Search

Background: According to the literature, about one third of patients with brain ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h, which are classified as Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) according to the traditional "time-based" definition, show the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. Recent evidence has shown that the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging may impact on the outcome of patients with transient ischemic symptoms treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). This uncertainty is even more compelling in recent years as short-term DAPT has become the standard treatment for any non-cardioembolic TIA or minor ischemic stroke., Methods: This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter real-world study (READAPT). The analysis included patients with time-based TIA-that is, those with ischemic symptoms lasting <24 h-who started DAPT. In the whole population, we assessed the presence of acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging and their association with the ABCD 2 score. To assess the impact of acute brain ischemic lesions on 90-day prognosis, we performed a propensity score matching of patients with and without those lesions. We adopted a primary effectiveness outcome which was a composite of new stroke/TIA events and death due to vascular causes at 90 days., Results: We included 517 patients-324 (62.7%) male-with a median (interquartile range-IQR) age of 74 (IQR = 65-81) years; 144 patients (27.9%) had acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. The proportion of patients with brain ischemic lesions did not vary according to the ABCD 2 score. At follow-up, 4 patients with brain ischemic lesions (2.8%) and 21 patients without lesions (5.6%) reported the primary effectiveness outcome, which was similar between the groups before ( p  = 0.178) and after matching ( p  = 0.518)., Conclusions: In our population, patients with transient ischemic symptoms and acute ischemic lesions at brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a risk of recurrent ischemic events similar to those without lesions. The risk of recurrent ischemic events was low in both groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.Z. reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. R.O. reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. S.S. reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila; and compensation from Novartis for other services. MP reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. DT reports compensation from Alexion, Astra Zeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer for consultant services and participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population., Methods: Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and three prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24 h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage., Results: We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% vs. 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1%-6.1%); p = 0.047, risk ratio 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01-1.07); p = 0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% vs. 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% (95% CI: 6.4%-13.4%); p < 0.001, risk ratio 1.65 (95% CI: 1.37-1.97); p < 0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and those who received antiplatelet loading dose., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill the criteria of landmark large clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AZ reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer, and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring or Advisory Board; he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. RO reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. SS reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; compensation from Novartis for other services. MP reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objective: This study aimed at identifying the incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term mortality and dementia of early-onset delirium in a cohort of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage., Methods: We prospectively recruited consecutive patients in the Prognosis of InTra-Cerebral Hemorrhage (PITCH) cohort and analyzed incidence rate of early-onset delirium (i.e. during the first seven days after intracerebral hemorrhage onset) with a competing risk model. We used a multivariable Fine-Gray model to identify baseline predictors, a Cox regression model to study its impact on the long-term mortality risk, and a Fine-Gray model adjusted for pre-specified confounders to analyze its impact on new-onset dementia., Results: The study population consisted of 248 patients (mean age 70 years, 54% males). Early-onset delirium incidence rate was 29.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.3-35.6). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-existing dementia (subhazard ratio (SHR) 2.08, 95%CI 1.32-3.32, p = 0.002), heavy alcohol intake (SHR 1.79, 95%CI 1.13-2.82, p = 0.013), and intracerebral hemorrhage lobar location (SHR 1.56, 95%CI 1.01-2.42, p = 0.049) independently predicted early-onset delirium. Median follow-up was 9.5 years. Early-onset delirium was associated with higher mortality rates during the first five years of follow-up (HR 1.52, 95%CI 1.00-2.31, p = 0.049), but did not predict new-onset dementia (SHR 1.31, 95%CI 0.60-2.87)., Conclusion: Early-onset delirium is a frequent complication after intracerebral hemorrhage; it is associated with markers of pre-existing brain vulnerability and with higher mortality risk, but not with higher dementia rates during long-term follow-up.

Background: CT perfusion may improve diagnostic accuracy in posterior circulation stroke. The posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT score (pc-ASPECTS) on Computed Tomography Angiography source images (CTA-SI) predicts functional outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion., Aims: We assessed the prognostic value of pc-ASPECTS on CT perfusion in patients with vertebral and basilar artery occlusion (VBAO) in comparison with CTA-SI., Methods: Whole-brain CT perfusion from consecutive stroke patients with VBAO at four stroke centers was retrospectively analyzed. pc-ASPECTS - a 10-point score assessing hypoattenuation on CTA-SI - was calculated from CT perfusion parameters as focally reduced cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume, focally increased time to peak of the deconvolved tissue residue function (Tmax) or mean transit time. Two investigators independently reviewed the images. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient. Good outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale ≤3 at three months., Results: We included 60 patients with VBAO. After assessment of four CT perfusion maps simultaneously, area-under-ROC curve (AROC) was 0.83 (95%CI 0.72-0.93) for cerebral blood volume, 0.76 (95%CI 0.64-0.89) for cerebral blood flow, 0.77 (95%CI 0.64-0.89) for Tmax, 0.70 (95%CI 0.56-0.84) for mean transit time versus area-under-ROC curve 0.64 (95%CI 0.50-0.79) for CTA-SI. Cerebral blood volume had greater accuracy compared with CTA-SI for poor outcome (p = 0.04). In logistic regression analysis, cerebral blood volume pc-ASPECTS≤8 was independently associated with poor outcome (OR 9.3 95%CI 2.2-41; p = 0.003, adjusted for age and clinical severity). Inter-rater agreement was substantial for cerebral blood volume pc-ASPECTS (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.82 95%CI 0.71-0.90 versus 0.67 for CTA-SI 95%CI 0.43-0.81)., Conclusions: Cerebral blood volume pc-ASPECTS may identify VBAO patients at higher risk of disability.

Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common causes of stroke in children worldwide. Based on the results of the Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP), annual transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) screening for affected children is standard practice. However, the need for TCD surveillance programs could override the accuracy of the screening, affecting the correct stratification of stroke risk and subsequent clinical management of the target population. Aims To shed light on this issue, a systematic review of the literature on TCD screening for children and adolescents with SCD was carried out (CRD42016050549), according to a list of clinically relevant questions, with a particular focus on screening practices in European countries. Quality of the evidence was rated using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation. Summary of review Thirty-three studies published in English or French were included (5 randomized controlled trials, 8 experimental non-randomized, and 20 observational studies). The quality of the retrieved evidence ranged between low and high, but was rated as moderate or high most of the times. TCD is effective as a screening tool for the primary prevention of stroke in SCD children. There is no high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of alternative screening methods, such as imaging-TCD with or without angle correction or magnetic resonance angiography. No evidence was found on effectiveness of the screening on children on hydroxyurea and with genotypes other than HbSS and HbS/β0. No European data were found on screening rates or adherence of screening practices to the STOP protocol. Conclusions High-quality studies on alternative screening methods that are currently used in real-world practice, and on screening applicability to specific subgroups of patients are urgently needed. Considering the low awareness of the disease in European countries and the lack of data on screening practices and adherence, clinicians need up-to-date guidelines for more uniform and evidence-based surveillance of children with SCD.