Search

Importance: Recent discussion has focused on questions related to the repeal and replacement of portions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). However, issues central to the future of health and health care in the United States transcend the ACA provisions receiving the greatest attention. Initiatives directed to certain strategic and infrastructure priorities are vital to achieve better health at lower cost.Objectives: To review the most salient health challenges and opportunities facing the United States, to identify practical and achievable priorities essential to health progress, and to present policy initiatives critical to the nation's health and fiscal integrity.Evidence Review: Qualitative synthesis of 19 National Academy of Medicine-commissioned white papers, with supplemental review and analysis of publicly available data and published research findings.Findings: The US health system faces major challenges. Health care costs remain high at $3.2 trillion spent annually, of which an estimated 30% is related to waste, inefficiencies, and excessive prices; health disparities are persistent and worsening; and the health and financial burdens of chronic illness and disability are straining families and communities. Concurrently, promising opportunities and knowledge to achieve change exist. Across the 19 discussion papers examined, 8 crosscutting policy directions were identified as vital to the nation's health and fiscal future, including 4 action priorities and 4 essential infrastructure needs. The action priorities-pay for value, empower people, activate communities, and connect care-recurred across the articles as direct and strategic opportunities to advance a more efficient, equitable, and patient- and community-focused health system. The essential infrastructure needs-measure what matters most, modernize skills, accelerate real-world evidence, and advance science-were the most commonly cited foundational elements to ensure progress.Conclusions and Relevance: The action priorities and essential infrastructure needs represent major opportunities to improve health outcomes and increase efficiency and value in the health system. As the new US administration and Congress chart the future of health and health care for the United States, and as health leaders across the country contemplate future directions for their programs and initiatives, their leadership and strategic investment in these priorities will be essential for achieving significant progress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a call for papers to be published in a special October, 2008 issue devoted to the health of the U.S. Preference will be given to papers describing original research that presents new scientific understanding backed by solid data. Any topic related to the nation's health is eligible, including national health status, the composition of the health care work force, econometric analysis of health care reform, and comparative analyses with health care systems in other countries.

Presents a letter to the editor in response to an editorial on computer technology and clinical trial work in the March 9, 2005 edition of the "Journal of the American Medical Association."

The article focuses on an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, "Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial" by M-C Morice. Some of the difficulties of performing the study are discussed, such as the non-linear progress of stent patients. Cardiologists want to find out whether there are marked advantages of using one kind of stent for diabetes or patients with long or bifurcating lesions. While the data is useful in finding lessened occurrence of in-lesion restenosis using Sirolimus-eluting stents, specific subgroups of the study were difficult to collect beneficial data from.