Search

Background: Locoregional treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is crucial because local relapses may be highly symptomatic and are commonly associated with distant metastasis. With a median follow-up of 20 years, we report here the long-term results of a monocentric clinical trial combining primary chemotherapy (CT) with a schedule of anthracycline-based CT and an alternating split-course of radiotherapy (RT*CT) without mastectomy., Methods and Materials: From September 1983 to December 1989, 124 women with nonmetastatic IBC (T4d M0) were treated with three cycles of primary AVCMF chemotherapy (anthracycline, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) and then an alternating RT*CT schedule followed by three cycles of FAC. Hormonal therapy was systematically administered: ovarian irradiation (12 Gy in four fractions) or tamoxifen 20 mg daily., Results: Local control was achieved in 82% of patients. The 10- and 20-year local relapse rates were 26% and 33%, respectively, but only 10% of locally controlled cases were not associated with concurrent distant metastasis. The 10- and 20-year overall survival rates were 39% and 19%, respectively. Severe fibrosis occurred in 54% of patients, grade 3 brachial plexus neuropathy in 4%, grade 2 pneumonitis in 9%. Grade 1, 2 and 3 cardiac toxicity was observed in 3.8%, 3.8% and 1.2% of cases respectively., Conclusions: This combined regimen allowed good long-term local control without surgery. Survival rates were similar to those obtained with conventional regimens (primary chemotherapy, total mastectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy). Since IBC continues to be an entity with a dismal prognosis, this approach, safely combining preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy and systemic treatments, should be reassessed when suitable targeted agents are available., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Local failure is a major problem in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. The main objective of this Phase II trial was to test the feasibility of a combined concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy approach in an attempt to improve local control., Methods and Materials: From December 1989 to December 1992, 34 patients were included. The treatment schedule consisted of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy in 48 fractions and 6 weeks with two daily sessions of 1.25 Gy), cisplatin (6 mg/m2 every day of radiotherapy), and vindesine (2.5 mg/m2 once weekly). After a 3-week rest period, two full cycles of cisplatin (120 mg/m2 on weeks 10 and 14) and vindesine (2.5 mg/m2 on weeks 11, 12, and 13) were given. Treatment evaluation with thoracic computed scan, bronchoscopy, and bronchial biopsies was performed 3 months after completion of radiation therapy. Failure rates were estimated using a competing risk approach., Results: The complete response rate was 50%. Local failure rates at 1 and 3 years were 53 and 56%, respectively. Distant metastases rates at 1 and 3 years were 26.5 and 29%. Overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were respectively 53, 33, and 12%. Severe esophagitis was observed in three patients (9%). Lethal toxicity was observed in two patients., Conclusion: This Phase II trial confirms the feasibility of this type of approach with specific dose reduction and suggests that it may improve local control compared to conventional approaches.

Most patients with locally advanced non small cell lung carcinoma are treated with external thoracic radiotherapy. Because of the high incidence of distant metastasis the addition of chemotherapy has been proposed. The present randomized study was conducted from June 1983 to February 1989 and included 353 patients. The trial compared arm A, thoracic megavoltage radiotherapy alone at a total dose of 65 Gy in 26 fractions and 45 days, to arm B that comprised the same radiotherapy preceded and followed by 3 monthly cycles of VCPC (vindesine 1.5 mg/m2 d 1-2, cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 d 2-4, cisplatinum 100 mg/m2 d 2 and lomustine 75 mg/m2 d 3). Disease was deemed unresectable but non-metastatic after bronchoscopic, radiologic, CAT, and nuclear scans and physical examinations. Only patients in clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and histological complete remission were considered as locally controlled; these patients were monitored by fiberoptic bronchoscopy and systematic biopsies to the primary site. One hundred seventy-seven patients received thoracic radiotherapy alone and 176 received the combined modality. Twenty-seven percent of arm B patients had an objective response after 2 VCPC cycles. At the time of final assessment, performed 3 months after the end of thoracic radiotherapy in both arms, there were 20% of complete responders in arm A versus 16% in arm B. The two-year survival rate was 14% in arm A versus 21% in arm B (p = 0.08, logrank test). The distant metastasis rate was 67% in arm A versus 45% in arm B (p less than 0.001). Local control at 1 year was poor in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively). The striking effect of VCPC chemotherapy on the incidence of distant metastasis did not have a significant impact on overall survival. We conclude that thoracic tumor control remains a significant problem in unresectable non small cell lung cancer.

