Search

The first part of the current study highlights the importance of developing a clean hydrogen supply chain (CHSC) in Iran to enhance energy security and contribute to global efforts towards sustainable energy transition. Depending on whether the focus is on domestic consumption or export of hydrogen, the study provides valuable insights into the prioritization of CHSC development pathways via multi-criteria decision-making tools (AHP, AHOP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR). The results show that for domestic hydrogen consumption (internal scenario), the best path of the supply chain includes blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming coupled with carbon capture and storage, H 2 -carriers (ammonia and methanol), natural gas grid for transportation and distribution, and industry sector as the end user. In the external scenario, however, the best path of the CHSC consists of green hydrogen production based on solar energy, and the other parts of the path include liquid hydrogen as the storage method, ship as the distribution and transportation, and industrial sector as the end user. By identifying the most suitable methods and technologies for each stage of the supply chain, this paper offers a comprehensive analysis that can guide decision-making in CHSC development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In continuation of the previous part, this paper comprehensively focuses on energy, exergy, exergo-economic, and environmental (4E) analyses of two prioritized clean hydrogen (H 2) supply chains pathways. The first scenario relies on domestic demand , involves blue H 2 production and storage using steam methane reforming coupled with carbon capture and storage through H 2 conversion to hydrogen carriers in liquid form (ammonia and methanol) aligned with the existing infrastructure. The second scenario involves green H 2 production from photovoltaic panels as the power source follows by storing H 2 in liquid form which is more suitable to export. The findings indicate that the blue H 2 system outperforms the green H 2 system in terms of energy and exergy, boasting 41.38% and 22.15% compared to 12.16% and 12.75%, respectively. However, when examining economic parameters, the blue H 2 system shows a total cost rate of 1976 US$/h, a net profit of $747.2 million (mn) at the end of its lifetime, and a payback period of approximately nine years. Conversely, the green H 2 system demonstrates economic indicators of a 125.2 $/h as a total cost rate, $1.26 billion (bn) net profit, and an 8.17 year payback period. Moreover, the production cost rates for blue and green H 2 are 1.32 $/kg and 2.55 $/kg, respectively; while the CO 2 emissions rate in the blue H 2 system is 10.71 kg/s. The green H 2 system prevents 19.84 kg/s of CO 2 emissions resulted a significant environmental cost reduction of 2.28 $/kg H 2. This analysis facilitates a thorough comparison of these two clean H 2 production and storage systems, offering insights for policymakers across performance, economic, and environmental dimensions. • A comprehensive 4E analysis was applied for the selected H 2 value chain scenarios. • Blue H 2 scenario is superior economically while environmentally the green one takes precedence. • Carbon credit makes the green H 2 scenario emerges frontrunner utilizing PV solar technology. • Methanol was recognized as the most cost-effective H 2 carrier for storage in Iran. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]