1. Debating British Decisionmaking toward Nazi Germany in the 1930s
- Author
-
Norrin M. Ripsman, Talbot Imlay, Andrew Barros, Evan N. Resnick, and Jack S. Levy
- Subjects
International relations ,Sociology and Political Science ,Argument ,Law ,Political science ,Political Science and International Relations ,Analogy ,Nazi Germany ,Security studies ,Administration (government) ,Period (music) ,Appeasement - Abstract
Ripsman and Levy’s argument merits attention for at least two related reasons. The arst is the renewal of interest in appeasement within the international relations and security studies aelds. Piqued by the repeated use (or misuse) of the appeasement analogy by the administration of George W. Bush, several scholars have recently turned their attention to the international politics of the 1930s to assess what lessons should be drawn from the events of the period for today’s decisionmakers. 2 More speciacally, they question whether appeasement is sometimes justiaed or is always misguided. The second reason is that many of these scholars embrace what might be called a “rational
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF