Search

Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of voriconazole treatment in patients with Child–Pugh class B and C cirrhosis. Methods Liver cirrhosis patients who had received the recommended voriconazole maintenance dose (group A) or halved maintenance dose (group B), orally or intravenously, were included. Voriconazole-related adverse events (AEs) were defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results A total of 110 trough plasma concentrations of voriconazole ( C min ) were measured in 78 patients. There was a significant difference in voriconazole C min between group A and group B ( C min , 6.95 ± 3.42 mg/l vs. 4.02 ± 2.00 mg/l; p < 0.001). No significant difference in voriconazole C min between Child–Pugh class B and C cirrhosis patients was observed in either of the two groups. The international normalized ratio and co-medication with a CYP2C19 inhibitor had a significant effect on voriconazole C min in group B. The incidence of AEs in group A was 26.5% and in group B was 15.9%, and 87.5% of AEs developed within 7 days after starting voriconazole treatment. Conclusions These results suggest that the recommended dose and halved maintenance dose may be inappropriate in patients with Child–Pugh class B and C cirrhosis due to the high C min , and that voriconazole C min should be monitored earlier to avoid AEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objectives: This study evaluated the efficacy of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index for increasing the success rate of linezolid treatment based on Monte Carlo simulation, and compared differences between the calculated PK/PD breakpoints and those defined by committee for critically ill patients with linezolid treatment. Methods: A Monte Carlo simulation involving 10000 subjects was used to analyze the pharmacokinetic parameters and microbiological data of linezolid for an effectiveness evaluation at the corresponding AUC24/MIC values (area under the serum concentration–time curve over 24h/minimum inhibitory concentration). Results: As the PK/PD index of linezolid increased from 80 to 120, the corresponding probability of target attainment (PTA) decreased from 99.91% to 18.97%, with a MIC of 2mg/l. Furthermore, the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) reached <90% for several pathogens at an AUC24/MIC of 100–120, revealing a relatively lower efficacy with recommended linezolid dosing. Conclusions: These findings reveal that the target AUC24/MIC value of 80–120 requires further classification for more accurate assessment of the linezolid dose regimen. At a MIC of ≥2mg/l, the clinical outcome varies greatly for different AUC24/MIC values when applying the same dose of linezolid. In such cases, we suggest optimized adjustment of the linezolid dosage regimen. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Background: The number of reported cases of resistance to tigecycline is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current standard tigecycline dosage regimen from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) perspective. Methods: Pharmacokinetic parameters and microbiological data were analyzed by Monte Carlo simulation in an evaluation of effectiveness. Results: Tigecycline exhibits excellent in vitro antimicrobial activity, however the standard tigecycline dosing regimen fails to achieve the best outcome in vivo for the common drug-resistant strains, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This may result in a lack of response to tigecycline therapy or to a further increase in the resistance rate. Conclusions: In the absence of new drugs on the horizon, rather than using a single fixed dosing regimen, tigecycline dosing needs to be optimized in order to achieve the desired successful clinical response and to prevent an escalation in drug resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]