Ninety-nine patients presenting with non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer were treated with an alternating protocol of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The alternating schedule consisted of 8 courses of combined chemotherapy, including doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil, and 3 series of loco-regional radiotherapy delivering a total dose of 65 to 75 Gy to the breast tumor, 65 Gy to the axilla, and 50 Gy to the supraclavicular and internal mammary chain lymph nodes. Radiotherapy was started after the third course of chemotherapy. A 1-week gap was respected between each course of chemotherapy and each series of radiotherapy. Seventy-five percent of patients were in complete remission at the end of this induction treatment. The 3-year local control was 72% and the 3-year overall survival rate was 70%. An isolated local recurrence was observed in only 4% of patients. Approximately one-half of patients developed distant metastases. These results show that alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy schedules deserve further investigation in locally advanced breast cancer.

One-hundred seventy-three patients with limited small cell lung cancer were included in three consecutive protocols alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The alternating schedule consisted of six courses of chemotherapy (doxorubicin, VP16213, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate in the first protocol; methotrexate being replaced by cisplatinum in the other two protocols) and three series of thoracic radiotherapy delivering a total dose of 45, 55, and 65 Gy in each consecutive protocol. Radiotherapy was started after the second course of chemotherapy. A 1-week gap was respected between each course of chemotherapy and each series of radiotherapy. Seventy percent of patients were in complete remission at the end of the induction treatment. The actuarial 5-year local control was 60% and the 5-year overall survival was 18%. Sixty percent of patients developed distant metastases. The death rate unrelated to cancer was 10%. These results show that alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy schedules are reproducible, and provide a consistent long-term local control and a long-term survival rate exceeding 15% in limited disease.

Chemotherapy is the main treatment in many human malignancies including non-Hodgkin lymphomas and some solid tumors such as those of embryonal origin and small cell lung carcinomas. The high responsiveness to chemotherapy of these tumors has led some groups to treatment policies limited to chemotherapy alone. A long follow-up has shown a high incidence of recurrence in the sites that were initially macroscopically involved. Some randomized trials evaluating the adjunction of radiotherapy to chemotherapy have shown that a failure in local control can be associated with a decreased overall survival. The survival benefit of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy is generally moderate and is best evaluated by randomized trials entering a large number of patients. The adjunction of radiotherapy to chemotherapy can lead to an increased rate of acute and late toxicity that may overshadow a therapeutic benefit. Critical points of the combined approach are: types of drugs, radiotherapy parameters, radiotherapy-chemotherapy doses, and timing. In this review, two clinical models, one with a low potential of cure, limited small cell lung cancer, and one with a medium potential of cure, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, are reviewed emphasizing information obtained from randomized trials. The modalities of combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy, particularly the timing, are analyzed to define optimal schedules for a definite therapeutic gain.

Sixty-three evaluable patients with limited small cell lung carcinoma were entered into two pilot studies alternating 6 cycles of combination chemotherapy (Doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 d 1; VP16213 75 mg/m2 d 1, 2, 3; Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 d 3, 4, 5, 6; and Methotrexate 400 mg/m2 d 2--plus folinic acid rescue--or Cis-Platinum 100 mg/m2 d 2) with 3 courses of mediastinal radiotherapy as induction treatment. The first course of radiotherapy started 10 days after the second cycle of chemotherapy; there was a 7 day rest between chemotherapy and radiotherapy courses. This 6 month induction treatment was followed by a maintenance chemotherapy. The total mediastinal radiation dose was increased from 4500 rad in the first study to 5500 rad in the second. Both protocols obtained a complete response (CR) rate of greater than 85% (with fiberoptic bronchoscopy and histological verification). Local control at 2 years was 61% in the first study and 82% in the second. Relapse-free survival at 2 years was 32 and 37%, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. We conclude that our results justify further clinical research in alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy schedules.

