Search

Purpose: No Food and Drug Administration-approved intervention exists for oral mucositis (OM) from chemoradiotherapy (CRT) used to treat head and neck cancers. RRx-001 is a hypoxia-activated, cysteine-directed molecule that affects key pathways involved in OM pathogenesis. This phase 2a, multi-institutional trial was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of 3 schedules of a fixed concentration of RRx-001; a standard-of-care arm was included to identify potential signals of efficacy for further study., Methods and Materials: This study enrolled patients with oral cavity and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive or postoperative cisplatin-based CRT. Patients were randomized into 4 cohorts. In arms 1 to 3, RRx-001 was coinfused with patients' blood at differing intervals. Arm 4 was a control cohort of patients treated with CRT alone. Trained evaluators assessed OM using a standardized data collection instrument twice weekly during treatment and then until resolution. OM severity was scored centrally using World Health Organization criteria. Safety outcomes were assessed using National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteriav4 benchmarks. Long-term tumor response was defined by Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors v1.1 criteria., Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled, with 46 and 45 individuals contributing safety and efficacy data, respectively. There were no severe adverse events attributed to the study drug. Across all 3 active arms, the study drug was infused fully per protocol in 86% of patients. All 3 RRx-001 treatment cohorts appeared to demonstrate a similar or lower OM duration relative to control; arm 1 had the lowest median duration of severe oral mucositis (SOM), 8.5 days versus 24 days in controls among patients who developed at least 1 day of SOM. There were no locoregional failures in any patient., Conclusions: Our results support the safety and feasibility of RRx-001 as an intervention to mitigate SOM. Additional studies are planned to confirm its efficacy., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to determine whether prophylactic gabapentin usage in patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (chemoRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) improves treatment-related oral mucositis pain, opioid use, and feeding tube (FT) placement., Methods and Materials: This double-blind, randomized phase 3 study for patients with locally advanced OPC undergoing chemoRT randomly allocated patients to prophylactic gabapentin (600 mg thrice daily) or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptom (PROMS) scores over the entire treatment period (baseline to 6 weeks post-radiation therapy [RT] follow-up) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Opioid requirements, FT placement, and other patient-reported quality of life (QOL) metrics (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck [FACT-HN] and Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE]) were assessed. Lower scores suggested poorer QOL with the FACT-HN questionnaire, and higher scores suggested worse outcomes with the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, weekly during RT, and at 6 weeks post-RT follow-up. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect differences in PROMS scores and change in opioid use from baseline. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare averages for the other secondary endpoints. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant., Results: Treatment arms were well balanced overall, including T and N staging and dosimetric variables. There were 58 patients analyzed. No significant difference was found in PROMS scores (mean 29.1, standard deviation [SD] 22.5 vs 20.1, SD 16.8 for gabapentin vs placebo, respectively, P = .11). The FACT-HN functional well-being index had a significant decrease in scores from baseline to follow-up in the gabapentin arm (median -6, interquartile range [IQR] -10.0 to -0.5 vs -1, IQR -5.5 to 3.0, P = .03). PRO-CTCAE scores increased significantly at follow-up for gabapentin (median 6.5, IQR 3.5-11.8 vs 1, IQR -2.0 to 6.0, P = .01). There was no significant difference in average or change in opioid use. FT placement was significantly higher in the gabapentin arm (62.1% vs 20.7%, P < .01)., Conclusions: This study suggests that prophylactic gabapentin is not effective in improving treatment-related oral mucositis symptoms in a select population of patients with OPC undergoing definitive chemoRT., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Despite the development of high-precision radiation therapy, ionizing radiation inevitably damages healthy tissues. Radiodermatitis and radioinduced oral mucositis are frequent and significant side effects among patients with breast and head and neck cancer, respectively. These radiation-related injuries