Search

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Yamamoto is a proctor for Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Coronary angiography-derived radial wall strain (RWS) is a newly developed index that can be readily accessed and describes the biomechanical features of a lesion., Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the association of RWS with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and high-risk plaque (HRP), and their relative prognostic implications., Methods: We included 484 vessels (351 patients) deferred after FFR measurement with available RWS data and coronary computed tomography angiography. On coronary computed tomography angiography, HRP was defined as a lesion with both minimum lumen area <4 mm 2 and plaque burden ≥70%. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of target vessel revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, or cardiac death., Results: The mean FFR and RWS max were 0.89 ± 0.07 and 11.2% ± 2.5%, respectively, whereas 27.7% of lesions had HRP, 15.1% had FFR ≤0.80. An increase in RWS max was associated with a higher risk of FFR ≤0.80 and HRP, which was consistent after adjustment for clinical or angiographic characteristics (all P < 0.05). An increment of RWS max was related to a higher risk of TVF (HR: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.03-1.47]; P = 0.022) with an optimal cutoff of 14.25%. RWS max >14% was a predictor of TVF after adjustment for FFR or HRP components (all P < 0.05) and showed a direct prognostic effect on TVF, not mediated by FFR ≤0.80 or HRP in the mediation analysis. When high RWS max was added to FFR ≤0.80 or HRP, there were increasing outcome trends (all P for trend <0.001)., Conclusions: RWS was associated with coronary physiology and plaque morphology but showed independent prognostic significance., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Doh has received research grants from Philips Volcano. Dr Koo has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular and Philips Volcano. Dr Tu is the cofounder of, has received research grants from, and has been a consultant for Pulse Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Yamamoto is a clinical proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Shimura has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Matsuo has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Low fractional flow reserve (FFR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Hitherto, this assessment has been independent of the epicardial vessel interrogated., Objectives: This study sought to assess the predictive capacity of post-PCI FFR for target vessel failure (TVF) stratified by coronary artery., Methods: We performed a systematic review and individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies with protocol-recommended post-PCI FFR assessment. The difference in post-PCI FFR between left anterior descending (LAD) and non-LAD arteries was assessed using a random-effect models meta-analysis of mean differences. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization., Results: Overall, 3,336 vessels (n = 2,760 patients) with post-PCI FFR measurements were included in 9 studies. The weighted mean post-PCI FFR was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and differed significantly between coronary vessels (LAD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.88 vs non-LAD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.94; P < 0.001). Post-PCI FFR was an independent predictor of TVF, with its risk increasing by 52% for every reduction of 0.10 FFR units, and this was mainly driven by TVR. The predictive capacity for TVF was poor for LAD arteries (AUC: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.58) and moderate for non-LAD arteries (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73; LAD vs non-LAD arteries, P = 0.005)., Conclusions: The LAD is associated with a lower post-PCI FFR than non-LAD arteries, emphasizing the importance of interpreting post-PCI FFR on a vessel-specific basis. Although a higher post-PCI FFR was associated with improved prognosis, its predictive capacity for events differs between the LAD and non-LAD arteries, being poor in the LAD and moderate in the non-LAD vessels., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Collet received research grants from Biosensors, HeartFlow Inc, Abbott Vascular, Insight Lifetech, GE Healthcare, Siemens and Shockwave Medical. Dr Johnson has received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis; has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST, NCT02184117) and Philips Volcano (DEFINE-FLOW, NCT02328820) for studies using intracoronary pressure and flow sensors; has an institutional licensing agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart-minimum FFR algorithm commercialized under 510(k) K191008; and has pending patents on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic stenosis and TAVI physiology and also algorithms to correct pressure tracings from fluid-filled catheters. Dr Mizukami has received consultancy fees from Zeon Medical. Dr Fearon receives institutional research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences; he has a consulting relationship with CathWorks and Siemens; and he owns minor stock options in HeartFlow. Dr Berry receives research funding from the British Heart Foundation grant (RE/18/6134217); and is employed by the University of Glasgow, which holds consultancy and research agreements for his work with Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Causeway Therapeutics, Coroventis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Menarini, Neovasc, Siemens Healthcare, and Valo Health. Dr Sonck is supported by a grant provided by the CardioPath PhD program. Dr Collison has received honoraria/speaker fees from Abbott. Dr Koo has received an institutional research grant from St. Jude Medical (Abbott Vascular) and Philips Volcano. Dr Meneveau