Search

Background: Vascular complications remain a major concern in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Hostile score has been proposed to stratify risk in TAVR patients with peripheral artery disease., Objectives: The authors aimed to assess the validity of the Hostile score in predicting iliofemoral vascular complications after TAVR., Methods: In a prospective TAVR registry, we validated the Hostile score for the prediction of puncture and non-puncture site vascular complications. This scoring system integrates the extent (number of lesions, lesion length, and minimum lumen diameter) and complexity (tortuosity, calcification, and the presence of obstruction) of iliofemoral atherosclerosis., Results: Of 2,023 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with contemporary devices between March 2014 and June 2022, 106 (5.2%) patients experienced puncture site vascular complications and 28 (1.4%) patients experienced non-puncture site vascular complications. The Hostile score was higher in patients with vascular complications than those without complications (1.00 [Q1-Q3: 0-5.00] vs 1.00 [Q1-Q3: 0-4.00]; P < .001). A higher body mass index (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.50) and the use of Prostar (OR: 6.03; 95% CI: 2.23-16.30) or MANTA (OR: 6.18; 95% CI: 2.67-14.27) compared with ProGlide were independent predictors of puncture site vascular complications, whereas a higher Hostile score (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.55-2.35) and female sex (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.12-6.42) were independent predictors of non-puncture site vascular complications. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for the prediction of puncture site and non-puncture site vascular complications were 0.554 and 0.829, respectively., Conclusions: The Hostile score proved useful in predicting non-puncture site vascular complications after TAVR. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Samim has received funding for an online course from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Gräni has received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation, InnoSuisse, Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine University Bern, GAMBIT foundation, Novartis Foundation for Medical-Biological Research, and Swiss Heart Foundation, outside of the submitted work. Dr Gräni has served as Editor-in-Chief of The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. Dr Stortecky has received research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and personal fees from Boston Scientific, Teleflex, and BTG. Dr Reineke has received travel expenses from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; and has served as unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, Med Alliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave; and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; served as a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration; served as an unpaid member of the Pfizer Research Award selection committee in Switzerland and of the Women as One Awards Committee; served as a member of the Clinical Study Group of the Deutsches Zentrum für Herz Kreislauf-Forschung and of the Advisory Board of the Australian Victorian Heart Institute; served as the chairperson of the ESC Congress Program Committee; and served as Deputy Editor of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. Dr Pilgrim has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and ATSens; and speaker fees and consultancy fees to the institution from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Biosensors, and Highlife. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has been increasingly adopted in recent years for the treatment of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, no dedicated risk stratification has been established for patients undergoing TTVI., Objectives: The aim of the present study was to propose a dedicated risk score for patients affected by severe TR undergoing TTVI., Methods: The score was derived from the TRIVALVE (International Multisite Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies Registry; NCT03416166) registry, according to data availability. A stepwise model approach was used on predictor variables to develop a scoring system for predicting 12-month mortality or rehospitalization using multivariable logistic regression. Internal discrimination, calibration, and validation were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and bootstrapping with 1,000 resamples., Results: A total of 483 patients were included in the study, with an overall 12-month mortality or rehospitalization rate of 19% (n = 94). The final risk score, ranging from 0 to 4.5, included the following 5 parameters (adjusted for age and gender): 1) atrial fibrillation at baseline; 2) glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min; 3) elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase/bilirubin levels; 4) signs of right heart failure; and 5) left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. The bias-corrected area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 68% (95% CI: 62%-75%). A cutoff value of 2.5 demonstrated sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 60.5% for the outcome., Conclusions: The present study proposes a dedicated risk score for patients undergoing TTVI, providing an additional and simple tool for heart teams to select the best therapy for patients affected by severe TR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Russo has received a fellowship training grant from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Adamo has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and Novartis. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; has stock options with NaviGate; and is chief scientific officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Andreas is a proctor, consultant, and speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Zoll; and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI Solutions. Dr Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Estevez-Loureiro is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nickenig has received honoraria for lectures or advisory board membership from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Schofer is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sievert has received study honoraria to the institution, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Adona Medical, Akura Medical, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Cardionovum, CeloNova Biosciences, Contego, Coramaze, CroíValve, CSL Behring, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, EndoBar, Endologix, EndoMatic, Esperion Therapeutics, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, InterShunt Technologies, Intervene, K2, Laminar, Life Tech Care, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, Neurotronic, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Shifamed, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed, and WhiteSwell. Dr Tang has served as a physician proctor for Medtronic; has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Structural Heart, and NeoChord; has served on the transcatheter aortic valve replacement advisory board for Abbott Structural Heart; and has served on the physician advisory board for JenaValve. Dr von Bardeleben has served for trials and as a principal investigator for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, CorFlow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or a member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis, with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry, without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Enriquez-Sarano is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, ChemImage, Cryolife, and HighLife. Dr Maisano is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Perifect, Xeltis, Transseptal Solutions, Magenta, and Cardiovalve; has received grant support from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received royalties from Edwards Lifesciences and 4Tech; and is a cofounder and shareholder of Transseptal Solutions, 4Tech, Cardiovalve, Magenta, Perifect, Coregard and SwissVortex. Dr Taramasso has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, 4Tech, Boston Scientific, CoreMedic, Mitraltech, and SwissVortex (outside the submitted work). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With the recent approval of the transcatheter EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system to treat severe, symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation, there is a need to define the appropriate patient population and anatomical considerations for this device. In this consensus document, the authors review these considerations, describe the procedural steps and imaging requirements to ensure technical success, and discuss management of complex intraprocedural circumstances., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips Healthcare, and Siemens Healthineers; and is chief scientific officer for the echocardiography core laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Makkar has received research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Makkar is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare. Dr Davidson has received research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular; is an advisor for Philips Healthcare; and is an uncompensated advisor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Puthamana has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Structural; and has received consultant fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Zahr has received consulting, research, and educational grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Philips. Dr Chadderdon is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Phillips Healthcare. Dr Fam is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Cardiovalve. Dr Ong has received speaker honoraria and consultant fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Yadav has received consultant and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; is an advisory board member for and has stock options in Dasi Simulations; has received institutional research funding from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Innovalve, JenaValve, HighLife, Trisol, and CroiValve. Dr Thourani has received research grants from and is an advisor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Vannan has received institutional research grants and equipment support from Siemens Healthineers, Philips, GE Healthcare; and has received institutional speaker honoraria from Siemens, Philips, Abbott, and Medtronic (no direct industry compensation). Dr Tchétché has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Dumonteil is a consultant for Abbott, Ancora Heart, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Smith has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, NeoChord, and Artivion; has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences; and is on the advisory board of Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Grayburn has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardiovalve, Cardiomech, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, NeoChord, Restore Medical, and 4C Medical; and has received consulting and advisory board fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and 4C Medical. Dr Webb has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Moss is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences; and has received speaker fees and travel support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, B. Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse, Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, MedAlliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, MonarQ, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the steering or executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Nabauer has received consultant and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular. Dr Hausleiter is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research funding and speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kodali is a consultant for Admedus, TriCares, TriFlo, X-Dot, Micro-Interventional Devices, Supira, Adona, Tioga, Helix Valve Repair, and Moray Medical; has served as an advisory board member for Dura, Biotech, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Philips, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and has received institutional grant support from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and JenaValve. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The safety profile of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TTV) repair techniques is well established, but residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains a concern., Objectives: The authors sought to assess the impact of residual TR severity post-TTV repair on survival., Methods: We evaluated the survival rate at 2 years of 613 patients with severe isolated functional TR who underwent TTV repair in TRIGISTRY according to the severity of residual TR at discharge using a 3-grade (mild, moderate, and severe) or 4-grade scheme (mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe, and severe)., Results: Residual TR was none/mild in 33%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 15%. The 2-year adjusted survival rates significantly differed between the 3 groups (85%, 70%, and 44%, respectively; restricted mean survival time [RMST]: P = 0.0001). When the 319 patients with moderate residual TR were subdivided into mild to moderate (n = 201, 33%) and moderate to severe (n = 118, 19%), the adjusted survival rate was also significantly different between groups (85%, 80%, 55%, and 44%, respectively; RMST: P = 0.001). Survival was significantly lower in patients with moderate to severe residual TR compared to patients with mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.006). No difference in survival rates was observed between patients with no/mild and mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.67) or between patients with moderate to severe and severe residual TR (P = 0.96)., Conclusions: The moderate residual TR group was heterogeneous and encompassed patients with markedly different clinical outcomes. Refining TR grade classification with a more granular 4-grade scheme improved outcome prediction. Our results highlight the importance of achieving a mild to moderate or lower residual TR grade during TTV repair, which could define a successful intervention., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Dreyfus has received speaker or proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr Kresoja has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Taramasso has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Shenqi Medical, PiCardia, CoreMedic, VentriMend, MEDIRA, CoreQuest, and HiD Imaging. Dr Iliadis has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nombela-Franco has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Products and Features. Dr Estevez-Loureiro has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Venus Medtech. Dr Hausleiter has received grants and consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Stolz has received consulting or speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, MonarQ, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an Advisory Board member and/or member of the Steering/Executive Group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and has served as a member of the Steering/Executive Committee Group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Zamorano has received consulting or speaker fees from Novartis, Bayer, and Pfizer. Dr von Bardeleben has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Philips, and Siemens. Dr Tang has received speaker honoraria and has served as a physician proctor, consultant, Advisory Board member, TAVR Publications Committee Member, APOLLO Trial Screening Committee Member, and IMPACT MR Steering Committee member for Medtronic; has received speaker honoraria and has served as a physician proctor, consultant, Advisory Board member, and TRILUMINATE Trial Anatomic Eligibility and Publications Committee member for Abbott Structural Heart; has served as an Advisory Board member for Boston Scientific and JenaValve; has served as a consultant and Physician Screening Committee Member for Shockwave Medical; has served as a consultant for NeoChord, Peija Medical, and Shenqi Medical Technology; and has received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthineers. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare. Dr Webb has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research funding from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lauten has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, Chiesi, and AstraZeneca; and is a shareholder of the Devie Medical Drug Eluting Valve for Endocarditis Treatment. Dr Rodés-Cabau has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Nejjari has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Robocath. Dr Badano has received consulting or speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, and Philips Medical Systems. Dr Himbert has received proctoring fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular. Dr Modine has received speaker or consulting fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Microport, and GE. Dr Rudolph has received consulting or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Bax has received lecture fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lurz has received consulting fees from Abbott Medical, Innoventric, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Maisano has received grant and/or research institutional support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific Corporation, NVT, Terumo, Venus, and 3mensio; has received consulting fees and personal and institutional honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Xeltis, Cardiovalve, Occlufit, Simulands, Mtex, Venus, and Squadra; has received royalty income/IP rights from Edwards Lifesciences; and is a shareholder (including share options) in Cardiogard, Cardiovalve, Magenta, SwissVortex, Transseptalsolutions, and 4Tech. Dr Messika-Zeitoun has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiac damage caused by aortic stenosis (AS) can be categorized into stages, which are associated with a progressively increasing risk of death after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Objectives: The authors investigated sex-related differences in cardiac damage among patients with symptomatic AS and the prognostic value of cardiac damage classification in women and men undergoing TAVR., Methods: In a prospective registry, pre-TAVR echocardiograms were used to categorize patients into 5 stages of cardiac damage caused by AS. Differences in the extent of cardiac damage were compared according to sex, and its implications on clinical outcomes after TAVR were explored., Results: Among 2,026 patients undergoing TAVR between August 2007 and June 2022 (995 [49.1%] women and 1,031 [50.9%] men), we observed sex-specific differences in the pattern of cardiac damage (women vs men; stage 0: 2.6% vs 3.1%, stage 1: 13.4% vs 10.1%, stage 2: 37.1% vs 39.5%, stage 3: 27.5% vs 15.6%, and stage 4: 19.4% vs 31.7%). There was a stepwise increase in 5-year all-cause mortality according to stage in women (HR adjusted : 1.43; 95% CI: 1.28-1.60, for linear trend) and men (HR adjusted : 1.26; 95% CI: 1.14-1.38, for linear trend). Female sex was associated with a lower 5-year mortality in early stages (stage 0, 1, or 2) but not in advanced stages (stage 3 or 4)., Conclusions: The pattern of cardiac damage secondary to AS differed by sex. In early stages of cardiac damage, women had a lower 5-year mortality than men, whereas in more advanced stages, mortality was comparable between sexes. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Maznyczka is a European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (EAPCI) international structural fellow; her fellowship is funded by Edwards Lifesciences through EAPCI and not directly from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Polares Medical. Dr Stortecky has received research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and has received personal fees from Boston Scientific, Teleflex, and BTG. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; has served as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, Med Alliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; and has been a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Pilgrim has received research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences and Biotronik; and has received personal fees from Biotronik, Medtronic, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and HighLife SAS. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this article to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Extravalvular cardiac damage caused by aortic stenosis affects prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The long-term impact of changes in cardiac damage in response to relief from mechanical obstruction has not been fully investigated., Objectives: The authors aimed to investigate changes in cardiac damage early after TAVR and the prognostic impact of the cardiac damage classification after TAVR., Methods: In this single-center observational study, patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR were retrospectively evaluated for cardiac damage before and after TAVR and classified into 5 stages of cardiac damage (0-4)., Results: Among 1,863 patients undergoing TAVR between January 2007 and June 2022, 56 patients (3.0%) were classified as stage 0, 225 (12.1%) as stage 1, 729 (39.1%) as stage 2, 388 (20.8%) as stage 3, and 465 (25.0%) as stage 4. Cardiac stage changed in 47.7% of patients (improved: 30.1% in stages 1-4 and deteriorated: 24.7% in stages 0-3) early after TAVR. Five-year all-cause mortality was associated with cardiac damage both at baseline (HR adjusted : 1.34; 95% CI: 1.24-1.44; P < 0.001 for linear trend) and after TAVR (HR adjusted : 1.40; 95% CI: 1.30-1.51; P < 0.001 for linear trend). Five-year all-cause mortality was stratified by changes in cardiac damage (improved, unchanged, or worsened) in patients with cardiac stage 2, 3, and 4 (log-rank P < 0.001 for stage 2, 0.005 for stage 3, and <0.001 for stage 4)., Conclusions: The extent of extra-aortic valve cardiac damage before and after TAVR and changes in cardiac stage early after TAVR have important prognostic implications during long-term follow-up. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Heg has no personal conflicts; his employer, Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees. However, Clinical Trials Unit Bern is involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of clinical studies funded by not-for-profit and for-profit organizations. In particular, pharmaceutical and medical device companies provide direct funding to some of these studies. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Polares Medical. Dr Stortecky has reported research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and has received personal fees from Boston Scientific, Teleflex, and BTG. Dr Samim has received funding for an online course from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Windecker has reported research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc, Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave. Dr Windecker has served as an Advisory Board member and/or member of the Steering/Executive Group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the Steering/Executive Committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Pilgrim has reported research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik; and has received speaker fees/consultancy from Biotronik, Medtronic, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and HighLife SAS. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data on valve reintervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are limited., Objectives: The authors compared the 5-year incidence of valve reintervention after self-expanding CoreValve/Evolut TAVR vs SAVR., Methods: Pooled data from CoreValve and Evolut R/PRO (Medtronic) randomized trials and single-arm studies encompassed 5,925 TAVR (4,478 CoreValve and 1,447 Evolut R/PRO) and 1,832 SAVR patients. Reinterventions were categorized by indication, timing, and treatment. The cumulative incidence of reintervention was compared between TAVR vs SAVR, Evolut vs CoreValve, and Evolut vs SAVR., Results: There were 99 reinterventions (80 TAVR and 19 SAVR). The cumulative incidence of reintervention through 5 years was higher with TAVR vs SAVR (2.2% vs 1.5%; P = 0.017), with differences observed early (≤1 year; adjusted subdistribution HR: 3.50; 95% CI: 1.53-8.02) but not from >1 to 5 years (adjusted subdistribution HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.48-2.28). The most common reason for reintervention was paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR and endocarditis after SAVR. Evolut had a significantly lower incidence of reintervention than CoreValve (0.9% vs 1.6%; P = 0.006) at 5 years with differences observed early (adjusted subdistribution HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.73) but not from >1 to 5 years (adjusted subdistribution HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.21-1.74). The 5-year incidence of reintervention was similar for Evolut vs SAVR (0.9% vs 1.5%; P = 0.41)., Conclusions: A low incidence of reintervention was observed for CoreValve/Evolut R/PRO and SAVR through 5 years. Reintervention occurred most often at ≤1 year for TAVR and >1 year for SAVR. Most early reinterventions were with the first-generation CoreValve and managed percutaneously. Reinterventions were more common following CoreValve TAVR compared with Evolut TAVR or SAVR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Medtronic. Dr Grubb is a proctor, principal investigator, and serves on the Advisory Board for Medtronic; and serves on the Advisory Board or is a consultant for Ancora Heart, Boston Scientific, Abbott, 4C Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and OpSens. Dr O’Hair has received personal consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and serves as a proctor for Medtronic. Dr Forrest has received grant support/research contracts and consultant fees/honoraria/Speakers Bureau fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr Mahoney has received proctor and consultant fees from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Van Mieghem has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Daiichi-Sankyo, and AstraZeneca; and has received advisory and consultancy fees from JenaValve, Anteris, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Amgen, Siemens, Pie Medical, Teleflex, Daiichi-Sankyo, and AstraZeneca. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech. Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; and has served as an Advisory Board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and does not receive personal fees from any medical device or pharmaceutical company. Dr Yakubov has received grants and personal fees from Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr Williams has served as a consultant to Medtronic; and has received research funding from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr Chetcuti has received grants from Edwards Lifesciences, WL Gore Medical, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and has received personal fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Jena. Dr Deeb serves on an Advisory Board for Medtronic; has received institutional grant support from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and has received fees as a proctor for the Medtronic-sponsored SMART Trial. Dr Kleiman has received research grants from Medtronic, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Althouse is a full-time employee and shareholder for Medtronic. Dr Reardon has received research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, WL Gore Medical, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) sustain comparable improvements in health status over 5 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or SAVR. Whether a similar long-term benefit is observed among intermediate-risk AS patients is unknown., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess health status outcomes through 5 years in intermediate risk patients treated with a self-expanding TAVR prosthesis or SAVR using data from the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial., Methods: Intermediate-risk patients randomized to transfemoral TAVR or SAVR in the SURTAVI trial had disease-specific health status assessed at baseline, 30 days, and annually to 5 years using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Health status was compared between groups using fixed effects repeated measures modelling., Results: Of the 1,584 patients (TAVR, n = 805; SAVR, n = 779) included in the analysis, health status improved more rapidly after TAVR compared with SAVR. However, by 1 year, both groups experienced large health status benefits (mean change in KCCQ-Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) from baseline: TAVR: 20.5 ± 22.4; SAVR: 20.5 ± 22.2). This benefit was sustained, albeit modestly attenuated, at 5 years (mean change in KCCQ-OS from baseline: TAVR: 15.4 ± 25.1; SAVR: 14.3 ± 24.2). There were no significant differences in health status between the cohorts at 1 year or beyond. Similar findings were observed in the KCCQ subscales, although a substantial attenuation of benefit was noted in the physical limitation subscale over time in both groups., Conclusions: In intermediate-risk AS patients, both transfemoral TAVR and SAVR resulted in comparable and durable health status benefits to 5 years. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms for the small decline in health status noted at 5 years compared with 1 year in both groups. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement [SURTAVI]; NCT01586910)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Medtronic funded the trial. Dr Kleiman is a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; and receives grant support from Medtronic. Dr Van Mieghem has received grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and advisory fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Pulse Cath BV, and Medtronic. Dr Reardon has received institutional fees from Medtronic for consulting and providing educational services. Dr Gada serves as a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Bard, Inc., Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Mumtaz serves as a consultant to and receives honoraria and research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, the Japanese Organization for Medical Device Development, Medtronic, Triflex, and Foldax. Dr Chetcuti has received personal fees from Medtronic; has received grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Jena; and serves on advisory boards for Biotrace and Jena Valve. Dr Deeb has received grant support from Medtronic; and personal fees from Medtronic outside the submitted work. Dr Chawla is a proctor for Medtronic. Dr Kiaii is a consultant and speaker for Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Abbott. Dr Chu has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Terumo Aortic, and Artivion. Dr Yakubov has received grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received institutional research, travel, or educational grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc. Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech. Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution; and is also member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Althouse is a shareholder and employee of Medtronic plc. Dr Baron has received research support from Boston Scientific and Abiomed, consulting/advisory board fees from Medtronic, Biotronik, Shockwave, and Zoll Medical; and speaker honoraria from Zoll Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data on the prognostic role of the TRI-SCORE in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) are limited., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the TRI-SCORE in predicting outcomes of patients undergoing TTVI., Methods: TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) is a large multicenter multinational registry including patients undergoing TTVI. The TRI-SCORE is a risk model recently proposed to predict in-hospital mortality after tricuspid valve surgery. The TriValve population was stratified based on the TRI-SCORE tertiles. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization. Procedural complications and changes in NYHA functional class were also reported., Results: Among the 634 patients included, 223 patients (35.2%) had a TRI-SCORE between 0 and 5, 221 (34.8%) had 6 or 7, and 190 (30%) had ≥8 points. Postprocedural blood transfusion, acute kidney injury, new atrial fibrillation, and in-hospital mortality were more frequent in the highest TRI-SCORE tertile. Postprocedure length of stay increased with a TRI-SCORE increase. A TRI-SCORE ≥8 was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint assessed at a median follow-up of 186 days (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.38-6.55; HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.78-4.13; HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.57-2.74, respectively) even after adjustment for procedural success and EuroSCORE II or Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality. The NYHA functional class improved across all TRI-SCORE values., Conclusions: In the TriValve registry, the TRI-SCORE has a suboptimal performance in predicting clinical outcomes. However, a TRISCORE ≥8 is associated with an increased risk of clinical events and a lack of prognostic benefit after successful TTVI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Adamo has received speaker honoraria from Abbott. Dr Russo has received a fellowship training grant from the EAPCI sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Badano is on the Speaker Bureau of GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and EsaOte SpA; is currently serving on the Clinical Event Committee of Edwards Lifesciences; and is the director of the echocardiography core laboratory at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS for multiple industry-sponsored trials for which he receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Andreas is a proctor/consultant/speaker for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Zoll; and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI. Dr Denti has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Estevez-Loureiro is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Gavazzoni is a proctor for Abbott. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; has stock options with Navigate; and is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr Nickenig has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Schofer is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sievert has received study honoraria to institution, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Adona Medical, Akura Medical, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Axon, Bavaria Medizin Technologie GmbH, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardiac Success, Cardimed, Cardionovum, Celonova, Contego, Coramaze, Croivalve, CSL Behring LLC, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, Endobar, Endologix, Endomatic, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Intershunt, Intervene, K2, Laminar, Lifetech, Magenta, Maquet Getinge Group, Metavention, Mitralix, Mokita, Neurotronic, NXT Biomedical, Occlutech, Recor, Renal Guard, Shifamed, Terumo, Trisol, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venus, Venock, Vivasure Medical, Vvital Biomed, and Whiteswell. Dr Tang has served as a physician proctor for Medtronic; has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Abbott Structural Heart, and NeoChord; has served on the TAVR Advisory Board for Abbott Structural Heart; and has served on the Physician Advisory Board for JenaValve. Dr von Bardeleben has served for trials and principal investigator for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an Advisory Board member and/or member of the Steering/Executive Group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the Steering/Executive Committee Group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Maisano is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Perifect, Xeltis, Transseptal Solutions, Magenta, and Cardiovalve; has received grant support from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received royalties from Edwards Lifesciences and 4Tech; and is cofounder/shareholder of Transseptal Solutions, 4Tech, Cardiovalve, Magenta, Perifect, Coregard, and SwissVortex. Dr Metra has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Actelion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Edwards Therapeutics, Livanova, Servier, Vifor Pharma, and WindTree Therapeutics. Dr Taramasso has received consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, 4Tech, Boston Scientific, CoreMedic, Mitraltech, and SwissVortex outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Evidence to support immediate P2Y 12 inhibitor loading in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is limited., Objectives: This study sought to compare outcomes of STEMI patients receiving immediate or delayed P2Y 12 inhibitor treatment., Methods: Using data from the prospective Bern-PCI registry between 2016 and 2020, we stratified STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention according to time periods with different institutional recommendations regarding P2Y 12 inhibitor pretreatment. In cohort 1 (October 2016-September 2018), immediate P2Y 12 inhibitor treatment was recommended. In cohort 2 (October 2018-September 2020), P2Y 12 inhibitor treatment was recommended after coronary anatomy was confirmed. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. Sensitivity analysis included only patients in whom these recommendations were followed., Results: Cohort 1 included 1,116 patients; pretreatment was actually given in 708 (63.4%). Cohort 2 included 847 patients; pretreatment was withheld in 798 (94.2%). The mean age was 65 ± 13 years, and 24% were female. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The median difference for P2Y 12 loading to angiography was 52 minutes between cohort 1 and 2 and 100 minutes between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment. Rates of MACCEs were similar between cohort 1 and cohort 2 (10.1% vs 8.1%; adjusted HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.65-1.28; P = 0.59) and between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment (7.1% vs 8.4%; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.78-1.74; P = 0.45)., Conclusions: In this cohort study of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y 12 inhibitor pretreatment was not associated with improved MACCEs., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Rohla has received advisory fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, COR2ED, Novartis and Medtronic; and has received lecturing fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Biotronik, and Takeda Pharma, all outside of the submitted work. Dr Stortecky has received research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific; and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Abbott Vascular, Polares Medical, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Pilgrim has received research grants to the institution from Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received speaker fees/consultancy from Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and HighLife SAS. Dr Windecker reports research, travel, or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech. Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as an advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; is member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration; is vice president of the European Society of Cardiology; and is associate editor of the JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. Dr Räber has received research grants to the institution by Abbott, Biotronik, Heartflow, Sanofi, and Regeneron; and has received speaker/consultation fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Canon, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Sanofi, Occlutech, and Vifor. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) is associated with suboptimal hemodynamics and rare left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction., Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether device position and asymmetry are associated with these outcomes., Methods: Patients undergoing SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences) mitral ViV included in the VIVID (Valve-in-Valve International Data) Registry were studied. Clinical endpoints are reported according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. Residual mitral valve stenosis was defined as mean gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Depth of implantation (percentage of transcatheter heart valve [THV] atrial to the bioprosthesis ring) and asymmetry (ratio of 2 measures of THV height) were evaluated., Results: A total of 222 patients meeting the criteria for optimal core lab evaluation were studied (age 74 ± 11.6 years; 61.9% female; STS score = 8.3 ± 7.1). Mean asymmetry was 6.2% ± 4.4%. Mean depth of implantation was 19.0% ± 10.3% atrial. Residual stenosis was common (50%; mean gradient 5.0 ± 2.6 mm Hg). LVOT obstruction occurred in 7 cases (3.2%). Implantation depth was not a predictor of residual stenosis (OR: 1.19 [95% CI: 0.92-1.55]; P = 0.184), but more atrial implantation was protective against LVOT obstruction (0.7% vs 7.1%; P = 0.009; per 10% atrial, OR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]; P = 0.044). Asymmetry was found to be an independent predictor of residual stenosis (per 10% increase, OR: 2.30 [95% CI: 1.10-4.82]; P = 0.027)., Conclusions: Valve stenosis is common after mitral ViV. Asymmetry was associated with residual stenosis. Depth of implantation on its own was not associated with residual stenosis but was associated with LVOT obstruction. Technical considerations to reduce postdeployment THV asymmetry should be considered., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Whisenant is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Unbehaun is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Erlebach has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Abbott; and is a proctor for Abbott. Dr Guerrero has received institutional research grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Bruschi is a consultant for Abbott. Dr Rudolph has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences; and is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Andreas is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Zoll, and AbbVie; and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI. Dr Dvir is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is still uncertain., Objectives: The aim of this analysis was to assess the effects of 1- vs 3-month DAPT in patients with and those without concomitant OAC included in the XIENCE Short DAPT program., Methods: The XIENCE Short DAPT program enrolled patients with high bleeding risk who underwent successful PCI with a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. DAPT was discontinued at 1 or 3 months in patients free from ischemic events and adherent to treatment. The effect of 1- vs 3-month DAPT was compared in patients with and those without OAC using propensity score stratification. The primary endpoint was all-cause death or any myocardial infarction (MI). The key secondary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2 to 5 bleeding. Outcomes were assessed from 1 to 12 months after index PCI., Results: Among 3,364 event-free patients, 1,462 (43%) were on OAC. Among OAC patients, the risk for death or MI was similar between 1- and 3-month DAPT (7.4% vs 8.8%; adjusted HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49-1.11; P = 0.139), whereas BARC types 2 to 5 bleeding was lower with 1-month DAPT (adjusted HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.51-0.99; P = 0.046). These effects were consistent in patients with and those without OAC (P for interaction = NS)., Conclusions: Between 1 and 12 months after PCI, 1-month compared with 3-month DAPT was associated with similar rates of all-cause death or MI and a reduced rate of BARC types 2 to 5 bleeding, irrespective of OAC treatment., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was sponsored by Abbott. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi Sankyo, Opsens, Bayer, CoreFlow, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel | Departement Klinische Forschung, Vifor, Bristol Myers Squibb, iVascular, and Medscape; and has received grants and personal fees from Terumo, outside the submitted work. Dr Spirito has received a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation. Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Ventura, outside the submitted work; and has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry, Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr Bangalore has received consulting fees or has been an advisory board member for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Viatris, and REATA. Dr Vranckx has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and CSL Behring, not related to this research. Dr Bhatt has served on advisory boards for AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; has served on boards of directors for AngioWave, the Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb, DRS.LINQ, High Enroll, the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; has stock or stock options with AngioWave, Bristol Myers Squibb, and DRS.LINQ; has served as inaugural chair of the American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; has been a consultant for Broadview Ventures; has served on data monitoring committees for Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, the Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly the Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (chair, PEITHO trial), the Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards Lifesciences), Contego Medical (chair, PERFORMANCE 2 trial), the Duke Clinical Research Institute, the Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo, and for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, the Population Health Research Institute, and Rutgers University (for the National Institutes of Health–funded MINT trial); has received honoraria from the American College of Cardiology (senior associate editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org, and chair of the American College of Cardiology Accreditation Oversight Committee), the law firm of Arnold and Porter (work related to Sanofi/Bristol Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), the Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly the Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee, funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee, funded by CSL Boehringer), Belvoir Publications (editor-in-chief, Harvard Heart Letter), the Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen & Company, the Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (editor-in-chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (guest editor, associate editor), K2P (cochair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (continuing medical education steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (course director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, the Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and U.S. national coleader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (chief medical editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (secretary and treasurer), WebMD (continuing medical education steering committees), and John Wiley (steering committee); has other relationships with Clinical Cardiology (deputy editor), the NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (chair), and the VA CART Research and Publications Committee (chair); has been named on a patent for sotagliflozin, assigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital, which assigned to Lexicon (neither Dr Bhatt nor Brigham and Women’s Hospital receives any income from this patent); has received research funding from 89Bio, Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, Myo-Kardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, the Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, and Youngene; has received royalties from Elsevier (editor, Cardiovascular Intervention: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease); has been a site coinvestigator for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, and Vascular Solutions; has been a trustee for the American College of Cardiology; and has performed unfunded research for FlowCo andTakeda. Dr Campo has received institutional research grants outside the submitted work. Dr Neumann has received grants or fees from Amgen, Bayer Health Care, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Ferrer, Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Vascular, and Medtronic. Dr Toelg has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, and Biotronik. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; serves as an advisory board member and/or a member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis, with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry, without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Arena, AstraZeneca, Atricure, Bayer, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi Sankyo, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Medtronic, Novartis, OrbusNeich, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Cine-Med Research, Novartis, and WebMD; holds equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, and ControlRad (spouse); is a scientific advisory board member for the American Medical Association, the American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees member), and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee member); is an associate editor for JAMA; and is a faculty member for the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (no fee). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with contemporary self-expanding valves (SEV)., Background: Need for PPI is frequent post-TAVR, but conflicting data exist on new-generation SEV and on the prognostic impact of PPI., Methods: This study included 3,211 patients enrolled in the multicenter NEOPRO (A Multicenter Comparison of Acurate NEO Versus Evolut PRO Transcatheter Heart Valves) and NEOPRO-2 (A Multicenter Comparison of ACURATE NEO2 Versus Evolut PRO/PRO+ Transcatheter Heart Valves 2) registries (January 2012 to December 2021) who underwent transfemoral TAVR with SEV. Implanted transcatheter heart valves (THV) were Acurate neo (n = 1,090), Acurate neo2 (n = 665), Evolut PRO (n = 1,312), and Evolut PRO+ (n = 144). Incidence and predictors of new PPI and 1-year outcomes were evaluated., Results: New PPI was needed in 362 patients (11.3%) within 30 days after TAVR (8.8%, 7.7%, 15.2%, and 10.4%, respectively, after Acurate neo, Acurate neo2, Evolut PRO, and Evolut PRO+). Independent predictors of new PPI were Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, baseline right bundle branch block and depth of THV implantation, both in patients treated with Acurate neo/neo2 and in those treated with Evolut PRO/PRO+. Predischarge reduction in ejection fraction (EF) was more frequent in patients requiring PPI (P = 0.014). New PPI was associated with higher 1-year mortality (16.9% vs 10.8%; adjusted HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.13-2.43; P = 0.010), particularly in patients with baseline EF <40% (P for interaction = 0.049)., Conclusions: New PPI was frequently needed after TAVR with SEV (11.3%) and was associated with higher 1-year mortality, particularly in patients with EF <40%. Baseline right bundle branch block and depth of THV implantation independently predicted the need of PPI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Pagnesi has received personal fees from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Kim is a proctor for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular; and has received personal fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Meril outside the submitted work. Dr Barbanti has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr De Marco has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific and Kardia. Dr Adamo has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic. Dr Estévez-Loureiro has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; and is a proctor for Lifetech Scientific. Dr Conradi has served as an advisory board member for Abbott, Medtronic, JenaValve, and Neovasc; and has received personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and MicroInterventions. Dr