Search

Identification and quantification of excipient related degradation products in the liposomal formulation is important, as they may impact the safety and efficacy of the drug. Phospholipids are one of the major excipients in liposome drugs composing the lipid bilayer, and they are vulnerable to oxidation and hydrolysis reactions. Since phospholipids with saturated fatty acid chain were preferred in most of liposome drug products, the major degradation pathway of phospholipids in liposome formulations are limited to hydrolysis of phospholipids into free fatty acids and lysophospholipids. These hydrolyzed degradation products may form during manufacturing and/or long-term storage of liposomal formulations. Herein, we report development and application of accurate and sensitive methods that can be utilized for the quantitation of saturated free fatty acids (FFA 18:0 and FFA 16:0), lysophosphocholines (LPC 18:0 and LPC 16:0), and lysophosphoglycerol (LPG 18:0) in liposomal formulations. The free fatty acids were separated using a C8 column whereas the LPCs and LPGs were separated using a C18 stationary phase upon direct injection without the need of lipid extraction process. Each analyte was quantified by Q-TOF mass spectrometry. This method was validated according to USP compendial procedures and has been applied to the analysis of four commercial liposomal pharmaceutical formulations. The limit of quantitation (LOQs) of FFA 16:0, FFA 18:0, LPC 16:0, LPC 18:0 and LPG 18:0 are 5 ng/mL, 5 ng/mL, 6.5 ng/mL, 7.0 ng/mL, 10 ng/mL respectively. Compared to CAD (Charge Aerosol Detector) and ELSD (Evaporative Light Scattering Detector) detection methods in ppm levels, this ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-Mass Spectroscopy (MS) method displays precise determination of lysophospholipids in the liposomal formulations with higher accuracy and sensitivity.

Cholesterol is one of the major structural constituents in a liposomal bilayer. Cholesterol is susceptible to various reactions in the presence of oxygen, heat, light, certain metals, and radicals during manufacturing or storage, which may cause to generate cholesterol oxidation products (COPs). Herein, we report the development of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based analytical method for screening and quantitating COPs present in liposomal parenteral pharmaceutical formulations (LPFs) from four different vendors. We detected and quantitated six COPs and desmosterol in LPFs, and desmosterol is an intermediate of cholesterol biosynthesis. 7α-hydroxycholesterol, 7β-hydroxycholesterol, 7-keto-cholesterol, and desmosterol were the major cholesterol-related impurities in LPFs. COPs were not detected in any of USP/NF grade cholesterol raw materials, implying that COPs were generated during liposome manufacturing and/or storage. This validated method presented here can be used to quantify cholesterol-related impurities present in liposomal pharmaceutical formulations to ensure the quality and the safety of liposomal pharmaceutical formulations.

The introduction of prescription opioids with abuse-deterrent (AD) properties to the marketplace has created a need for new testing methodologies to evaluate the performance of potentially abuse-deterrent opioid products. Drug abusers may attempt to chew solid oral extended-release (ER) opioids prior to ingestion to bypass the ER mechanism of the formulation to achieve euphoria. In the present study, a chewing apparatus was utilized to develop an in vitro chewing method for Hysingla ER tablets, a prescription opioid with labeling describing abuse deterrence via the oral route when chewed. Simulated chewing of Hysingla resulted in initially faster drug release during chewing while subsequent dissolution testing demonstrated that the masticated tablets still maintained ER properties. The degree of mastication and corresponding drug release were influenced by the compression gap and the resulting chewing forces. Simulated chewing followed by dissolution testing with different strengths of Hysingla indicated similar AD performance across strengths. By contrast, an opioid product with labeling that does not describe abuse-deterrent properties showed lower resistance to chewing resulting in higher drug release. The results of the present study suggest that the chewing methodology evaluated in this work may provide a useful in vitro tool for the comparative evaluation of AD properties.

To understand the quality, efficacy, and safety of liposomal drugs, it is necessary to develop a robust and accurate method for the separation and the quantification of unencapsulated and liposome-associated drugs (or liposomal encapsulated drugs). Conventional methods involve separation of unencapsulated and liposome-associated drug using solid phase extraction and further drug quantification. This is a lengthy process, and sometimes solid phase extraction induces drug leakage from the liposomes causing erroneous results. In this study, a capillary electrophoresis (CE) with UV–Vis detection method was developed for the simultaneous separation and quantification of unencapsulated drug from liposome-associated drug using a doxorubicin-containing liposome formulation as the model drug. CE separates the unencapsulated drug and liposomal drugs based on their electrophoretic mobility under the electric field. Liposomal drugs were diluted to the appropriate concentrations with running buffer or 5% dextrose before hydrodynamic sample injection. Using a high-sensitivity detection cell, the doxorubicin detection sensitivity was enhanced about 10-fold compared to the conventional on-column UV–Vis detection with a 75 µm i.d. capillary column. The optimal separation of unencapsulated doxorubicin from liposome-associated doxorubicin with minimal perturbation of liposomes was accomplished using phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 6.5) in the presence of 10% sucrose.

Conventional quantitation of drug content in the liposome formulation involves the breakdown of bulk liposomes, which ignores details on the distribution of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and excipients in liposomes of different sizes. The objective of this study is to develop an analytical method which can separate the liposomes into different sizes and obtain information of the drug and excipient distribution in the different sized liposomes. We developed an asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) method for size-based separation of AmBisome, an amphotericin B liposomal formulation, and a high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet-visible and charged aerosol detection (HPLC-UV-CAD) method for simultaneous quantitation of the API (Amphotericin B) and the lipid excipients [1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol (DSPG), hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine (HSPC), and cholesterol]. The measured drug content in the bulk liposome formulation was consistent with the drug product labeling. Liposomes were separated using AF4 into eleven size fractions and the liposomes particles sizes of each fraction were measured with nanoparticle tracking analysis. The drug to total lipid ratios in fractionated liposomes increased from 0.1 to 0.45 when the liposome size increased from 75 nm to 124 nm, while the lipid composition remained constant throughout the fractioned size range (cholesterol:DSPG, 0.7 and HSPC:DSPG, 0.3). These study results suggest that, for liposomal formulations of Amphotericin B in liposomes, the drug to lipid ratio increases with the size of the liposomes. This new analytical method provided a more in-depth characterization of liposomes, i.e., determining drug and excipient distributions in different sizes of liposomes, in a more efficient manner with more specific size-based composition information.

Advances in predicting in vivo performance of drug products has the potential to change how drug products are developed and reviewed. Modeling and simulation methods are now more commonly used in drug product development and regulatory drug review. These applications include, but are not limited to: the development of biorelevant specifications, the determination of bioequivalence metrics for modified release products with rapid therapeutic onset, the design of in vitro–in vivo correlations in a mechanistic framework, and prediction of food effect. As new regulatory concepts such as quality by design require better application of biopharmaceutical modeling in drug product development, regulatory challenges in bioequivalence demonstration of complex drug products also present exciting opportunities for creative modeling and simulation approaches. A collaborative effort among academia, government and industry in modeling and simulation will result in improved safe and effective new/generic drugs to the American public.