has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Terumo, Boston Scientific, Bayer Healthcare, BMS-Pfizer, Boehringer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Oldroyd is an employee of Biosensors International. Dr Leipsic is a consultant for and holds stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow; and has a research grant from GE Healthcare. Dr Taylor is an employee of HeartFlow Inc. Dr Ko has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic; and has received research support from Canon Medical. Dr Perera has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular, HeartFlow, and Philips. Dr Leone received consultant fees and honoraria for lectures in sponsored symposia with Abbott Vascular and Bracco Imaging/ACIST Medical. Dr Matsuo has received consultancy fees from Zeon Medical; and has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Philips, and Boston Scientific. Dr Amabile reports consulting/proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Shockwave Medical; and has received an institutional research grant from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Piróth has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Opsens, and Boston Scientific. Dr Toth has received consultancy fees and research support from Abbott, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Terumo. Dr Ihdayhid reports receiving consulting honorarium from Abbott Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Artrya Pty Ltd (including equity interest). Dr West is an employee of Abbott Vascular. Dr Munhoz is supported with a PhD grant from CardioPath. Dr Barbato has received speaker fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Engstrøm has received consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Novo Nordisk, and Bayer AS. Dr Escaned is supported by the Intensification of Research Activity project INT22/00088 from Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and served as speaker and advisory board member for Abbott and Philips. Dr Ali has received institutional grant support Abbott, Abiomed, ACIST Medical, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Cathworks, Canon, Conavi, Heartflow, Inari, Medtronic Inc, National Institute of Health, Nipro, Opsens Medical, Medis, Philips, Shockwave, Siemens, Spectrawave, Teleflex; and consulting fees from Abiomed, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Cathworks, Opsens, Philips, Shockwave and equity in Elucid, Lifelink, Spectrawave, Shockwave, VitalConnect. Dr Kern has received speaker fees from Abbott, ACIST Medical, Boston Scientific, Opsens, and Philips. Dr Pijls has received research grants from Abbott and Hexacath and consultancy fees from Abbott, GE, Philips, and HeartFlow and have equity in GE, Philips, and Heartflow. Dr De Bruyne has received institutional consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Siemens, and GE; has received institutional grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronic, CathWorks, Pie Medical, and HeartFlow; and holds minor equities in Philips, Siemens, GE, Bayer, HeartFlow, Edwards Lifesciences, and Ceyliad. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate comparative prognosis between deferred versus performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to coronary flow reserve (CFR) values of patients with intermediate fractional flow reserve (FFR)., Background: For coronary stenosis with intermediate FFR, the prognostic value of PCI remains controversial. The prognostic impact of PCI may be different according to CFR in patients with intermediate FFR., Methods: From the ILIAS Registry (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry, N = 2,322), 400 patients (412 vessels) with intermediate FFR (0.75-0.80) were selected. Patients were stratified into preserved CFR (>2.0, n = 253) and depressed CFR (≤2.0, n = 147) cohorts. Per-vessel clinical outcomes during 5 years of follow-up were compared between deferred versus performed PCI groups in both cohorts. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization., Results: Among the study population, PCI was deferred for 210 patients (219 vessels, 53.2%) (deferred group) and performed for 190 patients (193 vessels, 46.8%) (performed group). The risk of TVF was comparable between the deferred and performed groups (12.8% vs 14.2%; adjusted HR: 1.403; 95% CI: 0.584-3.369; P = 0.448). When stratified by CFR, PCI was performed in 39.1% (100/261 vessels) of the preserved CFR cohort and 61.9% (93/151 vessels) of the depressed CFR cohort. Within the preserved CFR cohort, the risk of TVF did not differ significantly between the deferred and performed groups (11.0% vs 13.9%; adjusted HR: 0.770; 95% CI: 0.262-2.266; P = 0.635). However, in the depressed CFR cohort, the deferred group had a significantly higher risk of TVF than the performed group (17.2% vs 14.2%; adjusted HR: 4.932; 95% CI: 1.312-18.53; P = 0.018). A significant interaction was observed between CFR and the treatment decision (interaction P = 0.049). Results were consistent after inverse probability weighting adjustment., Conclusions: In patients with intermediate FFR of 0.75 to 0.80, the prognostic value of PCI differed according to CFR, with a significant interaction. PCI was associated with a lower risk of TVF compared with the deferral strategy when CFR was depressed (≤2.0), but there was no difference when CFR was preserved (>2.0). CFR could be used as an additional risk stratification tool to determine treatment strategies in patients with intermediate FFR. (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry [ILIAS Registry]; NCT04485234)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Joo Myung Lee has received research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr Mejia-Renteria has received speaker fees from Philips, Abbott, and Medis. Dr Echavarria-Pinto has received speaker fees from Abbott and Philips. Dr van de Hoef has received speaker fees and institutional research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr van Royen has received speaker fees and institutional research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr Koo has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular and Philips Volcano. Dr Piek has received support as a consultant for Philips/Volcano; and has received institutional research grants from Philips. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical implications of combined assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR)., Background: Combined assessment of FFR and CFR allows detailed characterization of pathophysiology in chronic coronary syndromes. Data on the clinical implications of distinct FFR and CFR patterns are limited, leading to uncertainty regarding their relevance., Methods: Patients with chronic coronary syndromes and obstructive coronary artery disease were selected from the multicenter ILIAS (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes) registry. Patients were classified into 4 groups on the basis of FFR ≤0.80 and CFR <2.0. The endpoint was the 5-year target vessel failure (TVF) rate., Results: A total of 2,143 patients with 2,725 lesions were included. Compared with normal FFR/normal CFR, low FFR/low CFR carried the highest risk for TVF (HR: 5.4; 95% CI: 3.2-9.3; P < 0.001), significantly higher than in revascularized vessels (P = 0.007). Discordance, with either low FFR/normal CFR or normal FFR/low CFR, was associated with increased TVF rates compared with normal FFR/normal CFR (low FFR/normal CFR: HR: 3.5 [95% CI: 2.2-5.4; P < 0.001]; normal FFR/low CFR: HR: 3.0 [95% CI: 1.9-4.7; P < 0.001]). No difference in 5-year TVF was observed between the 2 discordant groups (P = 0.57) or between the discordant groups and the revascularized group (P = 0.26 vs low FFR/normal CFR; P = 0.60 vs normal FFR/low CFR)., Conclusions: Impaired coronary hemodynamics are uniformly associated with increased 5-year TVF rates. Nonrevascularized vessels with discordant FFR and CFR are associated with 5-year event rates that are equivalent to those of vessels that undergo revascularization, whereas vessels with combined low FFR and CFR exhibit event rates that are significantly higher than after revascularization. (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry [ILIAS Registry]; NCT04485234)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr van de Hoef has received speaker fees and institutional research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr J.M. Lee has received research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr Echavarria-Pinto has received speaker fees from Abbott and Philips. Dr van Royen has received speaker fees and institutional research grants from Abbott and Philips. Dr Escaned is a speaker and consultant for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Philips; and has received personal fees from Philips, Boston Scientific, and Abbott/St. Jude Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Koo has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular and Philips Volcano. Dr Piek has received support as a consultant for Philips/Volcano; and has received institutional research grants from Philips. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Munhoz has received research grants provided by the CardioPath PhD program. Dr Collet has received research grants from Biosensors, HeartFlow, and Abbott Vascular; and has received consultancy fees from HeartFlow, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Opsens, and Philips/Volcano. Dr Johnson has received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis; has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical and Philips/Volcano Corporation; has an institutional licensing agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart-minimum FFR algorithm; and has pending patents on diagnostic methods and algorithms. Dr Matsuo serves as an advisory board member for Zeon Medical; and receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, and Phillips Japan. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of thrombotic risk on the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease with deferred revascularization after fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements., Background: Deferral of revascularization on the basis of FFR is generally considered to be safe, but after deferral, some patients have cardiovascular events over time., Methods: From J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), 1,263 patients with deferral of revascularization on the basis of FFR were evaluated. The association between thrombotic risk as assessed by CREDO-Kyoto (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto) thrombotic score and 5-year target vessel failure (TVF) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was investigated., Results: FFR and high thrombotic risk (HTR) were associated with increased risk for 5-year TVF (FFR per 0.01-unit decrease: HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05-1.11; P < 0.001; HTR: HR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.37-3.39; P < 0.001) and MACCE (FFR per 0.01-unit decrease: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P < 0.001; HTR: HR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.56-2.84; P = 0.001). Patients with HTR had higher risk for 5-year TVF (HR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.45-3.66; P < 0.001) and MACCE (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.75-3.13; P < 0.001) than those without HTR, even when they had negative FFR., Conclusions: Assessment of thrombotic risk provides additional prognostic value to FFR in predicting 5-year TVF and MACCE in patients with deferral of revascularization after FFR measurements. (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry; UMIN000014473)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Abbott Medical Japan, Phillips Japan, and Boston Scientific Japan. The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication. Dr Shiono has received lecture fees from Abbott Medical Japan and Phillips Japan. Dr Kuramitsu has received lecture fees from Abbott Medical Japan and Boston Scientific Japan. Dr Matsuo serves as an advisory board member for Zeon Medical; and has received lecture fees from Abbott Medical Japan, Phillips Japan, and Boston Scientific Japan. Dr Kikuta has received lecture fees from Abbott Medical Japan and Phillips Japan. Dr Asano has received lecture fees from Abbott Medical Japan and Phillips Japan. Dr Tanaka serves as advisory board member for Abbott Medical Japan and Boston Scientific Japan. Dr Yokoi has received lecture fees from Boston Scientific Japan. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes after combined pressure and flow assessment of coronary lesions., Background: Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the invasive reference standard for revascularization, approximately 40% of stenoses have discordant coronary flow reserve (CFR). Optimal treatment for these disagreements remains unclear., Methods: A total of 455 subjects with 668 lesions were enrolled from 12 sites in 6 countries. Only lesions with reduced FFR and CFR underwent revascularization; all other combinations received initial medical therapy., Results: Fourteen percent of lesions had FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 while 23% of lesions had FFR >0.8 but CFR <2.0. During 2-year follow-up, the primary endpoint of composite all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization in lesions with FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 (10.8% event rate) compared with lesions with FFR >0.8 and CFR ≥2.0 (6.2% event rate) exceeded the prespecified +10% noninferiority margin (P = 0.090). Target vessel failure models using both continuous FFR and continuous CFR found that only higher FFR was associated with reduced target vessel failure (Cox P = 0.007) after initial medical treatment. Central core laboratory review accepted 69.8% of all tracings with mean differences of <0.01 for FFR and <0.02 for CFR, indicating no material impact on clinical measurements or outcomes., Conclusions: All-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization after 2 years was not noninferior between lesions with FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 and lesions with FFR >0.8 and CFR ≥2.0. These results do not support using invasive CFR ≥2.0 to defer revascularization for lesions with reduced FFR if the patient would otherwise be a candidate on the basis of the entire clinical scenario and treatment preference., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Johnson has received significant institutional research support from Philips Volcano for this study; has received significant institutional research support from St. Jude Medical (CONTRAST [Can Contrast Injection Better Approximate FFR Compared to Pure Resting Physiology?]; NCT02184117) for a different study using intracoronary pressure sensors; and has an institutional licensing agreement with Boston Scientific for the smart minimum FFR algorithm, commercially available as 510(k) K191008. Dr Matsuo serves as advisory board member for Zeon Medical; and receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, and Phillips Japan. Drs Johnson, Kirkeeide, and Gould have received internal funding from the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis; and have patents pending on diagnostic methods for quantifying aortic stenosis and transcatheter aortic valve replacement physiology, as well as algorithms to correct pressure tracings from fluid-filled catheters. Dr Gould is the 510(k) applicant for CFR Quant (K113754) and HeartSee (K143664, K171303, K202679), software packages for cardiac positron emission tomographic image processing, analysis, and absolute flow quantification. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) predicted nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) with actual post-PCI NHPRs and to assess the efficacy of PCI strategy using pre-PCI NHPR pullback., Background: Predicting the functional results of PCI is feasible using pre-PCI longitudinal vessel interrogation with the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), a pressure-based, adenosine-free NHPR. However, the reliability of novel NHPRs (resting full-cycle ratio [RFR] and diastolic pressure ratio [dPR]) for this purpose remains uncertain., Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, vessels were randomly assigned to receive pre-PCI iFR, RFR, or dPR pullback (50 vessels each). The pre-PCI predicted NHPRs were compared with actual NHPRs after contemporary PCI using intravascular imaging. The number and the total length of treated lesions were compared between NHPR pullback-guided and angiography-guided strategies., Results: The predicted NHPRs were strongly correlated with actual NHPRs: iFR, r = 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 0.90; p < 0.001); RFR, r = 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.91; p < 0.001), and dPR, r = 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 0.91; p < 0.001). The number and the total length of treated lesions were lower with the NHPR pullback strategy than with the angiography-guided strategy, leading to physiological improvement., Conclusions: Predicting functional PCI results on the basis of pre-procedural RFR and dPR pullbacks yields similar results to iFR. Compared with an angiography-guided strategy, a pullback-guided PCI strategy with any of the 3 NHPRs reduced the number and the total length of treated lesions. (Study to Examine Correlation Between Predictive Value and Post PCI Value of iFR, RFR and dPR; UMIN000033534)., Competing Interests: Author Relationship With Industry Dr. Escaned has provided consulting and speaking services at educational events for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Philips Healthcare. Dr. Mizukami has received consulting fees from HeartFlow. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with left main coronary artery (LM) stenosis in whom treatment strategy was based on the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)., Background: The overall safety of iFR to guide revascularization decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease has been established. However, no study has examined the safety of deferral of revascularization of LM disease on the basis of iFR., Methods: This multicenter observational study included 314 patients in whom LM stenosis was deferred (n = 163 [51.9%]) or revascularized (n = 151 [48.1%]) according to the iFR cutoff ≤0.89. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were each individual component of the primary endpoint and also cardiac death., Results: At a median follow-up period of 30 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 15 patients (9.2%) in the deferred group and 22 patients (14.6%) in the revascularized group (hazard ratio: 1.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 2.81; p = 0.26), indicating no evidence of a significant difference between the 2 groups. For the secondary endpoints, findings in the iFR-based deferral and revascularization groups were as follows: all-cause death, 3.7% versus 4.6%; cardiac death, 1.2% versus 2.0%; nonfatal myocardial infarction, 2.5% versus 5.3%; and target lesion revascularization, 4.3% versus 5.3% (p > 0.05 for all)., Conclusions: Deferral of revascularization of LM stenosis on the basis of iFR appears to be safe, with similar long-term outcomes to those in patients in whom LM revascularization was performed according to iFR values., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: This study sought to assess the diagnostic performance of FFRangio (CathWorks, Kfar Saba, Israel), an angiogram-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) technology., Background: Despite practice guidelines recommendations, the use of coronary physiologic assessment in daily practice remains low for patients undergoing coronary angiography. Angiogram-derived FFR technologies have the potential to promote the integration of physiologic assessment in daily practice., Methods: The study performed an analysis of pooled patient- and lesion-level data from 5 prospective cohort studies that examined the diagnostic performance of FFRangio compared with the reference standard wire-based FFR., Results: A total of 700 lesions from 588 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 65 years, 71% were men, and 40% presented with acute coronary syndromes. Mean FFR and FFRangio were 0.81 ± 0.12 and 0.81 ± 0.11, with 31.6% and 31.4% of lesions were in the 0.75 to 0.85 range, respectively. When using a binary cutoff FFR value of 0.80, FFRangio showed a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 94%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 93%. The mean difference between FFR and FFRangio was 0.00 ± 0.12. The correlation coefficient between FFR and FFRangio was 0.83 (p < 0.001). The C-statistic for FFRangio was 0.95 (p < 0.001). The accuracy of FFRangio was consistent across all subgroups examined., Conclusions: In the largest reported cohort examining the performance of angiogram-derived FFR technology, FFRangio showed excellent diagnostic performance, which was robust and consistent across all patient and lesion subgroups. Additional studies are needed allow FFRangio and fulfill its potential expand the implementation of functional assessment of coronary lesions in routine clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance between quantitative flow ratio (QFR) derived from coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (FFR CT ) using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard., Background: QFR and FFR CT are recently developed, less invasive techniques for functional assessment of coronary artery disease., Methods: QFR, FFR CT , and FFR were measured in 152 patients (233 vessels) with stable coronary artery disease., Results: QFR was highly correlated with FFR (r = 0.78; p < 0.001), whereas FFR CT was moderately correlated with FFR (r = 0.63; p < 0.001). Both QFR and FFR CT showed moderately good agreement with FFR, presenting small values of mean difference but large values of root mean squared deviation (FFR-QFR, 0.02 ± 0.09; FFR-FFR CT , 0.03 ± 0.11). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of QFR ≤0.80 for predicting FFR ≤0.80 were 90%, 82%, 81%, and 90%, respectively. Those of FFR CT  ≤0.80 for predicting FFR ≤0.80 were 82%, 70%, 70%, and 82%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of QFR ≤0.80 for predicting FFR ≤0.80 was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81% to 89%), whereas that of FFR CT  ≤0.80 for predicting FFR ≤0.80 was 76% (95% CI: 70% to 80%)., Conclusions: QFR and FFR CT showed significant correlation with FFR. Mismatches between QFR and FFR and between FFR CT and FFR were frequent., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)- and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization strategies., Background: An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes., Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization., Results: Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919)., Conclusions: An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038)., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether algorithmic interpretation (AI) of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) pressure-wire pull back data would be noninferior to expert human interpretation., Background: Interpretation of iFR pressure-wire pull back data can be complex and is subjective., Methods: Fifteen human experts interpreted 1,008 iFR pull back traces (691 unique, 317 duplicate). For each trace, experts determined the hemodynamic appropriateness for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and, in such cases, the optimal physiological strategy for PCI. The heart team (HT) interpretation was determined by consensus of the individual expert opinions. The same 1,008 pull back traces were also interpreted