Toggweiler is a proctor for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Biosensors/NVT; and is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biosensors/NVT, Medira, Shockwave, Teleflex, AtHeart, VeoSource, and Equity in Hi-D Imaging. Dr Mylotte is a proctor for Medtronic and Microport. Dr Veulemans has received lecture fees and travel support from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Søndergaard has received consultant fees and/or institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and SMT. Dr Wolf is a proctor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Pilgrim has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Biotronik; and has received personal fees from Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Abbott, Medtronic, and HighLifeSAS outside the submitted work. Dr Montorfano serves as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Kardia. Dr Hildick-Smith has served as an adviser or proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Taramasso is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, 4Tech, and CoreMedic; and has received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sinning is a proctor for Medtronic and Boston Scientific; has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and has received research grants from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic outside the submitted work. Dr Van Mieghem has received research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, PulseCath BV, and Daiichi Sankyo; and has received advisory fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Ancora, Medtronic, PulseCath BV, and Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Khogali is a proctor for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr Wood has received grant support from Boston Scientific; and is a consultant for Medtronic. Dr MacCarthy is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hamm has served on advisory boards for Medtronic. Dr Schäfer is a proctor for Boston Scientific and Medtronic; and has received lecture fees and travel support from both companies. Dr Zeus is a proctor for Medtronic; and has received speaker fees and financial scientific support from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Naber has received lecture fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular; and has served on advisory boards for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr Windecker has received institutional research and educational grants from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave. Dr Siqueira is a proctor for Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Sedaghat has received travel grants and support from Medtronic. Dr Metra has received personal fees from Amgen, Vifor Pharma, AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Servier, Edwards Therapeutics, Actelion, LivaNova, and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr Latib has served on advisory boards or as a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Philips, Edwards Lifesciences. and Abbott Vascular. Dr Mangieri has received an institutional research grant from Boston Scientific; has served on a medical advisory board for Boston Scientific; and has received speaker honoraria from Concept Medical and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Amulet (Abbott) left atrial appendage occluder investigational device exemption trial is the largest randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Amulet left atrial appendage occluder compared with the Watchman 2.5 device (Boston Scientific) through 5 years., Objectives: This analysis evaluated the device effect on 3-year outcomes in the Amulet investigational device exemption trial., Methods: The medication regimen and key clinical outcomes were reported through 3 years including: 1) the composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE); 2) the composite of all strokes, SE, or cardiovascular (CV) death; 3) major bleeding; and 4) all-cause death and CV death., Results: A total of 1,878 patients at 108 sites were randomized. A significantly higher percentage of patients were free of oral anticoagulation usage at 3 years with Amulet (96.2%) vs Watchman (92.5%) (P < 0.01). Clinical outcomes were comparable for the composite of ischemic stroke or SE (5.0% vs 4.6%; P = 0.69); the composite of all strokes, SE, or CV death (11.1% vs 12.7%; P = 0.31); major bleeding (16.1% vs 14.7%; P = 0.46); all-cause death (14.6% vs 17.9%; P = 0.08); and CV death (6.6% vs 8.5%; P = 0.14) for Amulet and Watchman, respectively. Through 3 years, device factors (device-related thrombus or peridevice leak ≥3 mm) preceded ischemic stroke events and CV deaths more frequently in Watchman compared with Amulet patients., Conclusions: The Amulet occluder demonstrated continued safety and effectiveness with over 96% free of oral anticoagulation usage through 3 years in a high-risk population compared to the Watchman device. (AMPLATZER Amulet LAA Occluder Trial [Amulet IDE]; NCT02879448)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Abbott funded the Amulet IDE Trial. No funding was provided for this analysis. Dr Lakkireddy has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, AtriCure, Alta Thera, Medtronic, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific; and has received speaker honorarium from Abbott, Medtronic, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific. Dr Thaler has received consulting fees from Abbott and Occlutech; and has received institutional research grants for clinical trials from Abbott and the National Institutes of Health. Dr Ellis has received institutional research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim Inc, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and has received consulting/advisory fees from, Abbott Medical Inc, Boston Scientific, and AtriCure Inc. Dr Swarup has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Gambhir has received consulting fees from Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific, and speaker honorarium from Boston Scientific. Dr Hermiller serves as a consultant to Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Nielsen-Kudsk has received institutional research grants from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Worthley has performed consultancy and proctoring for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott; and is a shareholder for Three Peaks Medical. Dr Nair has received research grants and support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Adagio; is on the advisory board for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Adagio; is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Adagio; and has received honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Adagio. Dr Schmidt has received speaker honorarium and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, and Medtronic. Dr Horton is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, St. Jude/Abbott Medical, Biotronik, Baylis, and Medtronic. Dr Gupta has received institutional research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and CVRx Inc. Dr Anderson is an employee of Abbott. Mr Gage is an employee of Abbott. Dr Alkhouli serves as a consultant to Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Windecker reports research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; serves as an advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and is a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Percutaneous transcatheter interventions have evolved as standard therapies for a variety of cardiovascular diseases, from revascularization for atherosclerotic vascular lesions to the treatment of structural cardiac diseases. Concomitant technological innovations, procedural advancements, and operator experience have contributed to effective therapies with low complication rates, making early hospital discharge safe and common. Same-day discharge presents numerous potential benefits for patients, providers, and health care systems. There are several key elements that are shared across the spectrum of interventional cardiology procedures to create a successful same-day discharge pathway. These include appropriate patient and procedure selection, close postprocedural observation, predischarge assessments specific for each type of procedure, and the existence of a patient support system beyond hospital discharge. This review provides the rationale, available data, and a framework for same-day discharge across the spectrum of coronary, peripheral, and structural cardiovascular interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Men and women differ regarding comorbidities, pathophysiology, and the progression of valvular heart diseases., Objectives: This study sought to assess sex-related differences regarding clinical characteristics and the outcome of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI)., Methods: All 702 patients in this multicenter study underwent TTVI for severe TR. The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality., Results: Among 386 women and 316 men in this study, men were more often diagnosed with coronary artery disease (52.9% in men vs 35.5% in women; P = 5.6 × 10 -6 ). Subsequently, the underlying etiology for TR in men was predominantly secondary ventricular (64.6% in men vs 50.0% in women; P = 1.4 × 10 -4 ), whereas women more often presented with secondary atrial etiology (41.7% in women vs 24.4% in men, P = 2.0 × 10 -6 ). Notably, 2-year survival after TTVI was similar in women and men (69.9% in women vs 63.7% in men; P = 0.144). Multivariate regression analysis identified dyspnea expressed as New York Heart Association functional class, tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) as independent predictors for 2-year mortality. The prognostic significance of TAPSE and mPAP differed between sexes. Consequently, we looked at right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling expressed as TAPSE/mPAP and identified sex-specific thresholds to best predict survival; women with a TAPSE/mPAP ratio <0.612 mm/mm Hg displayed a 3.43-fold increased HR for 2-year mortality (P < 0.001), whereas men with a TAPSE/mPAP ratio <0.434 mm/mm Hg displayed a 2.05-fold increased HR for 2-year mortality (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Even though men and women differ in the etiology of TR, both sexes show similar survival rates after TTVI. The TAPSE/mPAP ratio can improve prognostication after TTVI, and sex-specific thresholds should be applied to guide future patient selection., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Lachmann has received funding from the Technical University of Munich (Clinician Scientist Grant) and from the Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation (Clinician Scientist Grant). All authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization is mandatory before transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the effect of M-TEER on GDMT is unknown., Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate frequency, prognostic implications and predictors of GDMT uptitration after M-TEER in patients with SMR and HFrEF., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the EuroSMR Registry. The primary events were all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization., Results: Among the 1,641 EuroSMR patients, 810 had full datasets regarding GDMT and were included in this study. GDMT uptitration occurred in 307 patients (38%) after M-TEER. Proportion of patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was 78%, 89%, and 62% before M-TEER and 84%, 91%, and 66% 6 months after M-TEER (all P < 0.001). Patients with GDMT uptitration had a lower risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41-0.93; P = 0.020) and of all-cause death or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38-0.76; P < 0.001) compared with those without. Degree of MR reduction between baseline and 6-month follow-up was an independent predictor of GDMT uptitration after M-TEER (adjusted OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.08-2.71; P = 0.022)., Conclusions: GDMT uptitration after M-TEER occurred in a considerable proportion of patients with SMR and HFrEF and is independently associated with lower rates for mortality and HF hospitalizations. A greater decrease in MR was associated with increased likelihood for GDMT uptitration., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Adamo has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic. Dr Baldus has received lecture fees and research support from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kalbacher has received speaker honoraria from Abbott; and has received travel expenses and proctor fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lurz has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular. Dr Petronio has been a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr von Bardeleben has served on trial steering committees (unpaid) for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Neochord; and has served on advisory boards for and received speaker fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Neochord, Philips, and Siemens. Dr Windecker has received institutional research, travel, or educational grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis with payments to his institution; and has been an unpaid member of the steering/executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry. Dr Hausleiter has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Prof Metra has received consulting honoraria for participation in steering committees or advisory boards or for speeches from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Edwards Lifesciences, Fresenius, Novartis, and Servier. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data regarding the impact of the tricuspid valve gradient (TVG) after tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are scarce., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the association between the mean TVG and clinical outcomes among patients who underwent tricuspid TEER for significant tricuspid regurgitation., Methods: Patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation who underwent tricuspid TEER within the TriValve (International Multisite Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) registry were divided into quartiles based on the mean TVG at discharge. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Outcomes were assessed up to the 1-year follow-up., Results: A total of 308 patients were included from 24 centers. Patients were divided into quartiles of the mean TVG as follows: quartile 1 (n = 77), 0.9 ± 0.3 mm Hg; quartile 2 (n = 115), 1.8 ± 0.3 mm Hg; quartile 3 (n = 65), 2.8 ± 0.3 mm Hg; and quartile 4 (n = 51), 4.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg. The baseline TVG and the number of implanted clips were associated with a higher post-TEER TVG. There was no significant difference across TVG quartiles in the 1-year composite endpoint (quartiles 1-4: 35%, 30%, 40%, and 34%, respectively; P = 0.60) or the proportion of patients in New York Heart Association class III to IV at the last follow-up (P = 0.63). The results were similar after adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic characteristics (composite endpoint quartile 4 vs quartile 1-quartile 3 adjusted HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.52-2.12; P = 0.88) or exploring post-TEER TVG as a continuous variable., Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of the TriValve registry, an increased discharge TVG was not significantly associated with adverse outcomes after tricuspid TEER. These findings apply for the explored TVG range and up to the 1-year follow-up. Further investigations on higher gradients and longer follow-up are needed to better guide the intraprocedural decision-making process., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Coisne has served as a consultant for Abbott; and has received speaker fees from Abbott and GE Healthcare. Dr Scotti has served as a consultant for NeoChord Inc; and has received consulting fees from NeoChord Inc. Dr Taramasso has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, 4Tech, and CoreMedic; and has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Ludwig has received travel compensation from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Rodés-Cabau has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lurz has received speaker fees from Abbott. Dr Hausleiter has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kodali has served on the scientific advisory board for Microinterventional Devices, Dura Biotech, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, and Supira; has served as a consultant for Meril Lifesciences, Admedus, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; has served on the steering committee for Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott Vascular; has received honoraria from Meril Lifesciences, Admedus, Abbott Vascular, and Dura Biotech; and owns equity in Dura Biotech, Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Supira, and MID. Dr Alessandrini has received consulting fees from Abbott and Edwards LifeSciences. Dr Brochet has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Denti has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, 4Tech, Neovasc, and InnovHeart; and has received honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Estévez- Loureiro has received speaker fees from Abbott, Boston, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Ho has served as a consultant for NeoChord Inc; and has received consulting fees from NeoChord Inc. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Polares Medical. Dr Sievert has received study honoraria, travel expenses, and consulting fees from 4Tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Bavaria Medizin Technologie, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, Cardiac Dimensions, Celonova, Comed BV, Contego, CVRx, Edwards Lifesciences, Endologix, Hemoteq, Lifetech, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Mitralign, Nuomao Medtech, Occlutech, PFM Medical, ReCor, Renal Guard, Rox Medical, Terumo, Vascular Dynamics, and Vivasure Medical. Dr Tang has served as a consultant, physician advisory board member, and faculty trainer for Abbott Structural Heart; has served as a consultant for Medtronic and NeoChord; and has served as a physician advisory board member for JenaValve. Dr Andreas has served as a proctor/consultant for and has received speaker fees from Abbott, Edwards LifeSciences, Boston, Zoll and Medtronic; and has received institutional grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and LSI Solutions. Dr Gavazzoni has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular. Dr Braun has received speaker honoraria and travel support from Abbott Vascular. Dr Lubos has received grant support and lecture fees from Abbott; and has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kalbacher has received lecture fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Connelly has received honoraria from Abbott. Dr Schofer has served as a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Windecker reports research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave. Dr Windecker serves as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis, but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers. He is also a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Maisano has served as a consultant for and received consulting fees and honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Cardiovalve, SwissVortex, Perifect, Xeltis, Transseptal Solutions, Magenta, Valtech, and Medtronic; has reported being a cofounder of 4Tech; has received research grant support from Abbott, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, NVT, and Terumo; has received royalties and owns intellectual property rights from Edwards Lifesciences (FMR surgical annuloplasty); and has reported being a shareholder in Cardiovalve, Swiss Vortex, Magenta, Transseptal Solutions, Occlufit, 4Tech, and Perifect. Dr Leon has received institutional clinical research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Hahn has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Abbott Structural, NaviGate, Philips Healthcare, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and GE Healthcare; has been the Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-supported trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation; has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Baylis Medical; and has received nonfinancial support from 3mensio. Dr Latib has served on the advisory board for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Shifamed, NeoChord Inc, V-dyne, and Philips. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing invasive management is associated with worse outcomes. However, the prognostic implications of transient or in-hospital persistent AKI may differ., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic implications of transient or in-hospital persistent AKI in patients with ACS., Methods: In the MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox) trial, 203 subjects were excluded because of incomplete information or end-stage renal disease, with a study population of 8,201 patients. Transient and persistent AKI were defined as renal dysfunction no longer or still fulfilling the AKI criteria (>0.5 mg/dL or a relative >25% increase in creatinine) at discharge, respectively. Thirty-day coprimary outcomes were the out-of-hospital composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) and net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE), defined as the composite of MACE or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding., Results: Persistent and transient AKI occurred in 750 (9.1%) and 587 (7.2%) subjects, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, compared with patients without AKI, the risk for 30-day coprimary outcomes was higher in patients with persistent AKI (MACE: adjusted HR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.48-3.64; P < 0.001; NACE: adjusted HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.48-3.52; P < 0.001), driven mainly by all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 3.43; 95% CI: 2.03-5.82; P < 0.001), whereas transient AKI was not associated with higher rates of MACE or NACE. Results remained consistent when implementing the KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria., Conclusions: Among patients with ACS undergoing invasive management, in-hospital persistent but not transient AKI was associated with higher risk for 30-day MACE and NACE. (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox [MATRIX]; NCT01433627)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The trial was sponsored by Società Italiana di Cardiologia Invasiva (a nonprofit organization), which received grant support from The Medicines Company and Terumo. This substudy did not receive any direct or indirect funding. Prof Leonardi has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca; and has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer/Bristol Myers Squibb, ICON, Chiesi, and Novo Nordisk (all outside the submitted work). Prof Vranckx has received personal fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and CLS Behring (all outside the submitted work). Dr Tebaldi has received research grants from GADA and Abbott Vascular; and has received personal fees from Abbott (all outside the submitted work). Prof Andò has received personal fees and nonfinancial support from Daiichi Sankyo, Boeringer Ingelheim, and Amgen; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and Biosensors (all outside the submitted work). Dr Brugaletta has received a research grant to the institution from AstraZeneca; has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular (outside the submitted work); and has served as an advisory board member for Boston Scientific, iVascular, and Teleflex. Dr Adamo has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic (all outside the submitted work). Prof Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; has served as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis (but has not received personal payments from pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers); and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Prof Valgimigli has received grants and personal fees from Abbott, Terumo, and AstraZeneca; has received personal fees from Chiesi, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Alvimedica, Biosensors, and Idorsia; and has received grants from Medicure (outside the submitted work). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a progressive disease with characteristic pathophysiological changes that may influence prognosis. Although the staging of SMR patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to extramitral cardiac involvement has prognostic value in medically treated patients, such data are so far lacking for edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER)., Objectives: This study sought to classify M-TEER patients into disease stages based on the phenotype of extramitral cardiac involvement and to assess its impact on symptomatic and survival outcomes., Methods: Based on echocardiographic and clinical assessment, patients were assigned to 1 of the following HFrEF-SMR groups: left ventricular involvement (Stage 1), left atrial involvement (Stage 2), right ventricular volume/pressure overload (Stage 3), or biventricular failure (Stage 4). A Cox regression model was implemented to investigate the impact of HFrEF-SMR stages on 2-year all-cause mortality. The symptomatic outcome was assessed with New York Heart Association functional class at follow-up., Results: Among a total of 849 eligible patients who underwent M-TEER for relevant SMR from 2008 until 2019, 9.5% (n = 81) presented with left ventricular involvement, 46% (n = 393) with left atrial involvement, 15% (n = 129) with right ventricular pressure/volume overload, and 29% (n = 246) with biventricular failure. An increase in HFrEF-SMR stage was associated with increased 2-year all-cause mortality after M-TEER (HR: 1.39; CI: 1.23-1.58; P < 0.01). Furthermore, higher HFrEF-SMR stages were associated with significantly less symptomatic improvement at follow-up., Conclusions: The classification of M-TEER patients into HFrEF-SMR stages according to extramitral cardiac involvement provides prognostic value in terms of postinterventional survival and symptomatic improvement., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Orban has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Tomtec Imaging Systems. Dr Karam has received consultant fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and has received proctor fees from Abbott. Dr von Bardeleben has received institutional grants and has served as a speaker for Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences; and has performed trials unpaid for Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Lifetec, Medtronic, and NeoChord. Dr Iliadis has received travel support from Abbott; and has received consultant honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Pfister has received consultancy and speaker fee from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received speaker fee by Abbott Vascular. The Department of Cardiology of the Leiden University Medical Centre received unrestricted research grants from Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Biotronik, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, and Medtronic. Dr Higuchi has received lecture fees from Medtronic Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, and Ono Pharmaceutical Company. Dr Petronio has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Abbott and Medtronic; has received consulting fees from Boston; and has received honoraria fees from Daiichi Sankyo. Dr Melica has served as a proctor for Abbott Vascular. Dr Braun has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr Windecker reports research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson and Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave. Dr Windecker serves as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers. Dr Windecker is also member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Abbott Vascular, Polares Medical, and Edwards Lifesiences. Dr Kalbacher has received proctor and lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received lecture fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr Lurz has received grants from Abbott Medical and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Bax has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hausleiter has received research support and speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women have higher rates of acute complications after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, data on long-term safety and effectiveness are limited., Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine sex-specific short- and long-term outcomes after LAAO in the Amulet IDE (Amplatzer™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder) trial., Methods: The following outcomes were compared between men and women: in-hospital complications, device-related outcomes (peridevice leak at 45 days and device-related thrombus at 18 months), and long-term clinical outcomes (death, thromboembolism, and bleeding). Subanalyses for the interaction between sex and device type were performed., Results: A total of 1,833 patients underwent attempted device implantation (917 with the Amulet and 916 with the Watchman), of whom 734 were women (40%). Device success was 97.4% in men and 97.1% in women (P = 0.60). Rates of major in-hospital adverse events were higher in women (4.4% vs 1.9%; P < 0.01), driven by major bleeding (3.7% vs 1.0%; P < 0.01) and pericardial effusion requiring intervention (2.0% vs 0.5%; P < 0.01). Peridevice leak and device-related thrombus were similar in men and women (18.3% vs 18.9% [P = 0.78] and 3.3% vs 5.0% [P = 0.10], respectively). There were no differences between men and women in rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (2.6% vs 2.6%; P = 0.98), transient ischemic attack (1.3% vs 1.6%; P = 0.69), hemorrhagic stroke (0.5% vs 0.4%; P = 0.88), major bleeding (10.1% vs 10.9%; P = 0.49), cardiovascular death (4.3% vs 3.5%; P = 0.45), or all-cause death (8.9% vs 6.9%; P = 0.16)., Conclusions: In the Amulet IDE trial, long-term clinical outcomes including effectiveness following LAAO were comparable in men and women despite the higher rates of in-hospital complications due to major bleeding and pericardial effusion in women. (Amplatzer™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder Trial [Amulet IDE]; NCT02879448)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Abbott funded the Amulet IDE Trial. No funding was provided for this analysis. Dr Alkhouli serves as a consultant to Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Russo has received research support to the institution from Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Kestra, Medilynx, and Medtronic; is a consultant for Abbott, Atricure, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Medtronic and PaceMate; has received honoraria for speaking from Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer and Medtronic; and has received royalties from Up-to-Date. Dr Thaler has received consulting fees from Abbott and Occlutech; and has received institutional research grants for clinical trials from Abbott and the National Institutes of Health. Prof Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; serves as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis (but has not received personal payments from pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers); and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Anderson and Mr Gage are employees of Abbott. Dr Lakkireddy has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Atricure, Alta Thera, Medtronic, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific; and has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Up to 70% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have a relevant coronary stenosis which may need revascularization. The short- and long-term ischemic and bleeding risk of unconscious and conscious OHCA patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is largely unknown., Objectives: This study sought to compare the occurrence of 1-year outcomes after PCI between OHCA patients, stratified on the basis of state of consciousness, with patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not preceded by OHCA., Methods: The study assessed the unadjusted and adjusted risk of cardiovascular events in a prospective single-center cohort of 9,303 consecutive PCI patients., Results: At 1 year, all-cause mortality was higher in unconscious (49.5%) but not in conscious OHCA (8.9%) patients than in ACS patients (8.0%), and both unconscious and conscious OHCA patients were more likely than ACS patients to experience definite stent thrombosis (4.4% and 3.5% vs 1.3%) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (17.8% and 9.0% vs 5.1%). The higher hazards were largely determined by events occurring in the first 30 days. After multivariable adjustment, only unconscious OHCA patients remained at increased risk of death (adjusted HR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.65-4.05), definite stent thrombosis (adjusted HR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.30-4.43), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding (adjusted HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.82-3.47) at 1 year., Conclusions: At 1 year after PCI, unconscious OHCA patients were at higher risk of death, definite stent thrombosis, and bleeding, while conscious OHCA patients had similar hazards compared with an all-comer ACS population without OHCA. Dedicated PCI strategies for OHCA patients taking into account their state of consciousness after resuscitation are warranted., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Department of Cardiology at Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. Dr Spirito has received a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; served as an unpaid advisory board member or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; and served on the steering or executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Räber has received research grants to the institution by Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, HeartFlow, Sanofi, and Regeneron; and speaker or consultation fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Canon, Medtronic, Occlutech, and Sanofi. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Opsens, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel Departement Klinische Forschung, Vifor, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, iVascular, and Medscape, outside the submitted work; and received grants from Terumo, outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Resolute Onyx polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were noninferior in safety and effectiveness to BioFreedom polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stents (DCS) in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) at 1 year., Objectives: This study reports the final 2-year results of the randomized Onyx ONE trial., Methods: The Onyx ONE (A Randomized Controlled Trial With Resolute Onyx in One Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for High-Bleeding Risk Patients) trial randomly assigned HBR patients to treatment with ZES or DCS. Following 1-month DAPT, event-free patients received SAPT (either aspirin or a P2Y 12 inhibitor at physician discretion). The primary safety endpoint, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, was determined at 1 year. Rates of primary and secondary endpoints were calculated after final follow-up at 2 years., Results: A total of 1,003 patients were randomly allocated to ZES and 993 patients to DCS. Follow-up was complete in 980 (97.7%) ZES patients and 962 (96.9%) DCS patients at 2 years. The primary safety endpoint occurred in 208 (21.2%) patients in the ZES group and 199 (20.7%) patients in the DCS group (risk difference: 0.5%; 95% CI: -3.1% to 4.2%; P = 0.78) at 2 years without significant differences in individual components of the composite endpoint. The secondary effectiveness endpoint occurred in 217 (22.1%) patients in the ZES group and 202 (21.0%) patients in the DCS group (risk difference: 1.1%; 95% CI: -2.5% to 4.8%; P = 0.54)., Conclusions: Among patients at HBR treated with 1-month DAPT followed by SAPT, the Resolute Onyx polymer-based ZES had similar 2-year outcomes for the primary safety and secondary effectiveness endpoint compared with the BioFreedom polymer-free DCS. (A Randomized Controlled Trial With Resolute Onyx in One Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy [DAPT] for High-Bleeding Risk Patients [Onyx ONE]; NCT03344653)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Onyx ONE trial was sponsored by Medtronic. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; served as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, CardioValve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; and has served as a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Latib has received consulting fees from Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific. Dr Kedhi has received speaker honoraria and institutional grants from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular. Dr Kirtane has received institutional funding to Columbia University and/or the Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, and Neurotronic (in addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for consulting and/or speaking engagements in which Dr Kirtane controlled the content); has served as a consultant for IMDS; and has received travel expenses/meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. Dr Kandzari has received institutional research or grant support from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Orbus Neich, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Cardiovascular Systems, Magenta Medical, and Medtronic. Dr Mehran has received institutional research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Abiomed, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, Bristol Myers Squibb, CERC, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, DSI, Medtronic, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and OrbusNeich; has received consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, CardiaWave, Chiesi, Cine-Med Research, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Medscape/WebMD, Medtelligence (Janssen Scientific Affairs), Roivant Sciences, Sanofi, and Siemens Medical Solutions; has received consultant fees paid to the institution from Abbott Laboratories and Bristol Myers Squibb; has served on the advisory board, with funding paid to the institution, for Spectranetics/Philips/Volcano Corp; has a spouse who has served as a consultant for Abiomed, The Medicines Company, Merck; Equity <1% from Claret Medical, Elixir Medical, Applied Therapeutics, and STEL; has received Data Safety and Monitoring Board Membership fees paid to the institution from Watermark Research Partners; has served as a consultant (no fee) for Idorsia Pharmaceuticals and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and has served as an Associate Editor for the American College of Cardiology and the American Medical Association. Dr Price has received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and has received consulting fees from Acutus, Baylis Medical, and W.L. Gore. Dr Simon has received honoraria for serving as a course director (<$10,000) from Medtronic. Dr Worthley has received institutional grant or research support from Abbott and Biotronik. Dr Zaman has received consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Meril, SMT, and Terumo. Dr Petrov has received consulting, proctor, or speaker fees from Medtronic, Edwards, Philips, Cardiatis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, and Pfizer. Dr Mylotte has received consulting fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and MicroPort. Dr Moreno has received lecture or consulting fees from Medtronic, Biosensors, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Terumo, and Braun. Dr Pasupati has received consulting, proctor, or speaker fees from Medtronic, Edwards, Boston Scientific, JenaValve, BioExcel, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer. Dr Kim has received research grants through Seoul National University Hospital from Abbott, Medtronic, Biotronik, B. Braun, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and has received lecture and consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, AmGen, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Tie has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Dr Hur has received research grants from Boston Scientific and Terumo. Dr Marx has received an honorarium for Clinical Events Committee membership from the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Dr Ali has received institutional grant support from Abiomed, Acist Medical, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Philips, and Opsens Medical; has received consulting or advisory fees from Amgen and Boston Scientific; has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca; and owns equity in Shockwave Medical. Ms. Parke and Dr Lung are employees of Medtronic. Dr Stone has received speaker honoraria from Cook, Infraredx, Valfix, TherOx, Robocath, HeartFlow, Ablative Solutions, Vectorious, Miracor, Neovasc, Abiomed, Ancora, Elucid Bio, Occlutech, CorFlow, Apollo Therapeutics, Impulse Dynamics, Reva, Vascular Dynamics, Shockwave, V-Wave, Cardiomech, and Gore; and owns equity or options in Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, the Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, Valfix, and the MedFocus family of funds. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate patient-centered metrics in intermediate-surgical-risk aortic stenosis patients enrolled in the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial treated with self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgery., Background: Studies have shown TAVR to be an alternative to surgery in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis but have focused on "hard endpoints," including all-cause mortality and stroke, rather than on comparative patient-centered metrics, such as functional status and symptom burden., Methods: The study analyzed functional status (6-minute walk test [6MWT]) and symptom burden (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) in 1,492 patients from the SURTAVI trial at baseline, 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were categorized by baseline functional status into tertiles of slow, medium, and fast walkers., Results: Patients with lowest capacity baseline functional status were commonly women, had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores, and had more New York Heart Association functional class III or IV symptoms; reduced baseline functional status was associated with higher aortic valve- and heart failure-related hospitalization at 2 years. There was greater improvement in 6MWT distance in TAVR compared with surgery patients at 30 days (P < 0.001) and 1 year (P = 0.012), but at 2 years, both groups had similar improvement (P = 0.091). The percentage of patients with large improvement in 6MWT was greatest in patients categorized as slow walkers and lowest in fast walkers. Symptom burden improved after TAVR at 30 days and after both procedures at 1 and 2 years., Conclusions: In this substudy of patients from the SURTAVI trial, patients receiving TAVR demonstrated a more rapid improvement in functional status and symptom burden compared with patients undergoing surgery; however, both groups had similar improvements in long-term follow-up. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement [SURTAVI]; NCT01586910)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The SURTAVI trial was funded by Medtronic. Dr Kiaii has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Johnson and Johnson, and LivaNova; as a speaker for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Johnson and Johnson; and as a proctor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and LivaNova. Drs Van Mieghem and Laham have received research grants from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott Vascular. Dr Deeb has served on the advisory board and as a proctor for Medtronic; as a consultant and research investigator for Edwards Lifesciences; as a consultant and proctor for Terumo; and as a research investigator for Gore Medical with all fees paid to his institution. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, BMS, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed; has served as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; and has served as a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Chetcuti has received grant support and fees for proctoring from Medtronic; and has served as a consultant for JenaValve. Dr Yakubov has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic; Dr Chawla has served as a proctor for Medtronic. Dr Teefy has received grant support from Medtronic. Dr Li is an employee and shareholder of Medtronic. Dr Reardon has received fees from Medtronic for providing educational services. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Reineke has a consultancy agreement with Abbott; has received proctoring fees from Abbott; and has received travel expenses from Abbott. Dr Pilgrim has received institutional research grants and speaker fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; and is a consultant for HighLife SAS. Dr. Khan has served as a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and is co-inventor on patents, assigned to the National Institutes of Health, on devices for electrosurgical leaflet laceration. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; serves as an unpaid advisory board member and/or an unpaid member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis (but has not received personal payments from pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers); and is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Lanz has received a research grant from Boston Scientific to his institution. Dr Praz has received travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Polares Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents to disclose.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Okuno has received speaker fees from Abbott. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to his institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; has served as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis, but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; is a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration; and is an unpaid member of the Pfizer Research Award selection committee in Switzerland and of the Women as One Awards Committee. Dr Pilgrim has received research grants to the institution from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific and Biotronik; has received personal fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; and is on the clinical event adjudication committee for Highlife; and has received reimbursement of travel expenses from Medira. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Objectives: The authors sought to compare the differential effects of ultrathin-strut and thicker-strut drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with chronic (CCS) versus acute (ACS) coronary syndromes., Background: Newest-generation ultrathin-strut DES reduce target lesion failure (TLF) compared with thicker-strut second-generation DES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing newer-generation ultrathin-strut (<70 μm) versus thicker-strut (≥70 μm) DES. Patients were divided based on baseline clinical presentation (CCS versus ACS). The primary endpoint was TLF, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR)., Results: A total of 22,766 patients from 16 randomized controlled trials were included, of which 9 trials reported TLF rates in ACS patients. At a mean follow-up of 12.2 months, the risk of TLF was lower among patients treated with ultrathin-strut compared with thicker-strut DES (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95; P = 0.006). The difference was driven by a lower risk of clinically-indicated TLR (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.89; P < 0.001) among patients treated with ultrathin-strut DES. The treatment effect was consistent between patients presenting with CCS and ACS (relative RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.73-1.31; P for interaction = 0.854). In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, TLF risk was lower among those treated with ultrathin- compared with thicker-strut DES (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.54-0.99; P = 0.049)., Conclusions: Ultrathin-strut DES reduce the risk of TLF compared with thicker-strut second-generation DES in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, a difference caused by a lower risk of ischemia-driven TLR. The treatment effect was consistent among patients with CCS and ACS., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Statistical support was provided by the Clinical Research Center, University of Geneva, and Geneva University Hospitals. Dr Iglesias has received research grants to the institution from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, and Philips Volcano, outside the submitted work; has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Medtronic, Novartis, Philips Volcano, and Terumo, outside the submitted work; and has received and consultancy fees from Biotronik, Cardinal Health, Corflow Therapeutics, Medtronic, and Terumo, outside the submitted work. Dr Degrauwe has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular; has received institutional research grants, educational grants, and personal fees from Biotronik. Dr Roffi has received institutional research grants from Terumo, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Biotronik outside the submitted work. Dr Pilgrim has received institutional research grants from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; has received speaker fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; and has received consultancy fees for HighLife SAS outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 abbreviated dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: Current-generation drug-eluting stents are preferred over bare-metal stents for HBR patients, but their optimal DAPT management remains unknown., Methods: The XIENCE Short DAPT program included 3 prospective, multicenter, single-arm studies enrolling HBR patients who underwent successful PCI with a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. After 1 month (XIENCE 28 USA and XIENCE 28 Global) or 3 months (XIENCE 90) of DAPT, event-free patients discontinued the P2Y 12 inhibitor. The postmarketing approval XIENCE V USA study was used as historical control in a propensity score-stratified analysis., Results: A total of 3,652 patients were enrolled. The propensity-adjusted rate of the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction was 5.4% among 1,693 patients on 3-month DAPT versus 5.4% in the 12-month DAPT historical control (P noninferiority  = 0.0063) and 3.5% among 1,392 patients on 1-month DAPT versus 4.3% in the 6-month DAPT historical control (P noninferiority  = 0.0005). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2 to 5 bleeding was not significantly lower with 3- or 1-month DAPT, while BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding was reduced in both experimental groups. The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was 0.2% in XIENCE 90 (P < 0.0001 for the performance goal of 1.2%) and 0.3% in XIENCE 28., Conclusions: Among HBR patients undergoing PCI with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents, DAPT for 1 or 3 months was noninferior to 6 or 12 months of DAPT for ischemic outcomes and may be associated with less major bleeding and a low incidence of stent thrombosis., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was sponsored by Abbott. Dr Mehran has received institutional research grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CellAegis, CERC, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, DSI, Insel Gruppe, Medtronic, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, OrbusNeich, Philips, Transverse Medical, and Zoll; has received personal fees from the American College of Cardiology, Boston Scientific, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Cine-Med Research, Janssen, WebMD, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; has received consulting fees paid to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, AM-Pharma, Alleviant Medical, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, DSI, Duke University, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Novartis, and Philips; holds equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, STEL, and CONTROLRAD (spouse); and is a scientific advisory board member for the American Medical Association and Biosensors (spouse). Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; has received payments for participation in review activities from CeloNova and St. Jude Medical, outside the present work; and has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry, Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. Dr Bangalore has received grants from Abbott Vascular; and has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Amgen, and Pfizer. Dr Bhatt is an advisory board member for Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Janssen, Level Ex, Medscape Cardiology, MyoKardia, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, and Regado Biosciences; is a board of directors member for the Boston VA Research Institute, the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; is chair of the American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; is a member of data monitoring committees for the Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly the Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), the Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards Lifesciences), Contego Medical (chair, PERFORMANCE 2), the Duke Clinical Research Institute, the Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi-Sankyo), and the Population Health Research Institute; has received honoraria from the American College of Cardiology (senior associate editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; vice chair, ACC Accreditation Committee), the Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly the Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (editor-in-chief, Harvard Heart Letter), the Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), the Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (editor-in-chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (guest editor, associate editor), K2P (co-chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (continuing medical education steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, the Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and US national coleader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (chief medical editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (secretary/treasurer), and WebMD (continuing medical education steering committees); is deputy editor of Clinical Cardiology; is chair of the NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee and the VA CART Research and Publications Committee; has received research funding from Abbott, Afimmune, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, and 89Bio; has received royalties from Elsevier (editor, Cardiovascular Intervention: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease); is a site coinvestigator for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, St Jude Medical (now Abbott), and Svelte; is a trustee of the American College of Cardiology; and has conducted unfunded research for FlowCo, Merck, and Takeda. Dr Makkar has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; has served as a national principal investigator for Portico (Abbott) and Acurate (Boston Scientific) U.S. investigational device exemption trials; has received personal proctoring fees from Edwards Lifesciences; and has received travel support from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Dr Hermiller has received consulting and proctoring fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received consulting fees from Medtronic. Dr Toelg has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, and Biotronik. Dr Neumann has received grants and/or personal fees from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Bayer Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Boston Scientific, and Ferrer. Dr Maksoud is a member of the Speakers Bureaus of Abbott Vascular, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Chehab has received research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott; and has received speaker honoraria and/or personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Biotronik. Dr de la Torre Hernandez has received grants and research support from Abbott Medical, Biosensors, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Amgen; and has received honoraria or consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Kunadian has received personal fees and honoraria from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Amgen, and Daiichi-Sankyo. Dr Varenne has received personal fees and honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biosensors, and AstraZeneca. Dr Vranckx has received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, and CLS Behring. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; serves as unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis (but has not received personal payments from pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers); is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration; and is an unpaid member of the Pfizer Research Award selection committee in Switzerland. Dr Krucoff has received grants and/or personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Biosensors, Boston Scientific, CeloNova, Medtronic, OrbusNeich, and Terumo. Dr Valgimigli has received grants and personal fees from Terumo and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel Department Klinische Forschung, Vifor, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Vesalio, Novartis, Chiesi, and PhaseBio, outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of echocardiographic guidance on the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)., Background: Expert consensus documents recommend intraprocedural imaging by means of either transesophageal echocardiography or intracardiac echocardiography to guide LAAC. However, no evidence exists that intraprocedural echocardiographic guidance in addition to fluoroscopy improves the safety and efficacy of LAAC., Methods: Consecutive LAAC procedures performed at a high-volume center between January 2009 and October 2020 were stratified on the basis of intraprocedural imaging modalities, including fluoroscopic guidance (FG) only or intraprocedural echocardiographic guidance (EG) in addition to fluoroscopy. The primary safety endpoint was the composite of procedure-related complications occurring within 7 days after the procedure. Technical success at 7 days and at follow-up were secondary endpoints., Results: Among 811 LAAC procedures, 549 (67.7%) and 262 (32.3%) were assigned to the FG and EG groups, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, EG remained associated with a lower rate of the primary safety endpoint (3.4% vs 9.1%; P = 0.004; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.11-0.90; P = 0.030). Technical success trended higher at 7 days (92.1% vs 87.2%; P = 0.065; adjusted OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 0.95-3.01; P = 0.079) and was significantly improved with EG compared with FG (87.6% vs 79.9%; P = 0.018; OR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.60-10.27; P = 0.003) after a median follow-up period of 4.9 months (interquartile range: 3.4 months-6.2 months)., Conclusions: In a large cohort of consecutive LAACs, the use of intraprocedural echocardiography to guide intervention in addition to standard fluoroscopy was associated with lower risks for procedural complications and higher mid-term technical success rates., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Swiss Heart Foundation. Dr Räber has received research grants to the institution from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, HeartFlow, Sanofi, and Regeneron; and has received speaker and consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Canon, Occlutech, Sanofi, and Vifor. Dr Fischer has received grants from Medtronic; and has received other compensation from Medtronic, Stryker, and CSL Behring. Dr Meier has received proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed. Dr Valgimigli has received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Opsens, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel Department Klinische Forschung, Vifor, Bristol Myers Squibb, iVascular, and Medscape. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a treatment option for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are candidates for a bioprosthesis across the entire spectrum of risk. However, TAVR carries a risk for thrombotic and bleeding events, underscoring the importance of defining the optimal adjuvant antithrombotic regimen. Antithrombotic considerations are convoluted by the fact that many patients undergoing TAVR are generally elderly and present with multiple comorbidities, including conditions that may require long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) (eg, atrial fibrillation) and antiplatelet therapy (eg, coronary artery disease). After TAVR among patients without baseline indications for OAC, recent data suggest dual-antiplatelet therapy to be associated with an increased risk for bleeding events, particularly early postprocedure, compared with single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. Concerns surrounding the potential for thrombotic complications have raised the hypothesis of adjunctive use of OAC for patients with no baseline indications for anticoagulation. Although effective in modulating thrombus formation at the valve level, the bleeding hazard has shown to be unacceptably high, and the net benefit of combining antiplatelet and OAC therapy is unproven. For patients with indications for the use of long-term OAC, such as those with atrial fibrillation, the adjunctive use of antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding. Whether direct oral anticoagulant agents achieve better outcomes than vitamin K antagonists remains under investigation. Overall, single-antiplatelet therapy and OAC appear to be reasonable strategies in patients without and with indications for concurrent anticoagulation. The aim of the present review is to appraise the current published research and recommendations surrounding the management of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, with perspectives on evolving paradigms and ongoing trials., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Capodanno has received consulting and speaker fees from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Sanofi outside the present work. Dr Collet has received consulting and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Lead-Up, and WebMD; and his institution has received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Medtronic. Dr Dangas has received research grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. Dr Montalescot has received research grants to the institution and consulting or speaker fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cell Prothera, CSL Behring, Europa, Idorsia, IRIS-Servier, Medtronic, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Quantum Genomics, and Sanofi Aventis. Dr ten Berg has received lecture or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daiichi-Sankyo, The Medicines Company, Accu-Metrics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Bayer, Ferrer, and Idorsia; has received institutional research grants from ZonMw and AstraZeneca; and is the principal investigator of the POPular TAVI trial. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; serves as an unpaid member of the steering and executive groups for trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis (but has not received personal payments from pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers); is a member of the steering or executive committee groups of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding from industry without impact on his personal remuneration; and is an unpaid member of the Pfizer Research Award selection committee in Switzerland. Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; has received payments for participation in review activities from CeloNova and St. Jude Medical, outside the present work; and has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry, Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study reports 2-year outcomes from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm CLASP study with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative MR (DMR) analysis., Background: Transcatheter repair is a favorable option to treat MR. Long-term prognostic impact of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in patients with clinically significant MR remains to be established., Methods: Patients had clinically significant MR ≥3+ as evaluated by the echocardiographic core laboratory and were deemed candidates for transcatheter repair by the heart team. Assessments were performed by clinical events committee to 1 year (site-reported thereafter) and core laboratory to 2 years., Results: A total of 124 patients (69% FMR, 31% DMR) were enrolled with a mean age of 75 years, 56% were male, 60% were New York Heart Association functional class III to IVa, and 100% had MR ≥3+. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 80% survival (72% FMR, 94% DMR) and 84% freedom from heart failure (HF) hospitalization (78% FMR, 97% DMR), with 85% reduction in annualized HF hospitalization rate (81% FMR, 98% DMR). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 78% of patients (84% FMR, 71% DMR) and MR ≤2+ was achieved in 97% (95% FMR, 100% DMR) (all p < 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased by 33 ml (p < 0.001); 93% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I to II (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The PASCAL repair system demonstrated sustained favorable outcomes at 2 years in FMR and DMR patients. Results showed high survival and freedom from HF rehospitalization rates with a significantly reduced annualized HF hospitalization rate. Durable MR reduction was achieved with evidence of left ventricular reverse remodeling and significant improvement in functional status. The CLASP IID/IIF randomized pivotal trial is ongoing., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Edwards Lifesciences. Drs. Szerlip, Spargias, O’Neill, Ng, Smith, Fam, Rinaldi, Nickenig, Schäfer, Webb, and Lim have served as speakers, served as consultants, or received travel/grant support from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (resMR) on mortality with respect to left ventricular dilatation (LV-Dil) or right ventricular dysfunction (RV-Dys) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) who underwent mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER)., Background: The presence of LV-Dil and RV-Dys correlates with advanced stages of heart failure in SMR patients, which may impact the outcome after TEER., Methods: SMR patients in a European multicenter registry were evaluated. Investigated outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class with respect to MR reduction, LV-Dil (defined as LV end-diastolic volume ≥159 ml), and RV-Dys (defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-to-systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio of <0.274 mm/mm Hg)., Results: Among 809 included patients, resMR ≤1+ was achieved in 546 (67%) patients. Overall estimated 2-year mortality rate was 32%. Post-procedural resMR was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.031). Although the improvement in New York Heart Association functional class persisted regardless of either LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the beneficial treatment effect of resMR ≤1+ on 2-year mortality was observed only in patients without LV-Dil and RV-Dys (hazard ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 3.00)., Conclusions: Achieving optimal MR reduction by TEER is associated with improved survival in SMR patients, especially if the progress in heart failure is not too advanced. In SMR patients with advanced stages of heart failure, as evidenced by LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the treatment effect of TEER on symptomatic improvement is maintained, but the survival benefit appears to be reduced., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Klinikum der Universität München. Dr. Higuchi has received lecture fees from Medtronic Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Ono Pharmaceutical Company. Dr. Orban has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Tomtec Imaging Systems. Dr. Karam has received consultant fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Kalbacher has received lecture fees and travel expenses from Abbott; and has received proctor fees and travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Schofer has received personal fees from Boston Scientific; and has received travel compensation from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Ludwig has received travel compensation from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Braun has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, CSL, Medtronic, Edwards, Sinomed, and Polares. Dr. Pfister has received financial support for attending symposia from Abbott Vascular. Dr. von Bardeleben has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Hausleiter has received research support and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors sought to assess sex-based differences in characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR)., Background: Subgroup analysis from the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial indicated potential sex-related differences in outcomes after TMVR. The impact of sex on results after TMVR in a real-world setting is unknown., Methods: The authors assessed clinical outcomes and echocardiographic parameters in women and men undergoing TMVR for SMR between 2008 and 2018 who were included in the large, international, multicenter real-world EuroSMR registry (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation)., Results: A total of 1,233 patients, including 445 women (36%) and 788 men (64%), were analyzed. Although women were significantly older and had fewer comorbidities than men, TMVR was equally effective in women and men (mitral regurgitation [MR] grade ≤2+ at discharge: 93.2% vs. 94.6% for women vs. men; p = 0.35). All-cause mortality at 1 year (17.9% vs. 18.9%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.806; p = 0.46) and at 2-year follow-up (26.5% vs. 26.4%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.757; p = 0.26) were similar in women versus men after multivariate regression analysis. Durability of MR reduction, improvement in symptoms, quality of life, and functional capacity did also not differ during follow-up., Conclusions: Results from the EuroSMR registry confirmed effective and similar MR reduction with TMVR in women and men. There were no sex-related differences in clinical outcomes up to 2 years of follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Klinikum der Universität München. Dr. Orban has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Karam has received consultant fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Kalbacher has received travel expenses and lecture fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Pfister has received financial support for attending symposia by Abbott Vascular. Dr. Lurz has been a consultant to Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants to his institution from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSL Behring, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Polares, and Sinomed. Prof. Hausleiter has received speaker honoraria from and has served as consultant for Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) compared with durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for patients with STEMI, and long-term outcomes are determined by the safety and efficacy profile of the newest generation drug-eluting stents., Methods: BIOSTEMI (A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, assessor-blind, randomized superiority trial using Bayesian methods. Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI within 24 h of symptom onset were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive BP-SES (n = 649) or DP-EES (n = 651). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial reinfarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years., Results: Between April 2016 and March 2018, 1,300 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. Follow-up through 2 years was complete in 1,221 patients (94%). At 2 years, TLF occurred in 33 patients (5.1%) treated with BP-SES and in 53 patients (8.1%) treated with DP-EES (rate ratio: 0.58; 95% Bayesian credible interval: 0.40 to 0.84; posterior probability of superiority = 0.998). The difference was driven by a lower incidence of clinically indicated TLR in patients treated with BP-SES compared with DP-EES (2.5% vs. 5.1%; rate ratio: 0.52; 95% Bayesian credible interval: 0.30 to 0.87; posterior probability of superiority = 0.993). There were no significant differences in rates of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial reinfarction, and definite stent thrombosis between the 2 treatment arms., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, BP-SES were superior to DP-EES with respect to TLF at 2 years. The difference was driven by lower rates of ischemia-driven TLR. (A Comparison of an Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [BIOSTEMI]; NCT02579031)., Competing Interests: Funding Support And Author Disclosures The BIOSTEMI trial was an investigator-initiated study supported by a dedicated research grant from Biotronik. Dr. Pilgrim has received research grants to the institution from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; has received speaker fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; and is a consultant for HighlifeSAS. Dr. Roffi has received institutional research grants from Terumo, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, and Biotronik, outside the submitted work. Dr. Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Opsens, Bayer, CoreFLOW, IDORSIA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, Universität Basel/Dept. Klinische Forschung, Vifor, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, iVascular, Medscape, and Biotronik; and has received grants and personal fees from Terumo, outside the submitted work. Dr. Jüni is a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Clinical Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases, and this research was completed, in part, with funding from the Canada Research Chairs Programme; and serves as an unpaid member of the steering groups of trials funded by AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Biosensors, St. Jude Medical, and The Medicines Company. Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed; serves as an unpaid member of the steering and/or executive groups of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave, and Xeltis (but has not received personal payments from any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer); and is a member of the steering and/or executive committee groups of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding from industry, without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr. Iglesias has received a research grant to the institution and personal fees from Biotronik during the conduct of the study; has received research grants to the institution and personal fees from Biotronik, Philips Volcano, Abbott Vascular, and AstraZeneca; and has received personal fees from Terumo, Medtronic, and Cardinal Health, outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Author Dislcosures Dr. Pilgrim has received research grants to his institution from Symetis/Boston Scientific and Biotronik; has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Biotronik; and has received consultancy fees from HighLife SAS. Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, Cardiovalve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed; has served as an unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave and Xeltis for which he received no personal payments by any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer; and has been a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr. Praz has received travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Vascular, and Polares Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess coronary accessibility after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-in-TAVR using multidetector computed tomography., Background: Expanding TAVR to patients with longer life expectancy may involve more frequent bioprosthetic valve failure and need for redo TAVR. Coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR may be challenging, particularly as the leaflets from the initial transcatheter heart valve (THV) will form a neo-skirt following TAVR-in-TAVR., Methods: In 45 patients treated with different combinations of CoreValve and Evolut (CV/EV) THVs with supra-annular leaflet position and SAPIEN THVs with intra-annular leaflet position, post-TAVR-in-TAVR multidetector computed tomographic scans were analyzed to examine coronary accessibility., Results: After TAVR-in-TAVR, the coronary arteries originated below the top of the neo-skirt in 90% of CV/EV-first cases compared with 67% of SAPIEN-first cases (p = 0.009). For these coronary arteries originating below the top of the neo-skirt, the distance between the THV and the aortic wall was <3 mm in 56% and 25% of CV/EV-first and SAPIEN-first cases, respectively (p = 0.035). Coronary access may be further complicated by THV-THV stent frame strut misalignment in 53% of CV/EV-in-CV/EV cases. The risk for technically impossible coronary access was 27% and 10% in CV/EV-first and SAPIEN-first cases, respectively (p = 0.121). Absence of THV interference with coronary accessibility can be expected in 8% and 33% of CV/EV-first and SAPIEN-first cases, respectively (p = 0.005)., Conclusions: Coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR may be challenging in a significant proportion of patients. THVs with intra-annular leaflet position or low commissural height and large open cells may be preferable in terms of coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR., Competing Interests: Author Relationship With Industry Dr. De Backer has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr. Kim has been a proctor for and has received speaking fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr. Thomas Pilgrim has received institutional research grants and speaking fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; and is a consultant for HighLife SAS. Dr. Barbanti has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Nombela-Franco has received consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Kofoed has received institutional grants from AP Møller og Hustru Chastine McKinney Møllers Fond, the John and Birthe Meyer Foundation, The Research Council of Rigshopitalet, the University of Copenhagen, the Danish Heart Foundation, the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation by The Danish Council for Strategic Research, and Canon Medical Corporation. Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed. Dr. Sinning has received speaking honoraria and research grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Webb has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Prof. Dr. Søndergaard has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Symetis. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of valvular and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Background: AF has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes after TAVR. However, the differential impact of valvular as opposed to nonvalvular AF has not been investigated., Methods: In a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry, valvular AF was defined as AF in the setting of concomitant mitral stenosis or the presence of a mitral valve prosthesis. The presence of mitral stenosis was determined by pre-procedural echocardiography. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or disabling stroke at 1 year after TAVR., Results: Among 1,472 patients undergoing TAVR between August 2007 and June 2018, AF was recorded in 465 patients (31.6%) and categorized as nonvalvular in 376 (25.5%) and valvular in 89 (6.0%). AF scores including HAS-BLED, CHADS 2 , and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc were comparable between patients with nonvalvular and valvular AF. The primary endpoint occurred in 9.3% of patients with no AF, in 14.5% of patients with nonvalvular AF (hazard ratio: 1.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 2.20; p = 0.009), and in 24.2% of patients with valvular AF (hazard ratio: 2.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.71 to 4.41; p < 0.001). Valvular AF conferred an increased risk for cardiovascular death or disabling stroke compared with nonvalvular AF (hazard ratio: 1.77; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 2.94; p = 0.027)., Conclusions: The presence of valvular AF in patients undergoing TAVR increased the risk for cardiovascular death or disabling stroke compared with both no AF and nonvalvular AF. (SWISS TAVI Registry; NCT01368250)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of baseline massive or torrential tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI)., Background: The use of TTVI to treat symptomatic severe TR has been increasing rapidly, but little is known regarding the impact of massive or torrential TR beyond severe TR., Methods: The study population comprised 333 patients with significant symptomatic TR from the TriValve Registry who underwent TTVI. Mid-term outcomes after TTVI were assessed according to the presence of massive or torrential TR, defined as vena contracta width ≥14 mm. Procedural success was defined as patient survival after successful device implantation and delivery system retrieval, with residual TR ≤2+. The primary endpoint comprised survival rate and freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure, survival rate, and rehospitalization at 1 year., Results: Baseline massive or torrential TR and severe TR were observed in 154 patients (46.2%) and 179 patients (53.8%), respectively. Patients with massive or torrential TR had a higher prevalence of ascites than those with severe TR (27.3% vs. 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.15) and demonstrated a similar procedural success rate (83.2% vs. 77.3%, respectively; p = 0.21). The incidence of peri-procedural adverse events was low, with no significant between-group differences. Freedom from the composite endpoint was significantly lower in patients with massive or torrential TR than in those with severe TR, which was significantly associated with an increased risk for 1-year death of any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 3.34; p = 0.022). Freedom from the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with massive or torrential TR when procedural success was achieved (69.9% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.048)., Conclusions: Baseline massive or torrential TR is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure 1 year after TTVI. Procedural success is related to better outcomes, even in the presence of baseline massive or torrential TR. (International Multisite Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies Registry [TriValve]; NCT03416166)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair is a viable alternative to surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and high surgical risk. Yet the specific group of patients who would optimally benefit from this therapy remains to be determined. Selection of patients for transcatheter strategy is currently based on surgical prognostic scores and technical feasibility. Meanwhile, various clinical, anatomic, and procedural factors have been recently recognized as predictors of adverse outcomes following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, including device failure, recurrent mitral regurgitation, and mortality. Integration of these prognostic factors in the decision-making process of the heart team might improve patient management and outcomes. Herein, the authors review the different factors related to symptomatic status, comorbidity, serum biomarkers, echocardiographic findings, and procedural technique that have been identified as independent predictors of adverse outcome following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair and discuss their potential application in everyday clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aimed to systematically assess the importance of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification on procedural outcomes and device performances with contemporary transcatheter heart valve (THV) systems., Background: LVOT calcification has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the available evidence is limited to observational data with modest numbers and incomplete assessment of the effect of the different THV systems., Methods: In a retrospective analysis of a prospective single-center registry, LVOT calcification was assessed in a semiquantitative fashion. Moderate or severe LVOT calcification was documented in the presence of 2 nodules of calcification, or 1 extending >5 mm in any direction, or covering >10 % of the perimeter of the LVOT., Results: Among 1,635 patients undergoing TAVR between 2007 and 2018, moderate or severe LVOT calcification was found in 407 (24.9%). Patients with moderate or severe LVOT calcification had significantly higher incidences of annular rupture (2.3% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.001), bailout valve-in-valve implantation (2.9% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.004), and residual aortic regurgitation (11.1% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.002). Balloon-expandable valves conferred a higher risk of annular rupture in the presence of moderate or severe LVOT calcification (4.0% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.002) as compared with the other valve designs. There was no significant interaction of valve design or generation and LVOT calcification with regard to the occurrence of bailout valve-in-valve implantation and residual aortic regurgitation., Conclusions: Moderate or severe LVOT calcification confers increased risks of annular rupture, residual aortic regurgitation, and implantation of a second valve. The risk of residual aortic regurgitation is consistent across valve designs and generations. (SWISS TAVI Registry; NCT01368250)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As transcatheter aortic valve replacement becomes a more dominant treatment option across all risk profiles, the frequency of encountering patients with multivalvular disease will increase. Furthermore, percutaneous interventions to treat other valvular lesions are also evolving. Understanding the clinical implications and treatment options for a second valvular lesion is becoming increasingly important to guide heart team decisions, and this paper aims to review the evidence around these situations. Diagnosis of multivalvular disease can be challenging because of changes in physiology. There are little randomized data to guide therapy in multivalvular disease. Multidisciplinary heart team decisions can be invaluable in integrating the plethora of clinical, hemodynamic, and imaging data on which an optimal management strategy can be planned. Prospective studies to assess the role of structural valve interventions in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era would greatly help improve outcomes for structural heart patients., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)