Search

Introduction: Despite extensive research, comprehensive characterization of leukaemic stem cells (LSC) and information on their immunophenotypic differences from normal haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is lacking. Herein, we attempted to unravel the immunophenotypic (IPT) characteristics and heterogeneity of LSC using multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and single-cell sequencing., Materials and Methods: Bone marrow aspirate samples from patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were evaluated using MFC at diagnostic and post induction time points using a single tube-10-colour-panel containing LSC-associated antibodies CD123, CD45RA, CD44, CD33 and COMPOSITE (CLL-1, TIM-3, CD25, CD11b, CD22, CD7, CD56) with backbone markers that is, CD45, CD34, CD38, CD117, sCD3. Single-cell sequencing of the whole transcriptome was also done in a bone marrow sample., Results: LSCs and HSCs were identified in 225/255 (88.2%) and 183/255 (71.6%) samples, respectively. Significantly higher expression was noted for COMPOSITE, CD45RA, CD123, CD33, and CD44 in LSCs than HSCs (p < 0.0001). On comparing the LSC specific antigen expressions between CD34+ (n = 184) and CD34- LSCs (n = 41), no difference was observed between the groups. More than one sub-population of LSC was demonstrated in 4.4% of cases, which further revealed high concordance between MFC and single cell transcriptomic analysis in one of the cases displaying three LSC subpopulations by both methods., Conclusion: A single tube-10-colour MFC panel is proposed as an easy and reproducible tool to identify and discriminate LSCs from HSCs. LSCs display both inter- and intra-sample heterogeneity in terms of antigen expressions, which opens the facets for single cell molecular analysis to elucidate the role of subpopulations of LSCs in AML progression., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Current molecular research has shown the several oncogenic pathways that give rise to the peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise defined (PTCL, NOS) subtypes, which alter prognosis and might have predictive value. This study was conducted to assess the immunohistochemistry (IHC) algorithm by Amador et al for the subtyping of PTCL, NOS and determine its applicability in relation to the clinicopathological profile., Methods: This study included 43 patients with PTCL, NOS diagnosis. Following the use of IHC for the transcription factors GATA3, TBX21, CCR4, and CXCR3, two pathologists subtyped the samples. Comprehensive clinicopathological correlation was carried out., Results: Applying the algorithm of Amador et al., cases were classified into GATA3 (20), TBX21 (15), and unclassified (8) subtypes. No significant association with clinical parameters of subtypes or CD4/ CD8 positivity was observed. Although a higher proportion of cases in the TBX21 subgroup showed a polymorphic population compared with the GATA3 subgroup, which had a monomorphic population, no significant p-value (0.111) was observed. Two Lennert lymphomas were classified into the GATA3 subgroup. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in overall survival (p-value = 0.105) and progression-free survival (p-value = 0.0509) between IHC-defined subtypes; trends indicate that overall survival and progression-free survival are worse in the GATA3 subgroup., Conclusion: Although the algorithm is reproducible, a proportion of cases remains unclassifiable and may require additional investigation and gene expression profiling. The GATA3 subgroup was found to have a monomorphic population with a poor overall prognosis and thus requires a larger sample size for validation., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RAM immunophenotype is a distinct subtype of AML, as described by the Children's Oncology Group (COG), with characteristic morphological and immunophenotypic properties. It is characterized by strong CD56 expression with dim to negative CD45, HLA-DR, and CD38 expression. It is an aggressive leukemia with a poor response to induction chemotherapy and/or frequent relapses., Methods: Seven cases with the characteristic RAM immunophenotype were identified in this retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed pediatric AML cases from January 2019 to December 2021. Herein, we have critically analyzed their clinical, morphological, cytochemical, immunophenotyping, cytogenetic, and molecular profiles. The patients were traced and followed for their current disease and treatment status., Results: Of 302 cases of pediatric AML (age <18 years), seven cases (2.3%) with the distinct RAM phenotype were observed, with age ranging from 9 months to 5 years. Two patients were misdiagnosed earlier as small round cell tumor because of the strong CD56 positivity and the absence of leukocyte common antigen (LCA), but they were later correctly identified as granulocytic sarcoma. The bone marrow aspirate showed blasts with unusual cohesiveness and clumping with nuclear moulding, mimicking non-hematologic malignancies. Flow cytometry revealed blasts with low side scatter, dim to negative CD45 and CD38, negative cMPO, CD36, and CD11b; moderate to bright CD33, CD117, and bright CD56. The Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD13 expression was significantly lower as compared to the internal controls. Cytogenetic and molecular studies did not show any recurrent abnormalities. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for CBFA2T3-GLIS2 fusion was performed in 5/7 cases, with one positive result. On clinical follow-up, two patients were refractory to chemotherapy. Six of the seven cases had succumbed to death (duration of survival: 3-343 days after initial diagnosis)., Conclusion: AML with RAM immunophenotype, a distinct form of pediatric AML with a poor prognosis, may pose a diagnostic challenge if presented as a soft tissue mass. A comprehensive immunophenotypic evaluation, including stem cell and myeloid markers, is critical for an accurate diagnosis of myeloid sarcoma with the RAM-immunophenotype. Our data demonstrated weak CD13 expression as an additional immunophenotypic finding., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: CD34 and HLA-DR negativity is often used as a characteristic immunophenotypic feature of acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) that differentiates APL from other subtypes of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, other subtypes of AML, without expression of CD34 and HLA-DR antigens, have also been reported., Methods: We analysed the HLA-DR negative de novo non-APL AML cases by dividing HLA-DR negative non-APL group into 2 sub-groups based on CD34 expression and compared the characteristics of CD34 negative HLA-DR negative with CD34 positive HLA-DR negative non-APL AML cases with respect to morphologic, immunophenotypic, molecular and clinical parameters., Results: There were 70 cases (8.54%) which were CD34 negative HLA-DR negative and 52 cases (6.34%) were CD34 positive HLA-DR negative. The median age at diagnosis was higher in CD34 negative HLA-DR negative AML than in CD34 positive HLA-DR negative AML group (38 years vs. 12 years, p < 0.001). DIC rate was higher in CD34 negative HLA-DR negative group than the other group (p < 0.001). Median total leucocyte count was higher with higher blast count in peripheral blood and bone marrow in CD34 negative HLA-DR negative AML cases than the other group (p < 0.05). CD34 negative HLA-DR negative AML was more associated with normal karyotype (96.2% vs. 38.5%; p < 0.001), NPM1 mutation (67.8% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.001) and FLT-ITD mutation (37.3% vs. 13.9%; p < 0.05). In CD34 negative HLA-DR negative group, 16 cases had co-occurrence of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations, whereas no case of CD34 positive HLA-DR negative group had such dual mutation positivity. There was poor median overall survival [3.8 months (95%CI: 2.3-7.8 months) vs. 20.4 months (95% CI: 12.8-25.7 months); p = 0.0148] in CD34 positive HLA-DR negative AML than CD34 negative HLA-DR negative AML cases., Conclusion: We found that the CD34 negative HLADR negative non APL AML is highly associated with NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutation, older age at diagnosis, DIC, higher total leucocyte count, higher blast counts and normal karyotype in comparison to CD34 positive HLA-DR negative AML group. Co-occurrence of NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutation was also exclusively seen in CD34 negative HLA-DR negative group. There was poor overall survival in CD34 positive HLA-DR negative AML than CD34 negative HLA-DR negative AML cases., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Dysregulation of apoptosis has been explored in acute myeloid leukemia (AML); yet, its correlation with clinical outcomes in pediatric AML is unknown. This study was aimed to analyze percentage of apoptosis and apoptosis mediated through the intrinsic pathway with clinical outcomes in patients with pediatric AML., Methods: This prospective study included pediatric AML patients enrolled from July 2013 to August 2016. Annexin-V (marker of total apoptosis) and caspase-9 expression (marker of intrinsic pathway) was determined in baseline bone marrow (BM) samples by flow cytometery and compared with controls (unaffected BM of solid tumors and peripheral blood [PB] of unaffected siblings). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were compared using log-rank test., Results: A total of 151 AML patients were enrolled, median age 10 (range: 0.7-18 years). Annexin-V expression in blast cells was significantly high in AML patients as compared to BM of subjects with solid tumors (P = 0.01) and PB of healthy subjects (P = 0.04). Caspase-9 expression in blast cells was not significantly different. Median annexin-V expression was significantly higher in patients with WBC count ≥11 000/mm 3 (P = 0.02), poor-risk cytogenetics (P = 0.02), the absence of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 translocation (P = 0.004), and the absence of NPM1 mutation (P = 0.05). Patients with high annexin-V expression had significantly inferior OS (P = 0.05) in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis (P = 0.32)., Conclusion: Apoptosis as a whole was found to be activated in baseline BM samples of AML patients. High apoptosis may be associated with high-risk phenotype in this disease., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)