This retrospective study involved 463 breast cancer patients treated by radiotherapy alone at the Princess Margaret Hospital and at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. These patients either had operable tumors, but were unfit for general anesthesia, or had inoperable tumors due to local contraindications to surgery. Results were analyzed according to tumor response, local recurrence rate, tumor size, tumor fixation, nodal fixation and tumor dose. Conventional statistical analysis of local control showed two significant factors: tumor dose and tumor size. Multivariate analysis permitted to define an "individual risk" (IR) of local recurrence according to three independent factors: tumor size, tumor fixation, and nodal fixation. It was shown that the IR was a good prognostic factor for local control. Increase in tumor dose gave a similar effect in the local recurrence relative risk for all the IR groups. According to the slope of the dose-effect curve, it was deduced that a dose increase of 15 Gy can decrease the relative risk of local recurrence 2-fold. In fact, it was shown that tumor dose was the most significant independent factor on local control, able to produce up to a 10-fold increase compared to 2-fold decrease for tumor size. If the IR of local recurrence is known, a theoretical predictive value on local control, taking into account the tumor dose, can be determined according to the present data.

For several types of cancers, post-operative radiation therapy is able to reduce the incidence of local recurrences, but has only a relatively small beneficial effect on total survival. Conversely to what has been claimed, this discrepancy is not due to a detrimental effect of radiotherapy. The data do not substantiate the hypothesis that irradiation through an impact on the immune system enhances growth of neoplastic foci outside of the irradiated volume. Several sets of data show that uncontrolled primary tumors or lymph node metastases can be important foci for distant spread. However the analysis of the data shows that post-operative radiotherapy can prevent metastatic spread only in a small subset of patients, those without distant metastases at the initial treatment and in whom local recurrences can be a nidus for distant dissemination before being detected and treated. The results of the clinical trials carried out on patients with breast cancers show that this situation is frequently observed in patients with tumors located in the inner quadrants of the breast who are those in whom the involvement of the internal mammary chain is relatively frequent.

Between 1970 and 1981, 436 patients with T1 and small T2 breast carcinoma were treated by tumor excision followed by radiotherapy at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. The mean follow-up was 5 years, with 50% of patients followed 5 years. Twenty-four patients have experienced a local-regional (LR) relapse for an actuarial LR control rate of 93% at 5 years and 90% at 10 years. Potential prognostic factors for all 24 local-regional recurrences and for the subgroup with relapses in the breast were analyzed. A high Bloom grade and low Nominal Standard Dose (NSD) were significant prognostic factors for predicting LR relapse in both groups. Disease-free survival (from initial presentation) was not adversely affected by a solitary breast recurrence, when patients with successful salvage treatment were considered disease free. However, the group of patients with nodal or dermal recurrences had a much worse prognosis. This paper describes the natural history of breast cancer following a local-regional relapse in irradiated patients without mastectomy. Most importantly, we observed that breast relapses following radiotherapy become clinically apparent more slowly than chest wall failures after mastectomy, and if detected early, that these patients may be successfully retreated.

Between June 1970 and April 1982, 592 patients with unilateral T1 and small T2 breast cancers were managed conservatively at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. The treatment policy for the axilla was to perform a lower axillary dissection and to proceed to axillary clearance ( +/- radiotherapy) in patients with axillary invasion by tumor (N+). Some N+ patients had only lower axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Five hundred fifty-eight patients underwent axillary surgery which was a lower axillary dissection in 374 patients (67%) and axillary clearance in 184 patients (33%). There was axillary invasion in 198 cases (36%). Only five patients relapsed in the axilla and the probability of axillary relapse at 5 years was 1.2%. There were no axillary relapses in N+ patients who had had an axillary clearance whether irradiated or not. The incidence of upper limb complications was significantly greater in patients undergoing axillary surgery and radiotherapy compared with axillary surgery alone (p less than 0.0001). It is concluded that a lower axillary dissection accurately identifies N-patients and an axillary clearance in N+ patients ensures good local control and avoids the morbidity associated with axillary irradiation.