Search

The dimensions of 120 maxillary first premolar all-ceramic tooth preparation designs were measured and analyzed to determine relationships between design features and recorded differences in the strengths of restorations fabricated for each preparation design. To assess clinical feasibility, the remaining dentin thickness of each preparation design was measured. A total occlusal convergence angle of 10 degrees provided the best combination of restoration strength and remaining dentin thickness. Five degrees produced the weakest restorations, and 15 degrees and 20 degrees required greater tooth reduction and pulp proximity. Stronger restorations were noted when the shoulder finish line had a sharp axiogingival line angle, possessed minimal cervical inclination, and was located as close as possible to the same occlusocervical level on all four axial surfaces.

Six maxillary first premolar tooth preparation designs for all-ceramic restorations were tested for their effect on the strength of Dicor crowns. Ten crowns were fabricated for each preparation design, and the breaking strengths were measured. Three finish line designs (1.2-mm shoulder with sharp axiogingival line angle, 1.2-mm chamfer, and 0.8-mm chamfer) and two total occlusal convergence angles (5 degrees and 15 degrees) were tested. All preparations possessed 2.0 mm of occlusal reduction. The average breaking strengths of the 10 Dicor crowns were compared to those of 10 metal ceramic control restorations. The three groups of restorations fabricated for preparations with 5 degrees of occlusal convergence were significantly weaker than those made for preparations with 15 degrees of convergence. The metal ceramic restorations were significantly stronger (247.45 kg) than the strongest Dicor crowns (56.2 kg).

Six maxillary first premolar all-ceramic tooth preparation designs were tested for their effect on the strength of Dicor crowns. Ten crowns were fabricated for each preparation design, and their breaking strengths were measured. Three finish line designs (1.2-mm shoulder with sharp axiogingival line angle, 1.2-mm shoulder with rounded axiogingival line angle, and 0.8-mm chamfer) and two total occlusal convergence angles (10 degrees and 20 degrees) were tested. All preparations possessed 2.0 mm of occlusal reduction. The average breaking strengths of the 10 Dicor crowns were compared to that of 10 metal ceramic control restorations. The tooth preparation with a 1.2-mm shoulder finish line, sharp axiogingival line angle, and 10 degrees of total occlusal convergence produced the strongest Dicor crowns (88.6 kg). The weakest restorations were observed when a 0.8-mm chamfer finish line (66.8 kg) was used. The metal ceramic restorations were significantly stronger (247.45 kg) than the strongest Dicor crowns (88.6 kg).