1. Biased and inflexible interpretations of ambiguous social situations
- Author
-
Michael V. Bronstein, Jonas Everaert, Erich Kummerfeld, Ann F. Haynos, Sophia Vinogradov, and Medical and Clinical Psychology
- Subjects
SELECTION ,ANOREXIA-NERVOSA ,Emotions ,Psychology, Clinical ,interpretation bias ,Social Sciences ,Article ,Feeding and Eating Disorders ,Bias ,Humans ,Psychology ,ANXIETY ,VALIDITY ,interpretation inflexibility ,socioemotional functioning ,Psychiatry ,Science & Technology ,FIT INDEXES ,Nutrition & Dietetics ,DEPRESSION ,SCENARIOS ,Emotional Regulation ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,REJECTION ,restrictive eating ,DIFFICULTIES ,EMOTION DYSREGULATION ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine ,GFCI - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research indicates that difficulties across multiple socioemotional functioning domains (e.g., social emotion expression/regulation, response to social elicitors of emotion) and negatively biased interpretations of ambiguous social situations may affect eating disorder symptoms. The impact of inflexible interpretations of social situations on eating disorder symptoms is less clear. The present study therefore examined relations between inflexible and biased social interpretations, socioemotional functioning, and eating disorder symptoms. METHOD: A total of 310 participants from the general population, recruited from an online crowdsourcing platform, completed measures of socioemotional functioning (e.g., rejection sensitivity, negative social exchange), eating disorder symptoms, and positive and negative interpretation bias and inflexibility on a single measurement occasion. RESULTS: Socioemotional functioning impairments (Pillai's trace = 0.11, p
- Published
- 2022