Search

Density log data is one of the key physical attributes used for reservoir characterization by quantifying and qualifying lithological attributes in a wellbore. The density log is most often acquired by geophysical wireline logging techniques after drilling. However, wireline logging can be difficult to execute in highly deviated wells and alternative data acquisition such as logging-while-drilling (LWD) can be very costly. This paper describes the process of using instantaneous drilling attributes together with a machine learning algorithm, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), to generate a pseudo density log. The mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) are used as the evaluation metrics. Case studies are performed using data from six coalbed methane (or coal seam gas) wells in the Surat Basin, Australia. The inputs include drilling data [weight on bit (WOB), rotations per minute (RPM), torque, true vertical depth (TVD) and rate of penetration (ROP)] and LWD data (i.e., natural gamma ray and hole diameter). The MAE of pseudo density log for most wells is between 0.08 and 0.11 g/cc (except Well 4 is 0.16 g/cc), which results in an average error rate less than 5%. It is found that TVD, gamma ray, ROP, and hole diameter are four most important features. Further experiment shows that the model with these four important features has almost the same performance as the model with all features. The proposed machine learning methodology can assist petroleum engineers and geologists in reservoir characterization by generating pseudo density logs from ongoing LWD and drilling data in real time. It can potentially mitigate the need to run wireline logging tools after drilling or costly LWD techniques whilst drilling. • Pseudo density logs of six coal seam gas wells in Surat Basin, Australia are generated using a machine learning method (XGBoost). • Error rate of generated pseudo density logs for most wells is less than 5%. • True vertical depth (TVD), gamma ray, rate of penetration (ROP), and hole diameter are four important parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Identification of the extent of heat altered coals is important for coal mining and resource estimation because alteration directly affects key economic properties such as ash content, volatile matter, specific energy, sulphur, free swell index and beneficiation characteristics. The most reliable method to identify altered coal is through geochemical analysis of drill core samples; however this method is time consuming and costly. Cheaper alternative methods to identify altered coal is by macroscopic observation of non-core drill cuttings, but this is less reliable than core. Geophysical wireline log data is also used to identify altered coal, but with variable success. Over the past decades, Machine Learning methods have proven popular to automatically classify a variety of lithotypes from geophysical log data. However rarely has there been focus on predicting altered coal. In this paper we apply the most recent machine learning methods which include gradient boosted machines, random forests and artificial neural networks to automatically predict altered and non-altered lithotypes using geophysical log data. We use a massive data set comprising of 1230 samples from 263 boreholes from a highly intruded deposit in the Bowen Basin, Eastern Australia. To do this, we calculate each sample's distance from intrusion and predict their relative density from geophysical log inputs including gamma ray, caliper and compensated density. We then train our machine learning methods on 80% of the data to predict alteration class using the calculated distance to intrusion, predicted relative density, and geophysical log gamma ray, as primary inputs. We evaluated each of these machine learning methods on the remaining 20% of the data to determine the best performing model. Finally, using the best performing model we further split the altered and non-altered classification into lithotypes using a decision tree based on geological knowledge of the case study area. The results indicate that of the machine learning algorithms the random forest produced the best results with only 11 misclassifications across the entire data set of 1230 samples which represents <1% error. • Prediction of heat affected coals with a massive dataset and machine learning methods in the Bowen Basin. • Prediction of relative density and classification of altered and non-altered coals. • Lithology group definition based on a decision tree with <1% error. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]