Search

Purpose: Optimization of medical factors including diabetes and obesity is a cornerstone in the prevention of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Dyslipidaemia is another component of metabolic syndrome which has not been thoroughly investigated as an individual, modifiable risk factor. This study examined the association of dyslipidaemia with PJI caused by the lipophilic microbe Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes). Methods: A retrospective chart review examined patients with positive C. acnes culture at hip or knee arthroplasty explantation. A control group with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) positive cultures at explantation was matched for age, sex, and surgical site, as well as a second control group with no infection. A total of 80 patients were included, 16 with C. acnes, 32 with MSSA, and 32 with no infection. All patients had a lipid panel performed within one year of surgery. Lipid values and categories were compared using multinomial logistic regressions. Results: High or borderline triglycerides (TG) (relative risk ratio (RRR) = 0.13; P = 0.013) and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (RRR = 0.13; P = 0.025) were significantly associated with C. acnes PJI compared to MSSA-PJI. High or borderline TG (RRR = 0.21; P = 0.041) and low HDL (RRR = 0.17; P = 0.043) were also associated with a greater probability of C. acnes infection compared to no infection. Conclusions: The presence of elevated TG and low HDL were both associated at a statistically significant level with C. acnes hip or knee PJI compared to controls with either MSSA PJI or no infection. This may represent a specific risk factor for C. acnes PJI that is modifiable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The exponential increase in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has led to acute and chronic surgery-related complications. Common chronic and local complications are represented by hip ossification (HO). The aim of our study was to assess the clinical and radiological correlates of patients undergoing surgical removal of heterotopic ossifications after THA and the possible association between HO and prosthetic joint infection. Methods: Data of 26 patients who underwent surgical removal of periprosthetic calcifications after THA from 2000 to 2022 were analyzed and compared with characteristics of 156 subjects without HO. Results: The preoperative radiographs of patients showed a high-grade Brooker, 3 or 4, later reduced to 1 or 2 in the postoperative radiographs. Ten (38.5%) patients underwent radiotherapy prophylaxis, administered as a single dose 24 h before surgery. In 19 (73%) patients, pharmacological prophylaxis with indomethacin was added in the 30 postoperative days. Only one patient who underwent radiotherapy had a recurrence, while new ossifications were found in three patients without prophylaxis (11.5%). Intraoperative cultures were performed for suspected periprosthetic infection in 8 study group patients. In logistic regression, the presence of HO was significantly and inversely associated with the ASA score (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.09–0.82; P = 0.021) after adjusting. Conclusion: Surgical HO removal in symptomatic patients with high-grade disease produces good clinical and radiographic results. Radiotherapy was a good perioperative and preventive strategy for recurrence, also associated with NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify clinical and laboratory predictors for low- and high-grade prosthetic joint infection (PJI) within the first postoperative days following primary total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Methods: Institutional bone and joint infection registry of a single osteoarticular infection referral centre was reviewed to identify all osteoarticular infections treated between 2011 and 2021. Among them were 152 consecutive PJI (63 acute high-grade PJI, 57 chronic high-grade PJI, and 32 low-grade PJI) who also had primary THA/TKA performed at the same institution, which were retrospectively analyzed with multivariate logistic regression and covariables. Results: For each additional day of wound discharge, persistent wound drainage (PWD) predicted PJI in the acute high-grade PJI group with odds ratio (OR) 39.4 (p = 0.000, 95%CI 1.171–1.661), in the low-grade PJI group with OR 26.0 (p = 0.045, 95%CI 1.005–1.579), but not in the chronic high-grade PJI group (OR 16.6, p = 0.142, 95%CI 0.950–1.432). The leukocyte count product of pre-surgery and POD2 >100 predicted PJI in the acute high-grade PJI group (OR 2.1, p = 0.025, 95%CI 1.003–1.039) and in the chronic high-grade PJI group (OR 2.0, p = 0.018, 95%CI 1.003–1.036). Similar trend was also seen in the low-grade PJI group, but was not statistically significant (OR 2.3, p = 0.061, 95%CI 0.999–1.048). Conclusions: The most optimal threshold value for predicting PJI was observed only in the acute high-grade PJI group, where PWD >three days after index surgery yielded 62.9% sensitivity and 90.6% specificity, whereby the leukocyte count product of pre-surgery and POD2 >100 showed 96.9% specificity. Glucose, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, thrombocytes, and CRP showed no significant value in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The diagnostic criteria of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) recommended by the most commonly used diagnostic algorithms can be obscured or distorted by other inflammatory processes or aseptic pathology. Furthermore, the most reliable diagnostic criteria are garnered during revision surgery. A robust, reliable addition to the preoperative diagnostic cascade is warranted. Calprotectin has been shown to be an excellent diagnostic marker for PJI. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a lateral flow test (LFT) in the challenging patient cohort of a national referral centre for revision arthroplasty. Methods: Beginning in March 2019, we prospectively included patients scheduled for arthroplasty exchange of a total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA). Synovial fluid samples were collected intra-operatively. We used the International Consensus Meeting of 2018 (ICM) score as the gold standard. We then compared the pre-operative ICM score with the LFT result to calculate its diagnostic accuracy as a standalone pre-operative marker and in combination with the ICM score as part of an expanded diagnostic workup. Results: A total of 137 patients with a mean age of 67 (± 13) years with 53 THA and 84 TKA were included. Ninety-nine patients (72.8%) were not infected, 34 (25.0) were infected, and four (2.9%) had an inconclusive final score and could not be classified after surgery. The calprotectin LFT had a sensitivity (95% confidence interval) of 0.94 (0.80–0.99) and a specificity of 0.87 (0.79–0.93). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the calprotectin LFT was 0.94 (0.89–0.99). In nine cases with an inconclusive pre-operative ICM score, the calprotectin LFT would have led to the correct diagnosis of PJI. Conclusions: The synovial fluid calprotectin LFT shows excellent diagnostic metrics both as a rule-in and a rule-out test, even in a challenging patient cohort with cases of severe osteolysis, wear disease, numerous preceding surgeries, and poor soft tissue conditions, which can impair the common diagnostic criteria. As it is available pre-operatively, this test might prove to be a very useful addition to the diagnostic algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The management of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been widely studied in the context of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the outcomes of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for PJI have never been compared between hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and THA. This led us to carry out a retrospective case-control study comparing the surgical treatment of post-operative infections between HRA and THA to determine the infection remission rate and the medium-term functional outcomes.Methods: This single-centre case-control study analysed 3056 HRA cases of which 13 patients had a PJI treated by DAIR. These patients were age-matched with 15 infected THA hips treated by DAIR and modular component exchange (controls). Their survival (no recurrence of the infection) was compared and factors that could affect the success of the DAIR were explored: sex, body mass index, age at surgery, presence of haematoma, type of bacteria present and antibiotic therapy.Results: At a mean follow-up of five years (2-7), the infection control rate was significantly higher in the HRA group (100% [13/13]) than in the THA group (67% [10/15]) (p = 0.044). More patients in the THA group had undergone early DAIR (< 30 days) (73% [11/15]) than in the HRA group (54% [7/13]). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the ASA score, presence of comorbidities, body mass index and duration of the initial arthroplasty procedure. At the review, the Oxford-12 score of 17/60 (12-28) was better in the HRA group than the score of 25/60 (12-40) in the THA group (p = 0.004).Conclusion: DAIR, no matter the time frame, is a viable therapeutic option for infection control after HRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Microencapsulation techniques have allowed the addition of rifampicin to bone cement, but its in vivo efficacy has not been proven. The aim of our study is to determine the superiority of cement containing gentamicin and rifampicin microcapsules in the treatment of PJI versus cement exclusively containing gentamicin.Methods: An S. aureus PJI was induced in 15 NZW rabbits. A week after inoculation, the first stage of replacement was carried out, and the animals were divided into two groups: group R received a spacer containing gentamicin and rifampicin microcapsules, and group C received a spacer containing gentamicin. Intra-articular release curve of rifampicin and infection and toxicity markers were monitored for four weeks post-operatively, when microbiological analysis was performed.Results: The microbiological cultures showed a significantly lower growth of S. aureus in soft tissue (2.3·104 vs 0; p = 0.01) and bone (5.7·102 vs 0; p = 0.03) in the group with rifampicin microcapsules. No differences were found in systemic toxicity markers. Rifampicin release from the cement spacer showed higher concentrations than the staphylococcal MIC throughout the analysis.Conclusion: The in vivo analyses demonstrated the superiority of cement containing gentamicin and rifampicin microcapsules versus the isolated use of gentamicin in the treatment of PJI in the rabbit model without serious side effects due to the systemic absorption of rifampicin. Given the increasing incidence of staphylococci-related PJI, the development of new strategies for intra-articular administration of rifampicin for its treatment has a high clinical impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is considered one of the most successful surgical procedures ever developed. It can successfully provide pain relief, restore joint function, and improve mobility and quality of life. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents with a wide variety and severity of signs and symptoms. It remains a major threat to the outcome of TJA procedures and usually necessitates surgical intervention and prolonged courses of antibiotics. Inappropriate treatment of an unrecognized PJI usually ends with unacceptable and sometimes catastrophic results.the Aim: The understanding and evaluation of diagnostic investigations are extremely important to properly diagnose PJI, including frequently unrecognized low-grade infections, and to provide healthcare professionals with needed information for the care of patients affected by this condition. This article aims to review most of the methods available in PJI diagnostics, to emphasize the strengths and the weaknesses of each of them, and to provide a guideline on how to select the surgical treatment strategy based on the level of diagnostic certainty during the evaluation period. To safely accomplish this, it is crucial to be aware of the limitations of each diagnostic modality.the Focus: The emphasis will be on the use and interpretation of the core criteria for PJI diagnosis, including the pathognomonic sinus tract communicating with the implant, purulent synovial fluid, inflammation in the periprosthetic tissue, cell count with differential, microbial growth in the synovial fluid culture, tissue sample cultures, and sonication samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Chlorhexidine showers prior to shoulder arthroplasty are commonly recommended by surgeons to lower the risk of periprosthetic infection; however, the effectiveness of these washes in eliminating bacteria from the skin of the shoulder has not been thoroughly evaluated. The objective of this study was to determine the degree to which pre-operative chlorhexidine washes effectively eliminate bacteria from the epidermal skin surface and from the dermis freshly incised during shoulder arthroplasty.Methods: Around 66 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were instructed to shower with chlorhexidine before surgery. Each patient had three skin swabs: (1) the epidermis at a pre-operative clinic appointment, (2) the epidermis at surgery after home chlorhexidine showers but prior to skin preparation, and (3) the dermis after incision of the prepared skin. The bacterial loads of Cutibacterium and other bacterial types from each swab were compared to determine whether the showers were effective in altering the bacterial loads.Results: Chlorhexidine washes were effective in reducing the skin load of other bacterial species (p < 0.005), but they did not decrease the skin load of Cutibacterium (p = 0.585).Conclusions: Pre-operative skin showers with chlorhexidine were not effective in reducing the load of Cutibacterium on the skin of patients having shoulder arthroplasty. Since Cutibacterium is responsible for the highest percentage of shoulder periprosthetic infections, research is needed to identify more effective means of removing these bacteria from the surgical field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify potential risk factors and micro-organisms associated with prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee replacement surgery.Hypothesis Of Study: Our hypothesis is that body mass index (BMI), operative time, type of surgery, and order of surgery especially in bilateral simultaneous cases have a major impact on prosthetic joint infection (PJI).Methodology: We identified 4269 patients who underwent for primary knee replacement surgery between 2008 and 2018. We recorded patient demographics, comorbidities, order of surgery, type of surgery, causative micro-organism, and their antibiotic susceptibility. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was built to identify risk factors that are associated with prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee replacement.Results: Forty-eight patients developed prosthetic joint infection. The factors that are found to be associated with prosthetic joint infection are BMI, operative time, type of surgery, order of surgery, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the major underlying pathogen seen in majority of cases.Conclusion: Despite low incidence of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee replacement, there are patients at higher risk that would benefit by addressing modifying risk factors significantly associated with prosthetic joint infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To re-assess the scientific literature to ascertain if there is scientific evidence to support antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with periodontal disease as a means to decrease the risk of prosthetic joint infections.Introduction: Prosthetic joint infections occur in approximately 0.3-2% of patients and, of these, around 6-13% are thought to be caused by oral bacteria. Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures as a means to prevent a prosthetic joint infection has been controversial throughout the years. However, it remains unclear to what extent it has a beneficial effect. We do know that bacteraemia of oral origin is directly proportional to any ongoing inflammation or infection, and that a diseased periodontium may act as an entry for bacteria to spread to distant locations, through the bloodstream, and potentially be the cause of distant site infections.Materials and Methods: Updated literature search using the PubMed (Medline), and the Clarivate Analytics databases, to identify eligible articles since the previous searches up to April 2019 (last 5 years).Results: No studies that relate periodontal disease to the development of a prosthetic joint infection were found.Conclusion: Currently, there is no evidence to support or exclude the need of antibiotic prophylaxis as a means to decrease the risk of prosthetic joint infections in patients with periodontal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Dexamethasone has been shown to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and seems to reduce post-operative pain. Both factors, which can extend the hospital stay, delay rehabilitation, and impact patient satisfaction. Because of the immunosuppressive and glucose-rising effects of dexamethasone, there has been concern of its safety in arthroplasty surgery. The purpose of our study was to examine infection safety of dexamethasone in arthroplasty surgery with enough large study material to reliably detect a possible, even small, difference in infection incidence.Methods: A total of 18,872 consecutive primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasties were analyzed with data gathered from clinical information databases and a surgical site infection surveillance database with prospective data collection. Also, emergency operations due to fractures were included except for hip hemiarthroplasties.Results: During the follow-up, 189 (1.0%) prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) occurred: 0.8% after primary arthroplasty and 1.9% after revision arthroplasty. Dexamethasone was used in 2922 (15.5%) operations. The PJI rate in the dexamethasone group was 1.1% (31/2922) and in the non-dexamethasone group 1.0% (161/15950), with no significant difference in the risk of PJI between the two groups (OR 1.052, 95% CI 0.715-1.548, P = 0.773).Conclusions: In our study material, the use of a single 5-10 mg dose of dexamethasone did not increase the incidence of post-operative PJI. A low dose of dexamethasone may be safely used to prevent PONV and as part of multimodal analgesia on patients undergoing arthroplasty operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The two-stage revision protocol is the gold standard for controlling and treating low-grade prosthetic joint infections of total hip and total knee arthroplasty. The antibiotic pause for diagnostic reasons before reconstruction (stage two) is discussed in relation to the persistence of the infection and the development of resistant bacterial strains. Serological markers and a synovial analysis are commonly used to exclude the persistence of infection. Therefore, we asked (1) is the serological testing of C-reactive protein and leucocytes a valuable tool to predict a persistence of infection? and (2) what is the role of synovial aspiration of Plymethylmethacrylat (PMMA) spacers in hip and knee joints?Materials and Methods: One hundred twelve patients who were MSIS criteria-positive for a prosthetic joint infection were studied, including 45 total hip arthroplasties (THA) and 67 total knee artrhoplasties (TKA) patients. All patients were treated with a two-stage-protocol using a mobile PMMA spacer after a 14-day antibiotic-free interval, during which we measured serological markers (C-reactive protein and leucocytes) and performed synovial aspiration (white blood cell count, polymorphonuclear cell percentage, and microbiological culture) in these patients and compared the results with those of their long-term-follow-up (mean follow-up 27 months, range 24-36 months).Results: Of the 112 patients, 89 patients (79.5%; 95% CI 72-86.9) exhibited infection control after a two-stage exchange, and we detected most methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) in cases of a persistent infection. The mean sensitivity of serum C-reactive protein in the patients was 0.43 (range 0.23-0.64), and the mean specificity was 0.73 (range 0.64-0.82). For serum leucocytes, the mean sensitivity was 0.09 (range 0-0.29), and the mean specificity was 0.81 (range 0.7-0.92). The mean sensitivity for the WBC count in the synovial fluid (PMMA spacer aspiration) was 0.1 (range 0-0.29), and the mean specificity was 0.79 (range 0.68-0.92). For the PMN percentage, the mean sensitivity was 0.1 (range 0-0.29), and the mean specificity was 0.79 (range 0.68-0.92). No cut-off values could be established for C-reactive protein, leucocytes, WBC count and PMN percentage due to the low AUC.Conclusion: No reliable markers were identified for the long-term persistence of infection. C-reactive protein and leucocytes were often elevated, even when the infection was controlled. In addition, normalized serum markers did not exclude the persistence of infection during follow-up. The synovial analysis of the WBC count and PMN percentage did not predict the persistence of infection. However, microbiological synovial fluid analysis is often misleading due to false positive microbiological cultures, which results in overtreatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Periprosthetic tissue cultures, sonication and synovial fluid cultures remain the gold standard for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. However, some 15-20% culture-negative PJI are still reported. Therefore, there is the need for other diagnostic criteria. One point of concern relative to the different definitions of PJI is as to the inclusion of the c-reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as diagnostic criteria for PJI despite them being non-specific inflammatory blood tests.Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to determine the relevance of CRP and the ESR in the diagnosis of PJI.Methods: All PJI with positive cultures over a two-year period in two hospitals were reviewed. The main variables of the present study were the type of prosthesis and the CRP level. More information was recorded in those patients with normal CRP: radiographs, physical examination records and the ESR.Results: Seventy-three patients were included in study. Pre-operative CRP levels were normal (lower than 0.8 mg/dl) in 23 patients, representing 32% of all PJI with positive cultures. Low virulence micro-organisms, 12 coagulase-negative staphylococci and four P. acnes, grew in most of them. They represented 70% of all PJI with normal CRP levels. In addition, 17 patients (23% of all PJI with positive cultures) had a normal ESR, a normal physical examination (they only presented with pain) and no clear loosening was observed in the radiographs.Conclusions: Per the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines or the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), 23% of the patients in the present study with PJI would never have been identified. Blood inflammatory markers such as the CRP level and ESR may not be accurate as diagnostic tools in PJI, particularly to identify low-grade and chronic PJI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to be a significant complication after total joint arthroplasty. Diagnosis of PJI can be challenging and elusive in the absence of a gold standard. This purpose of this article is to review the current evidence on the utility of serum and synovial fluid biomarkers to help aid in the diagnosis of PJI with focusing on synovial fluid alpha-defensin.Methods: Articles and data for this review were identified by searches of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE up to June 1, 2016. In addition, we manually reviewed the bibliographies of the retrieved articles for additional citations for references from relevant articles on the diagnosis of PJI.Results: Serum biomarkers can be elevated in various inflammatory conditions. Synovial fluid biomarkers are more accurate for the diagnosis of PJI compared to serum biomarkers. Based on current available data, alpha-defensin is the most promising synovial fluid biomarker for the diagnosis of PJI and is commercially available.Conclusions: Synovial fluid alpha-defensin could enhance our ability to identify PJI and incorporate into the diagnostic algorithm in the future. Large-scale studies are needed to provide more data for its significance for the diagnosis of PJI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a serious and challenging complication after total joint arthroplasty. According to the literature, most PJI are monomicrobial infections caused by gram-positive cocci. The number of polymicrobial PJI might be underrepresented in the literature and only limited data are available regarding the outcome of polymicrobial PJI. Our hypothesis was that polymicrobial PJI are associated with a reduced cure rate compared with monomicrobial PJI.Methods: Routine clinical data were collected and analysed retrospectively as anonymised, aggregated data. A total of 77 consecutive patients with 77 confirmed PJI and proven infectious organism of the hip and knee joint treated within a two-stage exchange concept and a follow-up ≥ two years were investigated. Detection of the infectious organism was based on multiple microbiological cultures taken intra-operatively. Superficial wound swabs or swabs from sinus tracts were not taken into account. Data were grouped into polymicrobial and monomicrobial PJI. The main outcome variable was "definitively free of infection after two years" as published. Second, we considered several variables as potential confounders or as risk factors.Results: A total of 42 men and 35 women with 46 infected total hip arthroplasties and 31 infected total knee arthroplasties were evaluated. In 37 (46.6 %) of our 77 patients a polymicrobial PJI could be detected. We found a significant association between polymicrobial PJI and the outcome parameter definitively free of infection after two years with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.3 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.1-1.0]. The rate of patients graded as definitively free of infection after two years was 67.6 % for polymicrobial infections vs. 87.5 % for monomicrobial infections. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2-1.0, p = 0.062) was identified as a borderline significant covariable.Conclusions: Our data suggest that polymicrobial PJI might be underrepresented in the current literature. Additionally, the presence of multiple infectious organisms is associated with a reduced rate after two years with 67.6 vs 87.5 % for monomicrobial infections. Special attention and extra care should be considered for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was evaluation of the efficacy of the first step of a two-stage procedure for treatment of hip prosthetic joint infection (PJI) using articulating and non-articulating spacers as well as development of a prediction model and prognostic score for infection recurrence.Methods: In a cohort of 217 patients treated for PJI of the hip, demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, body temperature, body mass index (BMI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), microbiological cultures and the type of the spacer used were retrospectively analyzed for association with the recurrence of PJI.Results: Patients with infection recurrence had increased levels of ESR and CRP (P < 0.001) together with higher BMI and shorter infection manifestation period after previous surgery (P < 0.05). Among these patients, there was no significant difference of clinical characteristics between subjects with articulating and non-articulating spacers. Microbial associations were more often identified in patients with recurrent infection (50 %, P < 0.01) where Gram-negative bacteria were predominant (61.5 %, P < 0.01). These patients had higher percentage of Acinetobacter sp. and P. aeruginosa isolates (28.2 %, P < 0.01).Conclusions: Efficacy of the first step of two-stage revision was 64.1 %. Placement of either articulating or non-articulating spacers did not influence recovery from PJI. Laboratory values of ESR, CRP, BMI and the type of previous surgery were identified as main factors that affect outcomes of the two-stage procedure. A prognostic model with the calculation of a total risk score for PJI recurrence was developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) occur on a regular basis and with an increasing incidence. Under reporting of complications to national registries and unreliable ICD-10 coding increases the risk of under estimating the true rate of PJIs after hip arthroplasty. Also, the microbiology and final outcome is less well described, especially for hip-fracture patients operated upon with primary and secondary fracture prostheses. Our aim was to analyse re-operation rate, outcome and microbiology of PJIs following hip arthroplasty in patients operated upon due to hip fractures and degenerative hip disorders.Methods: This was a single-centre cohort study of 3807 consecutive hip arthroplasties performed between 1996 and 2005. The primary study outcome was to compare the incidence of PJIs. The secondary outcome was to analyse the microbiology and outcome of PJIs.Results: We identified 62 PJIs: seven surgical-site PJIs were found in patients operated upon for a degenerative hip disorder, 22 [hazard ratio (HR) 4.3] were found in patients operated upon for a primary fracture and prosthesis and 25 (HR 6.1) in patients operated upon with a secondary fracture and prosthesis. Outcome treatment was unfavourable for hip fracture patients with a high rate of Girdlestone operation performed (22 of 27). Staphylococcal infections dominated in the fracture group, whereas polybacterial infections were more common in patients with degenerative hip disorder.Conclusions: Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture treated primary or secondary with arthroplasties have a greater risk of PJIs and display worse outcomes compared with patients with a total hip replacement due to degenerative hip disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The reported success rates of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) vary widely. Several risk factors have been described for treatment failure, but they vary between studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictors of DAIR failure in PJI treatment and to assess the efficacy of rifampin combined with ciprofloxacin versus rifampin combined with other antibiotics in staphylococcal PJIs. Methods: Patients with PJI that underwent DAIR for the first time between February 2001 and August 2009 were identified retrospectively in the hospital's patient databases. A total of 113 PJI cases with early postoperative or acute haematogenous PJI were followed for up to two years from the start of treatment. Results: In univariate analysis, variables significantly associated with treatment failure were acute haematogenous infections ( p = 0.022), leucocyte count at admission > 10 × 10/l ( p < 0.01), pain in the joint ( p < 0.01), and ineffective empirical antibiotics ( p < 0.01). In a multivariate Cox model, leucocyte count > 10 × 10/l and ineffective empirical antibiotics were significant risk factors for failure. Compared to rifampin-ciprofloxacin, the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment failure was significantly increased in the rifampin-other antibiotics group (HR 6.0, 95 % CI 1.5−28.8, p = 0.014) and the group treated without rifampin (HR 14.4, 95 % CI 3.1−66.9, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Rifampin-ciprofloxacin combination therapy was significantly more effective than rifampin combined with other antibiotics. Effective empirical antibiotics are essential for successful PJI treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]