1. Experimental investigation on heat transfer performances in half-cylindrical shell space of different heat exchangers.
- Author
-
Su, Jindong, Chen, Yaping, Wu, Jiafeng, Fei, Fengfan, Yang, Shifan, and Gu, Huaduo
- Subjects
- *
HEAT exchangers , *HEAT transfer , *HEAT transfer coefficient , *SUPERHEATED steam , *PRESSURE drop (Fluid dynamics) - Abstract
• The power plant feedwater heaters and the countercurrent U-tube heat exchangers all involve half-cylindrical shell space. • Half-cylindrical space heat exchangers with ladder helical, orifice and segmental baffles were experimentally investigated. • The ladder helical baffle scheme has superior heat transfer coefficient and comprehensive index than those of the other ones. • The orifice baffle scheme has higher comprehensive index but lower heat transfer coefficient than those of segmental ones. • The average values of h o Δ p o −1/3 of ladder helical and orifice baffle schemes are about 15% higher than that of segmental one. The superheated steam cooling section and the condensate cooling section of the power plant feedwater heaters and the countercurrent U-tube heat exchangers all involve heat transfer in half-cylindrical shell space. The overall and shell-side heat transfer coefficients (h.t.cs.), pressure drop, and the comprehensive performances of some half-cylindrical space heat exchangers with different baffle structures were experimentally investigated. The investigated structures include three ladder helical baffle types [single inclined ladder helical (SH), dual inclined ladder helical (DH) and folded ladder helical (FH)], three orifice baffle types [fillet triangle orifice (F), trefoil-orifice (T) and quatrefoil-orifice (Q)], and segmental baffles (S), and all schemes are of two baffle pitches. Under the same baffle pitch and working condition, the experimental results show that the shell-side h.t.cs. of the ladder helical baffle schemes are higher than those of the orifice baffle schemes and segmental baffle ones; and the shell-side pressure drops of the orifice baffle schemes are much lower than those of the ladder helical baffle schemes and the segmental ones. The values of average comprehensive index h o Δ p o −1/3 of the ladder helical schemes FH-40, DH-40 and the orifice baffle schemes F-40 and T-40 are respectively 14.26%, 17.58%, 15.62% and 12.82% higher than that of the segmental scheme S-40. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF