Search

Purpose: After a seed implant of the prostate, computerized tomography (CT) is ideal for determining seed distribution but soft tissue anatomy is frequently not well visualized. Magnetic resonance (MR) images soft tissue anatomy well but seed visualization is problematic. We describe a method of fusing CT and MR images to exploit the advantages of both of these modalities when assessing the quality of a prostate seed implant., Methods and Materials: Eleven consecutive prostate seed implant patients were imaged with axial MR and CT scans. MR and CT images were fused in three dimensions using the Pinnacle 3.0 version of the ADAC treatment planning system. The urethra and bladder base were used to "line up" MR and CT image sets during image fusion. Alignment was accomplished using translation and rotation in the three ortho-normal planes. Accuracy of image fusion was evaluated by calculating the maximum deviation in millimeters between the center of the urethra on axial MR versus CT images. Implant quality was determined by comparing dosimetric results to previously set parameters., Results: Image fusion was performed with a high degree of accuracy. When lining up the urethra and base of bladder, the maximum difference in axial position of the urethra between MR and CT averaged 2.5 mm (range 1.3-4.0 mm, SD 0.9 mm). By projecting CT-derived dose distributions over MR images of soft tissue structures, qualitative and quantitative evaluation of implant quality is straightforward., Conclusions: The image-fusion process we describe provides a sophisticated way of assessing the quality of a prostate seed implant. Commercial software makes the process time-efficient and available to any clinical practice with a high-quality treatment planning system. While we use MR to image soft tissue structures, the process could be used with any imaging modality that is able to visualize the prostatic urethra (e.g., ultrasound).

Purpose: To validate a short, structured interview procedure that allows practicing oncologists to quickly and reliably identify mood disorders in their patients, and to estimate the prevalence and types of mood disorders in a radiation therapy patient setting, noting relationships between mood disorders and patient characteristics., Methods: Consecutive, eligible adult patients from the practices of two radiation oncologists were administered the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) by the treating physician. A subset of these patients was also evaluated with the SCID, administered by trained mental health care personnel. Agreement between the two instruments was examined using the kappa statistic. Prevalence of mood disorders was determined from the PRIME-MD. The significance of relationships between patient characteristics and mood disorders was examined by chi-square and ANOVA analysis, and subsequently by multivariate logistic regression analysis., Results: One hundred twenty-two patients were studied. Fifty-three of these were administered the SCID. Agreement between the two instruments was very good (kappa = 0.70). A diagnosis of a depressive or anxiety disorder by the PRIME-MD was made in 59 of the 122 patients (48%, 95% confidence interval = 39%, 58%). Multivariate analysis showed that a diagnosis of a depressive mood disorder was significantly related to pain intensity and prior history of depression., Conclusion: We have demonstrated the validity and feasibility of the PRIME-MD administered by oncologists in making diagnoses of mood disorders. The prevalence of mood disorders in our set of patients undergoing a course of RT was nearly 50%. Future studies should describe the natural history of these disorders, and determine optimal intervention strategies.

Purpose: The treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with conventional radiotherapy (RT) results in inadequate local tumor control and survival. We report results of a Phase II trial designed to treat patients with a significantly increased total dose administered in a reduced overall treatment time using a hyperfractionated, accelerated treatment schedule with a concurrent boost technique., Methods and Materials: A total of 49 patients with unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB (38 patients) or medically inoperable Stage I/II (11 patients) NSCLC were prospectively enrolled in this protocol. Radiation therapy was administered twice daily, 5 days/week with > 6 h between each treatment. The primary tumor and adjacent enlarged lymph nodes were treated to a total dose of 73.6 Gy in 46 fractions of 1.6 Gy each. Using a concurrent boost technique, electively irradiated nodal regions were simultaneously treated with a dose of 1.25 Gy/fraction for the first 36 fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy., Results: Median survival for the entire group of 49 patients is 15.3 months. Actuarial survival at 2 years is 46%: 60% for 11 Stage I/II patients, 55% for 21 Stage IIIA patients, and 26% for 17 Stage IIIB patients. The actuarial rate of freedom from local progression at 2 years is 64% for the entire group of 49 patients: 62% for Stage I/II patients, 70% for Stage IIIA patients, and 55% for Stage IIIB patients. Patients who underwent serial bronchoscopic reevaluation (4 Stage I/II, 8 Stage IIIA, and 6 Stage IIIB) have an actuarial rate of local control of 71% at 2 years. The median total treatment time was 32 days. Nine of 49 patients (18%) experienced Grade III acute esophageal toxicity. The 2-year actuarial risk of Grade III or greater late toxicity is 30%. The 2-year actuarial rate of severe-late pulmonary and skin-subcutaneous toxicity is 20% and 15%, respectively., Conclusion: This treatment regimen administers a substantially higher biologically effective dose compared with conventional and pure hyperfractionation treatment schedules. The overall rate of acute and late toxicity was acceptable. Preliminary rates of overall survival and local control and freedom from local progression compare favorably to results reported with pure hyperfractionated radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.

Purpose: Optimal position of the posterior field border when irradiating early stage vocal cord cancer is controversial. Several experts recommend moving the posterior field border 5-15 mm anteriorly after 50-60 Gy to decrease the chance of arytenoid edema. This article will evaluate the effect of field position on arytenoid dose., Methods and Materials: 5 x 5 cm opposed lateral fields centered on the glottis were set up on a patient with typical anatomy. Isodose profiles were obtained with equally weighted 6 MV photon beams attenuated with 15 degree wedge filters using contours from an axial CT scan. Profiles with the posterior field border overlaying, 5, and 10 mm posterior to the posterior edge of the thyroid cartilage are presented., Results: With the posterior field border 10 mm posterior to the thyroid cartilage, the arytenoids are included in the 95% isodose volume. Reducing the field by 5 mm has no significant effect on the position of the 95 and 90% isodose lines relative to the arytenoids. A field reduction of 10 mm places the arytenoids in the beam penumbra and leaves approximately 10 mm between the 95% isodose line and the midpoint of the true vocal cord., Conclusion: To achieve a significant dose differential between the arytenoids and the anterior portion of the vocal cord when using opposed lateral 6 MV photon beams the posterior field border must be at, or anterior to, the posterior edge of the thyroid cartilage. In view of the excellent results reported from institutions that include the arytenoids in the high-dose volume throughout treatment, it would seem appropriate to limit the use of arytenoid-sparing techniques to patients in whom there is no ambiguity about tumor location and in whom the treatment setup is very reproducible.

Purpose: To develop a clinical procedure to treat field within a field (concomitant boost) portals with a single compensated field., Methods and Materials: An ordinary manual cerrobend block former was used to produce styrofoam molds from simulator film data. A special gypsum compound was poured into the molds. The compensator block is independently mounted to the treatment machine via a custom-made compensator holder., Results: Measurements confirm that the inhomogeneous dose distribution has been reliably delivered via this technique. The accuracy of placement of the high dose region is sufficient for clinical use., Conclusion: The procedure enables the concomitant boost effect to be easily implemented in the clinic without increasing clinical setup time.

Purpose: The goals of this study were to determine whether magnetic resonance parameters (a) can identify early during therapy those patients most likely to respond to hyperthermia and radiotherapy, (b) can provide prior to or early during therapy information about the temperature distributions which can be obtained in patients receiving hyperthermia, and (c) can provide an understanding of the effects of hyperthermia on tumor metabolic status., Methods and Materials: Twenty-one human patients and 10 canine patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated with preoperative hyperthermia and radiation had a series of magnetic resonance imaging and phosphorous spectroscopy studies done. To address the goals for both the human and canine populations, changes in mean T2 relaxation times, pH, and various phosphometabolite ratios from the pretreatment (Study 1) to the post first hyperthermia study (Study 2) were correlated with treatment outcome; pretreatment magnetic resonance parameters and changes in magnetic resonance parameters (Study 2-Study 1) were compared with various cumulative thermal descriptors; and thermal descriptors of the first hyperthermia were compared with changes in magnetic resonance phosphometabolite ratios., Results: A decrease in adenosine triphosphate/phosphomonoester from study 1 to study 2 is associated with a greater chance of > or = 95% necrosis in surgical resected tumors from human patients, but no significant relationships were observed between changes in tumor pH or phosphometabolite ratios and time to local failure in dogs. Pretreatment magnetic resonance parameters correlated with various thermal dose descriptors in canines but not in humans. Change in adenosine triphosphate/inorganic phosphate and phosphomonoester signal to noise ratio correlated with cumulative thermal descriptors in dogs and humans, respectively. In dogs only, increases in thermal dose resulted in decreases in high energy phosphometabolites., Conclusion: Changes in magnetic resonance parameters early during therapy may be predictive of treatment outcome. Pretreatment and changes in magnetic resonance parameters appear to predict how well a tumor will be heated during hyperthermia. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy also appears to be a useful tool to study the effects of various thermal doses on tumor metabolic status.

Purpose: This study was designed to test the toxicity and efficacy of a regimen of twice daily irradiation and concurrent multiagent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck., Methods and Materials: This was a prospective Phase I/II trial. Patients received 125 cGy b.i.d. to 7000 cGy with a 6 hr interfraction interval. Chemotherapy was given during weeks 1 and 6 of irradiation and consisted of a 5 day infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/M2/day and 5 daily injections of cisplatin at 12 mg/M2/day. Two additional cycles of chemotherapy were given after the completion of radiotherapy., Results: Forty-six patients were evaluable: 28 had technically unresectable disease and 18 had resectable tumors. All had Stage III or IV disease: 84% had T3 or T4 primaries while 53% had > or = N2 neck disease. The primary acute toxicity, confluent mucositis, was seen in 74% of patients. Late side effects occurred in four patients. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 25-44 months). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival are 65% and 73%, respectively, while 2-year local regional control and distant disease-free survival are 72% and 88%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that resectability and receiving > 2 cycles of chemotherapy significantly influenced local regional control while age < 60 significantly influenced disease-free survival., Conclusion: This form of treatment can be delivered safely. The encouraging results have led to the initiation of a Phase III trial comparing this regimen with b.i.d. radiation alone.

Purpose: To review the theoretical basis and results of a Phase I study of concurrent intraperitoneal cisplatin and hyperthermia in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma., Methods and Materials: Previously treated patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma received intraperitoneal instillation of cisplatin and 60 minutes of regional hyperthermia, with a goal temperature of 41.5 degrees C. Cisplatin dose started at 20 mg/m2 with escalation to the maximally tolerated dose. Six such cycles given every 3 weeks were planned. Pharmacokinetic studies with and without hyperthermia were performed., Results: Fifteen patients receiving 17 courses of treatment were evaluable. The maximally tolerated dose of cisplatin was between 80 and 120 mg/m2. The dose limiting toxicity was nephrotoxicity in all but one course. The median intraperitoneal temperature was 40.7 degrees C; the majority of treatments in which the goal temperature was not reached had power limited by patient discomfort. No major toxicities attributable to hyperthermia were noted. Pharmacokinetic studies noted no significant differences between treatments with vs. without hyperthermia, with intraperitoneal to plasma area under the curve ratios being 30-35. Ten patients had a decline in their CA-125 count during treatment, although in only two patients did this response persist beyond their course of treatment., Conclusion: Intraperitoneal cisplatin and regional hyperthermia can be performed with reasonable toxicity. The maximally tolerated dose of 80-120 mg/m2 in pretreated patients (which is similar to those reported with cisplatin alone) and median intraperitoneal temperatures of 40.7 degrees C, however, are felt to be too low to be efficacious in a significant percentage of women with bulky recurrent disease. Further study using intravenous thiosulfate and controlled analgesia is being performed.

Purpose: To better define thermal parameters related to tumor response in superficial malignancies treated with combined hyperthermia and radiation therapy., Methods and Materials: Patients were randomized to receive one or two hyperthermia treatments per week with hyperthermia given during each week of irradiation. Hyperthermia was given for 60 min with treatments begun within 1 hr following irradiation. Power was increased to patient tolerance or normal tissue temperature of 43.0 degrees C. Irradiation was generally given 5 times per week with doses prescribed to normal tissue tolerance (generally 24-70 Gy at 1.8-2.5 Gy per fraction). Multipoint thermometry was used with temperatures obtained every 5 min., Results: One hundred eleven individual treatment fields containing 1 or more tumor nodules were completely evaluable. The complete and overall response rates were 46% and 80%, respectively. Forty-one percent of all treatment fields (51% of responding lesions) remained controlled at 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the cumulative minutes that the temperature achieved by 90% of the measured tumor sites (T90) was > or = 40.0 degrees C, tumor histology, tumor volume, and radiation dose were significantly associated with complete tumor response. The complete response rate was not significantly affected by the number of hyperthermia treatments given per week. The incidence of clinically significant complications was low., Conclusions: These results support the usefulness of the cumulative minute system in describing time-temperature relationships. The significance of thermal variables with regard to tumor response strongly supports the contention that hyperthermia can be a useful adjunct to irradiation for the local control of cancer.

