Search

Background: With standard treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), prognosis is very poor. The aim of this study is to show early and late results in patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective single centre study. All patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or modified early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) were included in the study. Results: In the period 1995-2014, 116 patients were treated, 55 with primary EOC and 61 with recurrent EOC. The mean age was 59 years (26-74). Statistically, median survival time was significantly longer in the group with primary advanced cancer of the ovary (41.3 months) compared to relapsed ovarian cancer (27.3 months). Survival for the primary EOC was 65 and 24% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Survival for recurrent EOC was 33 and 16% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Mortality was 1/116 (0.8%). Morbidity was 11/116 (9.5%). Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was ≤20 in 59 (51%) patients and statistically, their average survival was significantly longer than in the group of 57 (49%) patients with PCI >20 (p = 0.014). Conclusions: In advanced or recurrent EOC, a curative therapeutic approach was pursued that combined optimal cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. PCI and timing of the intervention (primary or recurrent) were the strongest independent prognostic factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:During the Fifth International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy in Milan in 2008, a consensus was reached that contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) was the principal imaging modality for patients being evaluated for treatment of peritoneal metastases. This fact being accepted, the radiologic criteria for that may exclude patients from a high value cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) have not been reliably determined. Methods:From a consensus of surgeons and radiologists, radiologic images were selected and their determinant radiologic characteristics described. The anatomic pathology causing the abnormal images were identified and characterised. The cytoreductive surgical procedures that may, in selected patients, result in a complete resection of the pathology identified were presented. Results:Radiographs of 15 CT images that cause concern when a patient is being evaluated for CRS were listed. The anatomic pathology these images define and possible surgical resections they require were reviewed. The surgical implications of the absence or presence of a single, or of multiple concerning CT features was extracted from the surgical and radiologic literature. Conclusions:There is a definite need to identify new pre-operative imaging parameters to define optimal indication of CRS with HIPEC. The presence of a single concerning radiologic feature is associated with the possibility of an adverse outcome or technically more complex resections associated with increased morbidity and mortality. If two or more of the concerning radiologic features are described from the CT, suboptimal cytoreduction will usually occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim:The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients operated on for peritoneal metastases from unusual cancer sites of origin, meaning apart from peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal, gastric and epithelial ovarian carcinomas, pseudomyxoma peritonei and mesothelioma. Patients and methods:A questionnaire concerning patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for PM arising from unusual cancer sites of origin was sent to all centres, which routinely performed HIPEC, through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International and the RENAPE network. Results:Between September 1990 and June 2016, 850 procedures for unusual cases were performed in 781 patients, in 53 centres worldwide. Nearly two-thirds of the procedures were performed for three indications: rare ovarian carcinoma (n = 224), sarcoma (n = 189) and neuroendocrine tumours (n = 127). The median PCI was 12 [0–39]. Grade III–IV postoperative complications occurred in 272 patients (41%). Nineteen patients (2.9%) died postoperatively. After a median follow-up of 46 months, median overall survival (OS) was 39 months [33.18–44.05]. Five-year OS rate was 38.7%. For the three main indications, 5-year OS was significantly greater in patients with PM from rare ovarian carcinoma (57.7%), than that of patients with PM from neuroendocrine tumours (39.9%), and from sarcoma (29.3%) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions:CRS and HIPEC appear to be safe and effective in patients with peritoneal metastases from unusual cancer sites of origin, especially from rare ovarian carcinomas, PM from neuroendocrine tumours. The respective roles of CRS and HIPEC remain unclear and should be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose:There is no standard treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical trials on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC PM. Materials and methods:The published clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for GC PM are critically evaluated, and survival and safety are the primary endpoints. In addition, the registered ongoing clinical trials are summarised. Results:The natural course of GC PM is <5 months. CRS + HIPEC could improve the overall survival (OS). In prospective studies, the median OS was 11.0 months in the CRS + HIPEC groupvs.5.4 months in the CRS alone group. In case-control studies, the median OS was 13.3 months in the CRS + HIPEC groupvs.7.9 months in the CRS alone group. In cohort studies, the median OS after CRS + HIPEC was 13.3. The median 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates after CRS + HIPEC were 50.0%, 35.8% and 13.0%, respectively. There is no statistically significant increase in serious adverse events that are directly attributed to CRS + HIPEC. Conclusions:The combination of CRS and HIPEC is a promising integrated treatment strategy for GC PM that has encouraging initial results, calling for urgent further evaluation of this strategy in randomised control trials (RCTs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]