted mostly for unsuitable coronary sinus anatomy. Any complication occurred in 5.7% of procedures, but never required bailout surgery nor resulted in intra- or periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. One patient developed periprocedural stroke after inadvertent carotid artery puncture. At the last available follow-up, overall mortality and MACE were 10.4% and 14.6% respectively. At one, three and five years, mortality rate at Kaplan-Meier analysis was 4%, 13.7%, and 23.4% respectively. Conclusions CSR implantation is safe and reduces angina in patients with refractory angina.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is frequent and associated with adverse outcomes and mortality; to date, in such setting of patients there is no consistent evidence that either low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) or iso‐osmolar contrast medium (IOCM) are superior to the other in terms of renal safety. Methods: 697 consecutive patients not in hemodialysis treatment who underwent TAVI (327 males, mean age 81.01 ± 5.75 years, mean european system for cardiac operative risk evaluation II 6.17 ± 0.23%) were enrolled. According to osmolality of the different iodinated CM, the population was divided in 2 groups: IOCM (n = 370) and LOCM group (n = 327). Preoperatively, 40.54% of patients in IOCM vs 39.14% in LOCM group (p = 0.765) suffered from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Results: The incidence of AKI was significantly lower with IOCM (9.73%) than with LOCM (15.90%; p = 0.02), and such significant difference (p < 0.001) in postprocedural change of renal function parameters persisted at discharge too. The incidence of AKI was also significantly lower with IOCM in younger patients, without diabetes, anemia, coronary artery disease history, CKD, chronic or persistent atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and in patients with low operative mortality risk scores, receiving lower amounts of dye (p < 0.05 for all). Importantly, multivariate analysis identified LOCM administration as an independent risk factor for both AKI (p = 0.006) and 1-year mortality (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The use of IOCM have a favorable impact on renal function with respect to LOCM, but it should be considered especially for TAVI patients at lower AKI risk.