1. Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry
- Author
-
Toru Tanigaki, Hitoshi Matsuo, Yousif Ahmad, Yoshihiro J. Akashi, Hiroyuki Omori, Darrel P. Francis, Takayuki Warisawa, Yoshiaki Kawase, Justin E. Davies, Christopher Cook, and James P. Howard
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cardiac Catheterization ,Hemodynamics ,Hyperemia ,Fractional flow reserve ,Constriction, Pathologic ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Severity of Illness Index ,Lesion ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Interquartile range ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Registries ,Instantaneous wave-free ratio ,Aged ,Cardiac cycle ,business.industry ,Coronary Stenosis ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ,Stenosis ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cardiology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Artery - Abstract
Background Identifying the individual hemodynamic significance of tandem coronary artery lesions can be complicated by the crosstalk phenomenon which occurs between serial stenoses under hyperemic conditions. Physiological assessments performed under resting conditions are considered to be, theoretically, less affected by the hemodynamic interaction between serial coronary stenoses. The purpose of this study was to assess whether pressure-wire (PW) pullback measurements at rest and during hyperemia provided different information as to which stenosis appeared to be most functionally significant. Methods In consecutive patients with angiographically discrete serial lesions, physiological lesion predominance (i.e. proximal or distal) was defined according to the pressure gradient along the vessels on PW-pullback trace. We used instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) based assessment as the reference standard and compared fractional flow reserve (FFR) based and hyperemic-iFR based lesion predominance. Results Eighty-eight vessels (70 patients, mean age 70.3 ± 9.4 years, 80% male) were included in this study. Median iFR, FFR and hyperemic-iFR were 0.85 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.74 to 0.91), 0.73 (IQR: 0.65 to 0.80) and 0.60 (IQR: 0.49 to 0.71), respectively. When judged against iFR-pullback based physiological assessment, lesion predominance changed in 22.7% (20/88) in FFR and in 20.5% (18/88) in hyperemic-iFR, respectively. There was no statistical difference between FFR and hyperemic-iFR for the impact on these changes (p = 0.77). Conclusions In serial coronary lesions, hyperemic PW-pullback disagreed with resting PW-pullback on the lesion-specific identification of ischemia in approximately 20% of cases, either in whole cardiac cycle or in wave-free period.
- Published
- 2019