1. A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction
- Author
-
Ash Monga, Jeyakumar Subbaroyan, and Michael R. Tracey
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous ,Intention-to-treat analysis ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Urology ,Urinary system ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Electric Stimulation Therapy ,Urinary incontinence ,Stimulation ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Treatment Outcome ,Urinary Incontinence ,Systematic review ,Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ,Lower urinary tract symptoms ,Humans ,Medicine ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
The aim of this manuscript was to provide a systematic literature review of clinical trial evidence for a range of electrical stimulation therapies in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The databases MEDLINE, BIOSIS Previews, Inside Conferences, and EMBASE were searched. Original clinical studies with greater than 15 subjects were included. Seventy-three studies were included, representing implanted sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) therapy modalities. Median mean reductions in incontinence episodes and voiding frequency were similar for implanted SNS and PTNS. However, long-term follow-up data to validate the sustained benefit of PTNS are lacking. Despite a substantial body of research devoted to SNS validation, it is not possible to definitively define the appropriate role of this therapy owing largely to study design flaws that inhibited rigorous intention to treat analyses for the majority of these studies.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF