Search

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine safety-related outcomes for patients with tracheostomy after flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) to assess and manage their swallow, when compared to other non-instrumental swallow assessments such as clinical swallowing examination (CSE) and/or a modified Evans blue dye test (MEBDT). Method: Three databases were searched for articles referring to safety-related outcome data for adults with a tracheostomy, who underwent FEES and CSE and/or MEBDT. Articles were screened using predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Result: The search strategy identified 2097 articles; following abstract and full-text screening, seven were included for review. The summary of evidence found low to very low certainty that FEES was associated with improved outcomes across swallow safety, physiological outcomes, tracheostomy cannulation duration, functional outcomes, and detection of upper airway pathologies. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated low to very low certainty evidence from seven heterogeneous studies with low sample sizes that incorporating FEES may be associated with improved safety-related outcomes. There is less evidence supporting the accuracy of other swallow assessments conducted at the point of care (i.e. CSE and MEBDT). Future research requires studies with larger sample sizes and routine reporting of safety-related outcomes with use of FEES. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The efficacy of thickened fluids for individuals with dysphagia has come under increasing scrutiny among healthcare professionals. This commentary provides a critical appraisal of the research evidence and presents a balanced argument on the benefits and limitations of thickened fluids in dysphagia management. By doing so, we aim to engage the readership to think critically about this controversial topic and make informed, patient-centered decisions regarding the use of thickened fluids in dysphagia management. Result/Conclusion: We argue that, while the research evidence for the use of thickened fluids in dysphagia management continues to grow, perhaps our problem lies in trying to find one pure answer—to thicken or not to thicken. We encourage clinicians to move past arguments about the controversies of thickened fluids and, rather, use the current evidence base, including research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to support individuals with dysphagia to make informed choices about their oral intake, in the short and long term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is most commonly undertaken as a minimally invasive approach for early staged oropharyngeal cancers (OPC), with good expectations for a functional recovery. A small number of patients, however, require TORS for recurrent or advanced OPC tumours. Their prospects for longer term recovery of communication and swallowing are both unreported and hypothesised to be poorer than the majority of TORS cases. This case-series describes the recovery of swallowing and communication function post-TORS for this unique group of patients. Method: Consecutive recruitment was carried out prospectively at a quaternity oncology referral centre. Participants were aged 18 years and older, with reconstruction involving a free-flap and tracheostomy. Patients were assessed using Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, and clinician and patient-reported outcomes 12-months post-TORS. Their pre-operative baseline and three-month post-TORS FOIS scores were collated retrospectively. Result: Six participants were recruited over an 18-month period of which three patients underwent TORS for recurrent, and three for advanced OPC. Those with recurrent-OPC did not return to their baseline diet and demonstrated post-swallow silent aspiration of pharyngeal residue. Three of the six were rehabilitated back to their baseline intelligibility (100%). Conclusion: TORS in the recurrent OPC setting appears congruent with high rates of silent aspiration and prolonged reliance on a feeding tube due to oropharyngeal dysphagia, as well as compromised intelligibility. This is the first study that evaluates this instrumentally and provides clinically relevant evidence to inform practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMethodResultConclusionPharyngeal residue rating scales are often used to rate pharyngeal residue observed during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Despite the widespread use of pharyngeal residue rating scales, there is no data that has systematically explored user experience. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate specific reporting of user experience, user centred design principles, and normative data in the development of pharyngeal residue rating scales.A scoping review was conducted across four electronic databases inclusive of all dates until June 2024. Grey literature searching occurred in March–April 2023 and was repeated in June 2024. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol. Titles/abstracts, full texts, and data extraction were reviewed by two independent reviewers.A total of 22 sources were included, with 18 unique pharyngeal residue rating scales identified. Two studies referred to user experience, seven included at least one user centred design principle, and four studies reported on normative data.The findings of this review highlight few pharyngeal residue rating scales include the experience of the intended user and establish normative data in the initial development phase. User experience, user centred design principles, and normative data may be useful considerations to optimise functionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]