negatively affect patient quality of life and can lead to unplanned therapeutic breaks and compromise treatment outcomes. Currently, no preventive or mitigating agent has emerged to address these issues. Although amifostine, a well-known free radical scavenger, has proven efficacy against specific radio- and chemo-induced toxicities, severe adverse side effects (reversible hypotension, nausea, emesis, etc) combined with logistical hurdles are associated with its recommended intravenous route of administration, limiting its use., Methods and Materials: We developed a thermogel containing the active thiol metabolite of amifostine (CPh-1014) that polymerizes at body temperature and serves as a matrix for topical application onto the skin or mucosa., Results: Applied before irradiation, CPh-1014 greatly reduced the severity of oral mucositis and dermatitis induced by either a single dose or fractionated irradiation regimens in in vivo mouse models. The cytoprotective effect of CPh-1014 was confirmed by the decrease in DNA double-strand breaks in the irradiated epithelium. Noticeably, CPh-1014 did not affect radiation therapy efficacy against tumors grafted at submucosal and subcutaneous sites. In contrast to the intravenous administration of amifostine, CPh-1014 oral application did not induce hypotension in dogs., Conclusions: CPh-1014 confers radioprotective effects in healthy tissues with reduced systemic side effects without compromising radiation therapy efficacy. We propose CPh-1014 as an easy-to-implement therapeutic approach to alleviate radiation therapy toxicity in patients with breast and head and neck cancer., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: No effective agents currently exist to treat oral mucositis (OM) in patients receiving chemoradiation for the treatment of head-and-neck cancer. We identified a novel 21-amino acid peptide derived from antrum mucosal protein-18 that is cytoprotective, mitogenic, and motogenic in tissue culture and animal models of gastrointestinal epithelial cell injury. We examined whether administration of antrum mucosal protein peptide (AMP-p) could protect against and/or speed recovery from OM., Methods and Materials: OM was induced in established hamster models by a single dose of radiation, fractionated radiation, or fractionated radiation together with cisplatin to simulate conventional treatments of head-and-neck cancer., Results: Daily subcutaneous administration of AMP-p reduced the occurrence of ulceration and accelerated mucosal recovery in all three models. A delay in the onset of erythema after irradiation was observed, suggesting that a protective effect exists even before injury to mucosal epithelial cells occurs. To test this hypothesis, the effects of AMP-p on tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis were studied in an endothelial cell line (human dermal microvascular endothelial cells) as well as an epithelial cell line (human adult low-calcium, high-temperature keratinocytes; HaCaT) used to model the oral mucosa. AMP-p treatment, either before or after cell monolayers were exposed to tumor necrosis factor-α, protected against development of apoptosis in both cell types when assessed by annexin V and propidium iodide staining followed by flow cytometry or ligase-mediated polymerase chain reaction., Conclusions: These observations suggest that the ability of AMP-p to attenuate radiation-induced OM could be attributable, at least in part, to its antiapoptotic activity., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Deleterious oral mucositis (OM) develops during radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients. There are currently no effective cytoprotective treatments for OM without a potential risk of tumor protection. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study aimed to determine the therapeutic safety and efficacy of phenylbutyrate (an antitumor histone deacetylase inhibitor and chemical chaperone) 5% mouthwash for treating OM caused by cancer therapy., Methods and Materials: Between September 2005 and June 2006, 36 HNC patients were randomized to standard oral care plus 5 mL of either phenylbutyrate 5% mouthwash (n = 17) or placebo (mouthwash vehicle, n = 19) taken four times daily (swish and spit). Treatment began when mild mucositis (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 1) occurred, and ended 4 weeks after RT completion. Safety and efficacy were based on adverse events, physical examination, laboratory determinations, vital signs, Oral Mucosa Assessment Scale (OMAS) and World Health Organization scores, the ability to eat, body weight change, local control, and survival., Results: We found no severe drug-related side effect. At RT doses of 5500-7500 cGy, phenylbutyrate significantly mitigated the severity of mucositis compared with placebo, based on both the WHO score (severity ≥ 3; p = 0.0262) and the OMAS scale (ulceration score ≥ 2; p = 0.0049). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 2- and 3-year local control, and overall survival were 100% and 80.8%, and 78.6% and 64.3%, respectively, in the phenylbutyrate group and 74.2% and 74.2%, and 57.4% and 50.2%, respectively, in the placebo group., Conclusions: This pilot trial suggested that phenylbutyrate mouthwash significantly decreased the impact of OM in HNC patients receiving RT or chemoradiotherapy and did not confront the tumor control. Larger Phase II randomized trials are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We tested the efficacy of oral recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) against radiation-induced oral mucositis in a rat model., Methods and Materials: Each of 35 Sprague-Dawley rats, 7 to 8 weeks of age and weighing 178 +/- 5 grams, was irradiated once in the head region with 25 Gy, using a 4-MV therapeutic linear accelerator at a rate of 2 Gy/min. The irradiated rats were randomly divided into four groups: those receiving no treatment (Group 1), those treated with vehicle only three times per day (Group 2), and those treated with 50 microg/mL (Group 3), or 100 microg/mL (Group 4) rhEGF three times per day., Results: Rats were monitored for survival rate and daily activity, including hair loss, sensitivity, and anorexia. We found that survival rate and oral intake were significantly increased and histologic changes were significantly decreased in the rhEGF-treated rats. There was no difference, however, between rats treated with 50 microg/mL or 100 microg/mL rhEGF., Conclusion: These findings suggest that orally administered rhEGF decreased radiation-induced oral mucositis in rats.

Purpose: To determine whether zinc supplementation can accelerate the healing of mucositis and dermatitis after radiotherapy., Methods and Materials: In this double-blind study, patients were placed into two randomized groups (experimental and control) of 50 patients each. The groups were homogeneous with respect to medical history, tumor characteristics, and therapeutic details. The experimental group received a standard dose of a zinc supplement, and the control group was given a placebo., Results: Patients in the control group developed Grade 2 mucositis and dermatitis earlier and sooner than patients in the experimental group. There was also a significant difference in the development of Grade 3 mucositis and dermatitis between the two groups. Patients in the experimental group were found to have milder mucositis and dermatitis. Zinc supplementation did not show much benefit in those patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy or make a substantial impact on weight changes., Conclusions: Zinc supplementation used in conjunction with radiotherapy could postpone the development of severe mucositis and dermatitis for patients with cancers of the head and neck. Zinc supplementation can also alleviate the degree of mucositis and dermatitis. The impact of zinc on tumor growth and patient survival is under further investigation.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to quantify the protective efficacy of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (rHuKGF) in oral mucosa., Methods and Materials: Mouse tongue mucosal ulceration was analyzed as the clinically relevant end point. Fractionated irradiation of the snout with 5 daily fractions of 3 Gy was followed by graded test doses, given to a test area of the lower tongue, on Day 7. rHuKGF was injected s.c. in daily doses of 5 mg/kg before radiotherapy, during radiotherapy, over the weekend break, or a combination. Moreover, single rHuKGF injections (5 or 15 mg/kg) were given on Day -1 or on Day 4., Results: In a single-dose control experiment, the ED50, i.e., the dose after which ulcer induction is expected in 50% of the mice, was 10.9 +/- 0.7 Gy. Fractionated irradiation without keratinocyte growth factor rendered an ED50 for test irradiation of 5.6 +/- 3.7 Gy. Keratinocyte growth factor increased the ED50 values to 7.8 +/- 3.3 Gy (Days -3 to -1, p = 0.01), 8.3 +/- 1.6 Gy (Days -4 to -2, p = 0.0008), 10.5 +/- 1.4 Gy (Days 0 to +2, p = 0.0002), 11.0 +/- 0.5 Gy (Days 0 to +4, p = 0.002), 10.6 +/- 1.4 Gy (Days +4 to +6, p = 0.0021), 10 +/- 0.07 (Days -3 to +1, p = 0.0001) or 11.0 +/- 0.02 (Days +4 to +8, p = 0.0001). This is equivalent to compensation of approximately 1.5 fractions of 3 Gy when rHuKGF is given before radiotherapy and 3-4 fractions in all other protocols by rHuKGF treatment. Single rHuKGF injections were similarly (5 mg/kg) or more (15 mg/kg) effective., Conclusions: In conclusion, these results indicate a marked increase in oral mucosal radiation tolerance by rHuKGF, which is most pronounced if the growth factor is applied during fractionated radiotherapy. The effect seems to be based on complex mechanisms, predominantly changes in both epithelial proliferation and differentiation processes.

