Search

Purpose/objective(s) Locoregional control remains an issue in women with multi-node positive estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer and many women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There is growing evidence that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) sensitizes breast cancer cells to ionizing radiation (RT) by suppressing the DNA damage response, but the role of RB is currently unclear. We sought to understand the role of RB and the implications of RB loss in ER+ and TNBC. Materials/methods Clonogenic survival assays were used to calculate radiosensitivity and calculate enhancement ratios (rER). Cellular viability was quantified 72 hours after drug addition to calculate half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s). Phospho- and total RB expression levels were assessed by immunoblotting. DNA repair was assessed with γH2AX and RAD51 immunofluorescence. GFP-based plasmid reporter systems were used to assess homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) competency. Isogenic RB1 knockout cells were generated with CRISPR-Cas9, and siRNA was used for transient RB1 knockdown. G1 cell cycle arrest was quantified using propidium iodide-based flow cytometry. In vivo efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibition + RT was assessed using MDA-MB-231 xenografts. Results Four TNBC cell lines with intact RB expression were radiosensitized (rER 1.08 - 2.22) after CDK4/6i with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib, but two RB null TNBC models were not radiosensitized with combination treatment (rER: 0.84 - 1.00). In ER+ and TNBC cell lines, response to CDK4/6i + RT was accurately predicted by the presence or absence of RB protein, and higher RB expression led to increased radiosensitization of breast cancer cell lines at lower doses. In addition, pRB expression decreased in wild type TNBC cell lines treated with CDK4/6i + RT. HR was suppressed with CDK4/6i in RB wild type - but not mutant - cell lines. NHEJ efficiency in RB wild type TNBC was unchanged with CDK4/6i. Genetic knockdown of RB1 led to the loss of radiosensitization in ER+ and TNBC cell lines (rER: 0.84 - 1.13) as well as a decrease in sensitivity to CDK4/6i monotherapy. Parental and Cas9 control TNBC cells arrested in G1 24 hours after CDK4/6i and remained arrested at 48 hours, but RB1 CRISPR TNBC cells did not arrest after drug treatment. In a TNBC xenograft model with wild type RB expression (MDA-MB-231), CDK4/6i + RT led to significant radiosensitization in vivo and delayed time to tumor doubling. Conclusion RB loss mitigates CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization of both ER+ and TNBC cells. Loss of RB expression prevents CDK4/6i-mediated radiosensitization, suggesting that RB expression may be a valuable clinical biomarker to predict efficacy of CDK4/6i + RT in future clinical trials. Our data also provide the preclinical rationale for CDK4/6i with RT not just in ER+ BC, but also in women with TNBC that express RB.

Purpose/Objective(s) Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is present in over 80% of breast tumors and has been shown to be a significant driver of tumor initiation and progression and therefore a target of first-line therapies for ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) patients. While both ionizing radiation (RT) and endocrine therapies (ET) are used for the treatment of women with ER+ BC, the sequencing of therapy and the effect of ET on tumor radiosensitization remains unclear. Here we assessed the efficacy and mechanism of ER inhibition in ER+ BC in combination with RT in multiple preclinical models. Materials/Methods Clonogenic survival assays were used to assess radiosensitization. ER inhibition was accomplished with tamoxifen and the selective ER degrader (SERD), fulvestrant, in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells or ER-negative (ER-) SUM-159 cells. DNA damage was assessed by yH2AX foci. Efficiency of homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) was measured by RAD51 foci or using a pYFP reporter, respectively. Cell cycle effects were measured using flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) staining. Apoptosis was assessed by annexin V/PI via flow cytometry. Western blotting was used to quantify protein expression. An MCF-7 xenograft model was used to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen with RT in vivo where mice were pretreated with tamoxifen for one or six days prior to starting RT. Synergy was determined using the fractional tumor volume method. Results One-hour pretreatment with tamoxifen prior to RT resulted in radiosensitization of ER+ MCF-7 (enhR: 1.14-1.50) and T47D (enhR: 1.33-1.60) cells but not ER- SUM-159 cells (enhR: 0.99-1.02). MCF-7 and T47D cells treated with tamoxifen and RT did not alter the kinetics of dsDNA break repair as measured by yH2AX foci (P > 0.05) but demonstrated a decrease in NHEJ-mediated repair (P 0.05). While cell cycle arrest was induced at 24 hours after RT, no changes were observed with tamoxifen treatment in combination with RT. In addition, there were no significant changes in apoptosis in MCF-7 or T47D cells with treatment of tamoxifen, RT, or the combination (P > 0.05). In vivo, an MCF-7 xenograft study demonstrated a significant delay in time to tumor doubling (17 days in control, 40 days with tamoxifen, 32 days with RT, and undefined with combination; P Conclusion Our data suggest that endocrine therapies may be effectively used to radiosensitize ER+ breast tumors. This work also supports further clinical investigation of the timing of RT for patients receiving ET as concurrent use may be more effective than sequential, especially as ET prior to RT is increasingly used as a bridging therapy during the COVID pandemic.