algorithmically. The coprimary hypotheses of this study were that AI would be noninferior to the interpretation of the median expert human in determining: 1) the hemodynamic appropriateness for PCI; and 2) the physiological strategy for PCI., Results: Regarding the hemodynamic appropriateness for PCI, the median expert human demonstrated 89.3% agreement with the HT in comparison with 89.4% for AI (p < 0.01 for noninferiority). Across the 372 cases judged as hemodynamically appropriate for PCI according to the HT, the median expert human demonstrated 88.8% agreement with the HT in comparison with 89.7% for AI (p < 0.0001 for noninferiority). On reproducibility testing, the HT opinion itself changed 1 in 10 times for both the appropriateness for PCI and the physiological PCI strategy. In contrast, AI showed no change., Conclusions: AI of iFR pressure-wire pull back data was noninferior to expert human interpretation in determining both the hemodynamic appropriateness for PCI and the optimal physiological strategy for PCI., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The study sought to investigate the prognostic implications of relative increase of fractional flow reserve (FFR) with PCI in combination with post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) FFR., Background: FFR, measured after PCI has been shown to possess prognostic implications. The relative increase of FFR with PCI can be determined by the interaction of baseline disease pattern, adequacy of PCI, and residual disease burden in a target vessel. However, the role of relative increase of FFR with PCI has not yet been evaluated., Methods: A total of 621 patients who underwent PCI using second-generation drug-eluting stents based on low pre-PCI FFR (≤0.80) and available post-PCI FFR were analyzed. The relative increase of FFR was calculated by %FFR increase with PCI ([post-PCI FFR - pre-PCI FFR]/pre-PCI FFR × 100). Patients were divided according to the optimal cutoff values of post-PCI FFR (<0.84) and %FFR increase (≤15%). The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization) at 2 years., Results: Among the total population, 66.0% showed high post-PCI FFR (≥0.84) and 69.2% showed high %FFR increase (>15%). Patients with low post-PCI FFR showed a higher risk of 2-year TVF than did those with high post-PCI FFR (9.1% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio [HR]: 3.367; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.412 to 8.025; p = 0.006). Patients with low %FFR increase also showed a higher risk of 2-year TVF compared with those with high %FFR increase (9.2% vs. 3.0%; HR: 3.613; 95% CI: 1.543 to 8.458; p = 0.003). Among the high post-PCI FFR group, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes according to %FFR increase. Conversely, among the low post-PCI FFR group, those with low %FFR increase showed a significantly higher risk of TVF than did those with high %FFR increase (14.3% vs. 4.1%; HR: 4.334; 95% CI: 1.205 to 15.594; p = 0.025). Percent FFR increase significantly increased discriminant and reclassification ability for the occurrence of TVF when added to a model with clinical risk factors and post-PCI FFR (C-index 0.783 vs. 0.734; relative integrated discrimination improvement 0.702; p = 0.009; category-free net reclassification index 0.479; p = 0.031)., Conclusions: Percent FFR increase with PCI showed similar prognostic implications with post-PCI FFR. Adding the relative increase of FFR to post-PCI FFR would enable better discrimination of high-risk patients after stent implantation. (Influence of FFR on the Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PERSPECTIVE]; NCT01873560)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients deferred from coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in stable angina pectoris (SAP) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS)., Background: Assessment of coronary stenosis severity with pressure guidewires is recommended to determine the need for myocardial revascularization., Methods: The safety of deferral of coronary revascularization in the pooled per-protocol population (n = 4,486) of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) and iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome) randomized clinical trials was investigated. Patients were stratified according to revascularization decision making on the basis of iFR or FFR and to clinical presentation (SAP or ACS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 1 year., Results: Coronary revascularization was deferred in 2,130 patients. Deferral was performed in 1,117 patients (50%) in the iFR group and 1,013 patients (45%) in the FFR group (p < 0.01). At 1 year, the MACE rate in the deferred population was similar between the iFR and FFR groups (4.12% vs. 4.05%; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.79; p = 0.60). A clinical presentation with ACS was associated with a higher MACE rate compared with SAP in deferred patients (5.91% vs. 3.64% in ACS and SAP, respectively; fully adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61 in favor of SAP; 95% confidence interval: 0.38 to 0.99; p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Overall, deferral of revascularization is equally safe with both iFR and FFR, with a low MACE rate of about 4%. Lesions were more frequently deferred when iFR was used to assess physiological significance. In deferred patients presenting with ACS, the event rate was significantly increased compared with SAP at 1 year., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the accuracy of instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback measurements to predict post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiological outcomes, and to quantify how often iFR pullback alters PCI strategy in real-world clinical settings., Background: In tandem and diffuse disease, offline analysis of continuous iFR pullback measurement has previously been demonstrated to accurately predict the physiological