Purpose: In previous work we have found that the cumulative minutes of treatment for which 90% of measured intratumoral temperatures (T90) exceeded 39.5 degrees C was highly associated with complete response of superficial tumors. Similarly, the cumulative time for which 50% of intratumoral temperatures (T50) exceeded 41.5 degrees C was highly associated with the presence of > 80% necrosis in soft tissue sarcomas resected after radiotherapy and hyperthermia. In the present work we have calculated the time for isoeffective treatments with T90 = 43 degrees C and T50 = 43 degrees C, respectively, using published thermal isoeffective dose formulae. The purpose of these calculations was to determine the sensitivity of treatment outcome to variations in thermal isoeffective dose., Methods and Materials: The basis for the calculations were the thermal parameters and treatment outcomes in three patient populations: 44 patients with moderate or high grade soft tissue sarcoma treated preoperatively with hyperthermia and radiation; 105 patients with superficial tumors treated with hyperthermia and radiation, and 59 patients with deep tumors treated with hyperthermia and radiation., Results: The thermal dose values calculated are strongly associated with outcome in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Simple dose-response equations result from the analysis, and we use these equations to assess the sensitivity of outcome upon variations in thermal dose. This information, in turn, allows us to estimate the number of patients required in Phase II and III trials of hyperthermia and radiation therapy., Conclusions: For regimens of 5 to 10 hyperthermia treatments, improvements in median T90 (superficial tumors) and T50 (deep tumors) parameters by 1.2-1.5 degrees C could result in response rates high enough (compared to radiotherapy alone) to justify Phase III trials. A similar improvement in response rates would require an increase in overall duration of treatment by a factor of 3 to 5. This would be difficult to achieve while also avoiding thermal tolerance induction. Achieving these temperature goals may be possible with improvements in hyperthermia technology. Alternatively, there may be ways to increase the sensitivity of cells to temperatures that can be achieved currently, such as pH reduction or chemosensitization.

As part of an ongoing Phase I/II study at Duke University Medical Center investigating the toxicity and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy plus hyperthermia for deep-seated, locally advanced or recurrent solid tumors, 12 patients with prostate malignancies (adenocarcinoma--11, leiomyosarcoma--1) were treated with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia. Hyperthermia was given after radiotherapy using a Radio Frequency Phase/Amplitude Control Sigma 60 annular phased array device. All patients had simultaneous temperature measurements made in the rectal lumen and within the prostate during at least one hyperthermia session. Intraprostate thermometers were placed via a unique method described herein using both computerized tomography scan and a rigid sigmoidoscope for guidance. We were able to achieve the desired tumor temperature of > or = 42.5 degrees C in only 1/28 (3.5%) of hyperthermia treatments. Subjective symptoms of pain and/or pressure limited power deposition in 79% of hyperthermia treatments. Higher temperatures were achieved in the distal rectum than in the prostate in all treatments, although the differences were not statistically significant. This temperature differential could not be compensated by using phase and amplitude steering. Rectal temperatures adjacent to the prostate were predictive of prostate temperatures. We conclude that using this regional heating technique we were unable to demonstrate an ability to get an advantageous temperature differential between the prostate and normal tissue. This technique is not useful as an adjuvant to radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The usefulness of other regional heating techniques and devices should be explored.

From 1984-1990, 143 patients with squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled in a Phase I/II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with or without subsequent esophagectomy. Patients received one cycle of Cisplatin or Carboplatin plus Etoposide for squamous cell carcinoma, or Cisplatin or Carboplatin plus 5FU for adenocarcinoma, followed by two cycles of the same chemotherapy given concurrently with 44-46 Gy over 5 weeks. Operable patients then underwent esophagectomy. Inoperable patients and those with positive surgical margins received additional irradiation (16-18 Gy). Twelve percent of the surgical group received preoperative radiotherapy doses > or = 50 Gy. Seventy-two percent (103) had clinical Stage I-III tumors and 28% (40) were clinical Stage IV (1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria). Only clinical Stage I-III patients were analyzed with respect to patterns of failure. Isolated local failure occurred in 19/103 (18%) of clinical Stage I-III patients. Both local and distant relapse occurred in 15/103 (15%), and distant metastases alone occurred in 25/103 (24%). The 3-year actuarial rates of local and distant failures were 45% and 60%, respectively. Among the clinical Stage I-III patients who underwent surgery (n = 58) versus those who did not (n = 45), the 3-year actuarial local and distant failure rates were 30% versus 60% and 45% versus 45%, respectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of local control. For all clinical Stage I-III patients, treatment with surgery (p = 0.001) and with three or more cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of improved local control. Patients who underwent surgery were significantly younger and had a better performance status than those who did not. The improvement in local control with surgery did not translate into better survival, likely on account of a high operative mortality rate in older patients and those receiving > or = 50 Gy preoperatively. We conclude that local control remains poor with concurrent chemotherapy + radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The addition of surgery improved local control, but distant metastases remain a problem both in this group of patients as well as those treated without esophagectomy. Efforts to improve local control appear warranted, but it remains to be demonstrated that improved local control translates into improved survival in esophageal cancer because of a high rate of distant metastases in patients whose disease is controlled in the esophagus.

