1. Comparison between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants: In Vivo Study
- Author
-
F. Javier Gil, Loreto Monsalve-Guil, Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra, Roman A. Perez, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Fernando Muñoz-Guzón, Ivan Ortiz-Garcia, Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de Estomatología, Universidad de Sevilla. CTS618: Investigación Básica y Clínica en Implantología Oral, and Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Anatomía, Produción Animal e Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias
- Subjects
Titanium implant ,Implant surface ,02 engineering and technology ,Bone Response ,lcsh:Chemistry ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oxidized surface ,Implants, Experimental ,osseointegración ,acid-etched surface ,Femur ,lcsh:QH301-705.5 ,Spectroscopy ,Titanium ,superficie de implante ,implant surface ,Acid-etched surface ,Communication ,Dental Implantation, Endosseous ,General Medicine ,titanio ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Computer Science Applications ,Female ,Rabbits ,0210 nano-technology ,Materials science ,Surface Properties ,sandblasted surface ,chemistry.chemical_element ,616.3 ,Catalysis ,Osseointegration ,Inorganic Chemistry ,03 medical and health sciences ,superfície d’implant ,In vivo ,White light ,Animals ,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry ,Molecular Biology ,Dental Implants ,titani ,Organic Chemistry ,osseointegration ,030206 dentistry ,osseointegració ,chemistry ,Sandblasted surface ,lcsh:Biology (General) ,lcsh:QD1-999 ,oxidized surface ,Implant ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
The surface modifications of titanium dental implants play important roles in the enhancement of osseointegration. The objective of the present study was to test two different implant surface treatments on a rabbit model to investigate the osseointegration. The tested surfaces were: a) acid-etched surface with sandblasting treatment (SA) and b) an oxidized implant surface (OS). The roughness was measured by an interferometeric microscope with white light and the residual stress of the surfaces was measured with X-ray residual stress Bragg–Bentano diffraction. Six New Zealand white rabbits were used for the in vivo study. Implants with the two different surfaces (SA and OS) were inserted in the femoral bone. After 12 weeks of implantation, histological and histomorphometric analyses of the blocks containing the implants and the surrounding bone were performed. All the implants were correctly implanted and no signs of infection were observed. SA and OS surfaces were both surrounded by newly formed trabeculae. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the bone–implant contact % (BIC) was higher around the SA implants (53.49 ± 8.46) than around the OS implants (50.94 ± 16.42), although there were no significant statistical differences among them. Both implant surfaces (SA and OS) demonstrated a good bone response with significant amounts of newly formed bone along the implant surface after 12 weeks of implantation. These results confirmed the importance of the topography and physico–chemical properties of dental implants in the osseointegration. The authors are grateful to the Spanish Government and European Union FEDER by the concession of the project RTI2018-098075-B-C22 SI
- Published
- 2019