outcome of revascularization. However, the accuracy of the online analysis approach (iFR pullback) remains untested., Methods: Angiographically intermediate tandem and/or diffuse lesions were entered into the international, multicenter iFR GRADIENT (Single instantaneous wave-Free Ratio Pullback Pre-Angioplasty Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome Without Wedge Pressure in Human Coronary Artery Disease) registry. Operators were asked to submit their procedural strategy after angiography alone and then after iFR-pullback measurement incorporating virtual PCI and post-PCI iFR prediction. PCI was performed according to standard clinical practice. Following PCI, repeat iFR assessment was performed and the actual versus predicted post-PCI iFR values compared., Results: Mean age was 67 ± 12 years (81% male). Paired pre- and post-PCI iFR were measured in 128 patients (134 vessels). The predicted post-PCI iFR calculated online was 0.93 ± 0.05; observed actual iFR was 0.92 ± 0.06. iFR pullback predicted the post-PCI iFR outcome with 1.4 ± 0.5% error. In comparison to angiography-based decision making, after iFR pullback, decision making was changed in 52 (31%) of vessels; with a reduction in lesion number (-0.18 ± 0.05 lesion/vessel; p = 0.0001) and length (-4.4 ± 1.0 mm/vessel; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In tandem and diffuse coronary disease, iFR pullback predicted the physiological outcome of PCI with a high degree of accuracy. Compared with angiography alone, availability of iFR pullback altered revascularization procedural planning in nearly one-third of patients., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic implication of functional incomplete revascularization (IR) and residual functional SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (rFSS) in comparison with 3-vessel fractional flow reserve (FFR) and residual SYNTAX score., Background: IR is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: A total of 385 patients who underwent 3-vessel FFR measurement after stent implantation were included in this study. The rFSS was defined as residual SYNTAX score measured only in vessels with FFR ≤0.8. The study population was divided into the functional IR group (rFSS ≥1) and the functional complete revascularization (CR) group (rFSS = 0). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization) at 2 years., Results: Functional CR was achieved in 283 patients (73.5%). At 2-year follow-up, the functional IR group showed a significantly higher risk for MACEs (functional IR vs. CR, 14.6% vs. 4.2%; hazard ratio: 4.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.82 to 9.21; p < 0.001) than the functional CR group. In a multivariate-adjusted model, functional IR was an independent predictor of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.17; 95% confidence interval: 1.85 to 9.44; p < 0.001). The rFSS showed a significant association with estimated 2-year MACE rate (hazard ratio: 1.09 per 1-U increase; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.17; p = 0.018). When added to clinical risk factors, rFSS showed the highest integrated discrimination improvement value for MACEs (3.5%; p = 0.002) among 3-vessel FFR, residual SYNTAX score, and rFSS., Conclusions: Patients with functional IR showed significantly higher rate of 2-year MACEs than those with functional CR. A combined anatomic and physiological scoring system (rFSS) after stent implantation better discriminated the risk for adverse events than anatomic or physiological assessment alone. (Clinical Implication of 3-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR]; NCT01621438)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to compare the initial success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a native coronary artery (NCA) in patients with and without previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to assess predictive factors., Background: Landmark novel wiring techniques for CTO-PCI have contributed to improvement in the initial success of CTO-PCI. However, challenges persist in CTO-PCI in NCA in pCABG patients., Methods: Patients who underwent CTO-PCI in an NCA were selected and classified into 2 groups: pCABG (206 PCIs in 153 patients) and nCABG (1,431 PCIs in 1,139 patients)., Results: CTO was located more often in the left anterior descending artery (p = 0.0003), and severe calcified lesions were observed more frequently in the pCABG group (p < 0.0001). Although the retrograde attempt was tried more frequently in the pCABG group, the CTO-PCI success rate was significantly lower in the pCABG patients than in the nCABG patients (71% vs. 83%). Longer procedural time and greater radiation exposure were needed in the pCABG patients. Logistic regression analysis among the pCABG patients revealed that intravascular ultrasound use and parallel wiring were positive factors, and lesion tortuosity was a negative factor., Conclusions: The initial success rate of CTO-PCI of an NCA in the pCABG group was significantly decreased compared with that in the nCABG group. Anatomic complexity and unstable hemodynamic state were unfavorable conditions. This study reveals that the issues to be overcome are lying with CTO revascularization in an NCA in pCABG patients., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate the effects of telmisartan, compared with the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine, on endothelial function after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in hypertensive patients., Background: DES implantation impairs local endothelial function, which may be associated with future cardiovascular events. Telmisartan, which has unique peroxisome proliferator-activated-receptor-gamma-mediated effects in addition to its renin-angiotensin system-inhibition effects, has favorable effects on endothelial function., Methods: Fifty-one hypertensive patients with coronary artery stenosis but without coronary artery spasm, treated with a sirolimus-eluting stent, were randomly assigned to either the telmisartan (25 cases) or amlodipine (26 cases) treatment groups. At baseline and at 3 months after DES implantation, endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotion were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography under the condition of medication withdrawal. The mean luminal diameter of a 20-mm coronary segment, beginning 5 mm distal to the stent, was measured before and after infusion of intracoronary acetylcholine (10(-7), 10(-6) mol/l) and then again after infusion of nitroglycerin., Results: Blood pressure was comparable between groups at baseline and after 3 months. Vasoconstriction after acetylcholine infusion at 3 months (impaired endothelial function) was less pronounced in the telmisartan group than in the amlodipine group (p<0.0001), although there was no significant difference between the 2 groups before DES implantation. The response to nitroglycerin did not differ between groups before or at 3 months after DES implantation., Conclusions: Telmisartan, compared with amlodipine, significantly ameliorated endothelial dysfunction after DES implantation in terms of vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine., (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a new concept for chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization-using a bilateral approach that utilizes a Controlled Antegrade and Retrograde subintimal Tracking (CART) technique., Background: Successful percutaneous recanalization of coronary CTOs results in improved long-term outcomes. The recanalization of CTOs in native coronary arteries no doubt represents one of the most technically challenging of interventional procedures., Methods: A total of 224 consecutive patients (mean age 61 +/- 9 years; 86.2% men) were enrolled in this prospective multicenter registry. This technique combines the simultaneous use of antegrade and retrograde approaches. A subintimal dissection is created in both antegrade and retrograde fashion, thereby limiting the extension of the subintimal dissection within the CTO portion., Results: Of 224 CTO lesions (>3 months in duration) undergoing attempted recanalization using the CART technique, 145 cases (64.7%) had undergone previous CTO recanalization attempts. The success rates of crossing in a retrograde fashion with a wire and a balloon were 87.9% and 79.9%, respectively. The overall technical and procedural success rates achieved in this registry were 92.4% and 90.6%, respectively., Conclusions: A bilateral approach for CTO lesions using the CART technique is feasible, safe, and has a higher success rate than previous approaches. These results indicate that a bilateral technique can solve a major dilemma that commonly affects CTO procedures.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with statins on the progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaques of a nonculprit vessel by serial volumetric virtual histology (VH) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)., Background: Recent clinical trials have demonstrated a reduction of atherosclerotic plaque, yet whether statin therapy affects the change in components of plaque remains unknown., Methods: This study was a nonrandomized and nonblinded design. Eighty patients with stable angina pectoris were divided into either the fluvastatin group (n = 40) or the control group (n = 40) according to their total or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level. The volume of each plaque component (dense calcium, fibrous tissue, fibro-fatty, or necrotic core) was evaluated at baseline and at 12-month follow-up., Results: The LDL cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels in the fluvastatin group were significantly decreased at time of follow-up. In VH IVUS findings, fibro-fatty volume was significantly decreased (baseline 80.1 +/- 57.9 mm(3) vs. follow-up 32.5 +/- 27.7 mm(3), p < 0.0001) and fibrous tissue volume was increased (baseline 146.5 +/- 85.6 mm(3) vs. follow-up 163.3 +/- 94.5 mm(3), p < 0.0001) in the fluvastatin group. In the control group, the volumes of all plaque components without fibrous tissue were significantly increased. Change in fibro-fatty volume has a significant correlation with a change in LDL cholesterol level (R = 0.703, p < 0.0001) and change in hsCRP level (R = 0.357, p = 0.006)., Conclusions: One-year lipid-lowering therapy by fluvastatin showed significant regression of plaque volume and alterations in atherosclerotic plaque composition with a significant reduction of fibro-fatty volume.

The aim of this study was to examine the procedural success and in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions in the current era during contemporary practice. The technique of PCI has improved over time with the introduction of novel equipment and guidewire crossing techniques. However, there is limited data available from contemporary practice in the recent years. We evaluated the procedural and in-hospital outcomes in a consecutive series of 904 procedures performed at Toyohashi Heart Center for PCI of chronic total occlusions of >3 months in duration. Technical and procedural success was achieved in 87.5% and 86.2%, respectively. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events occurred in only 1.9% of the patients. Single antegrade wire was the predominant strategy for guidewire crossing; however, retrograde guidewire crossing was used in 7.2% of the cases and controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking in 9.9% of the cases as the final strategy. Logistic regression analysis identified severe tortuosity and moderate-to-severe calcification as significant predictors of procedural failure. This is the first reported large series of patients undergoing PCI for chronic total occlusion with improved wire crossing techniques. We have reported high success rates in recent years and very low complication rates despite the use of more aggressive devices and techniques.