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of oral glutamine on radiation-induced oral mucositis in the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer., Methods and Materials: From July 1997 through June 1998, 17 patients with head and neck cancer receiving primary or adjuvant irradiation were randomized to either glutamine suspension (16 g in 240 ml normal saline) (n = 8) or placebo (normal saline) (n = 9) arm. Patients were instructed to swish the test solutions (30 ml) four times per day. All patients received half-mouth irradiation at least. Patients were treated 1.8 Gy per fraction daily, 5 days a week. We evaluated the grading of oral mucositis daily fraction at each day of treatment until 45 Gy/25 fractions. World Health Organization (WHO) step analgesic medication and body weight change were compared between the two arms., Results: The duration of objective oral mucositis > or = Grade 1 (p = 0.0097), Grade 2 (p = 0.0232), and Grade 3 (p = 0.0168) was shorter in the glutamine arm. Mean maximum grade of objective oral mucositis was less severe in the glutamine arm (1.6 vs. 2.6) (p = 0.0058). Glutamine did not reduce the duration and severity of subjective oral mucositis except for duration > or = Grade 3 (p = 0.0386). In the analysis of mean maximum WHO step of analgesic medication, there was no statistical difference (p = 0.5374) between the two arms. Mean body weight change was also not significantly different (p = 0.8070)., Conclusions: Oral glutamine may significantly reduce the duration and severity of objective oral mucositis during radiotherapy. It may shorten the duration of > or = Grade 3 subjective mucositis.

Purpose: To examine the usefulness and safety of a mucosa-adhesive water-soluble polymer film (AD film) containing anesthetics and antibiotics for the treatment of acute radiation-induced oral mucositis., Materials and Methods: To prepare AD films, 600 mg of hydroxy-propyl-cellulose was dissolved in ethyl alcohol, and mixed with a solution containing tetracaine, ofloxacine, miconazole, guaiazulene, and triacetin. The gel obtained was dried to form 30 translucent round sheets (20 mg per sheet) of 7.5 cm in diameter and 0.2 mm in thickness. The AD film showed excellent adhesive and coating properties when placed on wet oral mucosa. From 1993 to 1994, we used the AD film in 25 patients with acute radiation-induced oral mucositis, in an attempt to alleviate their pain and prevent secondary oral infection. All patients had received definitive radiotherapy for oral carcinoma. Intensity and duration of oral pain from mucositis, relief rates at rest and while eating, and presence of bacterial and/or fungal infection were compared with those of 27 patients treated with topical anesthetics (viscous lidocaine, Xylocaine and/or general systemic analgesics from 1990 to 1992 (NonAD Group)., Results: The intensity of oral pain was the same in the two groups. The mean duration of pain of the AD film Group (10 days) was significantly shortened compared with the NonAD Group (15 days). The rates of complete pain relief at rest and while eating of the AD film Group were statistically higher than those of the NonAD Group: 82% vs. 44%, and 68% vs. 22%, respectively. No secondary bacterial or fungal infections were observed in the AD film Group, whereas 4 cases of documented infections were found in the NonAD Group. No acute or chronic adverse effects of AD film were observed during the 3-year follow-up period. The rates for local control of oral carcinoma and overall survival, at the end of the follow-up period, were 96% and 87% for the AD film Group vs. 92% and 85% for the NonAD Group, respectively., Conclusion: The AD film, containing topical anesthetics and antibiotics, proved useful to alleviate pain due to acute radiation-induced oral mucositis, maintain good peroral feeding, and prevent secondary oral infections, without inducing adverse reactions.