Search

Purpose: The aim of this long-term cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of fixed partial dentures in a convenience sample of 100 patients with periodontal disease who were treated and maintained periodontal patients after 20 years., Materials and Methods: After active treatment, including periodontal surgery and endodontic and prosthetic treatment, patients were enrolled in a supportive periodontal care (SPC) program with 3- to 6-month recalls. All patients showed clinical data recorded at (1) the original consultation (T0), (2) the first SPC visit following the completion of prosthetic treatment (T1), and (3) at the latest SPC clinical session 20 years after T1 (T2). Multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the influence of clinical variables on the risk of prosthetic abutment (PA) loss after 20 years' visits., Results: The final sample comprised 100 patients. At T1, a total of 948 PAs represented the original sample of experimental teeth. At the 20-year follow-up, a total of 854 PAs (90.1%) were still in function, while 94 (9.9%) PAs in 41 patients (41%) were lost during SPC; 98% of lost PA were endodontically treated. Vertical root fracture (48%) was the major cause of PA loss, while progression of periodontitis caused 31% of PA loss. Age (P = .002), Full-Mouth Plaque Score (P < .0001), Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (P = .0002), and oral parafunctions (P = .0083) were associated with increased probability of PA failure. Among clinical-related factors, endodontic treatment (P = .0082), root resection/ amputation (P < .0001), multi-rooted teeth (P = .0005), and abutment associated with parafunction (P < .0001) were associated with increased risk of abutment loss after 20 years., Conclusions: Perioprosthetic treatment in compliant patients is highly successful after 20 years of SPC.

Purpose: This study had a twofold aim: first, to gather knowledge about the prevalence of radiologic signs of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and possible risk factors in patients who had worn an implant prosthesis for between 2.5 and 10 years; and second, to investigate the diagnostic value of radiologic TMJ-OA signs for orofacial pain in a non-temporomandibular disorders group., Materials and Methods: Two hundred thirty patients (134 women, 96 men) answered a questionnaire regarding orofacial pain. In mean, they were 64 years old and wore 98 fixed and 132 removable implant dentures. The effect of age, gender, state of the dentition, time span after prosthesis placement, parafunction, and TMJ sounds on radiologic TMJ-OA signs was estimated through multiple logistic regression. The predictive values were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of severe TMJ-OA signs to predict orofacial pain., Results: Prevalence of TMJ-OA signs was 70% for flattening, 23% for osteophytes, and 24% for erosion. Some effect on radiologic TMJ-OA signs of gender and state of the dentition was found. The predictive values for orofacial pain from radiologic TMJ-OA ranged from 0.22 to 0.81., Conclusion: Radiologic signs of TMJ-OA were common findings. The study gave no indication that long-term wearing of an implant prosthesis has a negative effect on TMJ-OA. It was not possible to predict orofacial pain from radiologic TMJ-OA signs.

This pilot study describes responses of Sprague Dawley rats to mandibular retrusion. Lingually overcontoured crowns were cemented onto maxillary incisors to produce 3.5 mm of autoretrusion. Monitoring data indicate that activity was suppressed and nutritional intake was reduced. Histological evaluation of the 2-, 4-, 7-, and 59-day test specimens detected only a monocytic infiltrate response in the 4-day group.

The phenomenon of occlusal wear has been generally reported, with no distinction being made between wear of the anterior or posterior teeth. This paper describes a group of patients without oral habits and exhibiting anterior tooth attrition or flaring with minimal posterior tooth attrition. The mandibular anterior movement patterns of the patients studied were evaluated using a Sirognathograph. These patterns appear to be the etiology for the anterior attrition or flaring present. A treatment mode allowing coexistence of this phenomenon with an anterior guidance that does not interfere with the mastication pattern is proposed. A hypothesis that might explain the clinical findings and a mode of treatment are described.