Search

In the event of partial damage to the wind barriers installed on a bridge, the wind loads of a train will change abruptly as they enter and exit the damaged area, resulting in the deterioration of the train running safety. This study aimed to assess the running safety of a CRH2 high-speed train traversing a four-tower cable-stayed bridge with damaged wind barriers. Formulas were deduced for the static and dynamic wind loads on the bridge and train and their combined effect. The aerodynamic coefficients of the train and bridge were obtained through wind tunnel tests of a train–bridge sectional model, and a model of the wind–train–track–bridge coupled system was established using multi-body dynamics and the finite element method. The effects of the length of the damaged area and average wind speed on the train running safety were investigated based on the proposed model. The results reveal that the car body lateral displacements and accelerations reach their maximum amplitudes when the vehicles enter and leave the damaged area, respectively. The amplitude of the car body lateral displacement increases as the length of the damaged area increases, until it reaches 72 m. The wheel load reduction rates (WLRRs) and derailment coefficients (DCs) of the vehicles increase owing to the damage of the wind barriers; however, the percentage increases for each vehicle are considerably different. The train can safely traverse the damaged area of wind barriers at a designed speed of 180 km/h when the average wind speed is lower than 10 m/s. When the average wind speed reaches 20 m/s, the train can still safely cross the damaged area if the length of the damaged area is less than 12 m. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, the influences of wind barriers on the aerodynamic characteristics of trains (e.g. a CRH2 train) on a highway-railway one-story bridge were investigated by using wind pressure measurement tests, and a reduction factor of overturning moment coefficients was analyzed for trains under wind barriers. Subsequently, based on a joint simulation employing SIMPACK and ANSYS, a wind–train–track–bridge system coupled vibration model was established, and the safety and comfort indexes of trains on the bridge were studied under different wind barrier parameters. The results show that the mean wind pressures and fluctuating wind pressures on the trains' surface decrease generally if wind barriers are used. As a result, the dynamic responses of the trains also decrease in the whole process of crossing the bridge. Of particular note, the rate of the wheel load reductions and lateral wheel-axle forces can change from unsafe states to relative safe states due to the wind barriers. The influence of the porosity of the wind barriers on the mean wind pressures and fluctuating wind pressures on the windward sides and near the top corner surfaces of the trains are significantly greater than the influence from the height of the wind barriers. Within a certain range, decreasing the wind barrier porosities and increasing the wind barrier heights will significantly reduce the safety and comfort index values of trains on the bridge. It is found that when the porosity of the wind barrier is 40%, the optimal height of the wind barrier is determined as approximately 3.5 m. At this height, the trains on the bridges are safer and run more smoothly and comfortably. Besides, through the dynamic response analysis of the wind–train–track–bridge system, it is found that the installation of wind barriers in cases with high wind speeds (30 m/s) may have an adverse effect on the vertical vibration of the train–track–bridge system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to investigate the flutter control scheme of super long-span bridges with various aspect ratios (e.g. width to height (B/H)) using passive aerodynamic countermeasures. Through a series of wind tunnel testing and theoretical analysis, three types of passive aerodynamic countermeasures, i.e. vertical central stabilizer (VCS), wind barrier and inspection rail, were investigated for five typical aspect ratios of a closed-box girder bridge. The results show that both the aspect ratio and flutter critical wind speed generally increase with the decrease of the ratio of torsional and vertical frequencies of the bridge. In the case of an aspect ratio of 8.9, a downward VCS (DVCS) has a much better flutter performance than that of an upward VCS (UVCS) because aerodynamic damping of Part A and Part D could produce a higher heaving degree of freedom (DOF) participation level. Furthermore, the position variation of wind barriers is superior to their shape variation for the bridge with an aspect ratio of 8.3, and the flutter performance of the girder with a combination of the wind barrier (WB3P3) and UDVCS with 0.3 h/H DVCS appears to be better than that without countermeasures. In addition, the installation of an inspection rail near the bottom point of an inclined-web (IR3) has the best flutter control effect among four positions of inspection rails. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]