The lack of an unambiguous thermal dosimetry continues to impede progress in clinical hyperthermia. In an attempt to define better this dosimetry, a model based on the cumulative minutes during which arbitrary percentages of measured tumor temperature points exceeded an index temperature was tested in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated with preoperative hyperthermia and conventional radiation therapy. Patients received 5000-5040 cGy at 180-200 cGy per fraction. Hyperthermia was delivered 30-60 minutes after radiation therapy and given for 60 minutes. Patients were randomized between one and two hyperthermia treatments per week for a total of five or 10 treatments, respectively. Lesions were excised 4-6 weeks after completion of hyperthermia/radiation therapy. Successful treatment outcome was considered to be the finding of greater than 80% necrosis of the sarcoma upon histopathologic examination of the resected specimen. Forty-five patients were eligible with thermometry data available in 44 patients. An average of 19 interstitial sites were monitored each treatment per tumor. Sixty percent of tumors had a successful histopathologic outcome. Univariate analysis demonstrated that several descriptors of the temperature distribution were strongly related to treatment outcome; more strongly than nonthermometric factors, such as the number of treatments per week, tumor volume and patient age and more strongly than the commonly used temperature descriptors Tmin and Tmax. Descriptors that incorporated both temperature and time were also superior to the more commonly used descriptors Tmin and Tmax. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that a descriptor of both the hyperthermia treatment time and the frequency distribution of intratumoral temperatures was the strongest predictor of histopathologic outcome and that the best predictive model combined this time/temperature descriptor and one versus two treatment per week grouping. The more conventional temperature descriptor, minimum measured tumor temperature, did not significantly enhance the predictive power of treatment group. Based on these results, we recommend that descriptors based on both the frequency distribution of intratumoral temperatures and hyperthermia treatment time be tested for relationships with treatment outcome in other clinical data bases. Furthermore, we recommend that temperature descriptors that are less sensitive to catheter placement and tumor boundary identification than Tmin and Tmax (such as T90, T50, and T10) be tested prospectively along with other important thermal variables in Phase II trials in further efforts to define a thermal dosimetry for spatially nonuniform temperature distributions.

A small number of patients with early stage breast cancer are found on presentation to have two or more separate carcinomas within the breast. To assess the effectiveness of conservative surgery and radiation therapy in these patients we compared treatment outcome among 10 patients with multiple lesions (21 cancers) and 707 patients with single lesions, treated at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy between 1968-1981. Median follow-up was 64 months and 75 months for the multiple and single lesion groups, respectively. In each patient with multiple lesions, both (or all 3) lesions had similar histologic features. Eight of these ten patients (80%) had an infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) compared to 72% of patients with single lesions. Six of these 8 patients with IDC had at least 1 lesion with an extensive intraductal component (EIC), compared to a 33% incidence of an EIC in solitary lesions. All lesions were grossly excised. Radiotherapy was given to the entire breast in all patients, with the majority also receiving a boost dose to the tumor bed site. Four of the 10 patients with multiple lesions recurred in the treated breast (40%) compared to 77 of the 707 patients (11%) with single lesions (p = 0.019, Fisher exact test). In the six patients with multiple lesions who had an EIC, three developed a local failure. In comparison, 43 of 167 patients (26%) with a single lesion with EIC developed a local failure. In patients with multiple lesions, 0 of 2 with IDC without an EIC, and 1 of 2 with histologies other than IDC had recurrence in the treated breast compared to 19 of the 342 (6%) and 15 of the 198 (8%) patients with single lesions with similar histologic features, respectively (p = NS). These results suggest that the presence of 2 or more separate primary tumors in the breast is associated with a high likelihood of local recurrence after treatment with conservative surgery and radiation therapy, even when all identified tumors are grossly resected. This may reflect the common finding of an EIC in these tumors. We conclude that the use of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for patients with more than one primary cancer in the breast should be considered with caution.

