Search

ObjectivesThis study sought to examine the relationships between in-hospital and post-discharge body weight changes and outcomes among patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF).BackgroundBody weight changes during and after hospitalization for AHF and the relationships with outcomes have not been well characterized.MethodsA post hoc analysis was performed of the ASCEND-HF (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide and Decompensated Heart Failure) trial, which enrolled patients admitted for AHF regardless of ejection fraction. In-hospital body weight change was defined as the difference between baseline and discharge/day 10, whereas post-discharge body weight change was defined as the difference between discharge/day 10 and day 30. Spearman rank correlations of weight change, urine output (UOP), and dyspnea relief as assessed by a 7-point Likert scale are described. Logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the relationship between weight change and outcomes.ResultsStudy participants with complete body weight data (n = 4,172) had a mean age of 65 ± 14 years, and 66% were male. Ischemic heart disease was reported in 60% of patients and the average ejection fraction was 30 ± 13%. The median change in body weight was -1.0 kg (interquartile range: -2.1 to 0.0 kg) at 24 h and -2.3 kg (interquartile range: -5.0 to -0.7 kg) by discharge/day 10. At hour 24, there was a weak correlation between change in body weight and UOP (r = -0.381), and minimal correlation between body weight change and dyspnea relief (r = -0.096). After risk adjustment, increasing body weight during hospitalization was associated with a 16% increase per kg in the likelihood of 30-day mortality or HF readmission for patients showing weight loss ≤1 kg or weight gain during hospitalization (odds ratio per kg increase 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.27; p < 0.001). Among the subset of patients experiencing >1-kg increase in body weight post-discharge, increasing body weight was associated with higher risk of 180-day mortality (hazard ratio per kg increase 1.16; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.23; p < 0.001).ConclusionsA substantial number of patients experienced minimal weight loss or frank weight gain in the context of an AHF trial, and increasing body weight in this subset of patients was independently associated with a worse post-discharge prognosis.

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate if diastolic pulmonary gradient (DPG) can predict survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD).BackgroundPatients with combined post- and pre-capillary PH-LHD have worse prognosis than those with passive pulmonary hypertension. The transpulmonary gradient (TPG) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) have commonly been used to identify high-risk patients. However, these parameters have significant shortcomings and do not always correlate with pulmonary vasculature remodeling. Recently, it has been suggested that DPG may be better a marker, yet its prognostic ability in patients with cardiomyopathy has not been fully assessed.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 1,236 patients evaluated for unexplained cardiomyopathy at Johns Hopkins Hospital was studied. All patients underwent right heart catheterization and were followed until death, cardiac transplantation, or the end of the study period (mean time 4.4 years). The relationships between DPG, TPG, or PVR and survival in subjects with PH-LHD (n = 469) were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.ResultsDPG was not significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, p = 0.10) in PH-LHD whereas elevated TPG and PVR predicted death (HR: 1.02, p = 0.046; and HR: 1.11, p = 0.002, respectively). Similarly, DPG did not differentiate survivors from non-survivors at any selected cut points including a DPG of 7 mm Hg.ConclusionsIn this retrospective study of patients with cardiomyopathy and PH-LHD, an elevated DPG was not associated with worse survival.

Heart failure is a syndrome with a pathophysiological basis that can be traced to dysfunction in several interconnected molecular pathways. Identification of biomarkers of heart failure that allow measurement of the disease on a molecular level has resulted in enthusiasm for their use in prognostication and selection of appropriate therapies. However, despite considerable amounts of information available on numerous biomarkers, inconsistent research methodologies and lack of clinical correlations have made bench-to-bedside translations rare and left the literature with countless publications of varied quality. There is a need for a systematic and collaborative approach aimed at definitively studying the clinical benefits of novel biomarkers. In this review, on the basis of input from academia, industry, and governmental agencies, we propose a systematized approach based on adherence to specific quality measures for studies looking to augment current prediction model or use biomarkers to tailor therapeutics. We suggest that study quality, rather than results, should determine publication and propose a system for grading biomarker studies. We outline the need for collaboration between clinical investigators and statisticians to introduce more advanced statistical methodologies into the field of biomarkers that would allow for data from a large number of variables to be distilled into clinically actionable information. Lastly, we propose the creation of a heart failure biomarker consortium that would allow for a comprehensive list of biomarkers to be concomitantly analyzed in a pooled sample of randomized clinical trials and hypotheses to be generated for testing in biomarker-guided trials. Such a consortium could collaborate in sharing samples to identify biomarkers, undertake meta-analyses on completed trials, and spearhead clinical trials to test the clinical utility of new biomarkers.

Background: The prognostic importance of residual congestion after acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalization is still debated., Objectives: The authors aimed to assess the impact of residual congestion in a large cohort of patients with AHF enrolled in the RELAX-AHF-2 (Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure 2) trial., Methods: Residual congestion was assessed at day 5 after admission among hospitalized patients using an established composite congestion score (CCS) based on the presence of orthopnea, peripheral edema, and increased jugular venous pressure, ranging from 0 to 8 points. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure or renal failure at 180 days., Results: Among the 5,900 AHF patients included in this analysis, 3,380 (57.3%) had at least 1 sign of congestion (ie, CCS ≥1) and 1,066 (18.1%) had a CCS ≥3 at day 5 after admission. Patients with residual congestion at day 5 were more symptomatic, had more comorbidities, received higher doses of loop diuretic agents in-hospital, albeit with lower diuretic response, were less likely to have hemoconcentration, and were more likely to have worsening renal function at day 5. After multivariable adjustment for clinically meaningful variables, any sign of residual congestion and CCS ≥3 at day 5 were both independently associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.15-1.51]; P < 0.001 and adjusted HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.39-1.88]; both P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Among patients with AHF who were still hospitalized at day 5, residual congestion was common and independently associated with worse outcome. (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF [RELAX-AHF-2]; NCT01870778)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The RELAX-AHF-2 trial was funded by Novartis. Dr Pagnesi has received personal fees from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor Pharma. Drs Cotter and Davison have received research grants and personal fees from Novartis during the trials’ conduct; and have received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Celyad, Cirius Therapeutics, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr Jongs has received a travel grant from AstraZeneca. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bayer, BMS, Novartis, Daxor, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; has been a consultant to Novartis, BMS, Cytokinetics, Innolife, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Abbott, Sanofi, Regeneron, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapeutics, and Whiteswell, and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, Rocket Pharma, V-Wave, and LivaNova. Dr Filippatos has participated in committees for trials and registries sponsored by Novartis, Servier, Medtronic, Vifor, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer. Dr Greenberg has received research support from the American Heart Association, the NIH, and Rocket Pharma; and has served as a consultant for ACI, Actelion, Akcea, Amgen, Bayer, EBR Systems, Ionis, Janssen, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Relypsa, Rocket, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma, Viking, Zensun, and Zoll. Dr Pang has served as a consultant for Baxter, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck; and has received research or other support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the American Heart Association, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, OrthoDiagnostics, and Abbott. Dr Ponikowski has received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Vifor Pharma, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Berlin Chemie, Bayer, Pfizer, Cibiem, Impulse Dynamics, Renal Guard Solutions, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca; and has received research grants from Vifor Pharma. Dr Adamo has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Medtronic. Drs Severin and Gimpelewicz are employees of Novartis Pharma. Dr Voors has received consultancy fees and/or grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Servier, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Teerlink has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, EBR Systems, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. Dr Metra has received consulting honoraria as a member of trial committees or advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Edwards Therapeutics, Servier, Vifor Pharma, and Windtree Therapeutics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Multimorbidity frequently occurs in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). The co-occurrence of comorbidities often follows specific patterns., Objectives: This study investigated multimorbidity subtypes and their associations with clinical outcomes., Methods: From the prospective RELAX-AHF-2 (Relaxin for the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure-2) trial, 6,545 patients (26% with HF with preserved ejection fraction, defined as LVEF ≥50%) were classified into multimorbidity groups using latent class analysis. The association between subgroups and clinical outcomes was examined. Validation of these findings was conducted in the RELAX-AHF trial, which comprised 1,161 patients., Results: Five distinct multimorbidity groups emerged: 1) diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (often male, high prevalence of CKD and diabetes mellitus); 2) ischemic (ischemic HF); 3) elderly/atrial fibrillation (AF) (oldest, high prevalence of AF); 4) metabolic (obese, hypertensive, more often HF with preserved ejection fraction); and 5) young (fewest comorbidities). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the diabetes and CKD (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.50-2.20), elderly/AF (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.20-1.70), and metabolic (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.20-1.80) groups had higher rates of the composite outcome than patients in the young group, primarily driven by differences in rehospitalization. Treatment allocation (placebo or serelaxin) modified these associations (P interaction  <0.001). Serelaxin-treated patients in the young group were associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40-0.90). Similarly, patients from the RELAX-AHF trial clustered in 5 multimorbidity groups. The clinical characteristics and associations with outcomes could also be validated., Conclusions: Comorbidities naturally clustered into 5 mutually exclusive groups in RELAX-AHF-2, showing variations in clinical outcomes. These data emphasize that the specific combination of comorbidities can influence adverse outcomes and treatment responses in patients with AHF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by the PROMINENT project (funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 754425). Dr Tromp is supported by the National University of Singapore Start-up grant, the tier 1 grant from the ministry of education, and the CS-IRG New Investigator Grant from the National Medical Research Council; has received consulting or speaker fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche Diagnostics, and Us2.ai; and owns patent US-10702247-B2 unrelated to the present work. Drs Cotter and Davison are employees of Momentum Research, Inc, which has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Celyad, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, Corteria Pharmaceuticals, Roche Diagnostics Inc, Sanofi, Windtree Therapeutics Inc, and XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapeutics, and Whiteswell; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Gimpelewicz is an employee of Novartis. Dr Greenberg is a consultant for or on the advisory board of AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ionis, Merck, Mesoblast, and Tenaya; and has been on the Data Safety Monitoring Board of ACI, Axon, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim, EBR Systems, Faraday, Inventiva, Impulse Dynamics, Ionis, Salubris, Vifor, Viking, and Windtree. Dr Lam is supported by a Clinician Scientist Award from the National Medical Research Council of Singapore; has received research support from Bayer and Roche Diagnostics; has served as consultant or on the Advisory Board/Steering Committee/Executive Committee for Actelion, Alleviant Medical, Allysta Pharma, Amgen, AnaCardio AB, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Darma Inc, EchoNous Inc, Eli Lilly, Impulse Dynamics, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Medscape/WebMD Global LLC, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ProSciento Inc, Radcliffe Group Ltd, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, and Us2.ai; and serves as co-founder and nonexecutive director of Us2.ai. Dr Voors has received research support and/or has been a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Merck, MyoKardia, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Metra received personal fees of minimal amounts in the last 3 years from Actelion, Amgen, LivaNova, and Vifor pharma as a member of Executive or Data Monitoring Committees of sponsored clinical trials; and from AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Edwards Therapeutics for participation on advisory boards and/or speeches at sponsored meetings. Dr Teerlink has received research support and/or has been a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Servier, and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr van der Meer received grant support and/or consultancy fees from Novartis, Pharma Nord, Pfizer, Ionis, Astra Zeneca, Vifor Pharma, Pharmacosmos, BridgeBio, and Novo Nordisk. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common and is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, data with adjudicated events from fully characterized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are lacking., Objectives: This study sought to explore the association between mild or moderate/severe TR and clinical outcomes of patients with HFrEF., Methods: GALACTIC-HF (Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial comparing omecamtiv mecarbil vs placebo in patients with symptomatic HFrEF., Results: Among the 8,232 patients analyzed in the GALACTIC-HF trial, 8,180 (99%) had data regarding baseline TR (none: n = 6,476 [79%], mild: n = 919 [11%], and moderate/severe: n = 785 [10%]). The primary composite outcome of a first HF event or cardiovascular death occurred in 2,368 (36.6%) patients with no TR, 353 (38.4%) patients with mild TR, and 389 (49.6%) patients with moderate/severe TR. Moderate/severe TR was independently associated with a higher relative risk of the primary composite outcome compared with either no TR (adjusted HR: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.01-1.26]; P = 0.046) or no/mild TR (adjusted HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 1.02-1.27]; P = 0.025) driven predominantly by HF events. The association between moderate/severe TR and clinical outcomes was more pronounced in outpatients with worse renal function, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and bilirubin levels. The beneficial treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil vs placebo on clinical outcomes was not modified by TR., Conclusions: In symptomatic patients with HFrEF, baseline moderate/severe TR was independently associated with cardiovascular death or HF events driven predominantly by HF events. The beneficial treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil on the primary outcome was not modified by TR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Adamo has received specker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr Metra has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Actelion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Edwards Therapeutics, Livanova, Servier, Vifor Pharma, and WindTree Therapeutics. Dr Claggett has received consulting fees from Amgen and Myokardia. Dr Diaz has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics, and Servier. Dr Felker has received grant funding to his institution from Amgen, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Merck, and Myokardia; has received consulting fees personally from Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Becton Dickinson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardionomic, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, and Sequana; and has served on the Board of Directors for the Heart Failure Society of America. Dr McMurray has received consulting fees paid to his institution from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardialysis, Cardurion, Dal-Cor, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, KBP Biosciences, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Theracos. Dr Solomon has received grants from Celladon, Eidos, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and Sanofi Pasteur; has received grants and personal fees from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bellerophon, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, MyoKardia, Novartis, and Theracos; and has received personal fees from Akros, AoBiome, Arena, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Daiichi-Sankyo, Dinaqor, Ironwood, Janssen, Merck, Moderna, Quantum Genomics, Roche, Takeda, and Tenaya. Dr Teerlink has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Servier, and Windtree Therapeutics; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, EBR Systems, LivaNova, Medtronic, Servier, and WindTree Therapeutics; and has served as Treasurer to Heart Failure Society of America. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although clinical studies have demonstrated the association between a single N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement and clinical outcomes in chronic heart failure, the biomarker is frequently measured serially in clinical practice., Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the added prognostic value of repeated NT-proBNP measurements compared with single measurements alone for chronic heart failure patients., Methods: In the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure) study, 894 study participants with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were enrolled at 45 outpatient sites in the United States and Canada. Repeated NT-proBNP levels were measured over a 2-year study period. Associations between repeated NT-proBNP measurements and trial endpoints were assessed using a joint longitudinal and survival model., Results: After adjustment for baseline covariates, each doubling of the baseline NT-proBNP level was associated with a HR of 1.17 (95% CI: 1.08-1.28; P = 0.0003) for the primary trial endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization. Serial measurements increased the adjusted HR for the primary trial endpoint to 1.66 (95% CI: 1.50-1.84; P < 0.0001), and a similar increased risk was observed across secondary trial endpoints. In joint modeling, an increase in NT-proBNP occurred weeks before the onset of adjudicated events., Conclusions: Repeated NT-proBNP measurements are a strong predictor of outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with an increase in concentration occurring well before event onset. These results may support routine NT-proBNP monitoring to assist in clinical decision making. (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure [GUIDE-IT]; NCT01685840)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The GUIDE-IT trial was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Additional substudies were supported by Roche Diagnostics. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the present study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr O’Connor has received grant or research support from Merck; and has received consulting fees from Merck, Bayer, and Abiomed. Dr Fiuzat has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Ezekowitz has received research grant support and consulting fees from Bayer, Merck, Servier, Amgen, Sanofi, Novartis, Cytokinetics, American Regent, Otsuka, and Applied Therapeutics. Dr Piña has participated on Advisory Boards for Vifor and AstraZeneca; and is a Steering Committee member for Novartis. Dr Whellan has received grants from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Merck, Amgen, Cytokinetcis, and Norvo Nordisk; has acted as a consultant to Cytokinetics and Novo Nordisk; and has served on Clinical Endpoint Committees/Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for CVRx and National Institutes of Health. Dr Mark reports grant support to institution from HeartFlow and Merck. Dr Felker has received research grants from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Innolife, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapuetics, Rocket Pharma, and Whiteswell; and has served on Clinical Endpoint Committees/Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, and LivaNova. Dr Desai works under contract with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to develop and maintain performance measures used for public reporting and pay for performance programs; and reports research grants and consulting for Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Novartis, SCPharmaceuticals, and Vifor. Dr Januzzi is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology and a Director at Jana Care and Imbria; has received grant support from Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, HeartFlow Inc, Innolife, and Roche Diagnostics, has received consulting income from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Beckman-Coulter, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Quidel, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens; and participates in Clinical Endpoint Committees/Data and Safety Monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Bayer, CVRx, Pfizer, and Takeda. Dr Ahmad has received consulting fees from Sanofi, Amgen, and Cytokinetics; and has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Cytokinetics, and Relypsa. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome traditionally classified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutpoints. Although LVEF is prognostic for risk of events and predictive of response to some HF therapies, LVEF is a continuous variable and cutpoints are arbitrary, often based on historical clinical trial enrichment decisions rather than physiology. Holistic evaluation of the treatment effects for therapies throughout the LVEF range suggests the standard categorization paradigm for HF merits modification. The multidisciplinary Heart Failure Collaboratory reviewed data from large-scale HF clinical trials and found that many HF therapies have demonstrated therapeutic benefit across a large range of LVEF, but specific treatment effects vary across that range. Therefore, HF should practically be classified by association with an LVEF that is reduced or not reduced, while acknowledging uncertainty around the precise LVEF cutpoint, and future research should evaluate new therapies across the continuum of LVEF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ibrahim has received consulting fees from Cytokinetics. Dr McMurray discloses payments to his employer, Glasgow University, for his work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities: Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, Dal-Cor, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, KBP Biosciences, Novartis, Pfizer, and Theracos; and personal payments: Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, Eris Lifesciences, Hikma, Ionis, Lupin, ProAdWise Communications, Sun Pharmaceuticals, and Servier. Dr Lindenfeld has received consulting fees from Abbott, Alleviant, Boston Scientific, Cordio, CRVx, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Merck, Whiteswell, Vascular Dynamics, and V-Wave. Dr Bozkurt has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, scPharmaceuticals, Baxter, Sanofi, Relypsa, Vifor, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served on the steering committees of Relypsa and Renovacor; has served on a Clinical Event Committee for Abbott Pharmaceuticals; and has served on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for LivaNova Pharmaceuticals. Dr Bristow has served as a director, officer, partner, advisor, consultant, or trustee for ARCA biopharma; has received research grants from the American Heart Association and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; and has received personal payments from ARCA biopharma. Dr Butler has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, CVRx, Foundry, G3 Pharma, Imbria, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Roche, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, V-Wave Ltd, and Vifor; and is a Trial Executive Committee member of the Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance (trial sponsor). Dr Carson has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and IQVIA related to work on Clinical Events Committees. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, Daxor, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Innolife, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapuetics, Rocket Pharma, and Whiteswell; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, and LivaNova. Dr Murillo is an employee and stockholder of UnitedHealth Group. Dr Kondo has received grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation and the Japanese Heart Failure Society Tsuchiya Foundation for research activity at the University of Glasgow; and has received lecture fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Novartis Pharma K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., Bristol Myers Squibb Co, Abiomed Japan K.K., and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has consulted for Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Cardior, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, and Tenaya. Dr Abraham has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardionomic, Zoll Respicardia, scPharmaceuticals, Sensible Medical, and Vectorious; has received salary support from V-Wave Medical; and has served as a speaker for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr O’Connor has received grant or research support from Merck; and consulting fees from Merck, Bayer, and Abiomed. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Obesity is associated with incident heart failure (HF), independent of other cardiovascular risk factors. Despite rising rates of both obesity and incident HF, the associations remain poorly understood between: 1) obesity and HF outcomes; and 2) weight loss and HF outcomes. Evidence shows that patients with HF and obesity have high symptom burdens, lower exercise capacity, and higher rates of hospitalization for HF when compared with patients with HF without obesity. However, the impact of weight loss on these outcomes for patients with HF and obesity remains unclear. Recent advances in medical therapies for weight loss have offered a new opportunity for significant and sustained weight loss. Ongoing and recently concluded cardiovascular outcomes trials will offer new insights into the role of weight loss through these therapies in preventing HF and mitigating HF outcomes and symptom burdens among patients with established HF, particularly HF with preserved ejection fraction., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapeutics, and Whiteswell; and has served on clinical endpoint committees or data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Lingvay has received research funding (paid to institution) from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Merck, Pfizer, Mylan, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received advisory or consulting fees and/or other support from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Johnson and Johnson, Intercept, TARGET Pharma, Merck, Pfizer, Valeritas, Zealand Pharma, Shionogi, Carmot Therapeutics, Structure Therapeutics, Bayer, Translational Medical Academy, Mediflix, Biomea, The Comm Group, and WebMD; and has served on the data safety monitoring board for JAEB. Dr Pagidipati has received research support from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eggland’s Best, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Verily Life Sciences; has served as a consultant or on an advisory panel for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; has served as an executive committee member for trials sponsored by Novo Nordisk and Amgen; and has served on data safety monitoring boards for trials sponsored by Janssen and Novartis. Dr McGuire has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi US, Merck and Co, Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp, Eli Lilly USA, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Pfizer, Metavant, Applied Therapeutics, Afimmune, Bayer, CSL Behring, and Esperion; has received research support for clinical trials leadership from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, Eli Lilly USA, and CSL Behring; and has received honoraria for consultancy from Eli Lilly USA, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lexicon, Novo Nordisk, Applied Therapeutics, Altimmune, CSL Behring, Bayer, Intercept, and New Amsterdam. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is one of the most common reasons for hospitalizations or urgent care and is associated with poor outcomes. Therapies shown to improve outcomes are limited, however, and innovation in pharmacologic and device-based therapeutics are therefore actively being sought. Standardizing definitions for ADHF and its trajectory is complex, limiting the generalizability and translation of clinical trials to effect clinical care and policy change. The Heart Failure Collaboratory is a multistakeholder organization comprising clinical investigators, clinicians, patients, government representatives (including U.S. Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health participants), payors, and industry collaborators. The following expert consensus document is the product of the Heart Failure Collaboratory convening with the Academic Research Consortium, including members from academia, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and industry, for the purposes of proposing standardized definitions for ADHF and highlighting important endpoint considerations to inform the design and conduct of clinical trials for drugs and devices in this clinical arena., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Lala is a Speakers Bureau member for Abiomed, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Zoll; and performs contracted research for Merck. Dr Bozkurt has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, scPharmaceuticals, Baxter, Sanofi, Relypsa, Vifor, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served on the steering committees of Relypsa and Renovacor; has served on a Clinical Event Committee for Abbott Pharmaceuticals; and has served on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for LivaNova Pharmaceuticals. Dr Burkhoff receives institutional grant support from Ancora Heart, Axon Medical, and Edwards Lifesciences; and receives consulting fees from AquaPass, Axon, BackBeat Medical, BioMind, Corvia Medical, Impulse Dynamics, and Therox/Zoll. Dr Costanzo has served as a Board of Directors member for Nuwellis; has received research grants from Bayer, Novartis, and V-WAVE to the Midwest Cardiovascular Institute; and is an Associated Editor for the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, Daxor, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Innolife, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapeutics, Rocket Pharma, and WhiteSwell; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-WAVE, and LivaNova. Dr Filippatos is a committee member of trials and registries sponsored by Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; is a Senior Consulting Editor for JACC Heart Failure; and has received research support from the European Union. Dr Konstam has been a consultant for FIRE1, Pfizer, Luitpold, Cardurion, Cytogenetics, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr McMurray reports payments to his employer, Glasgow University, for his work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, DalCor, GSK, Ionis, KBP Biosciences, Novartis, Pfizer, and Theracos; and personal payments from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, Eris Lifesciences, Hikma, Ionis, Lupin, ProAdWise Communications, Sun Pharmaceuticals, and Servier. Dr Mentz is a consultant to Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Zoll. Dr Metra has received personal fees of minimal amounts in the last 3 years: from Actelion as member of the Data Monitoring Committee of sponsored clinical trials; from Amgen, LivaNova, Servier, and Vifor Pharma as member of Executive Committees of sponsored clinical trials; and from AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Edwards Therapeutics for participation on advisory boards and/or for speeches at sponsored meetings. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NeuroTronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has served as a consultant for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi Pasteur, DiNAQOR, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, and Akros. Dr Teerlink is a consultant for 3iveLabs, Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Verily, ViCardia, and Windtree Therapeutics; and has received research grants from 3ive Labs, Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, EBR Systems, Edwards, Medtronic, Novartis, V-WAVE, ViCardia, and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr Abraham has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardionomic, Zoll Respicardia, scPharmaceuticals, Sensible Medical; Vectorious Salary support from V-WAVE Medical; and has served as a speaker for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr O’Connor has received grant or research support from Merck; and consulting fees from Merck, Bayer, and Abiomed. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receive less guideline-recommended therapy and experience worse quality of life than men., Objectives: The authors sought to assess differences in baseline characteristics, outcomes, efficacy, and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil between men and women enrolled in the GALACTIC-HF (Registrational Study With Omecamtiv Mecarbil [AMG 423] to Treat Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) study., Methods: In GALACTIC-HF, patients with symptomatic heart failure with EF of 35% or less, recent heart failure event, and elevated natriuretic peptides were randomized to omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo. The current analysis investigated differences in baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and efficacy and safety of omecamtiv mecarbil between men and women., Results: Of 8,232 patients analyzed, 21.2% were women. Women more likely self-identified as being Black, had worse symptoms (lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score [KCCQ-TSS]), and were less likely to be treated with angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor and devices at baseline. Compared with men, women had lower rates of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88). Sex did not significantly modify omecamtiv mecarbil's treatment effect (P interaction = 0.68). Women also had 20% less risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure event, and all-cause death. Women participants had lower rates of serious adverse events., Conclusions: Women participants of the GALACTIC-HF trial had worse quality of life and were less likely to be treated with guideline-based therapies at baseline. Despite KCCQ-TSS being predictive of poor outcomes in this population, women had a 20% lower risk of an HF event or cardiovascular death compared with men. The beneficial effect of omecamtiv mecarbil did not significantly differ by sex. (Registrational Study With Omecamtiv Mecarbil [AMG 423] to Treat Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [GALACTIC-HF]; NCT02929329)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Pabon is supported by the First.In.Women Fellowship Program in Sex- and Gender-Differences in Cardiovascular Diseases Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology and the John S. LaDue Memorial Fellowship at Harvard Medical School. Dr Cunnigham has consulted for Roche Diagnostics, Occlutech, and KCK. Dr Clagget has consulted for Alnylam, CVRX, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Intellia, Novartis, and Rocket. Dr Felker has received research grants from NHLBI, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, Myokardia; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, and Sequana; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharm. Dr McMurray has received payments through Glasgow University from work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GSK, KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; personal consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharma, Bayer, BMS, George Clinical PTY Ltd, Ionis Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharma, and River 2 Renal Corporation; and received personal lecture fees Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, AstraZeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharma Ltd, Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of CME, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica Health, Intas Pharma, J.B. Chemicals & Pharma Ltd, Lupin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharma, The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy; and he is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. Dr Metra has received personal fees in the last 3 years from Vifor Pharma and LivaNova (Executive Committee member); and participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Abbott Structural, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Diaz has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics Inc, and Servier Laboratories. Dr Wang is supported by a T32 postdoctoral training grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL094301) and by the Scott Schoen and Nancy Adams First.In.Women Cardiovascular Fellowship, Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr Crespo Leiro has received personal fees from Amgen; personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Vifor, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Medtronic; and grants from CIBERCV, outside the submitted work. Dr Fonseca has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; and grants and personal fees from Vifor Pharma, outside of the submitted work. Dr Goncalvesova has received personal fees from Amgen, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Servier; and grants and personal fees from Novartis, outside of the submitted work. Dr Lund has received grant funding and personal fees from Amgen; has received honoraria from Novartis; and has served as the New Zealand Chairperson for Cardiac Society Australia and New Zealand. Dr O’Meara has received research funds (paid to her institution) for clinical trials from American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Pfizer; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, and Janssen; and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Malik is an employee of and owns stock in Cytokinetics, Inc. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Cytokinetics, Eidos, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/NHLBI, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Valo. Dr Teerlink has received personal fees as Chairperson of the GALACTIC-HF Executive Committee from Amgen and Cytokinetics; personal fees for research contracts and/or consulting fees from 3ive Labs, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardurion, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Verily, ViCardia, and Windtree Therapeutics; has served as Secretary and Treasurer of the Heart Failure Society of America; and is currently President of the Heart Failure Society of America. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Polypharmacy is common among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its impact on the use of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is not well established., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the association between polypharmacy and odds of receiving optimal GDMT over time among patients with HFrEF., Methods: The authors conducted a post hoc analysis of the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment) trial. Polypharmacy was defined as receiving ≥5 medications (excluding HFrEF GDMT) at baseline. The outcome of interest was optimal triple therapy GDMT (concurrent administration of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blocker and beta-blocker at 50% of the target dose and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at any dose) achieved over the 12-month follow-up. Multivariable adjusted mixed-effect logistic regression models with multiplicative interaction terms (time × polypharmacy) were constructed to evaluate how polypharmacy at baseline modified the odds of achieving optimal GDMT on follow-up., Results: The study included 891 participants with HFrEF. The median number of non-GDMT medications at baseline was 4 (IQR: 3-6), with 414 (46.5%) prescribed ≥5 and identified as being on polypharmacy. The proportion of participants who achieved optimal GDMT at the end of the 12-month follow-up was lower with vs without polypharmacy at baseline (15% vs 19%, respectively). In adjusted mixed models, the odds of achieving optimal GDMT over time were modified by baseline polypharmacy status (P for interaction < 0.001). Patients without polypharmacy at baseline had increased odds of achieving GDMT (OR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.12-1.21] per 1-month increase; P < 0.001) but not patients with polypharmacy (OR: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.96-1.06)] per 1-month increase)., Conclusions: Patients with HFrEF who are on non-GDMT polypharmacy have lower odds of achieving optimal GDMT on follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Pandey has received research support from the National Institute on Aging GEMSSTAR grant (1R03AG067960-01) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Disparities (R01MD017529); grant funding from Applied Therapeutics and Gilead Sciences; honoraria outside of the present study as an advisor/consultant for Tricog Health Inc, Lilly USA, Rivus, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics; nonfinancial support from Pfizer and Merck; and is a consultant for Palomarin Inc with stock compensation. Dr Segar has received speaker fees from Merck and Co outside the present study. Dr Butler is a consultant for Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutic, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardior, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards, Element Science, Innolife, Impulse Dynamics, Imbria, Inventiva, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Janssen, Medtronics, Merck, Occlutech, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Roche, Sequana, SQ Innovation, 3live, and Vifor. Dr Fonarow has done consulting for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains suboptimal, in part because of concerns regarding tolerability and adverse events (AEs)., Objectives: The authors sought to compare rates of AE in patients randomized to GDMT medication vs placebo in a meta-analysis of landmark cardiovascular outcomes trials., Methods: The authors assessed rates of reported AE in 17 landmark HFrEF clinical trials across each class of GDMT in the placebo and intervention arms. The overall rates of AE for each drug class, the absolute difference in frequency in AEs between the placebo and intervention arms, and the odds of each AE according based on randomization strata were calculated., Results: AE were reported commonly in trials across each class of GDMT, with 75% to 85% of participants reporting at least 1 AE. There was no significant difference in the frequency of AE between the intervention and placebo arms, except for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (87.0% [95% CI: 85.0%-88.8%] vs 82.0% [95% CI: 79.8%-84.0%], absolute difference: +5% with intervention; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in drug discontinuation because of AE between placebo and intervention arms in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker trials. Patients randomized to beta-blocker were significantly less likely to stop study drug because of AE than placebo (11.3% [95% CI: 10.3%-12.3%] vs 13.7% [95% CI: 12.5%-14.9%], absolute difference: -1.1%; P = 0.015). When individual types of AE were assessed, the initiation of an intervention vs placebo resulted in small differences in absolute frequency of AE that were largely not statistically significant., Conclusions: In clinical trials of GDMT for HFrEF, AEs are observed frequently. However, rates of AE are similar between active medication and control, suggesting these may reflect the high risk nature of the heart failure disease state rather than be attributive to a specific therapy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Harrington has received salary support from T32 training grant T32HL069749. Dr Fonarow has done consulting for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Janssen, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapuetics, and Whiteswell; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Böhm is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; TTR 219, project number 322900939); and has received personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor during the conduct of the study. Dr Hernandez has received research grants from American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squib, Merck, Novartis, and Verily; and has done consulting for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squib, Myokardia, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Anker has received fees from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiac Dimension, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Occlutech, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; and has received grant support from Abbott and Vifor Pharma. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck and Co Inc, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; has served as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Co Inc, PhamaIN, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Tricog Health, Urovant Pharmaceuticals, and Vifor; and has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Vaduganathan has received research grant support or served on advisory boards for American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Baxter Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pharmacosmos, Relypsa, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Tricog Health; has had speaker engagements with Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Roche Diagnostics; and has participated on clinical trial committees for studies sponsored by Galmed, Novartis, Bayer AG, Occlutech, and Impulse Dynamics. Dr Butler has served as a consultant to Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Cures, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squib, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceutical, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Occlutech, Relypsa, Roche, Sanofi, SC Pharma, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. Dr Khan has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction regardless of previous treatments. Improvements in LVEF may change eligibility for primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Awaiting LVEF improvement may expose patients to potential risks for arrhythmic complications., Objectives: The authors sought to develop a model predicting LVEF change after Sac/Val therapy., Methods: A total of 416 persons with HF and LVEF of <35% were included in this analysis. Following initiation of Sac/Val, echocardiographic parameters were measured serially for 1 year. A machine learning algorithm was implemented to develop a risk model for predicting the persistence of LVEF of <35% after 1 year and was validated in a separate group of study participants., Results: Baseline LVEF, left ventricular mass index, HF duration, age, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration at baseline and change by day 14, and body mass index were the most significant factors for identifying lack of LVEF improvement to ≥35% after 1 year. In the training and validation cohorts, the areas under the model curve for predicting lack of LVEF improvement were 0.92 and 0.86, respectively. Three categories of likelihood for LVEF of <35% after 1 year of Sac/Val treatment were developed based on the model predictions: 3.8%, 30.1%, and 83.7%. During follow-up, arrhythmia event rates were 0.9%, 2.9%, and 6.7% in these groups, respectively., Conclusions: Many persons with HF with reduced ejection fraction eligible for ICD insertion experience an increase in LVEF to ≥35% after treatment with Sac/Val. Early identification of those less likely to improve their LVEF might allow for more refined selection of primary ICD candidates. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling, and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The PROVE-HF study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp (East Hanover, New Jersey). Dr Mohebi is supported by the Barry fellowship. Dr Januzzi is supported in part by the Hutter Family Professorship. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, and MyoKardia; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, and Sequana; and has served on Clinical Endpoint Committees/Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Drs Prescott and Ward are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr Piña has participated on Advisory Boards for Vifor and AstraZeneca and is a Steering Committee member for Novartis. Dr Butler is a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, Eli Lilly, G3 Pharmaceutical, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Sequana, StealthPeptide, and Vifor. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos and has consulted for Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Cardior, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Gilead, GSK, Ironwood, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, and Tenaya. Dr Januzzi is a trustee of the American College of Cardiology; is a board member of Imbria Pharmaceuticals; has received grant support from Abbott Diagnostics, Applied Therapeutics, Innolife, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Roche Diagnostics; has received consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, Prevencio, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in Clinical Endpoint Committees/Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, CVRx, Janssen, MyoKardia, Takeda, and Vifor. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Heart Failure Academic Research Consortium is a partnership between the Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) and the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) composed of patients, academic investigators from the United States and Europe, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, payers, and industry. Members discussed the measure, remote capture, and clinical utility of functional and quality-of-life endpoints for use in clinical trials of heart failure and cardiovascular therapeutics, with the goal of improving the efficiency of heart failure and cardiovascular clinical research, evidence generation, and thereby patient quality of life, functional status, and survival. Assessments of patient-reported outcomes and maximal and submaximal exercise tolerance are standardized and validated, but actigraphy remains inconsistent as a potential endpoint. This paper details those discussions and consensus recommendations., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the FDA or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dr Abraham has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Zoll Respicardia, speaker honoraria from Impulse Dynamics, salary support from V-Wave Medical, and research support from the U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr Filippatos has received consulting income from Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor; and has received lecture fees from Merck. Dr Lindenfeld has received consulting fees from Novartis, Abbott, ResMed, V-Wave, CVRx, and Cytokinetics. Dr Ahmad has received consulting fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics, Relypsa, and Novartis. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Merck, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics; and has received consulting fees from Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Relypsa, V-Wave, Myokardia, Innolife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Sphingotec, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, Windtree Therapeutics, Rocket Pharma, and SC Pharma. Dr Kitzman has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, DCRI, and Corvia; has received grant support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Novartis; and has stock in Gilead. Dr Lewis has received consulting fees from Novartis; and has received institutional research grant support from Amgen, Novartis, and Sanofi. Dr Mentz has received consulting fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Janssen, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Akros, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, InnoLife, Luitpold/American Reagent, Novartis, Otsuka, ResMed, and the National Institutes of Health (grants U01HL125511-01A1 and R01AG045551-01A1). Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has received consulting fees from Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, and Cardiac Dimensions. Dr Teerlink has received consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Stealth Health; and has received research funding from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and scPharma. Dr Unger’s employer, Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, has contracts with many companies, some of which are developing treatments for HF. Dr Whellan has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health (grant R01AG045551). Dr Wittes’s employer, Wittes LLC, has contracts with many companies, some of which are developing treatments for HF. Dr Anker has received fees from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiac Dimension, Cordio, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Occlutech, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; and has received grant support from Abbott and Vifor Pharma. Dr O’Connor has received grant or research support from Roche Diagnostics and Merck; and has received consulting fees from Merck, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Abiomed, and Windtree. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Objectives: In this study, the authors sought to explore age differences in effects of Sac/Val on biomarkers, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-23 scores and cardiac remodeling., Methods: After initiation and titration of Sac/Val, concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), and soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) were measured and KCCQ-23 scores obtained from baseline to 12 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and indexed left ventricular end-systolic (LVESVi) and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDVi) and left atrial volume index (LAVi) volumes were measured with the use of echocardiography. Safety end points were assessed. Age-stratified analysis was performed for groups aged <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years., Results: Among 794 participants with HFrEF (mean age 65.1 years, 28.5% women), compared with patients aged <65 years (n = 369), 65-74 years (n = 237), and those aged ≥75 years (n = 188), had similar reductions in hs-cTnT and sST2, but less NT-proBNP reduction (-45.6% vs -40.2% vs -30.5%, respectively; P = 0.02). Gains in KCCQ-23 were smaller (+11.8 vs +11.4 vs +6.0 points; P = 0.03) in patients aged ≥75 years, although similar proportions of each age group achieved ≥10-point and ≥20-point increases in KCCQ-23 by month 12. Improvements in LVEF, LVEDVi, LVESVi, and LAVi were similar among age groups. Incidence of safety end points was also similar., Conclusions: Sac/Val resulted in significant improvements in prognostic biomarkers and measures of cardiac remodeling and health status from baseline to month 12 across age categories. Older study participants showed somewhat blunted reduction in NT-proBNP and less improvement in KCCQ-23 overall summary scores. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling, and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The PROVE-HF study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Drs Ward, Meng, and Prescott are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Dr Piña has participated on advisory boards for Vifor and AstraZeneca and is a steering committee member for Novartis. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Cytokinetics, and Myokardia; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapuetics, and Whiteswell; and has served on clinical end point committees or data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Butler is a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, Eli Lilly, G3 Pharmaceutical, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Sequana, StealthPeptide, and Vifor. Dr Maisel has received consulting income from Abbott Vascular, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics and Novartis. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has consulted for Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Cardior, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, and Tenaya. Dr Januzzi is supported in part by the Hutter Family Professorship; is a trustee of the American College of Cardiology and a board member of Imbria Pharmaceuticals; has received grant support from Applied Therapeutics, Innolife, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Abbott Diagnostics and consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in clinical end point committees or data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, CVRx, Janssen, MyoKardia, and Takeda. Dr Murphy has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In this study, we sought to evaluate the association of frailty with the use of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Background: The burden of frailty in HFrEF is high, and the patterns of GDMT use according to frailty status have not been studied previously., Methods: A post hoc analysis of patients with HFrEF enrolled in the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure) trial was conducted. Frailty was assessed with the use of a frailty index (FI) using a 38-variable deficit model, and participants were categorized into 3 groups: class 1: nonfrail, FI <0.21); class 2: intermediate frailty, FI 0.21-0.31), and class 3: high frailty, FI >0.31). Multivariate-adjusted Cox models were used to study the association of frailty status with clinical outcomes. Use of optimal GDMT over time (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) across frailty strata was assessed with the use of adjusted linear and logistic mixed-effect models., Results: The study included 879 participants, of which 56.3% had high frailty burden (class 3 FI). A higher frailty burden was associated with a significantly higher risk of HF hospitalization or death in adjusted Cox models: high frailty vs nonfrail HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.20-2.58. On follow-up, participants with high frailty burden also had a significantly lower likelihood of achieving optimal GDMT: high frailty vs non-frail GDMT triple therapy use at study end: 17.7% vs 28.4%; P interaction, frailty class × time <0.001., Conclusions: Patients with HFrEF with a high burden of frailty have a significantly higher risk for adverse clinical outcomes and are less likely to be initiated and up-titrated on an optimal GDMT regimen., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The GUIDE-IT study was funded by grants HL105448, HL105451, and HL105457 from the National Institutes of Health, and Roche Diagnostics provided support for NT-proBNP testing. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, and Sanofi; and serves as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Vifor. Dr Fonarow is a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis, and Associate Section Editor for the JAMA Cardiology. Dr Anker has received research support from Vifor International and Abbott Vascular; and fees for consultancy and/or speaking from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Respicardia, Impulse Dynamics, Janssen, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor International. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, Myokardia; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, and Sequana; and has served on clinical end point committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Januzzi has received grant support from Roche Diagnostics, Abbott Diagnostics, Singulex, Prevencio, Novartis, and Cleveland Heart Labs; has received consulting income from Roche Diagnostics, Abbott, Prevencio, and Critical Diagnostics; and participates in clinical end point committees/data safety monitoring boards for Siemens Diagnostics, Novartis, Bayer, AbbVie, and Amgen. Dr Butler has acted as a consultant to Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, G3 Pharma, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Relypsa, Sequana Medical, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor; and has served on speaker bureaus for Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim–Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. Dr Pandey is supported by the Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholars Program; and has served on the advisory board of Roche Diagnostics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors sought to characterize associations between initiation of metformin and sulfonylurea therapy and clinical outcomes among patients with comorbid heart failure (HF) and diabetes (overall and by ejection fraction [EF] phenotype)., Background: Metformin and sulfonylureas are frequently prescribed to patients with diabetes for glycemic control. The impact of these therapies on clinical outcomes among patients with comorbid HF and diabetes is unclear., Methods: The authors evaluated Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry between 2006 and 2014 with diabetes and not prescribed metformin or sulfonylurea before admission. In parallel separate analyses for metformin and sulfonylurea, patients with newly prescribed therapy within 90 days of discharge were compared with patients not prescribed therapy. Multivariable models landmarked at 90 days evaluated associations between prescription of therapy, and mortality and hospitalization for HF (HHF) at 12 months. Negative control (falsification) endpoints included hospitalization for urinary tract infection, hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleed, and influenza vaccination. Prespecified subgroup analyses were stratified by EF ≤40% versus >40%., Results: Of 5,852 patients, 454 (7.8%) were newly prescribed metformin and 504 (8.6%) were newly prescribed sulfonylurea. After adjustment, metformin prescription was independently associated with reduced risk of composite mortality/HHF (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.98; P = 0.03), but individual components were not statistically significant. Findings among patients with EF >40% accounted for associations with mortality/HHF (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.90) and HHF (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.40-0.85) endpoints (all P for interaction ≤0.04). After adjustment, sulfonylurea initiation was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.00-1.52; P = 0.045) and HHF (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.00-1.48; P = 0.050) with nominal statistical significance. Associations between sulfonylurea initiation and endpoints were consistent regardless of EF (all P for interaction >0.11). Neither metformin initiation nor sulfonylurea initiation were associated with negative control endpoints., Conclusions: In this population of older U.S. adults hospitalized for HF with comorbid diabetes, metformin initiation was independently associated with substantial improvements in 12-month clinical outcomes, driven by findings among patients with EF >40%. By contrast, sulfonylurea initiation was associated with excess risk of death and HF hospitalization, regardless of EF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported in part by an American Heart Association (AHA) grant award #16SFRN30180010 (to Dr DeVore). The GWTG-HF program is provided by the AHA and sponsored, in part, by Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly Diabetes Alliance, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Bayer. Dr Sharma has received support from the Fonds de Recherche Santé Quebec (FRSQ) Junior 1 Clinical Research Scholar, Canada Institute for Health Research grant #175095, European Society of Cardiology young investigator grant, Roche Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Takeda. Dr DeVore has received research funding through the Duke Clinical Research Institute from the AHA, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Intra-Cellular Therapies, American Regent, Inc, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Novartis, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; and consulting for AstraZeneca. Dr Felker has received research grants from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), AHA, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, and Myokardia; has been a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Innolife, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Reagent, Abbott, Eidos Therapeutics, Reprieve, and Sequana; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Hernandez has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi; and research support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Luitpold, Merck, and Novartis. Dr Butler has been a consultant to Abbott, Adrenomed, Arena Pharma, Array, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, CVRx, Eli Lilly, G3 Pharma, Imbria, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sequana Medical, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. Dr Peterson has received research funding from the NHLBI; and personal fees from American Heart Association outside the submitted work. Dr Fonarow has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health; and has been a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Medtronic, and Novartis. Dr Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, the AHA, NHLBI, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Cytokinetics; and has served as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Vifor. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between systolic blood pressure (SBP) drop, worsening renal function (WRF), and prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF)., Background: A large drop in SBP early after hospital admission for AHF might be associated with increased risk for WRF and prognosis. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the interaction between WRF and a drop in SBP on clinical outcomes., Methods: A post hoc analysis among 6,544 patients with AHF enrolled in the RELAX-AHF-2 (Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure-2) trial was performed. Blood pressure was uniformly and repetitively measured. Peak SBP drop was defined as the difference between baseline SBP and lowest SBP documented during the first 48 hours. WRF was defined by an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL from baseline to day 5., Results: Peak SBP drop was independently associated with a higher risk for WRF (HR: 1.11 per 10 mm Hg SBP drop; P < 0.001), 5-day worsening heart failure (HR: 1.12 per 10 mm Hg SBP drop; P = 0.006), and 180-day cardiovascular death (HR: 1.09 per 10 mm Hg SBP drop; P = 0.026) after adjustment for potential confounders including baseline SBP. There was no interaction between the prognostic value of early SBP drop according to the presence or absence of WRF., Conclusions: In patients hospitalized for AHF, a greater early drop in SBP was associated with a higher incidence of WRF, worsening heart failure, and an increased risk for 180-day cardiovascular death. However, the association between SBP drop and prognosis was not influenced by WRF. (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF [RELAX-AHF-2]; NCT01870778)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The RELAX-AHF-2 trial was funded by Novartis. Dr Matsue is affiliated with a department endowed by Philips Respironics, ResMed, Teijin Home Healthcare, and Fukuda Denshi; and has received an honorarium from Otsuka Pharmaceutical and Novartis Japan. Dr Metra has received consulting honoraria as a member of trial committees or advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Bayer, Edwards Therapeutics, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Greenberg has received research support from the American Heart Association, the National Institutes of Health, and Rocket Pharma; and serves as a consultant for ACI, Actelion, Akcea, Amgen, EBR Systems, Ionis, Janssen, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Sanofi, Viking, Zensun, and Zoll. Drs Cotter and Davison have received research grants and personal fees from Novartis during the trials’ conduct; and have received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Celyad, Cirius Therapeutics, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics; and has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, V-Wave, MyoKardia, InnoLife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, Rocket Pharma, Reprieve, and SC Pharma. Dr Filippatos has participated in committees for trials and registries sponsored by Novartis, Servier, Medtronic, Vifor, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer. Dr Pang has served as a consultant for Baxter, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck; and has received research or other support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the American Heart Association, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, OrthoDiagnostics, and Abbott. Dr Ponikowski has received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Vifor Pharma, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Berlin Chemie, Bayer, Pfizer, Cibiem, Impulse Dynamics, Renal Guard Solutions, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca; and has received research grants from Vifor Pharma. Dr Voors has received consultancy fees and/or grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, MyoKardia, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Servier, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Teerlink has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, EBR Systems, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine patterns of care and clinical outcomes among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the United States and Canada., Background: In the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment) trial, the use of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) was compared with usual care alone for patients with HFrEF in the United States and Canada. It remains unknown whether the country of enrollment had an impact on outcomes or GDMT use., Methods: A total of 894 patients at 45 sites across the United States and Canada with HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤40%) were enrolled in the trial. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates stratified by country of enrollment were developed for the trial outcomes, and log-rank testing was compared between the groups. GDMT use and titration were also compared., Results: U.S. patients were more likely to be younger, to be Black, to have higher body mass index, and to have histories of defibrillator placement or sleep apnea. Use of β-blockers was significantly higher in Canada at baseline (99.3% vs. 94.0%; p = 0.01) and 6 months (99.0% vs. 94.1%; p = 0.04), and use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was higher in Canada at 6 months (68.3% vs. 55.1%; p = 0.01). Canadian patients were less likely to experience the primary study endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45 to 0.93; p = 0.01) due to decreased rates of HF hospitalization (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.86; p = 0.003). The differences in outcomes were driven by increased heart failure hospitalization among U.S. Black patients., Conclusions: In GUIDE-IT, patients with HFrEF in Canada were significantly less likely to be hospitalized for heart failure. Differences in GDMT use, along with differences in sociodemographics and care delivery structures, may contribute to these differences, highlighting the importance of increasing diversity in clinical trials. (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment [GUIDE-IT]; NCT01685840)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The GUIDE-IT trial was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Additional substudies were supported by Roche Diagnostics. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the present study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr. Januzzi is a trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has received grant support from Roche Diagnostics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Applied Therapeutics; has received consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in clinical endpoint committees and data and safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, CVRx, Janssen, MyoKardia, and Takeda. Dr. Desai works under contract with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to develop and maintain performance measures used for public reporting and pay-for-performance programs; and has received research grants and consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, The Medicines Company, Relypsa, Novartis, and SCPharmaceuticals. Dr. Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, and Myokardia; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Innolife, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, Eidos Therapeutics, Reprieve, and Sequana; and has served on clinical endpoint committees and data and safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, and Rocket Pharma. Dr. Fiuzat has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. O’Connor has received grant support from Roche Diagnostics and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Ahmad is a consultant for Amgen, Cytokinetics, Relypsa, and Novartis. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors estimated changes of stressed blood volume (SBV) induced by splanchnic nerve block (SNB) in patients with either decompensated or ambulatory heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Background: The splanchnic vascular capacity is a major determinant of the SBV, which in turn determines cardiac filling pressures and may be modifiable through SNB., Methods: We analyzed data from 2 prospective, single-arm clinical studies in decompensated HFrEF (splanchnic HF-1; resting hemodynamics) and ambulatory heart failure (splanchnic HF-2; exercise hemodynamics). Patients underwent invasive hemodynamics and short-term SNB with local anesthetics. SBV was simulated using heart rate, cardiac output, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, systolic and diastolic systemic arterial and pulmonary artery pressures, and left ventricular ejection fraction. SBV is presented as ml/70 kg body weight., Results: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 21 ± 11%. In patients with decompensated HFrEF (n = 11), the mean estimated SBV was 3,073 ± 251 ml/70 kg. At 30 min post-SNB, the estimated SBV decreased by 10% to 2,754 ± 386 ml/70 kg (p = 0.003). In ambulatory HFrEF (n = 14) patients, the mean estimated SBV was 2,664 ± 488 ml/70 kg and increased to 3,243 ± 444 ml/70 kg (p < 0.001) at peak exercise. The resting estimated SBV was lower in ambulatory patients with HFrEF than in decompensated HFrEF (p = 0.019). In ambulatory patients with HFrEF, post-SNB, the resting estimated SBV decreased by 532 ± 264 ml/70 kg (p < 0.001). Post-SNB, with exercise, there was no decrease of estimated SBV out of proportion to baseline effects (p = 0.661)., Conclusions: The estimated SBV is higher in decompensated than in ambulatory heart failure. SNB reduced the estimated SBV in decompensated and ambulatory heart failure. The reduction in estimated SBV was maintained throughout exercise. (Splanchnic Nerve Anesthesia in Heart Failure, NCT02669407; Abdominal Nerve Blockade in Chronic Heart Failure, NCT03453151)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by American Heart Association (AHA) Grant, 17MCPRP33460225 and Translating Duke Health Award. Dr. Fudim has received grants from the American Heart Association (Grant 17MCPRP33460225), National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 grant 5T32HL007101, Mario Family Award, Translating Duke Health Award; and has received consulting fees from AxonTherapies, Daxor, and Galvani. Dr. M.R. Patel has received research grants from HeartFlow, Bayer, Janssen, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); and is on advisory boards for HeartFlow, Bayer, and Janssen. Dr. Borlaug has received research funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (R01 HL128526, U01 HL125205), AstraZeneca, Corvia, Medtronic, Mesoblast, GlaxoSmithKline, and TENAX; and is on advisory boards/consults for Merck, Novartis, Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. Dr. DeVore has received research funding through his institution from the American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Intra-Cellular Therapies, American Regent, Inc., the NHLBI, Novartis, and PCORI; has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CareDx, InnaMed, LivaNova, Mardil Medical, Novartis, Procyrion, scPharmaceuticals, Story Health, and Zoll; and has received nonfinancial support from Abbott for educational activities. Dr. Lopes has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer AG; and has received grants from Amgen Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic PLC, and Sanofi Aventis outside the submitted work. Dr. Mentz has received research support and honoraria from Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim/Eli Lilly, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Fast BioMedical, Gilead, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Vifor. Dr. Felker has received research funding from NHLBI, AHA, Amgen, Cytokinetics, Merck; and has received consulting fees from Novartis, Amgen, Cytokinetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Innolife, Medtronic, EBR Systems, Cardionomic, SC Pharma, and Myokardia. Dr. Hernandez has received research funding from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Novartis; and has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr. Burkhoff has received institutional grants from Abiomed, Ancora Heart, Tenax Therapeutics, and Fire 1; and has received consulting fees from PVLoops LLC and Axon Therapeutics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The primary objective was to identify well-tolerated doses of cimlanod in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Secondary objectives were to identify signals of efficacy, including biomarkers, symptoms, and clinical events., Background: Nitroxyl (HNO) donors have vasodilator, inotropic and lusitropic effects. Bristol-Myers Squibb-986231 (cimlanod) is an HNO donor being developed for acute heart failure (AHF)., Methods: This was a phase IIb, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 48-h treatment with cimlanod compared with placebo in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% hospitalized for AHF. In part I, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to escalating doses of cimlanod or matching placebo. In part II, patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to either of the 2 highest tolerated doses of cimlanod from part I or placebo. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or patients became symptomatic)., Results: In part I (n = 100), clinically relevant hypotension was more common with cimlanod than placebo (20% vs. 8%; relative risk [RR]: 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83 to 14.53). In part II (n = 222), the incidence of clinically relevant hypotension was 18% for placebo, 21% for cimlanod 6 μg/kg/min (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.43), and 35% for cimlanod 12 μg/kg/min (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.04 to 3.59). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and bilirubin decreased during infusion of cimlanod treatment compared with placebo, but these differences did not persist after treatment discontinuation., Conclusions: Cimlanod at a dose of 6 μg/kg/min was reasonably well-tolerated compared with placebo. Cimlanod reduced markers of congestion, but this did not persist beyond the treatment period. (Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of 48-Hour Infusions of HNO (Nitroxyl) Donor in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure [STANDUP AHF]; NCT03016325)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The STAND-UP AHF study was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Felker has received research grants from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, Myokardia, Bayer, and Roche Diagnostics; and he has been a consultant for Novartis, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, V-Wave, Myokardia, Innolife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, Eidos Therapeutics, Rocket Pharma, Reprieve, and SC Pharma. Dr. McMurray has been a consultant for Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, DalCor, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier Theracos, and Vifor-Fresenius. Dr. Cleland has received personal grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb for the submitted work; has received personal fees from Abbott; has received grants and personal fees from Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Myokardia, Pharmacosmos, Vifor, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Servier, outside of the submitted work; and had received personal fees and non-financial support from Medtronic. Dr. O’Connor has been a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation, Bayer, and Merck. Dr. Teerlink has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, EBR Systems, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. Dr. Voors has received research support and/or has been a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetcs, Merck, Myokardia, NovoNordisk, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Belohlavek has received funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb for the conduct of this study. Dr. Bueno has received research funding from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (PIE16/00021 & PI17/01799), Sociedad Española de Cardiología, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer, Novartis; and has received speaker fees or support for attending scientific meetings from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Pfizer, Novartis, and MEDSCAPE-the heart.og. Drs. Borentain, DeSouza, Kessler, Seiffert, and Ye are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Böhm has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TTR 219, S-01); and has received consultant and speaking honoraria from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor, Servier, and Vifor. Dr. Ezekowitz has received research grants or honoraria from CIHR, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, Amgen, Bayer, Merck, and Cytokinetics. Dr. Filippatos has been a committee member in trials sponsored by Medtronic, Novartis, Vifor, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Servier, and Bayer. Dr. Lang has received research, grant or other support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda, Vifor Pharma, Pfizer, and Roche. Dr. Martinez has received research grants and/or honoraria from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gador, Baliarda, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Mebazaa has received speaker's honoraria from Orion, Otsuka, Philips, Roche, and Servier; and has received fees as a member of advisory board and/or the steering committee and/or has received research grants from 4TEEN4, Abbott, Adrenomed, Bristol Myers Squibb, Epygon, Fire1, Roche, Sanofi, and Sphyngotec. Dr. Metra has received consulting honoraria from Amgen, LivaNova, and Vifor Pharma as trials’ committees member, from Abbott Vascular and Bayer as a participant to an advisory board, and from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Therapeutics as speaker at an industry sponsored meeting. Dr. Mosterd has received a research grant from Novartis; has been a consultant to Amarin, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, and Pfizer. Dr. Pang has been a consultant for Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck; and has received research, grants, or other support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, PCORI, AHA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, AHRQ, OrthoDiagnostics, and Abbott. Dr. Ponikowski has received consulting fees and speaker’s honoraria from Vifor Pharma, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Berlin Chemie, Bayer, Pfizer, Cibiem, Impulse Dynamics, Renal Guard Solutions, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca; and has received research grants from Vifor Pharma. Dr. Sato has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, during the conduct of the study; has received honoraria and consultant fees from Otsuka, Ono, Terumo, Bayer, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics Japan, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study sought to determine whether patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have similar reverse cardiac remodeling with sacubitril/valsartan as patients without T2DM., Background: Sacubitril/valsartan promotes reverse cardiac remodeling and improves outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF with T2DM have worse prognosis than those without T2DM., Methods: In this post hoc analysis of PROVE-HF (Prospective Study of Biomarkers, Symptom Improvement, and Ventricular Remodeling During Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy for Heart Failure), we examined changes in N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), measures of cardiac remodeling, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) scores from baseline to 12 months following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan between patients with HFrEF with and without T2DM. Using latent growth curve modeling, we evaluated the longitudinal association between changes in NT-proBNP, left ventricular ejection fraction, and KCCQ-OS., Results: Among 794 patients enrolled, 361 (45.5%) had T2DM. NT-proBNP concentrations were modestly higher at baseline among patients with T2DM but were reduced after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. Cross-sectional improvement was observed in left ventricular ejection fraction (T2DM: 28.3% at baseline and 37% at 12 months vs. non-T2DM: 28.1% at baseline and 38.3% at 12 months) and KCCQ-OS (T2DM: 71 at baseline and 83 at 12 months vs. non-T2DM: 76 at baseline and 88 at 12 months). Similar changes were also observed for other echocardiographic measures. In longitudinal analyses, the average NT-proBNP change was similar in patients with T2DM (-5.6% vs. -7.1% per 90-day interval; p = 0.64), whereas improvements in KCCQ-OS scores were slightly smaller (2.1 vs. 3.46 per 90-day interval; p = 0.07)., Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan favorably affects natriuretic peptide levels, reverse cardiac remodeling, and health status in patients with HFrEF with and without T2DM. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Felker has received personal fees from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Innolife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Alnylam, SC Pharma, Rocket, Sphingotec, LivaNova, Cardionomic, Relypsa, V-Wave, and MyoKardia; grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, and Merck; and grants and personal fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Piña has received consulting income from Relypsa and Novartis. Dr. Ibrahim is funded in part by the Dennis and Marilyn Barry Fund in Cardiovascular Research and has received honoraria from Novartis and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Maisel has received consulting income from Abbott Vascular, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, and Novartis. Drs. Prescott and Ward are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Dr. Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH/NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has consulted for Abbott, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, and Moderna. Dr. Januzzi reported receiving personal fees from the American College of Cardiology, Pfizer, Merck, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Takeda; grants and personal fees from Novartis, Roche, Abbott, and Janssen; and grants from Singulex and Prevencio. Dr. Butler serves as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceutical, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Roche, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to assess associations between longitudinal change in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and reverse cardiac remodeling following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Background: Neprilysin inhibition results in an increase of several vasoactive peptides that may mediate the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan, including ANP., Methods: In a prospective study of initiation and titration of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF, blood was collected at scheduled time points into tubes containing protease inhibitors. This pre-specified exploratory analysis included patients in whom ANP was measured at baseline and serially through 12 months of treatment., Results: Among 144 participants (mean age: 64.5 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 30.8%), following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, there was an early and significant increase in ANP, with the majority of rise from 99 pg/ml at baseline to 156 pg/ml at day 14 (p < 0.001). There was a further trend toward a second increase from day 30 to day 45 (p = 0.07). At maximal rise, ANP had doubled. In longitudinal analyses, early rise in ANP was followed by a subsequent increase in urinary cycle guanosine monophosphate. Larger early increase in ANP was associated with larger later improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and left atrial volume index (p < 0.001 for both)., Conclusions: Concentrations of ANP doubled after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HFrEF. Larger early increases in ANP were associated with a greater magnitude of subsequent reverse cardiac remodeling. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author disclosures This work was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Januzzi is supported in part by the Hutter Family Professorship. Dr. Prescott is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Maisel has received consulting income from Abbott Vascular, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, and Novartis. Dr. Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Merck, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics and has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Relypsa, V-Wave, Myokardia, Innolife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Sphingotec, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, and SC Pharma. Dr. Butler has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the European Union; and serves as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceutical, Innolife, Janssen, LinaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Roche, Sanofi, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. Dr. Piña has received consulting income from Relypsa and Novartis. Dr. Ibrahim has received honoraria from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Abbas is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institute of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has consulted for Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, and Tenaya. Dr. Januzzi is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has received grant support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Abbott Diagnostics and consulting income from Abbott Diagnostics, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in clinical endpoint committees/Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, and Takeda. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has changed considerably over time, particularly with the sequential development of therapies aimed at antagonism of maladaptive biologic pathways, including inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system. The sequential nature of earlier HFrEF trials allowed the integration of new therapies tested against the background therapy of the time. More recently, multiple heart failure therapies are being evaluated simultaneously, and the number of therapeutic choices for treating HFrEF has grown considerably. In addition, implementation science has lagged behind discovery science in heart failure. Furthermore, given there are currently >200 ongoing clinical trials in heart failure, further complexities are anticipated. In an effort to provide a decision-making framework in the current era of expanding therapeutic options in HFrEF, the Heart Failure Collaboratory convened a multi-stakeholder group, including patients, clinicians, clinical investigators, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, industry, and payers who met at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration campus on March 6, 2020. This paper summarizes the discussions and expert consensus recommendations., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Dr. Bhatt has received honorarium from Sanofi Pasteur and is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute T32 postdoctoral training grant T32HL094301. Dr. Abraham has received consulting fees from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, Edwards Lifesciences, Respicardia; salary support from V-Wave Medical; and research support from the U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Bristow is an employee of ARCA Biopharma. Dr. Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Merck, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics; and has received consulting fees from Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Relypsa, V-Wave, MyoKardia, Innolife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, SphingoTec, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, Windtree Therapeutics, Rocket Pharma, and SC Pharma. Dr. Fonarow has received consulting from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CHF Solutions, Edwards, Janssen, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. Dr. Greene has received a Heart Failure Society of America/Emergency Medicine Foundation Acute Heart Failure Young Investigator Award funded by Novartis; has received research support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Novartis; has served on advisory boards for Amgen and Cytokinetics; and serves as a consultant for Amgen and Merck. Dr. Lindenfield has received consulting fees from Novartis, Abbott, ResMed, V-Wave, CVRx, and Cytokinetics. Dr. Psotka has received consulting fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics, and Windtree; and grant support from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Dr. Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Neurotronik, Novartis, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos; and has consulted for Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AOBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi Pasteur, Dinaqor, and Tremeau. Dr. Teerlink has received consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Stealth Health; and research funding from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and scPharmaceuticals. Dr. Vaduganathan is supported by the KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training award from Harvard Catalyst (National Institutes of Health/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Award UL 1TR002541); serves on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxter Healthcare, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, and Relypsa; and participates on clinical endpoint committees for studies sponsored by Novartis and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wittes reports that the company for which she works, Statistics Collaborative, has contracts with many companies, some of which are developing treatments for HF. Dr. O’Connor has received research support from Roche Diagnostics; has received research support and is a consultant for Merck; is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Windtree, and Neurotronik; and is a co-owner of BisCardia. Dr. Butler has received personal fees as a consultant from Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Cures, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squib, CVRx, G3 Pharmaceuticals, Innolife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Roche, Sanofi, SC Pharma, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF) may improve patient-reported health outcomes., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine timing and magnitude of change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-23 scores following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan and interaction with change in amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations., Methods: From a single-arm, open-label study of patients initiated on sacubitril/valsartan, KCCQ-23 scores and NT-proBNP were obtained at baseline and follow-up through 12 months. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses evaluated magnitude and rate of change in KCCQ-23 scores and associations with NT-proBNP. Patient-level data from the randomized EVALUATE-HF study were used as historic controls., Results: The analysis cohort (n = 678, age 64.7 years, 71.5% men, EF 28.9%) had a baseline KCCQ-23 overall score (OS) of 65.6. Following sacubitril/valsartan initiation, the majority (n = 412; 60.8%) of participants experienced a rise in KCCQ-23 OS ≥10 points; 26.0% increased by ≥20 points. Comparable improvement in KCCQ-23 scores was seen in various subgroups. Change in KCCQ-23 OS was inversely associated with change in circulating NT-proBNP concentrations. Among a control group of patients in EVALUATE-HF, linear rate of change in KCCQ-12 OS/14-day interval in the enalapril arm was 0.37 points (p = 0.06), whereas in the sacubitril/valsartan arm, scores increased at a rate of 1.19 points (p < 0.001), nearly identical to this dataset (1.08 points; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Treatment of heart failure with reduced EF with sacubitril/valsartan is associated with rapid and significant improvement in KCCQ-23 scores which was significantly related to change in NT-proBNP. (Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy on Biomarkers, Myocardial Remodeling and Outcomes [PROVE-HF]; NCT02887183)., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures The PROVE-HF Study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Ibrahim is supported in part by the Dennis and Marilyn Barry Research Fund in Cardiology; and has received honoraria from Novartis and Roche Diagnostics. Dr. Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, Amgen, Merck, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics; and has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Relypsa, V-Wave, Myokardia, Innolife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Sphingotec, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, Rocket Pharma, and SC Pharma. Dr. Claggett has received consulting income from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia, Myokardia, and Novartis. Dr. Desai has received research funding to his institution from AstraZeneca, Alnylam, Bayer, and Novartis; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Biofourmis, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvidia, DalCor Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Relypsa, and Regeneron. Dr. Solomon has received research grants from Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lone Star Heart, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and has consulted for Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ironwood, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Theracos, Quantum Genetics, Cardurion, AoBiome, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, and Tenaya. Drs. Prescott and Williamson are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Januzzi is supported in part by the Hutter Family Professorship; is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has received grant support from Applied Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Abbott Diagnostics; has received consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche Diagnostics; and has participated in clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Takeda. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to better understand the discrepant results of 2 trials of serelaxin on acute heart failure (AHF) and short-term mortality after AHF by analyzing causes of death of patients in the RELAX-AHF-2 (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF-2) trial., Background: Patients with AHF continue to suffer significant short-term mortality, but limited systematic analyses of causes of death in this patient population are available., Methods: Adjudicated cause of death of patients in RELAX-AHF-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of serelaxin in patients with AHF across the spectrum of ejection fraction (EF), was analyzed., Results: By 180 days of follow-up, 11.5% of patients in RELAX-AHF-2 died, primarily due to heart failure (HF) (38% of all deaths). Unlike RELAX-AHF, there was no apparent effect of treatment with serelaxin on any category of cause of death. Older patients (≥75 years) had higher rates of mortality (14.2% vs. 8.8%) and noncardiovascular (CV) death (27% vs. 19%) compared to younger patients. Patients with preserved EF (≥50%) had lower rates of HF-related mortality (30% vs. 40%) but higher non-CV mortality (36% vs. 20%) compared to patients with reduced EF., Conclusions: Despite previous data suggesting benefit of serelaxin in AHF, treatment with serelaxin was not found to improve overall mortality or have an effect on any category of cause of death in RELAX-AHF-2. Careful adjudication of events in the serelaxin trials showed that older patients and those with preserved EF had fewer deaths from HF or sudden death and more deaths from other CV causes and from noncardiac causes. (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF [RELAX-AHF-2]; NCT01870778)., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures The RELAX-AHF-2 trial was funded by Novartis. Dr. Loungani receives research support from Pfizer and Boston Scientific. Dr. Teerlink has received research grants and/or consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, EBR Systems, Medtronic, Merck, and Novartis. Dr. Metra has received consulting honoraria as a member of trials’ committees or advisory boards from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Bayer, Edwards Therapeutics, and Vifor Pharma. Dr. Allen has received research grants from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), PCORI, and American Heart Association; and has acted as a consultant to Abbott, ACI Clinical, Amgen, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, and Novartis. Dr. Butler serves as a consultant for Abbott, Adrenomed, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, InnoLife, Janssen, LivaNova, Luitpold, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, V-Wave Limited, and Vifor. Dr. Carson has received honoraria as a CEC member from Novartis. Drs. Chen, Gimpelewicz, and Holbro are all employees and shareholders of Novartis Pharma AG. Drs. Cotter and Davison received research grants and personal fees from Novartis during the trials’ conduct; and grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Celyad, Cirius Therapeutics, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr. Filippatos has participated in committees of trials and registries sponsored by Novartis, Servier, Medtronic, Vifor, BI, and Bayer. Dr. Greenberg has received research support from the AHA, NIH, and Rocket Pharma; and serves as a consultant for ACI, Actelion, Akcea, Amgen, EBR Systems, Ionis, Janssen, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Sanofi, Viking, Zensun, and Zoll. Dr. Januzzi is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has received grant support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Abbott Diagnostics, and consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, MyoKardia, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, CVRx, Janssen, and Takeda. Dr. Lanfear has received research grants from NHLBI, Amgen, Bayer, and Janssen; and has acted as a consultant for Amgen, Janssen, Ortho Diagnostics, and Novartis. Dr. Pang has served as a consultant for Baxter, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck; and has received research or other support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, PCORI, AHA, NHLBI, AHRQ, OrthoDiagnostics, and Abbott. Dr. Piña is an Advisory Board member of Relypsa and Vifor. Dr. Ponikowski receives consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Vifor Pharma, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Berlin Chemie, Bayer, Pfizer, Cibiem, Impulse Dynamics, Renal Guard Solutions, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca, and research grants from Vifor Pharma. Dr. Miller serves as a consultant for Abbott, Boehringer, CVRx, Pfizer, Novartis, and Respicardia; and receives research support from Merck. Dr. Voors has received consultancy fees and/or grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, MyoKardia, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Servier, and Vifor Pharma. Dr. Felker has received research grants from NHLBI, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer Merck, Cytokinetics, and Roche Diagnostics; and has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, V-Wave, MyoKardia, InnoLife, EBR Systems, Arena, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, Alnylam, LivaNova, Rocket Pharma, Reprieve, and SC Pharma. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to characterize in-hospital treatment patterns and associated patient outcomes among patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) in U.S. clinical practice., Background: Hospitalizations for HF are common and associated with poor patient outcomes. Real-world patterns of in-hospital treatment, including diuretic therapy, in contemporary U.S. practice are unknown., Methods: Using Optum de-identified Electronic Health Record data from 2007 through 2018, patients hospitalized for a primary diagnosis of HF (ejection fraction ≤40%) and who were hemodynamically stable at admission, without concurrent acute coronary syndrome or end-stage renal disease, and treated with intravenous (IV) diuretic agents within 48 h of admission were identified. Patients were categorized into 1 of 4 mutually exclusive hierarchical treatment groups defined by complexity of treatment during hospitalization (intensified treatment with mechanical support or IV vasoactive therapy, IV diuretic therapy reinitiated after discontinuation for ≥1 day without intensified treatment, IV diuretic dose increase/combination diuretic treatment without intensified treatment or IV diuretic reinitiation, or uncomplicated)., Results: Of 22,677 patients hospitalized for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 66% had uncomplicated hospitalizations without escalation of treatment beyond initial IV diuretic therapy. Among 7,809 remaining patients, the highest level of therapy received was IV diuretic dose increase/combination diuretic treatment in 25%, IV diuretic reinitiation in 36%, and intensified therapy in 39%. Overall, 19% of all patients had reinitiation of IV diuretic agents (26% of such patients had multiple instances), 12% were simultaneously treated with multiple diuretics, and 61% were transitioned to oral diuretic agents before discharge. Compared with uncomplicated treatment, IV diuretic reinitiation and intensified treatment were associated with significantly longer median length of stay (uncomplicated: 4 days; IV diuretic reinitiation: 8 days; intensified: 10 days) and higher rates of in-hospital (uncomplicated: 1.6%; IV diuretic reinitiation: 4.2%; intensified: 13.2%) and 30-day post-discharge mortality (uncomplicated: 5.2%; IV diuretic reinitiation: 9.7%; intensified: 12.7%)., Conclusions: In this contemporary real-world population of U.S. patients hospitalized for HFrEF, one-third of patients had in-hospital treatment escalated beyond initial IV diuretic therapy. These more complex treatment patterns were associated with highly variable patterns of diuretic use, longer hospital lengths of stay, and higher mortality. Standardized and evidence-based approaches are needed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of in-hospital HFrEF care., Competing Interests: Author Relationship With Industry Dr. Greene has received a Heart Failure Society of America/Emergency Medicine Foundation Acute Heart Failure Young Investigator Award funded by Novartis; has received research support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Novartis; serves on Advisory Boards for Amgen and Cytokinetics; and serves as a consultant for Amgen and Merck. Drs. Ionescu-Ittu and Burne and Ms. Guérin are employees of Analysis Group Inc., which has received consultancy fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb for this study. Drs. Borentain, Kessler, Tugcu, and DeSouza are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Felker has received research funding from Otsuka, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Amgen, Merck, the American Heart Association, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and has served as a consultant for Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Amgen, Trevena, Cytokinetics, Madeleine, MyoKardia, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Stealth Biotherapeutics, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Chen was an employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb at the time the research was conducted. Dr. Triana has reported that she has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We hypothesized that splanchnic nerve blockade (SNB) would attenuate increased exercise-induced cardiac filling pressures in patients with chronic HF., Background: Chronic heart failure (HF) is characterized by limited exercise capacity driven in part by an excessive elevation of cardiac filling pressures., Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm interventional study in chronic HF patients. Eligible patients had a wedge pressure ≥15 mm Hg at rest or ≥25 mm Hg with exercise on baseline right heart catheterization. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic assessment, followed by percutaneous SNB with ropivacaine., Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled, 15 of whom underwent SNB. The average age was 58 ± 13 years, 7 (47%) patients were women and 6 (40%) were black. Left ventricular ejection fraction was ≤35% in 14 (93%) patients. No procedural complications were encountered. SNB reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure at peak exercise from 54.1 ± 14.4 (pre-SNB) to 45.8 ± 17.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001) (post-SNB). Similarly, SNB reduced exercise-induced wedge pressure from 34.8 ± 10.0 (pre-SNB) to 25.1 ± 10.7 mm Hg (p < 0.001) (post-SNB). The cardiac index changed with peak exercise from 3.4 ± 1.2 (pre-SNB) to 3.8 ± 1.1 l/min/m 2 (p = 0.011) (post-SNB). After SNB, patients exercised for approximately the same duration at a greater workload (33 ± 24 W vs. 50 ± 30 W; p = 0.019) and peak oxygen consumption VO 2 (9.1 ± 2.5 vs. 9.8 ± 2.7 ml/kg/min; p = 0.053)., Conclusions: SNB reduced resting and exercise-induced pulmonary arterial and wedge pressure with favorable effects on cardiac output and exercise capacity. Continued efforts to investigate short- and long-term effects of SNB in chronic HF are warranted. Clinical Trials Registration (Abdominal Nerve Blockade in Chronic Heart Failure; NCT03453151)., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Heart failure (HF) patients experience a high burden of symptoms and functional limitations, and morbidity and mortality remain high despite successful therapies. The majority of HF drugs in the United States are approved for reducing hospitalization and mortality, while only a few have indications for improving quality of life, physical function, or symptoms. Patient-reported outcomes that directly measure patient's perception of health status (symptoms, physical function, or quality of life) are potentially approvable endpoints in drug development. This paper summarizes the history of endpoints used for HF drug approvals in the United States and reviews endpoints that measure symptoms, physical function, or quality of life in HF patients., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This study investigated the use of natriuretic peptides as inclusion criteria and to develop recommendations regarding their use. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are commonly used as inclusion criteria for heart failure (HF) clinical trials, but no consensus exists regarding their optimal use for this purpose. A comprehensive search of the Aggregate Analysis of ClincalTrials.gov database identified 3,446 HF trials. Of these, 365 recently completed or ongoing HF clinical trials (10.6%) used either BNP or NT-proBNP as inclusion criteria. A panel of experts discussed current practices and a path forward for the use of natriuretic peptides as inclusion criteria for HF trials. Significant variations existed across trials regarding which natriuretic peptide and which cutoff value were used. Overall, 43% used both natriuretic peptides, 33% used only NT-proBNP, and 24% used only BNP in determining eligibility. Studies using BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations as inclusion criteria had higher cardiovascular event rates and higher concentrations for study entry and were generally associated with higher event rates. Areas of uncertainty included use in certain patient populations in which natriuretic peptides are historically lower (e.g., black patients, obese patients, patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction) or higher (older patients, patients with atrial fibrillation). This paper discusses best practices regarding use of BNP or NT-proBNP in clinical trials and identification of gaps in medical literature, including importance of documentation in ClinicalTrials.gov studies to inform future research efforts., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A central factor in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction is the initial decrease in systolic function. Prior attempts at increasing cardiac contractility with oral drugs have uniformly resulted in signals of increased mortality at pharmacologically effective doses. Omecamtiv mecarbil is a novel, selective cardiac myosin activator that has been shown to improve cardiac function and to decrease ventricular volumes, heart rate, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic HF. The GALACTIC-HF (Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure) trial tests the hypotheses that omecamtiv mecarbil can safely improve symptoms, prevent clinical HF events, and delay CV death in patients with chronic HF. The GALACTIC-HF trial is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven cardiovascular outcomes trial. More than 8,000 patients with chronic symptomatic (New York Heart Association functional class II to IV) HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides, and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization or emergency department visit for HF within a year of screening will be randomized to either oral placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil employing a pharmacokinetic-guided dose titration strategy using doses of 25, 37.5, or 50 mg twice daily. The primary efficacy outcome is the time to cardiovascular death or first HF event. The study has 90% power to assess a final hazard ratio of approximately 0.80 in cardiovascular death, the first secondary outcome. The GALACTIC-HF trial is the first trial examining whether selectively increasing cardiac contractility in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction will result in improved clinical outcomes. (Registrational Study With Omecamtiv Mecarbil/AMG 423 to Treat Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [GALACTIC-HF]; NCT02929329)., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), elevated soluble neprilysin (sNEP) levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, and its inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan has improved survival., Objectives: This study sought to determine the relevance of sNEP as a biomarker in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and to compare circulating sNEP levels in patients with HFpEF with normal controls., Methods: A case-control study was performed in 242 symptomatic patients with HFpEF previously enrolled in the Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (RELAX) and Nitrates's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection (NEAT-HFpEF) clinical trials and 891 asymptomatic subjects without HF or diastolic dysfunction (confirmed by NT-proBNP levels <200 pg/ml and echocardiography) who were enrolled in the Prevalence of Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction study. sNEP was measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in all subjects., Results: Overall, sNEP levels were lower in HFpEF compared with controls (3.5 ng/ml; confidence interval [CI]: 2.5 to 4.8 vs. 8.5 ng/ml; CI: 7.2 to 10.0; p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and smoking history, mean sNEP levels were also lower in HFpEF compared with controls (4.0 ng/ml [CI: 2.7 to 5.4] vs. 8.2 ng/ml [CI: 6.8 to 9.7]; p = 0.002). The cohorts were propensity matched based on age, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, smoking history, and renal function, and sNEP levels remained lower in HFpEF compared with controls (median 2.4 ng/ml [interquartile range: 0.6 to 27.7] vs. 4.9 ng/ml [interquartile range: 1.2 to 42.2]; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Patients with HFpEF on average have significantly lower circulating sNEP levels compared with controls. These findings challenge our current understanding of the complex biology of circulating sNEP in HFpEF., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The development of treatments for heart failure (HF) is challenged by burdensome clinical trials. Reducing the need for extensive data collection and increasing opportunities for data compatibility between trials may improve efficiency and reduce resource burden. The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) multi-stakeholder consortium sought to create a lean case report form (CRF) for use in HF clinical trials evaluating cardiac devices. The HFC convened patients, clinicians, clinical researchers, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), payers, industry partners, and statisticians to create a consensus core CRF. Eight recent clinical trial CRFs for the treatment of HF from 6 industry partners were analyzed. All CRF elements were systematically reviewed. Those elements deemed critical for data collection in HF clinical trials were used to construct the final, harmonized CRF. The original CRFs included 176 distinct data items covering demographics, vital signs, physical examination, medical history, laboratory and imaging testing, device therapy, medications, functional and quality of life assessment, and outcome events. The resulting, minimally inclusive CRF device contains 75 baseline data items and 6 events, with separate modular additions that can be used depending on the additional detail required for a particular intervention. The consensus electronic form is now freely available for use in clinical trials. Creation of a core CRF is important to improve clinical trial efficiency in HF device development in the United States. This living document intends to reduce clinical trial administrative burden, increase evidence integrity, and improve comparability of clinical data between trials., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aims to assess the association between biomarker-guided therapy and left ventricular (LV) remodeling., Background: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), it is unclear if lowering natriuretic peptides reflects structural and functional changes in the heart. This study aims to assess the association between biomarker-guided therapy and left ventricular (LV) remodeling., Methods: The GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment in Heart Failure) Echo Substudy was a multicenter study that randomized 268 patients with HFrEF (EF ≤40%) to either pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-guided treatment or usual care. Echocardiograms were performed at baseline and 12 months in 124 patients. Remodeling indices and clinical outcomes were compared between treatment arms and by achievement of the NT-proBNP goal of <1,000 pg/ml at 12 months., Results: At 12 months, the changes in EF and LV volumes were similar between the biomarker-guided and usual care arms with no difference in clinical outcomes; however, lowering NT-proBNP to <1,000 pg/ml, regardless of treatment strategy, was associated with a significantly greater increase in EF compared with those not reaching goal (9.9 ± 8.8% vs. 2.9 ± 7.9%; p < 0.001) and lower LV volumes. The extent of reverse remodeling correlated with the change in NT-proBNP: a decrease of 1,000 pg/ml was associated with an increase in EF of 6.7% and a reduction in systolic and diastolic volumes of 17.3 ml/m 2 and 15.7 ml/m 2 , respectively. Adverse events were significantly lower among patients achieving the NT-proBNP goal (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Among patients with HFrEF, lowering NT-proBNP to <1,000 pg/ml by 12 months was associated with significant reverse remodeling and improved outcomes. A greater reduction in NT-proBNP was associated with more extensive reverse remodeling. (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment [GUIDE-IT]; NCT01685840)., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to characterize the course of decongestion among patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) by history of atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial flutter (AFL)., Background: AF/AFL and chronic heart failure (HF) commonly coexist. Little is known regarding the impact of AF/AFL on relief of congestion among patients who develop AHF., Methods: We pooled patients from 3 randomized trials of AHF conducted within the Heart Failure Network, the DOSE (Diuretic Optimization Strategies) trial, the ROSE (Renal Optimization Strategies) trial, and the CARRESS-HF (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) trial. The association between history of AF/AFL and in-hospital changes in various metrics of congestion was assessed using covariate-adjusted linear and ordinal logistic regression models., Results: Of 750 unique patients, 418 (56%) had a history of AF/AFL. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher (35% vs. 27%, respectively; p < 0.001), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were nonsignificantly lower at baseline (4,210 pg/ml vs. 5,037 pg/ml, respectively; p = 0.27) in patients with AF/AFL. After adjustment of covariates, history of AF/AFL was associated with less substantial loss of weight (-5.7% vs. -6.5%, respectively; p = 0.02) and decrease in NT-proBNP levels (-18.7% vs. -31.3%, respectively; p = 0.003) by 72 or 96 h. History of AF/AFL was also associated with a blunted increase in global sense of well being at 72 or 96 h (p = 0.04). There was no association between history of AF/AFL and change in orthodema congestion score (p = 0.67) or 60-day composite clinical endpoint (all-cause mortality or any rehospitalization; hazard ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 0.92 to 1.59; p = 0.17)., Conclusions: More than half of the patients admitted with AHF had a history of AF/AFL. History of AF/AFL was independently associated with a blunted course of in-hospital decongestion. Further research is required to understand the utility of specific therapies targeting AF/AFL during hospitalization for AHF., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)