Search

Mortgage is one of the collateral institutions used as collateral for immovable objects, such as land or buildings. Collateral for mortgage rights is a requirement if a debtor wants to get a loan from a bank. The mortgage right will be executed by the creditor if the debtor cannot repay the loan. However, creditors can also be sued for committing unlawful acts in executing mortgage guarantees. In this case, it will be examined whether the creditor in Decision Number 95/Pdt.G/2021/PN SBY committed an unlawful act in executing the mortgage right. This research is normative legal research carried out descriptively analytically and using a statutory approach. From the results of this research, it can be seen that creditors cannot be said to have taken legal action because all the arguments for the debtor's lawsuit cannot be proven, starting from providing credit restructuring, violating standard clauses, and irregularities by creditors in granting credit. Apart from that, the lawsuit filed by the creditor does not meet the formal requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Children are a vulnerable group that requires special protection, including in the criminal law process. This study aims to analyze the enactment of child witness testimony in examining criminal case evidence. The research method used in this research is empirical juridical research. The data collection technique in this research is a literature study exploring journals, books, laws, and other relevant information. The data that has been collected is then analyzed using three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the enactment of child witness testimony in examining criminal case evidence is essential in the investigation, prosecution, and trial examination. However, Article 171 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that children who are not yet 15 years old and have never been married may be examined to provide information but may not be sworn in. The testimony of minors is considered incompletely accountable in criminal law. Therefore, they cannot be taken under oath or promise, and the testimony of child witnesses is only used as guidance. This is by the provisions of Article 185 paragraph (7) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that the testimony of witnesses who are not sworn in, even if it is by one another, does not constitute evidence. However, the testimony is the testimony of a sworn witness. In that case, it can be used as an addition to other legal evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The failure to implement medical rehabilitation or social rehabilitation for narcotics abusers causes problems, one of which is the excess capacity of prisons/detention centers in Indonesia, especially in DKI Jakarta Province, as the author gathered from General SDP data as of July 2023. This research aims to examine legal certainty for narcotics abusers/addicts. This research uses normative legal research methods with a case approach. The results of the study show that legal certainty for narcotics abusers or people with an addiction refers to the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 4 of 2010 concerning the Placement of Narcotics Abusers, Victims, and Addicts into Medical Rehabilitation and Social Rehabilitation Institutions, which states that Judges can decide whether people with an addiction The narcotics are undergoing rehabilitation. There are 5 (five) conditions for obtaining a rehabilitation decision, as well as articles regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics regarding the possibility for narcotics abusers/addicts to be rehabilitated rather than being subject to physical imprisonment because, in reality, narcotics abusers /addicts are an addiction process that can be interpreted as a disease in every user that must be treated. Repressive social control usually takes the form of consequences for those who violate, appropriate punishment, advice, and counseling so as not to do it again, in this case, related to narcotics in the form of rehabilitation sentences and can reduce the number of prisons for abusers/ addicts if the perpetrator/addict consumes less than the Circular. Supreme Court Number 4 of 2010 and has never been charged/violated the narcotics law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]