Review of clinical hyperthermia (HT) trial results shows that there previously has not been a robust model relating efficacy of HT treatments to characteristics of the temperature distribution. Lack of a model has been an impediment in Phase II trials; these trials must include defining the prescription for HT treatment, optimizing the schedule of HT treatments, and defining quality assurance procedures. We propose a model that is based upon noting that the majority of a tumor volume is contained in the outermost "shell" of a solid tumor, across which shell the radial temperature distribution is assumed to be linear. Any linear distribution can be defined by coordinates of a point and a slope, and we choose the temperature at the radiographically defined edge of a tumor and the slope (dT/dr) across the outer shell as these determinants of the linear radial temperature distribution. A discriminant analysis of success or failure of treatment can then be based upon these two descriptors (Tedge, dT/dr). We have tested this model using data from patients with soft tissue sarcoma (Stage IIB or greater) that have entered an ongoing prospective trial of conventional preoperative radiotherapy (5000 cGy/25 Fx/5 wk) together with HT, the latter randomized to be given once or twice weekly during the 5 week course. Wide local excision of the primary tumor is done 1 month after completion of radiotherapy, and the extent of histologic change in the resected specimen is scored. Our model has an 86% predictive value for lack of complete or nearly complete necrosis in the resected specimen according to whether the time-averaged Tedge and slope during each HT treatment satisfy the equation Tedge + 1.2 (slope in degree C/cm) less than or equal to 40.6 degrees C in all but one treatment at most. Conversely, in 85% of cases with complete or nearly complete tumor necrosis, temperature distributions satisfied Tedge + 1.2 (slope in degree C/cm) greater than 40.6 degrees C during at least one HT treatment. Requiring greater than or equal to one third of treatments of a patient to satisfy the preceeding discriminant equation resulted in 80% of patients being correctly classified as a responder or nonresponder, with only one false positive prediction (patient incorrectly classified as a responder). The model can reveal systematic changes in the edge temperature distribution during the treatment course that are consistent with tumor perfusion changes inferred and measured by independent means.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

As part of an ongoing Phase II trial at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC), patients with Stage IIB-IVA soft tissue sarcomas (STS) potentially amenable to wide local excision were treated with preoperative hyperthermia (HT) plus radiation therapy (RT), with HT randomized to one versus two treatments per week, stratified with respect to tumor volume. 17 patients were treated and analyzed. HT was given 30-60 minutes after RT, with heating maintained for 1 hour after 42.0 degrees C was reached. In patients treated with 2 HT per week, treatments were separated by 48 hrs. Concurrent RT was given with 180-200 cGy fractions, five treatments per week, to a nominal tumor dose of 5000-5040 cGy. Surgical extirpation was performed 4 weeks after completion of HT/RT. Treatment effect was evaluated by histopathologic examination of the resected lesions, according to a previously reported system. The mean number of HT given in the 1 and 2/wk groups was 4.4 and 7.3, respectively (p less than 0.01). Tmax for the 1 and 2 HT/wk groups was 42.4 +/- 2.1 degrees C and 43.5 +/- 1.8 degrees C, and T min was 38.1 +/- 0.8 degrees C and 38.6 +/- 0.5 degrees C, respectively. The increase in T min from first to last treatment was 0.5 +/- 1.2 degrees C and 1.0 +/- 0.8 degrees C, respectively. The T min from the best treatment was 39.1 +/- 1.2 degrees C and 40.0 +/- 1.0 degrees C, and the Tmax from the best treatment was 44.5 +/- 3.4 degrees C and 45.4 +/- 2.5 degrees C for the 1 and 2 HT/wk groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups for any of the above temperature parameters. Severe histopathologic changes were found in 71% (12 of 17) of the lesions. T min and Tmax and highest T min and Tmax were between 0.4-1.1 degrees C higher in patients with severe changes (p = NS). All 9 patients in the 2 HT/wk group had extensive changes, versus only 3 of the 8 patients in the 1 HT/wk group. This difference was highly statistically significant (p = 0.009, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). These findings suggest an advantage to twice weekly, as opposed to weekly, HT in the setting of this study. Whether there is a corresponding therapeutic gain, or whether these results can be extrapolated to other settings requires further investigational efforts. It is recommended that treatment parameters, particularly temperature parameters, continue to be examined in Phase II trials.