Search

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, impact, and predictors of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundSeveral issues remain unresolved post-TAVR, including CVEs.MethodsThe FRANCE-2 (French Aortic Nation CoreValve and Edwards-2) registry prospectively included all patients who underwent TAVR in France and Monaco from January 2010 to October 2011. A total of 3,191 patients were analyzed. Six-month follow-up data were obtained. Events were adjudicated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-1 definition.ResultsOf the cohort, 3.98% experienced a CVE: 55% were major strokes, 14.5% minor strokes, and 30.5% transient ischemic attacks. The mean delay for CVE occurrence was 2 days (interquartile range: 0 to 7 days) with 48.5% of CVEs occurring within 2 days. There was no statistically significant difference in CVE rate with regard to the type of valve (p = 0.899) and the access route (p = 0.128). Patients with a CVE more frequently had new-onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13.6% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.015). During follow-up, the unadjusted mortality rate was higher in patients with a CVE (26% vs. 16.5%; p = 0.002). By multivariate analysis, only advanced age (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.08; p = 0.02) and having 2 valves implanted (odds ratio: 3.13; 95 confidence interval: 1.40 to 7.05; p = 0.006) were associated with a significant risk of CVEs.ConclusionsCVEs occur frequently after TAVR and are associated with an increased mortality rate. No difference exists in the CVE rate when exploring the type of valve or the access route. Advanced age and multiple valves implanted during the same procedure are predictors of CVE.

ObjectivesThis study was designed to evaluate long-term clinical and economic outcomes for subjects receiving Endeavor drug-eluting versus Driver bare-metal stents (both Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California).BackgroundEarly studies found that the drug-eluting stent (DES) was a clinically and economically attractive alternative to the bare-metal stent; however, associations between DES and very late stent thrombosis suggest that longer follow-up is required.MethodsWe used clinical, resource use and follow-up data from 1,197 subjects randomized to receive Endeavor (n = 598) versus Driver (n = 599) stents in ENDEAVOR II (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) study with Medicare cost weights and quality of life adjustments applied from secondary sources. We compared differences through 4-year follow-up (1,440 days).ResultsPatients in both treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics. The use of Endeavor versus Driver reduced 4-year target vessel revascularization rates per 100 subjects (10.4 vs. 21.5; difference: −11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −16.0 to −6.1; p < 0.001), with no difference in the rates per 100 subjects of death (5.0 vs. 5.2; difference: −0.2; 95% CI: −2.7 to 2.4; p = 0.90) or nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.2 vs. 4.4; difference: −1.2; 95% CI: −3.4 to 1.0; p = 0.29). After discounting at a 3% annual rate, there were no differences in quality-adjusted survival days (1,093 vs. 1,090; difference: 3; 95% CI: −13 to 19; p = 0.69) and total medical costs ($21,483 vs. $21,680; difference: −$198; 95% CI: −$1,608 to $1,207; p = 0.78).ConclusionsThe use of Endeavor versus Driver was associated with a significant reduction in target vessel revascularization through 4-year follow-up with no difference in death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, quality-adjusted survival, or total medical costs. These results are comparable to those for other studies evaluating drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions [ENDEAVOR II]; NCT00614848)

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) and of patients who presented with new-onset AF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).BackgroundLittle is known regarding the impact of AF after TAVI.MethodsThe FRANCE-2 registry included all patients undergoing TAVI (N = 3,933) in France in 2010 and 2011. New-onset AF was defined as the occurrence of AF post-procedure in a patient with no documented history of AF.ResultsAF was documented before TAVI in 25.8% of patients. New-onset AF was observed in 174 patients after TAVI among patients without a history of pre-existing AF (6.0%). At 1 year, the rates of all-cause death (26.5 vs. 16.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (11.5 vs. 7.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with pre-existing AF compared with those without AF. Rehospitalization for worsening heart failure and New York Heart Association functional class was also higher in patients with pre-existing AF versus those without, resulting in a higher rate of combined efficacy endpoint in this group (p < 0.001). A history of stroke, surgical (nontransfemoral) approach, cardiological, and hemorrhagic procedure-related events were all independently related to the occurrence of new-onset post-procedural AF. New-onset AF in patients without pre-existing AF was associated with a higher rate of combined safety endpoint at 30 days (p < 0.001) and a higher rate of both all-cause death and combined efficacy endpoint at 1 year (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionsPre-existing and new-onset AF are both associated with higher mortality and morbidity after TAVI.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate late safety and efficacy outcomes among patients enrolled in clinical trials comparing Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stents (E-ZES) (Medtronic, Inc., Santa Rosa, California) with first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS).BackgroundDespite demonstration of higher angiographic luminal loss and restenosis with E-ZES compared with alternative DES, whether differences in these early angiographic measures translate into more disparate late clinical events is uncertain.MethodsAmong 3,616 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in 5 registration trials, late safety and efficacy events were compared between E-ZES (n = 2,132) versus sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 888) or BMS (n = 596).ResultsCompared with a parallel cohort of patients treated with first-generation DES and BMS, 5-year rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI) (5.8% vs. 8.8% DES, p = 0.003; vs. 8.4% BMS, p = 0.02) and major adverse cardiac events (16.1% vs. 20.6% DES, p = 0.009; vs. 24.6% BMS, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with E-ZES. The E-ZES was associated with significantly lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with BMS (7.4% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001) but similar to comparator DES (7.4% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.63). Despite higher TLR in the first year with E-ZES compared with DES, between 1- and 5-year follow-up, rates of cardiac death/MI, TLR, and definite/probable stent thrombosis were significantly lower with E-ZES.ConclusionsOver 5 years, significant differences in cardiac death/MI and composite endpoints favored treatment with E-ZES over comparator BMS and DES. Rates of clinical restenosis and safety events, including stent thrombosis beyond the first year of revascularization, remain stable with E-ZES, leading to significant differences compared with first-generation DES.