Search

Knowledge in the field of bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusions (CTOs) has progressively improved over the past 20 years. Therefore, the European Bifurcation Club and the EuroCTO Club have decided to write a joint consensus statement to share general knowledge and practical approaches in this complex field. When percutaneously treating CTOs, bifurcation lesions with relevant side branches (SBs) are found in approximately one-third of cases (35% at the proximal cap, 38% at the distal cap, and 27% within the CTO body). Occlusion of a relevant SB is not rare and has been shown to be associated with procedural complications and adverse outcomes. Simple bifurcation rules are very useful to prevent SB occlusion, and provisional SB stenting is the recommended approach in the majority of cases: protect the SB as soon as possible by wiring it, respect the fractal anatomy of the bifurcation by using the 3-diameter rule, and avoid using dissection and re-entry techniques. A systematic 2-stent approach can be used if needed or sometimes to connect both branches of the bifurcation. The retrograde approach can be very useful to save a relevant SB, especially in the case of a bifurcation at the distal cap or within the CTO body. Intravascular ultrasound is also a very important tool to address the difficulties with bifurcations at the proximal or distal cap and sometimes also within the CTO segment. Double-lumen microcatheters and angulated microcatheters are crucial tools to resolve access difficulties to the SB or the main branch., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Lefèvre has received minor fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Dr Pan has received minor lecture fees from Abbott, Asahi Intecc, Terumo, and Boston Scientific. Dr Stankovic has received speaker fees from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Dr Ojeda has received consulting fees from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Boudou has received consulting honoraria for Asahi Intecc, Terumo, and Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cardiovascular Systems, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is an owner of Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. Dr Garbo has received proctorship and consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Philips, Terumo, Teleflex, and IMDS. Dr Di Mario has received research grants to his institution from Abbott, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Idorsia, Medtronic, Shockwave, and Volcano. Dr Hildick-Smith has received research funds and speaker fees from Medtronic. Dr Mashayekhi has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Shockwave Medical, Teleflex, and Terumo. Dr Werner has received speaker fees from Asahi Intecc, Orbus-Neich, Philips-Volcano, Siemens, Shockwave Medical, and Terumo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Guiding catheter extensions (GCEs) have become indispensable tools in the modern approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The support offered during complex PCI of uncrossable, or tortuous lesions is particularly valuable in the setting of chronic total occlusions (CTO), both for conventional anterograde wire escalation and for anterograde or retrograde dissection and re-entry techniques. This EuroCTO consensus document describes the use of GCE during CTO recanalization and provides a practical guide to anatomies and techniques in which these devices are applicable. We describe the peculiar features of the most-used device and the practical technique for GCE delivery in standard PCI; further specific indications for antegrade and retrograde CTO PCI are discussed in a specific section. In the antegrade approach, the GCEs may be useful to increase support or facilitate antegrade dissection and re-entry techniques, while in the retrograde approach for reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking, to increase retrograde support for gear delivery, for treatment of CTO in bifurcation and ipsilateral externalization with a single guide catheter. The last section of the paper describes GCE-related complications, challenges, limitations, and future perspectives., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Mashayekhi has received consulting/speaker/proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Ashai Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Shockwave Medical, Teleflex, and Terumo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of procedural success after retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: Retrograde CTO PCI is an established technique, but predictors of success remain poorly understood., Methods: A multivariable logistic regression model was used to analyze potentially important demographic, clinical, anatomical, and technical aspects of retrograde CTO PCI cases uploaded to the multicenter European CTO (ERCTO) Club Registry., Results: In calendar years 2018 and 2019, 2,364 retrograde CTO PCI cases constituted the primary analysis cohort. A primary retrograde strategy was used in 1,953 cases (82.6%), and an initial antegrade approach was converted to retrograde in 411 cases (17.4%). Procedural success was achieved in 1,820 cases (77.0%) and was more likely to occur after a primary retrograde attempt versus conversion from an initial antegrade approach (80.9% vs 58.4%; P < 0.0001). After multivariable analysis, an absence of lesion calcification (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.37-2.51; P < 0.0001), a higher degree of distal vessel opacification (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.72-3.55; P < 0.0001), little or no proximal target vessel tortuosity (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.28-2.64; P = 0.001), Werner collateral connection CC1 (OR: 4.87; 95% CI: 2.90-8.19; P < 0.0001) or CC2 (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 3.02-9.42; P < 0.0001), and the top tertile of operator volume (>120 cases over 2 years) (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.26-2.79; P = 0.002) were associated with the greatest chance of achieving angiographic success., Conclusions: Less calcification with good distal vessel opacification, little or absent proximal vessel tortuosity, and visible collateral connections, along with high-volume operator status, were all independently predictive of angiographically successful retrograde CTO PCI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Mashayekhi has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Teleflex, and Terumo. Dr Avran has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Terumo, Alvimedica, and OrbusNeich. Dr Boudou is a proctor and consultant for Asahi Intecc, Terumo, and Boston Scientific. Dr Garbo is a proctor and consultant for Philips Volcano, Boston Europe, Terumo Italy, and Europe Teleflex. Dr Bryniarski has received speaker and proctoring honoraria from Procardia Medical, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Prof Spratt has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Lesiak has received speaker and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Terumo Medical. Prof Di Mario has received research or educational grants from Abbott, Amgen, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Behring, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Menarini, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shockwave, Teleflex, and Volcano-Philips. Dr Hildick-Smith has served on the advisory boards for Abbott, Terumo, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is noninferior to 24-month DAPT in aspirin-sensitive patients., Background: The ITALIC (Is There a Life for DES After Discontinuation of Clopidogrel) trial showed that rates of bleeding and thrombotic events at 1 year were much the same with 6 versus 12 months of DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents. In this report, 2-year follow-up is presented., Methods: In a multicenter randomized study, patients with confirmed nonresistance to aspirin undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation were allocated to 6 or 24 months of DAPT. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding at 12 months post-percutaneous coronary intervention. The secondary endpoints comprised the same composite endpoint at 24 months and each individual component., Results: Overall, 2,031 patients from 70 centers were screened; 926 were randomized to 6-month and 924 to 24-month DAPT. Noninferiority was demonstrated for 6- versus 12-month DAPT, with an absolute risk difference of 0.11% (95% confidence interval: -1.04% to 1.26%; p = 0.0002). At 2 years, the composite endpoint was unchanged, at 3.5% for 6 months and 3.7% for 24 months (p = 0.79), and rates of myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.51), stroke (0.6% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.77), and target vessel revascularization (1.0% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.09) were likewise similar. There was a trend toward higher mortality with longer DAPT (2.2% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.11). Four patients (0.4%) in the 24-month group and none in the 6-month group had major bleeding., Conclusions: Two-year outcomes in the ITALIC trial confirmed the 1-year results and showed that patients receiving 6-month DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stent have similar outcomes to those receiving 24-month DAPT., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this fractal bifurcation bench study was to compare provisional bifurcation stenting with a "re-POT" sequence, comprising a proximal optimizing technique (POT), side branch inflation, and final POT, between a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) and a metallic stent., Background: Re-POT proved significantly better than kissing balloon inflation in maintaining circular geometry without overstretch in metal stents, while significantly reducing side branch ostium strut obstruction and global strut malapposition. This should be useful for BVSs, which are more easily breakable., Methods: Twenty left main-like and 20 left anterior descending-like fractal coronary bifurcation bench models used 10 each 2.5 × 24 mm and 3.5 × 24 mm Absorb (Ab) BVSs and 10 each 2.5 × 24 mm and 3.5 × 24 mm XIENCE Xpedition (XX) metal stents, implanted by re-POT, with optical coherence tomographic analysis at each step and micro-computed tomographic analysis of Ab devices to detect strut fracture., Results: With Ab devices, re-POT reduced percentage strut malapposition close to XX rates (0.8 ± 0.7% vs. 0.0 ± 0.0%, p < 0.05; 3.5 ± 1.7% vs. 0.3 ± 0.6%, p < 0.05), conserving proximal circularity (elliptical ratio, 1.04 vs. 1.03 and 1.04 vs. 1.04; p = NS). Mean post-re-POT proximal expansion was 0.6 ± 0.1 mm (+21.6 ± 2.1%) for 2.5-mm and 1.0 ± 0.1 mm (+23.6 ± 2.2%) for 3.5-mm Ab devices, with only 1 strut fracture (left anterior descending-like bench). Side branch ostium strut obstruction was greater with Ab scaffolds than XX stents: 41.1 ± 9.4% versus 16.4 ± 8.1% (p < 0.05) and 31.8 ± 3.2% versus 10.0 ± 5.3% (p < 0.05), respectively, for 2.5- and 3.5-mm scaffolds and stents. Ab scaffolds showed 2 ± 1% moderate but significant late recoil as of 1 h, reaching 4 ± 2% by 24 h (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Re-POT optimized most Ab provisional bifurcation treatments, without fracture, respecting fractal geometry, and without exceeding 1.0-mm proximal differential diameter., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study used a fractal bifurcation bench model to compare 6 optimization sequences for coronary bifurcation provisional stenting, including 1 novel sequence without kissing balloon inflation (KBI), comprising initial proximal optimizing technique (POT) + side-branch inflation (SBI) + final POT, called "re-POT.", Background: In provisional bifurcation stenting, KBI fails to improve the rate of major adverse cardiac events. Proximal geometric deformation increases the rate of in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization., Methods: A bifurcation bench model was used to compare KBI alone, KBI after POT, KBI with asymmetric inflation pressure after POT, and 2 sequences without KBI: initial POT plus SBI, and initial POT plus SBI with final POT (called "re-POT"). For each protocol, 5 stents were tested using 2 different drug-eluting stent designs: that is, a total of 60 tests., Results: Compared with the classic KBI-only sequence and those associating POT with modified KBI, the re-POT sequence gave significantly (p < 0.05) better geometric results: it reduced SB ostium stent-strut obstruction from 23.2 ± 6.0% to 5.6 ± 8.3%, provided perfect proximal stent apposition with almost perfect circularity (ellipticity index reduced from 1.23 ± 0.02 to 1.04 ± 0.01), reduced proximal area overstretch from 24.2 ± 7.6% to 8.0 ± 0.4%, and reduced global strut malapposition from 40 ± 6.2% to 2.6 ± 1.4%., Conclusions: In comparison with 5 other techniques, the re-POT sequence significantly optimized the final result of provisional coronary bifurcation stenting, maintaining circular geometry while significantly reducing SB ostium strut obstruction and global strut malapposition. These experimental findings confirm that provisional stenting may be optimized more effectively without KBI using re-POT., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)