Search

The purpose of this study was to explore the views of mental health professionals on deinstitutionalization reforms in Russia. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 specialists from outpatient mental health clinics. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results revealed that the professionals appeared very restrained in supporting the reforms. They argued for the preservation of the existing mental health care system rather than its transformation. Their lines of argumentation were organized around four key themes as follows: 1) critiques of state policies and a suspicion of reforms, 2) tradition instead of innovation: reclaiming the image of Soviet psychiatry, 3) hospitals as a means of social control, and 4) reform as a threat to the protection of people with mental health problems. The findings suggest that practitioner resistance to deinstitutionalization is a complex phenomenon, demonstrating how various political, economic, social, and cultural factors are intertwined ...

This article analyzes developments in the mental health policy of post-Soviet Russia. It is based on a qualitative analysis of health policy documents of the Russian Federation published between 1992 and 2006. The developments are considered in the context of their social and historical background with due reference to the current World Health Organization (WHO) guiding principles on mental health policy. We analyze how the post-Soviet documents discuss aspects of mental health policy such as patients' rights, the integrative model of mental health and illness, the reorganization of mental health services toward deinstitutionalization and community-based care, the social inclusion and participation of mentally ill people, and measures to prevent their stigmatization. The results indicate that the post-Soviet documents increasingly articulate an intention to follow the international state-of-the-art in terms of civil and patients' rights, as well as an attempt to overcome conventional approaches related to...