Search

In their letter to the editor, the authors from the Karolinska Institute argue that, with the current available evidence of efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, it is unethical to perform a trial in patients with basilar artery occlusion in which patients are at risk of being withheld this effective treatment. Good outcomes of a few selected patients after intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) were enough evidence for the stroke community to obviate the performance of a randomized trial of patients with basilar artery occlusion. Meta-analysis of retrospectively collected data of case series of selected patients showed no "obvious" difference in outcome between patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or IAT.[4]. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: This study aims at exploring the 3-month outcome predicting ability of delayed neurological improvement and the cause of delayed neurological improvement. Materials and methods: Early neurological improvement and delayed neurological improvement were calculated to represent the neurological improvements. Good functional outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0–2. We used multivariant logistic regression to explore the influential factors of good functional outcome as well as delayed neurological improvement. We applied net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement to assess the quantitative improvement of the predictive model. Results: Early neurological improvement was observed in 50 (23%) patients and delayed neurological improvement exhibited in 67 (30%) patients. Early neurological improvement and delayed neurological improvement were both independent predictive factors to good functional outcome. In the basic model (adjusted for age, admission glucose level, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, and complications and number of retrieval attempts), early neurological improvement and delayed neurological improvement statistically improved the predictive ability (early neurological improvement: net reclassification improvement = 0.34, 95% confidence interval, 95% confidential interval (0.06, 0.69); integrated discrimination improvement = 0.05, p < 0.001; delayed neurological improvement: net reclassification improvement = 0.79, 95% confidential interval (0.47, 1.12); integrated discrimination improvement = 0.14, p < 0.001) delayed neurological improvement could predict clinical outcomes more accurately than early neurological improvement (early neurological improvement vs. delayed neurological improvement: integrated discrimination improvement = 0.09, p < 0.001). Moreover, delayed neurological improvement was affected by hypertension (odds ratio = 0.40, 95% CI (0.18, 0.88), p = 0.02), early neurological improvement (odds ratio = 20.10, 95% confidential interval (8.24, 19.02), p < 0.001), number of retrieval attempts (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidential interval (0.24, 0.66), p < 0.001), and complication (odds ratio = 0.25, 95% confidential interval (0.12, 0.54), p < 0.001). Conclusions: Delayed neurological improvement could predict clinical outcomes more accurately than early neurological improvement. Hypertension, early neurological improvement, numbers of retrieval attempts, and complications were all predicting factors to delayed neurological improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vascular angioplasty and stenting of middle cerebral artery (MCA) and basilar artery (BA) stenoses are associated with poor clinical outcomes and high mortality rates thought to be related to the abundance of perforating arteries in those segments. This study explores the use of Solitaire AB as an off-label vascular stent to treat stenoses in the MCA and BA. Methods: Solitaire AB stents were placed during angioplasty and stenting of MCA and BA stenoses in patients at our department between January 2015 and May 2017 with 6-36 months follow-up. Operative results were assessed by follow-up angiography and transcranial doppler after the procedure. Neurologic status was evaluated before and after treatment according to the modified Ranking Scale (mRS). Results: A total of 32 patients were included in the study. Seventeen (53.12%) patients presented with MCA stenosis and 15 (46.87%) with BA stenosis. The 30-day rate of procedure-related complications was 3.1% (1/32). Post-stenting residual stenosis degrees ranged from 0% to 40% (mean 13.44% ± 10.66%). Mean degree of residual stenosis in 26 patients followed up by DSA was 8.64% ± 9.67%. The mRS 0-2 was achieved in all (100%) patients at 6-12 months post-procedure. Conclusions: Our study indicates the off-label use of Solitaire AB for stenting is effective and safe for MCA and BA stenoses with high technical success and low complications. We recommend that lesion-specific therapy with an anatomically fitted stent design enables optimal treatment for intracranial stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preoperative neuroimaging assessment of collateral circulation is important for selecting acute ischemic stroke patients who are appropriate for endovascular treatment. We sought to validate the capillary index score system in an Asian population and compare its ability in predicting clinical outcomes with the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology grading system. Methods: We continuously enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients from two neurological centers from March 2014 to March 2017. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the capillary index score system with 90-day clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score). The scoring systems were compared for predicting good (modified Rankin scale 0–2) and excellent (modified Rankin scale 0–1) functional outcomes using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: We identified 157 patients (median age, 65 years; 96 (61.1%) males), of whom 71 (45.2%) patients with 90-day good functional outcomes were selected. Capillary index score was independently associated with clinical outcome after endovascular treatment (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43–0.92; P = 0.016) with its predictive ability for good functional outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.755). For excellent functional outcome, the capillary index score system was not inferior to the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology grading system (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.748 versus 0.793, P = 0.09). Conclusions: The capillary index score system is a potentially useful tool for predicting 90-day functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients after endovascular treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The endovascular treatment strategy for acute tandem occlusion stroke is challenging, and controversy exists regarding which lesion should be treated first. This study addresses the uncertainty regarding the priority choice for thrombectomy in acute anterior circulation tandem occlusion stroke. Methods We analysed the clinical and angiographic data of tandem stroke patients who underwent interventional therapy from the endovAsCular Treatment of acUte Anterior circuLation ischaemic stroke (ACTUAL) registry. Recanalisation was assessed according to the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score. Clinical outcome was evaluated at 90 days using the modified Rankin scale score. Results Sixty tandem occlusion stroke patients were enrolled. Thirty-one (51.7%) patients received anterograde therapy, while 29 (48.3%) patients underwent the retrograde approach. Successful recanalisation (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b–3) occurred in 78.3% (47/60) of patients, and 50.0% (30/60) of patients achieved a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 at 90 days. Patients undergoing the retrograde approach spent less time in distal occlusion recanalisation (125 (86–167) vs. 95 (74–122) minutes; P = 0.04) and achieved better functional outcomes at 90 days (69.0% (20/29) vs. 32.3% (10/31); P = 0.004) than patients who received anterograde therapy. The retrograde approach was associated with favourable clinical outcomes (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.07–0.64; P = 0.006). Conclusion For acute tandem occlusion stroke, favourable outcomes were better in patients undergoing retrograde therapy than in patients who received the anterograde approach. Future randomised trials are warranted to determine the optimal treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The objective of this article is to compare the effectiveness of primary angioplasty and/or stenting with stent retriever thrombectomy in acute anterior large-vessel occlusion due to atherosclerotic disease. Methods Patients were retrospectively reviewed from the endovascular treatment for acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke registry. Patients with large-vessel occlusions due to atherosclerosis were selected. We evaluated modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score immediately post-procedure, and symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 72 hours. Results Of 302 patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion due to atherosclerotic disease, 269 were treated with stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line therapy and 33 with angioplasty and/or stenting. Patients who received primary angioplasty treatment showed favorable independent outcome at 90 days (69.7% (23/33) vs 47.6% (128/269), p = 0.02) and lower rate of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (9.1% (3/23) vs 30.5% (82/269), p = 0.01). Recanalization immediately post procedure did not differ (78.8%% (26/33) vs 86.2% (232/269), p = 0.29). Primary angioplasty therapy (OR, 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08–0.90; p = 0.03) and small baseline infarct (OR 0.36: 0.16–0.82; p = 0.02) were protective factors against poor functional outcome, while old age (OR 1.04:1.01–1.07; p = 0.006), severe neurological deficits (OR 3.76: 2.00–7.07; p < 0.001), and high glucose (OR 1.11: 1.01–1.23; p = 0.03) were associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions Patients with acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion due to atherosclerosis may benefit from urgent angioplasty and/or stenting as first-line therapy. Randomized controlled trials are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two early basilar artery occlusion (BAO) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not establish the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical management. Yet many providers continued to recommend EVT. The goal of the present article is to compare physicians’ diagnostic and management strategies of BAO among middle-income and high-income countries (MICs and HICs, respectively).We conducted an international survey from January to March 2022 regarding management strategies in acute BAO, to examine clinical and imaging parameters influencing clinician management of patients with BAO. We compared responses between physicians from HIC and MIC.Among the 1245 respondents from 73 countries, 799 (64.2%) were from HIC, with the remaining 393 (31.6%) from MIC. Most respondents perceived that EVT was superior to medical management for acute BAO, but more so in respondents from HIC (98.0% vs. 94.2%, p < 0.01). MIC respondents were more likely to believe further RCTs were warranted (91.6% vs. 74.0%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to find it acceptable to enroll any patient who met a trial’s criteria in the standard medical treatment arm (58.8% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.01).In an area where clinical equipoise was called into question despite the lack of RCT evidence, we found that respondents from MIC were more likely to express willingness to enroll patients with BAO in an RCT than their HIC counterparts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]