Search

Background: This study evaluated the association of age-related lens opacities with the use of nutritional supplements and demographic factors among 4314 black participants (> or = 40 years) in the population-based Barbados Eye Study.Methods: Lenses were classified at the slit lamp by the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II); a score > or = 2 was used to define the presence of gradable lens opacities, by type. Lens changes also included prior cataract surgery or cataract too advanced to grade. Associations with risk factors were evaluated by logistic regression analyses.Results: The study identified 1800 individuals with lens changes in at least one eye; 229 had nuclear opacities only; 851 had cortical opacities only. Older age and indicators of lower socioeconomic status (low education and/or non-professional occupation), were positively associated with both nuclear (odds ratio [OR] = 1.90) and cortical (OR = 1.47) opacities. Women had an increased risk of cortical opacities (OR = 1.41). Regular users of nutritional supplements were less likely to have lens changes (OR = 0.78) and, specifically, cortical opacities (OR = 0.77). The association with nutritional supplements was present in those < 70 years, but not at older ages.Conclusions: The study supports the association of lower socioeconomic status with lens changes, including nuclear and cortical lens opacities. The findings also suggest that regular users of nutritional supplements have a one-fourth lower risk of lens changes and particularly, of cortical opacities; a result seen at ages under 70 years. The associations with potentially modifiable factors indicate the need for further evaluations, given the high prevalence of lens opacities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alcohol use is associated with breast cancer in many epidemiological studies. Most, however, have measured risk from recent consumption patterns, and only a few include analyses for duration of drinking or age that a woman started to drink. The authors studied the effect of these variables, as well as of recent alcohol consumption patterns, on breast cancer risk.Methods: Data from a large case-control study conducted in Long Island, New York from 1 January 1984 to 31 December 1986 were used. A total of 1214 women aged 20-79 years with incident breast cancer were interviewed. A control was selected for each case from driver's license files, and matched on age and county of residence. Alcohol consumption was measured as: ever versus never, grams of alcohol per day, age started drinking, and total years drinking.Results: After adjustment for breast cancer risk factors, the odds ratio for ever versus never drinking was 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.79); odds ratios for > 0-5 and > or = 5 grams of alcohol use per day, as compared to nondrinkers, were 1.29 (95% CI: 1.00-1.65) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.13-1.89), respectively. Age when drinking began was not related to breast cancer risk, but the greater the total years of drinking, up to 40 years (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI: 1.13-1.93), the greater the risk. However, when grams per day and duration of drinking were simultaneously included in the multivariate model, duration was not important as a risk factor. This suggests that intensity of drinking may be the important factor for breast cancer risk. After covariate adjustment, risk from alcohol intake did not differ between pre- and postmenopausal women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The relationship between oestrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer risk was examined based on data obtained from a population-based case-control study of breast cancer on Long Island, New York, USA. Cases were defined as female residents of two Long Island counties, aged 20–79, who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1986. Age- and county-matched controls were selected from driver's licence files. Among all postmenopausal women, there was no significant association between ever-use of hormones to treat menopausal symptoms and breast cancer risk. There was also no significant positive association in any subgroup defined by type of menopause (natural, hysterectomy with at least one ovary intact, bilateral oophorectomy) or age at menopause. Additionally, there was no increasing trend in risk with duration of use either overall or in any subgroup, nor was there an effect at any interval since last use. A significant elevation in risk was observed in women with 10–19 years since first exposure, which was concentrated in women with a natural menopause or hysterectomy with at least one ovary remaining, and women aged >45 at menopause. Results of logistic regression analysis revealed no important confounding by any of several established breast cancer risk factors. However, a significant interaction was observed between body mass index (BMI) and oestrogen use, with an effect of oestrogen use being seen only in the thinnest tercile. Although biologically plausible explanations for this finding exist, the effect of chance cannot be ruled out. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]