Search

• Obtained local surface temperature (T w), boiling curves and liquid loss rate (m loss). • Heat transfer rate (Q w) and m loss increase markedly at onset of nucleate boiling. • Jet outlet velocity (v) affects Q w and m loss more obviously than impact height (H). • Effects of v and H on T w are more significant at non-phase transition stage. • Growing of Q w and M loss slows down at anaphase of nucleate boiling. Combining the benefits of jet impact and phase-transition heat transfer, jet impact boiling has been widely adopted in industrial scenarios. Notably, owing to limitations of high-velocity jets, such as high impact stress and pumping pressure in liquid circuits, low-velocity jet impacting deserves more attention and explorations. In this paper, under an atmospheric environment with wall heating temperatures ranging from 36 °C to 128 °C, the two-phase flow and heat transfer characteristics (local surface temperature, boiling curves and liquid loss rate) of low-velocity jet impacting on a cylindrical surface are investigated by experiment, followed by the analysis on the effects of jet outlet velocity and impact height. The findings reveal that, with the increase of heat transfer rate, the heat transfer regimes in sequence are non-phase transition (single-phase convection and air-liquid two-phase convection) and nucleate boiling. The influences of jet impact height and outlet velocity on local surface temperatures are pronounced at non-phase transition stage. In impact region, along with average superheat, the growth rates of heat transfer rate and liquid loss rate increase significantly from non-phase transition to nucleate boiling stage, and slow down at anaphase of nucleate boiling stage. Interestingly, the increase in outlet velocity delays the onset of slowdown in growth of liquid loss rate to some extent. Overall, the heat transfer rate and liquid loss rate are significantly enhanced at higher jet outlet velocity of 0.60 m/s, but not affected significantly by impact height. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A revised self-induced jet impingement device is introduced in pool boiling using R1336mzz(Z). • Liquid-vapor separation promoted by the revised device is confirmed from the visualization results. • The revised device does nearly no effort on the nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient until a relatively high heat flux. • Parametric investigations on the characteristics of the revised device are conducted. • The revised device gains up to 69.5 % and 36.7 % in the critical heat flux and the maximum nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient, respectively. Pool boiling performance enhancement has attracted considerable interest on high power electronic cooling. In this paper, we introduce a self-induced jet impingement device for practical boiling enhancement, achieved by integrating the guidance tube with an orifice plate. With R1336mzz(Z) as the working fluid, we conduct visualization and parametric investigations on the pool boiling performance, considering the varying characteristics of this device. Visualization snapshots confirm the liquid-vapor separation and indicate that the two-phase flow pattern in the guidance tube eventually stabilizes as a churn-annular flow. Our findings suggest that self-induced liquid jet impingement has a minimal effect on the nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient (h NB) under a certain heat flux, around 75 % CHF of the standard pool boiling, as the single-phase heat transfer is weakened due to the low thermal conductivity of R1336mzz(Z). As the heat flux intensifies, we observe substantial enhancements in both the Critical Heat Flux (CHF) and the Maximum Nucleate Boiling Heat transfer coefficient (h MNB) resulted from the delayed onset of boiling crisis, owing to the additional liquid supply and the promotion on vapor exhausting. The parametric studies reveal that the flow rate of the liquid jet, amplified by either extending the length or the inner diameter of the guidance tube, or by increasing the number of jet holes, positively impacts the boiling performance. However, these improvements show diminishing returns. Our study shows enhancements in CHF and h MNB of up to 69.5 % and 36.7 %, respectively, compared to the standard pool boiling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]