Search

Purpose: This paper focuses attention on declining rates of instrumental (vacuum or forceps) delivery. The decline often means that women must travel further to deliver in hospitals with capacity for cesarean delivery.Background: The paper illustrates recent trends in the use of vacuum extraction and forceps in low- and high-income countries. It describes some of the obstacles to the use of instrumental delivery and why the techniques, especially vacuum extraction, should be reintroduced. Over the past two decades, many countries have observed a decline in instrumental delivery rates while cesarean rates have increased. Objections to instrumental delivery are largely due to the potential harm it causes newborns. Some medical schools no longer train their professionals to perform instrumental delivery. Elsewhere, only specialists are permitted to perform the procedures.Methods and Results: As this is a policy paper rather than a research report, the methods and results sections are not applicable.Conclusions: Vacuum extraction can be taught to midlevel practitioners (midwives, nurse practitioners and general physicians), thereby increasing access to emergency obstetric care especially at the periphery. This allows women to give birth closer to home in midlevel facilities when hospitals are not easily accessible or are overcrowded. Where instrumental and cesarean delivery are both available, instrumental delivery could potentially reduce the risks associated with cesarean delivery and reduce the costs of obstetric care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To improve women's childbirth experiences in health facilities, their psychosocial and communication needs have to be met. However, what constitutes these specific needs is poorly understood, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper explores women's needs for communication and emotional support during facility-based childbirth.Methods: Qualitative research was conducted in a large referral maternity hospital and its catchment communities in Akure, Nigeria. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among women of reproductive age, midwives, doctors, and facility administrators. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize findings, and then interpreted within the context of this study and existing quality of care framework.Results: Forty-two IDIs and 10 FGDs are included in this analysis. Participants reported such needs as communication in simple words in local language by healthcare staff, having their husbands as birth companions, spiritual support, and prayers from family members and healthcare providers.Conclusion: To increase, improve, and sustain facility-based childbirth in Nigeria, health systems should appreciate the uniqueness and importance of each woman's needs during childbirth. Practical and sustainable actions should be taken to meet these needs, within the confines of the acceptable sociocultural norms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: "Negotiated standards" describe a level of quality of care that is acceptable and achievable within a specific health system, based on consensus between key stakeholders. This paper presents the development of negotiated standards for effective labor and childbirth care in selected hospitals and communities in Nigeria and Uganda.Methods: A four-step development process involving different methodologies. The process included: (1) review and synthesis of internationally recognized intrapartum clinical principles and practices; (2) primary qualitative research to assess values and preferences of women and healthcare providers, and practices that align with these preferences; (3) draft contextualization of effective and ineffective behaviors to reflect values and preferences; and (4) WHO-mediated negotiations between relevant stakeholders, including community members, providers, and administrators.Results: The primary outcomes of this process were a comprehensive set of effective behaviors and clinical practices covering the main domains of quality of care, which are practical and easy to communicate, implement, and audit across all levels of healthcare delivery.Conclusion: The process demonstrates that health facilities and providers can be motivated to adopt standards of care that uphold the values and preferences of both service users and providers, while adhering to international best practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]