Search

We retrospectively investigated the prognostic significance and clinical utility of pretreatment neutrophilia and elevated neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Clinical data were collected from 344 surgically staged ovarian cancer patients between April 2007 and March 2016 and retrospectively reviewed. Neutrophilia and elevated NLR were defined as a neutrophil count ≥ 8,000/μl and an NLR ≥ 4.0, respectively. Univariate or multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between pretreatment neutrophilia or elevated NLR and clinicopathological characteristics, optimal surgery rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Finally, we compared the clinical utility between neutrophil count and NLR by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Pretreatment neutrophilia and elevated NLR were observed in 24 (7.0%) and 142 (41.3%) patients, respectively. In univariate analysis, both neutrophilia and elevated NLR were found to be associated with short PFS and DSS (p

The appropriate interval of post-treatment follow-up appointments for uterine cervical cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of reducing the frequency of post-treatment follow-up examinations on life expectancy and medical expenses in cervical cancer patients. Cervical cancer patients who were treated with radiotherapy between 2008 and 2017, underwent a less frequent follow-up program, and subsequently developed recurrent disease were included in consecutive group (CG). Non-randomized groups of cervical cancer patients who underwent a frequent follow-up program after radiotherapy between 1997 and 2007, and subsequently developed recurrent disease were also identified through a chart review and served as a comparison group (primary group [PG]). Clinical data regarding the primary disease, follow-up, recurrence, and survival were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of survival were performed. A total of 263 recurrent cervical cancer patients (PG: 154, CG: 109) were included in the current study. A reduction in follow-up frequency of up to 40% did not increase the frequency of symptomatic recurrence (PG: vs. CG: 31.2% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.43) or reduce the median overall survival periods of recurrent cervical cancer patients (PG vs. CG: 32 months vs. 36 months, p = 0.15). However, the reduction in the follow-up frequency significantly reduced follow-up costs. Reducing the frequency of follow-up by up to 40% did not result in shorter overall survival compared with a conventional follow-up program. The results of this study provide a rationale for future studies investigating the optimal follow-up schedule for patients with cervical cancer.

There are no guidelines about the selection of recurrent cervical cancer patients for salvage surgery. Patients who developed recurrent or persistent cervical cancer in a previously irradiated field and were subsequently treated with salvage surgery (the surgery group) or palliative care alone (the palliative group) were identified. Patient characteristics, treatment-related complications, and survival were retrospectively compared between the two groups. A total of 79 patients (surgery group, n = 51; palliative group, n = 28) were identified. In the surgery group, no intraoperative complications or treatment-related deaths occurred. Eleven patients (21.6%) experienced severe postoperative complications. After a median follow-up period of 41.5 months, 23 patients (45.1%) had developed recurrent disease, predominantly at distant sites, and 19 patients (37.3%) had died of disease progression. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates of the surgery group were 50.4 and 56.5%, respectively. In the palliative group, all of the patients died of disease progression. Positive surgical margins and lymph node metastasis were found to be independent prognostic factors for PFS in the surgery group. Among the patients with no or one poor prognostic factor, the patients in the surgery group survived significantly longer than those in the palliative group. However, among the patients with 2 poor prognostic factors, the surgery group and palliative group displayed similar survival periods. Salvage surgery is a curative treatment in recurrent or persistent cervical cancer patients. However, considering its high surgical complication rate, salvage surgery should only be offered to carefully selected patients.